.MjEzNw.MjEzNw

_;; De ci sions · Necessc:1.ry to Develop New-Town-In- Town Proj e cts Who will admi nister t 11e pro ject? 1. a. Di r e c t s ale by fIDD t o Developer . b. -HUD t o City of Atlanta t o Devel oper • c. HUD t o Atlanta Hous i ng Autho ri ty _to De v el op er . .. . 2. Will dispos i tion b e f or 221 (D) ( J ) , 202 onl y ? J. Who builds prima ry streets and uti lities ? 4. a. Devel oper . b. Ci ty . c. At l anta Housing Authority. Wilen are street locati on.s to b e pinne d dov;n? I I �Persons to be i nvol ved in these decisions ? !" .,, ~~ a. ('I tt Members of the Planning 1.Development ComTTLi. tte~ and Board of Ald ermen . Mayor Ivan Allen Mr. John Edmunds Mr. M. B, Satterfield e. Mr. E win Stern f. Mr. Fr\k Ethridge . L--- g. h.

i .

Mr . Colli er Gl a ddin Mr. Richard Case Atlanta Housing Authority Board of Commissioners ..,....-J. . Mr , Ceci1 A1exander Col . Malcolm J ones v"l. v-- m. Mro Dan Sweat Mre Eda Baxter I �l. a . Dir ect Sal e By HUD To Devel opers 1. HUID states tha t they would expect t he City to pr ovide t he l and use plan ) assur ances a s t o public f a cil i t i e s , r eview t he developer s pr opos als, 2. HUD would need Bureau of Budget approval of the method of s ale and would present the proposal to s ell to t he Bureau prior to making t he award. Ea ch of t hese steps would cons ume a minimum of approximatel y 30 days or a total of 60 days on t hi s s t a ge . 3. Under this method the Tuveloper would put i n the streets and uti liti es and this cos t would be r efle cted in r ents or sal es pr ices. 4. No non- ca sh credit s i nvol ved. 5. Fed . Pen. to GSA to }TIJD i s based on certain ~nprovement s (fence s , etc. ) which only HUD can finance. 6. Can HUD acquire the 4 non-gov 1 t owned parcels ? Leave t hem out? �l,a. Schedule Direct Sale HUD to Developer Decisions Land Us e Map Disposition Plan Relocation Plan Acquisition Plan Project Impr ovements Plan Financing Plan Submit to the Burea u of the Budge t for prior approval ~ Appr oval Sele ct developer (adverti se if necessary) Submit t o the Bureau of the Budget for concurrenc e Concurrence Execute Contract Approval of FHA or Mort gag or of re development Start Engi neeri ng Start Constr ucti on of Si te i mprovement s Complete Si te I mprovements suffici ent t o begin cons t ructi on of Housi ng May May May May May May May 1, 1968 J, 1968 21, 1968 21, 1 968 21, 1968 21, 1 968 21, _1968 May 21, 1968 June 21, 1968 July 21, 1968 July 21, 1968 Au gust 21, 1968 September 1, 1968 J anuary 1, 1969 J anuary 1, 1 969 February 1, 1969 June 15, 1 969 Du d.ng t he i nteri m f rom July 21 t o J anuary 1, it will be necessary t o acqu i re t he 4 pr i vatel y owned parcels , r el ocate t he~ one f amily and demoli s h the str ucture . �l. b. Sale from Government to City t o Developer 1. HU]) cl ear with Bureau of Budget for sale direct to City - approximately 30 days . 2. · City proc eeds with land use plan, decisions as to provision for streets Md u til o, determine method of sale~ J. / of Method s al e as outlined by Asst. City Atty - Tom Choyce : 1. A re s olution must be passed by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen stating t hat the real estate is no l onger useful and necessary to t he City and ordering the real estate to be sold. Forn1ality but must be done at a regular Ald. meeting after a mee t i ng of P & D Com. • 2. I I The Land Agent must cause a plat of the property to be made by a regis t ered land surveyor . ~This mus t be done by any agent. AHA woµ.ld need about 20 day s prior to clos i ng ) o J. The Land Agent must cause an appra isa l of the property to be made by the Atlanta Real Estat e Board or a r eal estat e appraiser who is a member of t he American Ins titut e of Real Est at e Apprai sers. The apprai sal must be pla ced in a s eal ed envelope and turned over to the the Land Agent. 4. The pl at of the property along with t he l egal descript i on mus t be submitte d to t he Purchasing Agen t, who must advertise f or bids to be submitte d for t he purchase of t he proper t y . 5. All bids mus t be opened and read at the desi gnated time by t he Purchasing Committee . The Purchasing Committee must t abul ate t he bids and refer t hem to an Aldermanic Committee. 6. The Connnittee must open the sealed appraisal a..n.d take the appraisal into consideration in determinine whether or not any of the bids shall �-2- b e recommended for acceptance . This Corruni ttee must submit its f inal recommendation to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen for £.x:fud: determination. · li. Ci ty must find a way to purcha se the them out. 4 non-gov' t owned parcels or l eave �1. b. Schedul e HUD to City of Atlant a to Developer Decisions Land Use Map Dispos i t ion Plan Acqui sition Plan (4 pr iva t el y owne d parc el s as well as Federal Land) Rel oca tion Plan Pro j ect I mprovement s Plan Financing Plan Planning and Devel opment Committee to make r ecommendati ons to t he Board of Aldermen in j oi nt s ess ion with t he Finance Commi t tee Alder manic Appr oval Order Survey and Des cr i ption Appra i sals Ord ered Adver ti se Receive Bids Boa rd of Ald ermen Approve Cont rac t • Begin Constru ction of housing ·'<- Ma,y 1, 1968 May 3, 1968 May 21, 1968 May May May May 21, 21, 21, 21, 1968 1-968 1968 1968 May 27, 1968 June 3, 1968 J une 3, 1961:l J une 24, 1968 June 24, 1968 Augus t 24, 1968 September 16, 1968 Septe mber 26, 1968 J anuary 26, 1969 ENGINEERING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS Ehgi neering Let Si t e Improvements Contract Compl ete S. I. s uff ici ent to begi n Construction of housing -'<-'-t. J une 3, 1968 -::-::-:~ July 21 , 1968 September 16, 1968 "" November 1 , 1968 December 6, 1968 March 15, 1969~~

Thi s dat e woul d delay t he s t art of constructi on f rom J anuary 26, 1969, t o

March 15, 1969. ~:-:~ Engineering start after s el ection of Toveloper. ~HH(- Engineering start before selection of .Devel oper . �1. c . HUD to AHA to Developer 1. Atl anta Hou s ing Author ity l'rould us e the normal ur ban renewal procedure t r,rough on and 'expe di t ed 11 b as i s . The sche dule i s estimate d on optimum ti me i n t erval s a s a re t he other sche dules . 2. If the pr o j ect put s i n the b a si c str e ets and uti l ities , t hey woul d be c onstruc ted at pro j ect c ost which c oul d be mor e t han offset by Noncas·h Gr ant-i n-Aid Cr edi ts. J, The t wo maj or credits are for t wo s c-hool s : one a t $1 ,000 , 000 - 1 90% eli gibl e and one at $2 , 000, 000 - 1 0 to 50% eligible. 4, S ome c ompar ati v ely s mall cre dits woul d b e el igible from park, bri dge , ramp and other ite ms probably in t he range of $50-1 00, 000, �1. c · Sr.hedul e Thomasville Amendr~ent. R-22 HUD To AHA To Devel oper This schedule is prc:pared b ased on the f o l l01-,ing assumptions : L All decisions nec8 s sm·y for t11 e submissio n of the a pplic ation ( particu-l arly the ones applied to the me thod of disposition and s e que n ce i nstallation of sit e i mprovements ) are maclc prior to May l, 1968 . 2. That the submission is to be ma de to the <Tune · Committee . 3, 1968 Alcl.ermanic 3. That I-ru""D holds good on tl:.eir c orrtffiitmf.mt to revi ew and appro ve the appli c ation in 30 days . I. ] _-~- Part I - Part_II .ll!fplication Decisions Land Use Map Proj e ct Ar e a Data Report Disposition PJ.an Relocatio n Report Ac quisiti on Plcm Urba n Renewal Pla n Proj ect I mprovements Plan All other sectio ns of t he applic a tion Fimmc:i..ng Plan Subrni t to Alci err,1an:i.c F i nanc e Committee Public Heari ng Alde r-,nank Approval Comple t e Submi ssj_on I I. 2-~~May May May May May May May May ·May May 1, 1968 3, 20, 20, 21, 21, 21 , 21, 21, i I 2!_1, May 27, May 31, J une 3, <Tune 7, Execu tfo n Acti vi.ties Appro val Executed Loan and Grant Cont ract a. 8, 1968~*- 15, ~*" Di...,.-snos itio n Activities ..J,,.,_ - r·-• D' 1• , . , . . . , _ . , , _ _ -,..,__ . . . _ . . _ , . _ . _ ,_ _ _ ...._,._ Adve rt:i.. se Re c e i ve Bids Identify n eveloper Sign Contract Be gin Constr-ucV.o·n of housing-l8 '" b. July July J anu ary 27, 1969 J uly 29, 1968 Sept. 23, Oc t. 21, Oct . 31; Apr il 2o, 1969 Mc1y 27, 1968 July 27, Aug. 27, Sept . 2'( , Feb. 27, 1969 ." Acquisiti_or.--Rc) 0cc::t j on--D2-rrol.it:i.ou Begin Acquisitio n B-2g:i.n HcJ occ't:i_r:,n Complot e Ac~uis ition Com;Jlcte H2J.oc; :-- L,ion CompJ.ctc D~~1lj_t J an J uly 29, J 968 Jlug . 2(), Se pt. . 30, Sept. 30, Oct . l li _, 1~Tjme con t i n gent on HUD action.,.(_ I ,•:H(·Ti rne contingent on Devel opment FHA action and completion of ac cess str0e tso Col. 1 contin gent on pre- adver tising. ( ; ,,, f ~ �Engi neer:i..ne; Le t Site I mprovements Cont:r·8c:t Compl ete Site I mproveme nts Su_ffic ien-l; for Constru.ct:ion Complete Si t e I mprovement ,:; May 27, 1968 July ·12, 1968 Nov . Apr . 27; 27, 1969 Oct . 21, 1968 Aug • 27, 1968 11, .1968 Oct. 15, 1968

Uec.

26, 1969 Febo ·;t;1, 1969 Aug . 19, 1969 J une 27, 1969 Apro l;':- Site I mpro vement s Desi gnat ed in Pl anning if J~ Adve r tise after Loan and Grant Site Impr ovements on basis of bid Pre --Advertise .. Sj_te I mpr ovements on b asis of bid �2. Will Disposition be 221 (d ) a. (3), 202 , only? 221 ( d) ( 3) development would prevent any private development being f i nanced by other FHA or conventional finance. This woul d prevent an extensive economic mix i n this new area. However , .. high; income fami l ies now occupy the Single Family Portion of the Thomasville Project. · ( b. To split the area between t wo programs will require definite boundaries for each, so that each can be appraised s epara tel y . c. 221 ( d ) ( 3) wo uld insure l ow and moder ate i ncome occupc;1nts . d. 221 ( d) (3) would r equire special appraisa l techniques (writedown of l and price ) . e. Commercial areas must be des ignated r ega rdl ess of other con sideration for appraisal pur pos es . f. If public hou sing is invol ved (this is at the present ruled out ) , this boundary would have to be delinea t ed. ( Turn key or conventiona l ) . g. Can the developer be . non-profit, limited dividend , Co -o p, or other ; or will it be limited to one . �I . 3. Who buil ds primary streets and utilities? a. Fo r t he developer t o build streets and ut ilities would i ncrease the cost per dwelli ng unit. b. 221 (d) ( 3) might affect the decisions . c. Approx imately months would be r equired for the City or Authority t o buil d the primary street system sufficiently to provide access . However , construction can begin prior to advertising sal e of l and. d. A develo per could build the streets at his rate of need but probabl y 6½ no more r apidly than t he City or the Authority . It would however , fo rce scheduling of co nstruction to be tied to str eet const ruc t ion schedule ( acc ess) . This may not be pertinent. ,. e. Authority co nstructi on of the streets would cost the City approximately 1/3. f. Bridge credits would be aff ected. g. Cost of streets and utilit i es estimated at$

�4. When shoul d street l ocations be pi nned down ( invol ves s avi ngs of appr oximately 1-3½ months )? a. I f street is pinned down before adverti sing property: ( , (1) Would restri ct the design of the devel opment pl an . ( 2) Would define schoo l and park s i tes so that costs and credits could be f irm. ( 3) b. Would sa ve approximat el y 1-3½ months. After streets are pinned down after advertising and decision on developer : (1 ) Would gi ve freedom to t he development pl an . ( 2) Cost and credits woul d not be quite as firm . ( 3) Would del ay from 1-3½ months before construction could be started (would thi s be actual or would the architects use up the time anyway ) ? �