Editing .MjEzNw.MjEzNw

_;;
De ci sions · Necessc:1.ry to Develop New-Town-In- Town Proj e cts
Who will admi nister t 11e pro ject?
1.
a.
Di r e c t s ale by fIDD t o Developer .
b.
-HUD t o City of Atlanta t o Devel oper •
c.
HUD t o Atlanta Hous i ng Autho ri ty _to De v el op er .
.. .
2.
Will dispos i tion b e f or 221 (D) ( J ) , 202 onl y ?
J.
Who builds prima ry streets and uti lities ?
4.
a.
Devel oper .
b.
Ci ty .
c.
At l anta Housing Authority.
Wilen are street locati on.s to b e pinne d dov;n?
I
I
�Persons to be i nvol ved in these decisions ?
!" .,,
~~
a.
('I
tt
Members of the Planning 1.Development ComTTLi. tte~ and Board of Ald ermen .
Mayor Ivan Allen
Mr. John Edmunds
Mr. M. B, Satterfield
e.
Mr. E win Stern
f.
Mr. Fr\k Ethridge
. L--- g.
h.

 i .
Mr . Colli er Gl a ddin
Mr. Richard Case
Atlanta Housing Authority Board of Commissioners
..,....-J.
. Mr , Ceci1 A1exander
Col . Malcolm J ones
v"l.
v-- m.
Mro Dan Sweat
Mre Eda Baxter
I
�l. a . Dir ect Sal e By HUD To Devel opers
1.
HUID states tha t they would expect t he City to pr ovide t he l and use plan )
assur ances a s t o public f a cil i t i e s , r eview t he developer s pr opos als,
2.
HUD would need Bureau of Budget approval of the method of s ale and
would present the proposal to s ell to t he Bureau prior to making t he award.
Ea ch of t hese steps would cons ume a minimum of approximatel y 30 days or a
total of 60 days on t hi s s t a ge .
3.
Under this method the Tuveloper would put i n the streets and uti liti es
and this cos t would be r efle cted in r ents or sal es pr ices.
4.
No non- ca sh credit s i nvol ved.
5.
Fed . Pen. to GSA to }TIJD i s based on certain ~nprovement s (fence s , etc. )
which only HUD can finance.
6.
Can HUD acquire the
4 non-gov 1 t
owned parcels ?
Leave t hem out?
�l,a. Schedule
Direct Sale HUD to Developer
Decisions
Land Us e Map
Disposition Plan
Relocation Plan
Acquisition Plan
Project Impr ovements Plan
Financing Plan
Submit to the Burea u of the Budge t
for prior approval
~
Appr oval
Sele ct developer (adverti se if necessary)
Submit t o the Bureau of the Budget for concurrenc e
Concurrence
Execute Contract
Approval of FHA or Mort gag or of re development
Start Engi neeri ng
Start Constr ucti on of Si te i mprovement s
Complete Si te I mprovements suffici ent t o begin
cons t ructi on of Housi ng
May
May
May
May
May
May
May
1, 1968
J, 1968
21, 1968
21, 1 968
21, 1968
21, 1 968
21, _1968
May 21, 1968
June 21, 1968
July 21, 1968
July 21, 1968
Au gust 21, 1968
September 1, 1968
J anuary 1, 1969
J anuary 1, 1 969
February 1, 1969
June 15, 1 969
Du d.ng t he i nteri m f rom July 21 t o J anuary 1, it will be necessary t o
acqu i re t he 4 pr i vatel y owned parcels , r el ocate t he~ one f amily and demoli s h
the str ucture .
�l. b. Sale from Government to City t o Developer
1.
HU]) cl ear with Bureau of Budget for sale direct to City - approximately
30 days .
2. · City proc eeds with land use plan, decisions as to provision for streets Md
u til o, determine method of sale~
J.
/ of
Method s al e as outlined by Asst. City Atty - Tom Choyce :
1.
A re s olution must be passed by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen stating
t hat the real estate is no l onger useful and necessary to t he City and
ordering the real estate to be sold.
Forn1ality but must be done at
a regular Ald. meeting after a mee t i ng of P & D Com.
•
2.
I
I
The Land Agent must cause a plat of the property to be made by a
regis t ered land surveyor .
~This mus t be done by any agent.
AHA woµ.ld
need about 20 day s prior to clos i ng ) o
J.
The Land Agent must cause an appra isa l of the property to be made by
the Atlanta Real Estat e Board or a r eal estat e appraiser who is a
member of t he American Ins titut e of Real Est at e Apprai sers.
The
apprai sal must be pla ced in a s eal ed envelope and turned over to the
the Land Agent.
4.
The pl at of the property along with t he l egal descript i on mus t be submitte d
to t he Purchasing Agen t, who must advertise f or bids to be submitte d
for t he purchase of t he proper t y .
5.
All bids mus t be opened and read at the desi gnated time by t he Purchasing
Committee .
The Purchasing Committee must t abul ate t he bids and refer
t hem to an Aldermanic Committee.
6.
The Connnittee must open the sealed appraisal a..n.d take the appraisal
into consideration in determinine whether or not any of the bids shall
�-2-
b e recommended for acceptance .
This Corruni ttee must submit its
f inal
recommendation to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen for £.x:fud: determination.
· li.
Ci ty must find a way to purcha se the
them out.
4
non-gov' t owned parcels or l eave
�1. b.
Schedul e
HUD to City of Atlant a to Developer
Decisions
Land Use Map
Dispos i t ion Plan
Acqui sition Plan (4 pr iva t el y owne d parc el s as
well as Federal Land)
Rel oca tion Plan
Pro j ect I mprovement s Plan
Financing Plan
Planning and Devel opment Committee to make
r ecommendati ons to t he Board of Aldermen in
j oi nt s ess ion with t he Finance Commi t tee
Alder manic Appr oval
Order Survey and Des cr i ption
Appra i sals Ord ered
Adver ti se
Receive Bids
Boa rd of Ald ermen Approve
Cont rac t
• Begin Constru ction of housing ·'<-
Ma,y 1, 1968
May 3, 1968
May 21, 1968
May
May
May
May
21,
21,
21,
21,
1968
1-968
1968
1968
May 27, 1968
June 3, 1968
J une 3, 1961:l
J une 24, 1968
June 24, 1968
Augus t 24, 1968
September 16, 1968
Septe mber 26, 1968
J anuary 26, 1969
ENGINEERING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Ehgi neering
Let Si t e Improvements Contract
Compl ete S. I. s uff ici ent to
begi n Construction of housing
-'<-'-t.
J une 3, 1968 -::-::-:~
July 21 , 1968
September 16, 1968 ""
November 1 , 1968
December 6, 1968
March 15, 1969~~


Thi s dat e woul d delay t he s t art of constructi on f rom J anuary 26, 1969, t o


March
15, 1969.
~:-:~ Engineering start after s el ection of Toveloper.
~HH(-
Engineering start before selection of .Devel oper .
�1. c . HUD to AHA to Developer
1.
Atl anta Hou s ing Author ity l'rould us e the normal ur ban renewal procedure
t r,rough on and 'expe di t ed 11 b as i s . The sche dule i s estimate d on optimum
ti me i n t erval s a s a re t he other sche dules .
2.
If the pr o j ect put s i n the b a si c str e ets and uti l ities , t hey woul d be
c onstruc ted at pro j ect c ost which c oul d be mor e t han offset by Noncas·h Gr ant-i n-Aid Cr edi ts.
J,
The t wo maj or credits are for t wo s c-hool s : one a t $1 ,000 , 000 - 1 90%
eli gibl e and one at $2 , 000, 000 - 1 0 to 50% eligible.
4, S ome c ompar ati v ely s mall cre dits woul d b e el igible from park, bri dge ,
ramp and other ite ms probably in t he range of $50-1 00, 000,
�1. c · Sr.hedul e Thomasville Amendr~ent. R-22
HUD To AHA To Devel oper
This schedule is prc:pared b ased on the f o l l01-,ing assumptions :
L All decisions nec8 s sm·y for t11 e submissio n of the a pplic ation ( particu-l arly the ones applied to the me thod of disposition and s e que n ce i nstallation of
sit e i mprovements ) are maclc prior to May l, 1968 .
2. That the submission is to be ma de to the <Tune
· Committee .
3, 1968 Alcl.ermanic
3. That I-ru""D holds good on tl:.eir c orrtffiitmf.mt to revi ew and appro ve the appli c ation in 30 days .
I.
] _-~-
Part I - Part_II .ll!fplication
Decisions
Land Use Map
Proj e ct Ar e a Data Report
Disposition PJ.an
Relocatio n Report
Ac quisiti on Plcm
Urba n Renewal Pla n
Proj ect I mprovements Plan
All other sectio ns of t he applic a tion
Fimmc:i..ng Plan
Subrni t to Alci err,1an:i.c F i nanc e Committee
Public Heari ng
Alde r-,nank Approval
Comple t e Submi ssj_on
I I.
2-~~May
May
May
May
May
May
May
May
·May
May
1, 1968
3,
20,
20,
21,
21,
21 ,
21,
21,
i
I
2!_1,
May 27,
May 31,
J une 3,
<Tune 7,
Execu tfo n Acti vi.ties
Appro val
Executed Loan and Grant Cont ract
a.
8, 1968~*-
15,
~*"
Di...,.-snos
itio n Activities
..J,,.,_ - r·-•
D'
1•
, . , . . . , _ . , , _ _ -,..,__
. . . _ . . _ , . _ . _ ,_ _ _ ...._,._
Adve rt:i.. se
Re c e i ve Bids
Identify n eveloper
Sign Contract
Be gin Constr-ucV.o·n of housing-l8 '"
b.
July
July
J anu ary
27, 1969
J uly 29, 1968
Sept. 23,
Oc t. 21,
Oct . 31;
Apr il 2o, 1969
Mc1y 27, 1968
July 27,
Aug. 27,
Sept . 2'( ,
Feb. 27, 1969
."
Acquisiti_or.--Rc) 0cc::t j on--D2-rrol.it:i.ou
Begin Acquisitio n
B-2g:i.n HcJ occ't:i_r:,n
Complot e Ac~uis ition
Com;Jlcte H2J.oc; :-- L,ion
CompJ.ctc D~~1lj_t J an
J uly 29, J 968
Jlug . 2(),
Se pt. . 30,
Sept. 30,
Oct .
l li _,
1~Tjme con t i n gent on HUD action.,.(_
I ,•:H(·Ti rne contingent on Devel opment FHA action and completion of ac cess str0e tso
Col. 1 contin gent on pre- adver tising.
( ;
,,, f ~
�Engi neer:i..ne;
Le t Site I mprovements Cont:r·8c:t
Compl ete Site I mproveme nts
Su_ffic ien-l; for Constru.ct:ion
Complete Si t e I mprovement ,:;
May 27, 1968
July ·12, 1968
Nov .
Apr .
27;
27, 1969
Oct . 21, 1968 Aug • 27, 1968
11, .1968 Oct. 15, 1968


Uec.


26, 1969 Febo ·;t;1, 1969
Aug . 19, 1969 J une 27, 1969
Apro
l;':-
Site I mpro vement s Desi gnat ed in Pl anning
if
J~
Adve r tise after Loan and Grant
Site Impr ovements on basis of bid
Pre --Advertise .. Sj_te I mpr ovements on b asis of bid
�2.
Will Disposition be 221 (d )
a.
(3), 202 , only?
221 ( d) ( 3) development would prevent any private development
being f i nanced by other FHA or conventional finance. This woul d
prevent
an extensive economic mix i n this new area. However ,
..
high; income fami l ies now occupy the Single Family Portion of the
Thomasville Project.
·
(
b.
To split the area between t wo programs will require definite
boundaries for each, so that each can be appraised s epara tel y .
c.
221 ( d ) ( 3) wo uld insure l ow and moder ate i ncome occupc;1nts .
d.
221 ( d) (3) would r equire special appraisa l techniques (writedown of l and price ) .
e.
Commercial areas must be des ignated r ega rdl ess of other
con sideration for appraisal pur pos es .
f.
If public hou sing is invol ved (this is at the present ruled out ) ,
this boundary would have to be delinea t ed. ( Turn key or conventiona l ) .
g.
Can the developer be . non-profit, limited dividend , Co -o p, or
other ; or will it be limited to one .
�I
.
3. Who buil ds primary streets and utilities?
a.
Fo r t he developer t o build streets and ut ilities would i ncrease
the cost per dwelli ng unit.
b.
221 (d) ( 3) might affect the decisions .
c.
Approx imately
months would be r equired for the City or Authority
t o buil d the primary street system sufficiently to provide access .
However , construction can begin prior to advertising sal e of l and.
d.
A develo per could build the streets at his rate of need but probabl y
6½
no more r apidly than t he City or the Authority . It would however ,
fo rce scheduling of co nstruction to be tied to str eet const ruc t ion
schedule ( acc ess) . This may not be pertinent.
,.
e.
Authority co nstructi on of the streets would cost the City
approximately 1/3.
f.
Bridge credits would be aff ected.
g.
Cost of streets and utilit i es estimated at$


�4.
When shoul d street l ocations be pi nned down ( invol ves s avi ngs of
appr oximately 1-3½ months )?
a.
I f street is pinned down before adverti sing property:
(
,
(1)
Would restri ct the design of the devel opment pl an .
( 2) Would define schoo l and park s i tes so that costs and
credits could be f irm.
( 3)
b.
Would sa ve approximat el y 1-3½ months.
After streets are pinned down after advertising and decision on
developer :
(1 )
Would gi ve freedom to t he development pl an .
( 2)
Cost and credits woul d not be quite as firm .
( 3)
Would del ay from 1-3½ months before construction could be
started (would thi s be actual or would the architects use
up the time anyway ) ?
�