Search (49 results)

Applied Filters (Reset)

  • Tags = Box 3 Folder 6

Filters

Result Types

Item Types

Tags

Featured

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 2

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_002.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 2
  • Text: I Aug ust 6,, 1968 Mr . Edwar d H . Baxter Regional Admin istrato r Department of H ousing and Urban Dev e lopment 645 Peachtree-Seventh Building Atlanta, G e orgia 30323 Dear Mr. Baxter; I have bec ome inc reasingly concerned with the c onditions existing in an area of Atlanta that is designated as the Bedford-Pine Urban Redevelopment Area , Ga R-101. I have recently made several tours of this area and find the structures in an extremely bad and often dangerous state of repair. In reviewing this with the City's Building Inspectol', he has advised me of the practical difficulties that he has in requiring a p:roperty owner to make a substantial investment when it is anticipated that the property will oon be acquired as a result of urban renewal. The City already has expended over $1,600,000 of its own fwids in this area to acquire street and sew r rights of way s well s properties of thos persons who, if was felt, w re uffering a ev r hardship because of the impending urban renewal ctiv!ty. It is now obvious th t ev ry l'esident nd property owner in this rea is suff .ring a hardship and the City Comptroller has advised me that,. even lf funds were avail bl ,. there is considerable risk involved in dvancing funds for any further acquisitions that -re outside letter of consent areas . This ls because of the rule that requires us to · ccept the amount we paid, or th pprai ed value, which ver is lower , at the time we eventu Uy r · sell the pl"op rty to th proj ct. l m co · lzant of the f ct that th combin tion of th origin 1 Butt rmilk Bottoms, R -91, Proj ct with th Bedfoa-d ... Pin P:roj ct,. R .. 101, Project, �/ Mr . Baxter Page Two August 6, 1968 after we had received Part I approval on the original project, may have caused some problems and delays that might not otherwise have occurred , I am sure that any such delays were caused by factors occurring at all levels , including our own. Regardless of the reasons for the delays, however, I am sure that you can appreciate the plight of the residents of this area as a result of living with the impending urban renewal activity for this period of time , The situation in this area is now critical. In reviewing the situation with everyone concerned, it seems to be the concensus thnt immediate approval of the urban renewal project would be the single most effective factor in meeting the problem. For this r ason , this letter is to request that the processing of this application be placed on an emergency status . I would sincerely appreciate any assistance that you personally can provide in obtaining this approval as quickly as possible . Needless to say , your continued cooperation and assistance in helping Atlanta me et its problems is very much · ppreciated. Sincerely yours, Ivan All n , M yor lAJr:fy cc~ Mr . John Edmund J.,.-. , �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 6

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_006.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 6
  • Text: M. EDWIN L. STERNE 8 . SATTERFIELD E X ECUT IV E DIRECTOR A ND S ECRET A R Y CHAIR M AN LESTER H . PERSELLS GEORGE S. CRAFT ASSO CI A TE E X ECUT iV E DIRECT O R VICE CHAIRMAN CARL TON GARRETT D IREC TO R OF' f' INAN CE J. GILBERT H . BOGGS B. BLAYTON DIRECT OR OF' HO US I NG FRANK G. ETHERIDGE HOWARD OPENSHAW JACK F . GLENN DIREC T OR 824 HURT BUI L DING ATLANTA , GEORG IA 30303 JAC K SON OF REDE V ELOP ME NT GEORGE R . SANDER T ECHNICAL DIRECTOR 3 - 6074 September 6, 1968 The Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Subject: Bedford Pine UR Redevelopment Project Dear Mayor Allen: As was stated in our Conference, this project area, sometimes called Buttermilk Bottoms, contains some of the worst housing in Atlanta. Much of the worst housing was removed in clearing the land for the relief sewer and the City Auditorium. The condition of the remainder has been aggravated by the long period of waiting for Federal approval to execute the Project. In an effort to give some relief, the following acti ons have been taken: (1) The Housing Code Department, working with our Project employees, have made and are making inspections of the buildings which appear to be in the worst condition. (2 ) As complaints are received from tenants,or representatives of tenants, the structures in which they live are also inspected. (3) The Housing Code Enforcement Department notifies the owner of the work which must be performed in order to correct those conditions which are an immediate threat to health or safety. Our Project employees go to the owners and attempt to persuade them to make t he corre ct ions immedi ateq . This appr oach is achieving a large measure of succe ss . (4) In those cases where the owner wil l not corre ct the conditions , the structure is placarded and t he owner is asked to vacate the building and board it up. �-2- (5) In the cases of structures becoming vacant, the structures are immediately placarded so that they cannot be reoccupied, and the owner is required to board it up. All other vacant structures have been boarded up, and when evidence of saneone breaking into the structure becomes apparent, the structures are reboarded. We believe that as a temporary measure the above procedure is working. A meeting of the Community Relations Commission to hear grievances was held last night, and no grievances related to this situation were voiced. The real solution, which should be achieved immediately, is for this Project to be in execution. Docwnents are pending in Washington awaiting approval. Mr. Hummel and his staff seem to be agonizing over a decision to proceed with approval due to the large amount of Federal Capital Grant required by the project. The City's one-third share of Net Project Cost appears to be in sight due to the credits for the City Auditorium and the new C. W. Hill School. It seems to be the desire of the Federal Agency for this Project to be converted to the new Neighborhood Development Program. This would permit i'unding of the Federal and local shares on an annual basis, thus removing the need for a large Federal Grant reservation. Unfortunately, procedures for this conversion have not yet been written. We recommend and urge that this Project be converted to the Neighborhood Development Program within the next three to four months, particularly since the City's share is already available and est,ablished through the above mentioned improvements. It is important, however, that the Project, as now constituted, be appr oved without delay, with the conversion to take place later. We suggest that a letter similar to the suggested draft attached be mailed to Mr. Hummel over your signature . In addition to the letter, a personal tel ephone call from you to Mr. Hummel, pointing out that this is an area of acute racial t ensions, and that approval is urgent, should be helpful. Sincerely yours, ~~t0Lester H. Perseus Associate Executive Director Enclosure �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 15

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_015.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 15
  • Text: EDWIN L. STERNE M. B. SATTERFIELD CHAIRMAN E X ECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SECRETARY LESTER H . PERSELLS GEORGE S. CRAFT ASSOCIATE EXEC UT .IVE O IRECTOR VICE CHAIRMAN CARL TON GARRETT DIRECTOR J. B. BLAYTON FRANK G. ETHERIDGE JACK F. GLENN OF FINANCE GILBERT H. BOGGS ~ / .' \ .J X0' { DIRECTOR OF HOUSING ,0a' HOWARD OPENSHAW DIRECTOR 824 Y6'q_: J I ./' HURT BUILDING OF REDEVELOPMENT GEORGE R. ATLANTA, GEORG IA 30303 JACKSON 3-6074 July 24, 1968 Mr. Dan Sweat Government Liason Director City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Dan: We have received Part I approval from the Department of Housing and Urban Development for Amendment 7 to the Loan and Grant Contract in our University Center Urban Renewal Area. This will reduce the Federal Capital Grant $218,548, from $5,420,508 to $5,201,960. We will request that the reduction in the Capital Grant be applied to our Thomasville Urban Renewal Area to partially offset the increase in its Capital Grant for the development of the Federal Surplus Land. Please take this matter before the Grant Review Board for its approval at the earliest possible date. Sincerely yours, ~ Howard Openshaw Director of Redevelopment HO:ab SANDER TECHNICAL DIRECTOR · �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 16

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_016.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 16
  • Text: C ITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL August 6, 1968 ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR R. EARL LANDERS, Admin istrative Assistant MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary DAN E. SWEAT, JR ., Director of Governmental Liaison Mr . . Edward H. Baxter Regional Admini s trator Department of Housing and Urban Development 645 Peachtree-Seventh Building Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Dear Mr. Baxter: I have become increasingly concerned with the conditions existing in an area of Atlanta that is designated as the Bedford-Pine Urban Redevelopment Area, Ga R-101. I have recently made several tours of this area and find the structures in an extremely bad an d often dangerous state of repair. In reviewing this with the City's Building Inspector, he has advised me of the practical difficulties that he has in requiring a property owner to make a substantial investment when it is anticipated that the property will soon be acquired as a result of u_rban renewal. ~ The City already has e x pended over $ 1, 600, 000 of its own funds in this area to acquire street and sewer rights of way as well as properties of those persons who, if was felt, were suffering a severe hardship because of the impending urban -renew al activity. It is now obvious that every resident and property owner in thi ~ area is suffering a hardship and the City Comptroller has advised me that, even if funds w ere available, there is considerable risk involv ed in advancing funds for any furth e r acquisiti on s tha t a r e outsid e l e tt e r of consent areas. This is because of the rule that requires us to accept the amount we paid, or the apprais e d va.lue , whicheve r is low er, at the time we eventually resell the prope rty to the project . . . I am cognizan t of the fact that the combin ation of the original Butte rmilk Bottoms , R-91 , P r oj e ct with the Bedford - Pine Project, R-101, Project, �Mr. Baxter Page Two August 6, 1968 after we had received Part I approval on the original project, may have caused some problems and delays that might not otherwise have occurred. I am sure that any such delays were caused by factors occurring at a _ll levels, including our own. Regardless of the reasons for the delays, however, I am sure that you can appreciate the plight of the residents of this area as a result of living with the impending urban renewal activity for this period of time. The situation in this area is now critical. In reviewing the situation with everyone concerned, it seems to be the concensus that immediate approval of the urban renewal project would be the single most effective factor in meeting the problem. For this reason, this letter is to request that the processing of this application be placed on an emergency status. I would --sincerely appreciate any assistance that you personally can provide in obtaining this approval as quickly as possible. / Needless to say, your continued cooperation and assis·tance in helping Atlanta meet its problems is very much appreciated. IAJr:fy cc: Mr. John Edmunds - �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 18

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_018.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 18
  • Text: I C ITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL August 6, 1968 ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR R. EARL LANDERS, Administrative Assistant MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison Mr. Edward H. Baxter Regional Administrator Department of Housing and Urban Development 645 Peachtree -Seventh Building Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Dear Mr. Baxter: I have become increasingly concerned with the conditions existing in an area of Atlanta that is designated as the Bedford-Pine Urban Redevelopment Area, Ga R -101. I have recently made several tours of this area and find the structures in an extremely bad and often dangerous state of repair. In reviewing this with the City's Building Inspector, he has advised me of the practical difficulties that he has in requiring a property owner to make a substantial investment when it is anticipated that the property will soon be acquired as a result of u_rban renewal. The City already has expended over $1,600,000 of its own funds in this area to acquire street and sewer rights of way as well as properties of those persons who, if was felt, were suffering a severe hardship because of the impending urban -renewal activity. It is now obvious that every resident and property owner in thiel area is suffering a hardship and the City Comptroller has advised me that, even if funds were available, there is considerable risk involved in advancing funds for any further acquisitions that are outside lett~r of consent areas. This "'is because of the rule that requires us to accept the amount we paid, or the appraised va_lue, whichever is lower, at the time we eventually resell the property to the project . . I am cognizant of the fact that the combination of the original Buttermilk Bottoms, R -91, Proj e ct with the Bedford-Pine Project, R-101, Project, .,,.. �Mr. Baxter Page Two August 6, 1968 after we had received Part I approval on the original project, may have caused some problems and delays that might not otherwise have occurred. I am sure that any such delays were caused by factors occurring at all levels, including our own. Regardless of the reasons for the delays, however, I am sure that you can appreciate the plight of the residents of this area as a result of living with the impending urban renewal activity for this period of time, The situation in this area is now critical. In reviewing the situation with everyone concerned, it seems to be the concensus that immediate approval of the urban renewal project would be the single most effective factor in meeting the problem. For this reason, this letter is to :i;equest that the processing of this application be placed on an emerg_e ncy status. I would sincerely appreciate any assistance that you personally can provide in obtaining this approval as quickly as possible. Needless to say, your continued cooperation and assistance in helping Atlanta meet its problems is · very much appreciated . IAJr:fy cc: Mr. John Edmunds ... �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 24

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_024.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 24
  • Text: DEPARTMENT O F HOUSING AND UR BAN DEVELOPM ENT PEACHTREE SEVENTH BUILDING, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Room 645 April 15, l968 REGION Ill I N REPLY REFER TO: 3CP Mro Wayne Moore, Jr. Coordinator Metropolitan Atl anta Council of Local Goverl'l.ments 900 Glenn Building Atla.~ta, Georgia 30303 Dear lf1 r. Moore: Subject: Urba.ri. Pla.l'l!ling Assistance Program Funding One Areawide Planni ng Agency per Metropolitan Area Thi s offi ce is in receipt of notific ation from our Washington offi ce that it is the present departmental policy to support only one areawi de agency per metropolitan areao The re a sons why grants should not be made to t wo agencies , a s is the c ase i n the Atlant a metropolitan area, as set forth by the Washington office are: l . Lack of ne ces sity . There is no distinction in the 701 Program between Organi zations of Public Officials and metropolitan planning c ommissions with regard t o eligible work . Although Section 701(g) and Pla...rming Agency Letter #50 emphasi ze coordination of governmental regulations and services , such studies were eligible before the enactment of 701(g). 2 . Value t o the community of a single areawide agency . Having one areawide agency responsible for developing and coordinating multij urisdict_ional plans, programs and policies on all front s - social, physical, economic, health, administrative, etc. , - is of ultimate benefit to the connnunity. It reduces confusion on the part of electe d officials and the people as to where this responsibility rests, and it reduces divisive competition between agencies . Specific 701- assisted work items c an be subcontracte d t o other agencies, but the legal responsibility should lie with the central agency. 3. Conservat ion of scarce pe ople and dollar s. There is a serious shortage of competent public administrators and high-level professional people t o fill top staff positions on these agencies. !HID should avoid generating unnecessary additional demand for such personnel. Also, grant funds are scarce. Again, we should avoid creating unnecessary additional demand. �2 ~-. Federal policy or coor dination i n m -ci-jurisdictional a.reas o The multiplicity of fe 'eral and state assistance p:rogram.s -· o u:c-oan areas requires that these programs be coordinated at t _e etropolitan or regional level. P--resident Johnson has c alled for such coord · nation, and the Bureau of the Budget has lid out guideli es in c:rcula.r _-8o. It is unlikely that funding t wo a.rea,-Tide agencies in t he sane area thro' gh 701 wou d e : the spL it o '-h s - - c..:.tive ::?ro. cur..cer Gnts . 5. Conflicting plans and programs ., Dual agencies provide no mechanism f or resolving inconsistent plans and programs which li ely will be developed by each agency. A policy of dual grants opens the door for ser~ous disputes in the future over the proper role of each agency. We have been advi sed also not to accept further applicat ions from two areawide agencies i n t he s a..me metropolitan area without clearance of such action with the Washington office . It is our i nterpretation of the information at hand and fro_ discussions with Washington office personnel that .,_he department does not discour age the creation of two areawide agencies, but that, in the future, it will receive and fund applic ations from only one such agency. We understand that one areawide agency may file an application fo_ the work program of the second agency and contract the work back to it. In view of the current relationship existing between etropolitan Atlanta Counc il of Loccl Governments and Atlanta Region 1etropolitan Planning Commission, consideration should be given at an early date as to the future organizational arrangements for submittal of and administration of UFA applicationso We will be pleased to meet with representatives of both agencies as may be required. 7 I ; 'tr' Si~ erely y~urs, ,1i r IJ,~ 1/ l !. - , u/I',: l/1 , , l ~-1 -v (I /~. l ~ lr,,( ,.1..t. :·, ; , /\ ./(? / A. Frederick Smith, ' Assistant Regional Administrator Program Coordination and Services Division �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 25

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_025.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 25
  • Text: CITY OF ATLANTA OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER CITY HALL Atlanta, Georgia 30303 CHARLES L. DAVIS COMPTROLLER EDGAR A. VAUGHN, JR. October 1, 1968 DEPUTY COMPTROLLER Mr . Louden C . Hof £man A~sociate Planner Greenville County Planning Commission 18 Thompson Street Greenville, South C rolina Dear Mr. Hoffman: Your reque t for information regarding th City of Atlanta' Urban Renewal Program was referr d to my office by Mayor Allen, Unfortunately, we were unable to supply the amount of expenditures for urban renewal projects by year ince we are on a project b i • I have .attached a chedule of project budge~ed cost for our ten urban renewal proj ct and hop that thi will supply you with the information you nod . Yours very truly, t7t';~
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 27

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_027.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 27
  • Text: ATLANTA, GEORGIA OF THE CITY OF 824 HURT BUILDING• ATLANTA 3, GA . • JACKSON 3-807• November 1, 1968 Mr . Dan E. Swea t , J r . City Hal l At l anta, Georgia 30303 ~ if) Q - u1 w.l _( Gentlemen: 08 PAD-C~L@ 8d I I-' (J ([l _=-- 7_ 0a,o 0 Ocs -o <-9 Re: Parcel 24 West End Urban Redevelopment Area Project Georgia R-90 We h ave issued an invitation for proposals to purchase this small tract of Commercial land located on the east side of Lee Street 109 feet nor t h of Gordon Street in the West End Urban Redevelopmen t Area . It is z o ne d C-2 and has a minimum estab lished price of $8,500.00 . Proposals are to be opened in the office of the Housing Authority on December 18 , 196 8, at 10:00 A. M. If an acceptable proposal is not received , the Authorit y will continue to receive proposals and to open them as received for a period of twelve months or u n til the trac t is sold. Proposals must be made on our forms which we will gladly send upon request. Very truly yours, ~ 6 'C//c::-o-o~,1-1-, tt v \ ,· Philip E. Vrooman, Chief Real Estate Disposition Branch PEV : hcn �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 28

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_028.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 28
  • Text: ,RtC . ,tb·.· ......,. /---/ DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,..,- t. WASHINGTON, D . C. 20410 ,,J. i - \ ~\ 0CT14196B?t,.. -~ •• I .•-(/{.£~/ <" --r-.--.---,4-:::. .-f OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR RENEWAL AND HOUSING ASSISTANCE CIRCULAR 9-18-68 TO: Local Authorities Regional Administrators Assistant Regional Administrators for Housing Assistance FROM: Don Hummel SUBJECT: Families With Children to be Located in Low-Rise Buildings The Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (Section 15(11)) specifies that "except in the case of housing predominantly for the elderly, • • • , the Secretary shall not approve high-rise elevator projects for families with children unless he makes a detennination that there is no practical alternative." This prohibition applies to projects placed under Annual Contributions Contract on or after August 1, 1968. It does not apply to a project in this category if the Regional Administrator makes a finding that, prior to August 1, 1968, development of the project had reached a stage wh:l-ch would make it impractical to require the Local Authority to change its housing program. Pending experience with the above-cited provision of the statute, the following policies are established to assure compliance with the legislation: 1. Dwellings for families with children shall be provided in structures which do not exceed three stories in height. 2. Projects proposed for families with children shall be designed not to exceed a net dwelling density of 45 per acre nor a net building coverage in excess of 35 percent. The Regional Administrator shall make the required finding as to whether there is 11 no pra ctical alternative" under Section 15(11) at the earliest stage. Such .a finding may be made under the following circumstances: (Cont'd) I I r- -_/ /- , �2 .. ... a. Compliance _with the limitation at the selected site would result in room costs exceeding the statutory limits, and there are no other acceptable sites available, or b. Current land value of the site proposed and the going construction cost produce an average development cost per famiJ.y dwelling which is unacceptably high in comparison with current costs of sale or rental housing for family dwellings of the same size and character in other residential neighborhoods within the local area, and other sites cannot be obtained, or c. The housing is being leased by the Local Authority for family occupancy on a short-term basis, and there is no housing available which satisfies the policies established above for family dwellings. A finding of "no practical alternative" on the basis of any other circumstances requires the approval of the Assistant Secretary for Renewal and Housing Assistance. In those instances where the Regional Administrator makes a finding pursuant to the provisions of this Circular, a statement setting forth the basis for such finding shall accompany the Annual Contributions Contract list submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Renewal and Housing Assistance. =) ~~r-e"" '\-:-ar--..y----------~ ...J 231841-P HUD-Wash., D. C. �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 31

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_031.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 31
  • Text: TWO l1E:HBER FAHILIES HAVING NO HI NORS, NOT ELDERLY NOR DISABIED 6-1 ) 6-9 ) Techwood. Clark Hm·r ell 30 10 6-2) 6-10) University John Hope 17 23 6-3 Capitol 15 6-4 Grady 13 6-5 Rl Eagan 21 6-5 R2 Herndon 6-6 Carver 17 6-7 Harris 2 6-8 Perry 10 6-12 Ba.rnn 7 6- 18 Leased 21 5 202 (710 units elderly not incl.) out of 8,811 Units �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 36

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_036.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 36
  • Text: EDWIN L. STERNE M. B. SATTERFIELD CHAUIMAH CX£CUTIVE DIRECTOR AND S ECRETARY LESTER H . PERSELLS GEORGE S. CRAFT ASSOCIATE &:XECUTIVE DIRECTOR VICE CHAI .. MAN CARL TON GARRETT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE GILBERT H. BOGGS J. B. BLAYTON DIRECTOR OF HOUSING FRANK G. ETHERIDGE HOWARD OPENSHAW DIRECTOR OF REDEV£LOPMENT JACK F. GLENN 824 HURT IIUILDING ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 GEORGE R. SANDER TECHNICAL DIRECTOR JACKSON 3· 6074 November 15, 1968 Mr. Rodney M. Cook 34 - 10th St. N. E. Atlanta, Georgia . 30309 .Dear Rodney: Your letter of October 11 concerning low-rent public housing and the approaches which you feel the Housing Authority should take have led to a restudy of the current situation and the future course of action with respect to the development of high and low-density housing. The overall objective for housing in Atlanta is contained in the Community Improvement Program study as adopted by the Board of Aldermen. As restated by you, it is: "Place greater and intensified emphasis on creating higher density (high-rise} housing and preserving and promoting additional single family dvrellings; garden type apartments must be deemphasized in the future development and redevelopment of Atlanta. 11 Our studies indicate, and we believe this to be implicit in the CIP Study, that housing for higher income families should be largely in high-rise and single family structures, and that housing for low-income families should be largely in garden type apartments and high-rise for the elderly structures. Though we know of no study which indicates the extent of need and the degree of acceptability of high-rise structures by elderly low-income families in Atlanta, our experience, on the whole, has been favorable. The Housing Authority is, therefore, placing very considerable emphasis on this type of housing even though the Federal program is de-emphasizing elderly housing at the present. We referred your letter to the Regional Housing Assistance Office with a request for their comments. We are attaching a copy of their l etter and a .,, · copy of HUD Circular of 9/18/68 which also relates to these matters. Mr. Hanson I s letter clearly states the position of the ·Federal Agericy with respect to the low- income housing program. �-2Weha.ve also reviewed much of the literature concerning the development of planned communities and neighborhoods. In addition to this, we have discussed such developments with developers and planners of national and international stature. The general consensus is that a desirable neighborhood is one that contains a· reasonable cross-section of family sizes and income groups. Our observation is that in Atlanta most of the privately developed housing consists of one and two bedroom .units, except for higher-income single family residences. There is apparently a very great need for a large number of 3, 4 & 5 bedroom units for lower income families. We have attached a listing of the low-rent public housing projects in Atlanta, giving data on apartmem, by bedroom size. Please note that the older projects included no four or five bedroom apartments, and were heavily weighted toward efficiency and one bedroom units. The more recent developments have been increasingly weighted toward apartments with a larger number of bedrooms. · Your letter requested certain statistical information with respect to one and two person families. As of June 30, 1968, we were serving 2,345 one person families. Of these, 1,926 are elderly (62 years and over}, and the remainder consist of handicapped persons, widows or widowers whose spouses have deceased during their tenancy, and a very few single persons displaced by Urban Renewal or other governmental activities. In low-rent public housing are also 1,972 two person families, of which 202 are families having no minors and who are neither elderly nor disabled. We have included a listing showing the projects in which these two person families live. Because of the great demand for admission to low-rent public housing, which stays fully occupied with an average waiting list of approximately 1,500 applications, it is clear that the family sizes accommodated in low-rent housing is controlled by the size apartments which have been built, and, as mentioned above, the early program was heavily weighted toward the smaller size apartments. In the light of the foregoing, it would appear that the policies being followed by the Housing Authority in the construction of new low-rent public housing is the proper course of action, and, in the light of the current laws and regulations, achieves to the maximum degree possible the objectives which you advocate. With respect to the Bedford-Pine Project, GA. R-101, and the public hous:Lng presently planned for that project, we believe that fill consideration has been given to the objectives outlined in your letter and to the objectives of the project as agreed in meetings with the project residents. We enclose an �-3- analysis of one and two person families now living in the Bedford Pine Project area. Our past experience indicates that most of the 148 individuals will insist on being self-relocated for a variety of reasons such as contemplated marriage, illegal occupations, alcoholism. Most of the elderly and handicapped will probably move into public housing. Of the 223 two person families, most will be satisfactorily relocated by our staff, and it is our hope that most of those eligible for public housing will take advantage of their opportunity. It would appear that the public housing for the elderly planned for this area will acconunodate all those who are likely to move in, and will leave a small surplus. The Project Advisory Committee, with whom this matter has been discussed, feels strongly that the very limited land area available for residential reuse should be devoted to housing which will serve the people living in the area. The 353 apartments, of which 149 will be for elderzy, is designed to accomplish this. We are attaching a letter from the Project Advisory Committee stating their feelings in this matter. We reconunend and urge that these 353 apartments be constructed in the apartment sizes presently planned. · The constructive approach which you are taking to this matter is greatly appreciated, and we appreciate also the thoughtful and constructive policies which you and the Policy Committee present for the guidance of the Urban Renewal program. Sincerely yaurs, ,/J ~ r. lLd' _ // __.,,,,- ,/ v ~ · MBS/IBP:sd CC: AHA Board Members UR Policy Committee Hembers _ /, - L. •" 1 \.;L.J.;.:cz:z,-,~ /4-e-f.--#U 1;· M. B. Satterfield Executive Director ~ Enclosures / · �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 38

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_038.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 38
  • Text: EDWIN L . STERNE M . 8 , SATTERFIELD CHAIRMAN E X ECUT I VE DIREC T O R AND S ECRETAR Y LESTER H. PERSELLS GEORGE S . CRAFT ASSOCIATE E XE C U T } VE DIA EC TOR VICE CHAIRMAN CARL TON GARRETT D IRECTOR OF FINAN CE J, 8. SLAYTON GILBERT H. BOGGS DIRECTOR OF' HOUS ING FRANK G. ETHERIDGE HOWARD OPENSHAW JACK F . GLENN DIRECTOR 824 HURT B U ILD IN G GEORGE R . A T LANTA, GEORGIA 30303 JACKSON OF REDEVELOPMENT SANDER T ECHN IC AL DIRECTOR 3-6074 November 8, 1968 Mr. Dan Sweat The Mayor's Office City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Mr. Sweat: You are invited to attend the ground-breaking ceremonies for the 220-units of low r ent housing to be constructed under the turnkey method to be held on the Gilbert Road site Tuesday, November 19, 1968 at 10:00 a.m. The site is located in southeast Atlanta at the intersection of Gilbert Road and Flynn Road, as indicated on the attached map. Mayor Ivan Al len, Jr . will officially break the ground f or this $4-million development. This project has been made possible through the very fine effor ts of Claridge Towers Company as developers and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company as contractors. We hope you will be present at this brief ceremony which marks another stride forward in Atlanta ' s low rent housing program. Sincerely, ~ Vy,:_,'-\ --? -1--- • Edwin L. Sterne Chairman ELS: ab Enclosure ~ �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 1

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_001.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 1
  • Text: ATLANTA,Gll!:ORGIA ROUTE SLIP TO: ~• FROM: Dan E. Sweat, Jr. D For your information D Please refer to the attached corres pondence and -make the necessary reply. D Advise me the status of the attached. <.Q~ ? . F ORM 25-4-S �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 8

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_008.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 8
  • Text: CITY OF ATLANTA OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER CITY HALL Atlanta, Georgia 30303 CHARLES L. DAVIS COMPTROLLER EDGAR A. VAUGHN, JR. DEPUTY COMPTROLLER September 12, 1968 Mr. Dan E. Sweat, Jr. Director Governmental Liaison City Hall Dear Dan: We have reviewed the amended application for the Rockdale Urban Redevelopment Project R-21 which was approved by the Board of Aldermen on September 3, 1968. Basically, we are in agreement with the proposed amendment, however, there are certain factors we feel should be taken into consideration and brought to light at this time. This amendment results in additional cost to the City of Atlanta of $169,369.00. Of this amount $102,960.00 is attributable to increases in administrative costs ($30,360) and interests on temporary loans ($72,600). The major portion of the increases are due solely to the extension of the project execution period by 36 months. It is our understanding that this extension in the project execution period principally results from the reluctance of the FHA to approve the release of construction funds over a short period of time. They apparently have some doubt about the economic feasibility of this type of project and believe that by staging the project some degree of the risk can be removed. However, since this extension results in an increase in Federal Government costs of more than $200,000.00 in addition to the $169,000.00 increase in the City's share, it would seem apparent that a reduction in the period of this extension would benefit all parties involved. Perhaps proper channeling of this cost information might result in a review of the risk supposedly involved and a prompter release of funds. �September 12, 1968 Page 2 We are in no way objecting to the project amendment and realize that there are certain Local Grant-in-Aids that might also delay completion of the project. However, a shortening of the project by even 12 to 24 months should result in substantial savings while still allowing a reasonable period for completion. Any assistance you can give us in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, Charles L. Davis Comptroller CLD:cs �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 26

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_026.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 26
  • Text: Urban Renewal Prujects Schedu l cofProjectBudgeLedCost• Septe1:1b c r30,l968 Butler St re et !.of Net $ ~::~~:~r:;~v:urvey_ Legel Servi c e 143.215.248.55112:55, 29 December 2017 (EST) 0 :peoses Dispos a l,LeaseRel e ntion Cost ~~:~;:~/r Site Improvemen t 160,38& 501,832 70,005 167,256 205,011 102,067 991,000 180,130 8,267;204 -S367535 Real Estate Pu rchases Sa l e Pr ice of Land ...b~ ,., ,., ,., '-' '-' -686456 6454671 Nel Projec t Costs $173, 151 442,177 71,984 192,496 233, 687 59,350 ,., 1,013,500 149 , 935 ¼Ji 8,652,367 -2851501 5800661 l5.4 ,., o., ,., .., ~ -10.6 100,0!. - 335770 12 51~ 582 $225,281 512,331 40,258 ]44,869 12 2,608 28,l76 517,438 77,279 94, 54 9 264,217 64,294 88,269 59 ,202 33,086 662,000 357,900 28 , 586 7 ,162,2 94 ·3078972 4 0 83 322 2,246,209 .,. - 985375 1260834 '·' .6.6 TI:J 7749~ $ $ ... o., .., 12 . 6 '-' 100.0 ~ Federal C11pital Gunt 4 , 303 ,1 14 5, 166,198 7,742,476 CityofAtla,;ita Non-Cash Cash&Rca1£st a tcTaxCrcdit• 1,863,771 287786 2,151,557 $6454671 =~:;;:r. ~:I~:!~::~i~:. ~=~:~7 ~ ~::t~:~'";143.215.248.55ts 28,87 4.46 3:\,.33 4,7L4,606 58.SOO 4,773, 106 37,67 ~ 36, 14 ~ 2,583,100 213,718 2,817,845 -7L 2 900 2,104945 1,372,373 54.8 -1336iA .:.1.:1 5 258,303 I 00 . 0 4254861 3838,096 100 . 0 7 - 23-59 48.25 -1L..Q..Q£ 33 . 33 2,558,046 ·" 48,65 1,887,017 ~ u 1,8.92 , 034 106, 564 318,640 4l,250 16 2,500 216,000 23,500 443,457 300,000 288,322 4,912,203 -993287 3918916 $706,407 1,446,378 76,400 431 , 782 8!6,708 260,400 836,306 1,900,000 1,135,966 ,., ,., ,; ,.o ,., ,., 56,8 -ll.5 ~ 8,165,277 ,..JOl.3802 5 121 475 75. l · -~ ~ 2,963,873 - 194338 44 ,1 1 .........,]_§; 44.47 2,462,223 64 . 15 1,372,373 _1..1Q2 1,375, 87 3 35.76 . 09 35.85 17,819,8S5 - 5233227 12 586 628 7,430,196 -1.8 .......l.ll..., 10870860__!.QQ.,__Q 27778~ $ ,., ,.,., l0,450 26,185 554 4,108 9,8}3 ,oo '-' 15,807 3,144 -~ ~ ~ ~ 286,900 ,., "' ..,., "'., lOS,6 -31. 4 74,2 4,014 -~ ~ Tot a l !. of Net $ 1 ,950,442 4,:~~:i~: . 1,6l2,891 2, 013 , 55 9 714, 781 3,J/+3,796 6,262,645 2, 206,l 74 ,., ,., ,.,·' LS ,,., 62,599,154 -24012635 -~ ~ ~ 28,082,499 ·Ll 100.0 3 8 38.096 100.00 5,70 4,176 7,507,743 19,724,584 181,107 57,854,705 2,894,\77 2,963,873 3 99244 3,363, 117 7,430, 196 ---.ll'.L.TI.! 4,014 ~ 90 , 554 28,082,499 1708,052 29790S5l ~ 2,949,177 8,053,987 87645256 147,465 22,806 --1.dl!Q How,1rd Stree t J;of Net .., ,., ., 7·3-62 2,362,8 27 2,537,046 --1..,_.Ql Ge org laTec h Amount t ofNet $ 2,894,177 -165688 34 , 426 244,100 --2,..!!22 165,000 91,657 4.3 2. 4 1,877,0!7 100,00 ~~:~e1\ts 14. 3 0.5 3.2 .:1..J! 2,700,257 2,425,426 ~ 20,311 121,064 22,340 54,393 12,500 7,141 -19 1 680 6 -28-60 Allu~ at ion of Projec t Costs: 64,343 23 1 , 108 36,060 82, 218 33,030 75,761 999,435 352,000 6!,l63 2,269,000 - 1660586 2, 537,046 ..b]_ 100.0t l Georgia Stace !.of Net Arnqunt Univcrsity Ccnt-,r t ofNet A.-nount 2,425,426 4,7L4,606 L,863,771 ProJcctloco:ne Rawson -Wa,hington Amount !. of Net 633,485 616,302 ill.....:!.ll ....!.Q__,_Q_QQ 1L2~ 6,547 2,128,204 ~ $281! 720 ., 32 . U 33,9 �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 29

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_029.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 29
  • Text: I/JW RENT PUBLIC HOUSING APPLICATIONS ON HA.ND Efficiency 189 ) 1 Bedroom 267 ) 2 II 433 3 n 327 4 " 191 5 II 57 TOTAL AS OF ll/4/68 265 Elderly 1,464 All applications apparently eligible on basis of income unverified. �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 30

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_030.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 30
  • Text: ,. DISTRIBUTION OF ONE PERSON FAMILIES TOTAL 8,878 FAMILIES as of 6/30/68 Techwood Clark Howell Palmer APrS BR 391 7ll 52 216 199* 30+ % 100 50 248 200 15.5% ( 6 49* 76 199* 13.9% ( 4. % ( 9.9 82 10 % 56 55-* 14. 7% 56 172 154-x108 24 92 2.8% 223 ) 365 Harris Homes John O. Chiles 95) 232 ) 327 Capitol Homes 238 Grady Homes Graves II II Eagan 15.3 ) 4~- 108 192) 91 : 65 345 3.9% pa.....rver Community 71 194 . 3 % Perry Homes 49 148 2.1% Bowen 63 no 2.7% 20 297 1 % Leased II (12.8% 180} 231 } 142 ) II" 1 API'S 300) University John Hope Herndon EFF. 2,345 599 2,892 Designed for elderly only. 100 % ( 1.1 . ( 9.9 ( 9.5% (6.5% · (8.2 �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 32

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_032.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 32
  • Text: BEDFORD-PINE PROJECT AREA R-101 Re: Individuals and Families of two (2) Composition In the Bedford-Pine Project Area we are showing by family sum,--nary: 148 Indi v:i.duals HANDICAPPED Over 62 Apparently eligible for Pub. Hsg. 122 35 3 Apparently ineligible for Pub. Hsg. 26 6 0 _______ _____ ___ .....,._ Families of two __,_ (2) Compositi ons - 223 - Apparently Eligible for P.H. . Eligible Combination of Co~position: ·Did not Ineligible give Income ( 178 ) 126 48 Two (2) Females ( 32 ) 25 7 Two (2) Hales ( 13) 5 5 3 60 7 Male & Female 4 .- TOTAL Of above: (223 ) Case s where both over 62 Handicappe~ Cases NOTE: 156 16 9 Apparently eligibl e for Public Housing category is ba sed on families 1 s t aterr.ent of incor.:e un verified. �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 43

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_043.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 43
  • Text: bee: Mr. Dan Sweat, Jr. Ee 0 ppor· 111i ty At anta, c. 101 i\b ri ecca Scr ee c Bldg . • Acl an ca, Ge org ia 3030 3 • T el eph on e 688 -1012 t T. \ L P arl-- am Ex ecuci ,·e Adminis c: a co r Dece mber 9, 19 68 Mr . M. B. Sa t t e rf i eld Exe cutive Di r ect or Atl a n ta Housi ng Au t horit y 824 Hu r t Bu i ld ing Atla nta , Ge or gi a Dear Mr. Sa t te r fie l d : We wis h t o t hank you for send ing r e p r e sen ta t ive s t o t he mee ting o f the Centra l Cit izens Adviso r y Comrn i ttee o f EOA on November 19. The m8eting was very he l pfu l t o u s a nd c r ea tin g improved un der s tanding of s ome o f the p oli c ies of the Rousi ng Au thoriti es . At th a t mee t ing , r epr e s e nta tives of th e Reg i ona l Offic e of HUD , Housing As si stance Section, r e a d to the group f r om a "circula r " da t e d 3/22/68 whic h was tra~s mit t e d t o l oca l Hous ing Au t h ori tie s f rom Washing t on HUD ( Mr. Don Hum..rne l ) i n r egard t o " soc i a l g oa l s f or pub l ic hous ing ." Mr. Hu mme l ind i ca t e d t hat as a mat t er of na tiona l policy , ur gent and ma j or socia l obje c tives i ncluded : Mor e attent i on to r esi de nt 's di gn ity , p r i va cy, a nd pe r s ona l safet y . Sp e cia l a tten tion s houl d be give n to the elimina tion o f u nnecess a ry r ules and regula t ions. Le a de r s hip to ac h ieve be tter and more co ordina t ed s oc i a l s ervi ce s fo~ p r o ject t e na nt s . I nc reas e d t rai ni ng a nd e mp loyme nt o f t e na nts in p roje ct ma na ge me n t . The de velopme nt o f e qui t a b l e s y stems for ha ndlin g gr i evance s . I Great l y e x pande d par t icipa tion o f t e na nts in p r o j ec t mana geme nt affa i r s and pr og r ams designe d to s t r engthen the s e l f - sufficiency o f t enan ts. ,. �-· M__r. M. B. Satterfield Pag e t wo Dece mb er 9", 19 68 Mr . Hummel's directive indicated that national and regional offices of HUD sho·Jld give attention to the se m3.t ter s , bu t sta te d t ha t "it is the l ocal Housing Authorities who will m3.ke the goa ls a re a li t y . It is they who ffi'JS t ex::tmine their own ope ra t ions and m:tke. th e changes called for by t heir findin gs." He recommended i mmed iate r ev i e w of the following: The r a i sing of inco me limits where they have sub stantially fallen be hind changes i n the comnun ity. The libera lizing of t he definition of income with the resp e ct to the income of minors . The adjustin_g o f r ·e ntal policies and require me nts for the examination of tenants to minimize the difference between public housing and nor ma l real es t ate practic es . The use of the statutory authority to contin ue in occup ancy an over-income family when it is unab le to find good housing in a suitab l e ne i gh borhood. The iib era li z ing of regulations limiting the number of e mp loyees who may live in a projec t. The adopt ion o f a simple and equitable lease. The simp lific at ion of rules and r egulations. The provision o f adequat e mea~ures for s afety and s ecur ity of tenants. The adoption o f proced ures where t enan ts, either i ndiv i dua lly or in a group, may be given a hea ring on questions r elat i ng to Au thority policies and p ractices , either in general, or in relation to an ind ividual or fa mily. I The u pgradin g o f l eve l s of maintenance and the appe a r a nce of buildings and grounds with the maxim·Jm t enan t par ticipa tion and, where possib le, tenant employ~e nt. �Mr . M. B. Sa tt e rfield Page three Dece;:nber 9, 1968 Am~ng o the r thin gs Mr . Huwme l also su gge sted that local Housing Authorities: Develop a two wa.y c oi.11mun i.ca t ion with tenant s co ncerning bas ic policy ; afford the t enants full opportun it y to or ganize, incl uding the prov ision of meet ing rooms and a cce s s to t enant lists and b ulle t in boa rds. Gi ve r es i dents the opp or tunit y to partic ipate i n th e de te r minati on of manage men t p olicies and p ractices , subject to general princ iples of l:l.\A. , such as re nta l and o-:::cup a ncy polici es ; rul es and r egu l ations; charges for brea ka ge a nd damage ; eviction pol i c ies , e tc . Th e Centra l Citize ns Advisory Cormnittee would like to ask what action the ~tlan ta Housing Athorit~_!_aken or c ontemp lat e s t a kin g , to comply with the r e c om:ne ndat ions of Mr . Humme l. We are especially inter este d in the point s li sted ab ove and would apprec iate a reply, if possible, by Deceillber 17, 19 68, the dar e o f our ne x t mee tin g. ! S inc~_x:eJ y y our s, ,,,--/ -/ \ / -- - . I - . , , 1 f, t - -- - - - -- , Er (vin St ev~ns';· Cha irma n : U. - -- - --· .__,,Centra l Citiz ens Advisory Committ ee ES/ gnd cc: Mr. Ed wa rd Ste rne, Cha ir ma n Ware , St erne & Griffin 636 Trust Co~pany of Geor g ia Bui lding Atla nta, Georgia Mr. George F. Craft, Vice Chairman Chairma n of th e Board of Trust Co~pany of Georgia Trust Coillpany o f Georgia Building Atlanta, Georg ia I Mr. J. B. Bl a y ton Mu tua]. Fe der a l Sa vings an d Loan 205 Auburn Ave nue Atl anta, Geor g ia ~rr. Frank Ethridge Ethrid ge and Company Suite 100 3100 Map l e Dr ive , N. E. _Atlanta, Ge org ia Mr. J a ck Chairman Citize ns 35 Broad Atlanta, F. Glenn of the Board of and Southern Nationa l Bank Stree t, N. W. Geor g ia "' �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017

Box 3, Folder 6, Document 3

http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_003_006_003.pdf
  • Result Type: Item
  • Item Type: Text
  • Title: Box 3, Folder 6, Document 3
  • Text: / BEDFORD-.PINE URBA N REDEVELOPMENT AREA, GA R-101 CHDONICAL OF EVENTS A UGUST 6, 1968 November 27, 1963 R-91 S urvey & Planning A pplic ations filed February 4, 1964 GNRP Application authorized by Board of A ldermen February 27, 1964 GNRP Application filed April 3, 1964 R-91 Survey & Planning approved May 6, 1964 Contract for R -91 planning services executed June 9 , 1964 GNRP Application a p proved July 17., 1964 ELA - A ud itodum area submitted GNRP terminated by C i ty S & P , R-101, authorized July 20, 1964 R-101 Survey &: Planning Application submitted N ovember 17, 1965 R -101 S urvey & Planning Application approved February 2, 1966 R - 101 contract for planning s ervice a e x ecuted Ma rch 7. 1966 E L A -Hill School site s ubm itted J une 15, 1966 Sub m itt d P artl, R - 91 Sept mb r 20 , 1967 Combined S & P Applic t ion., R-91,-R -10~ submitte d Novemb- r 30, 1967 F b ruary 5, 1968 Combined Surv y & P l anning pproved S ubmitted Part I, R -101 Definitions : Original B utterm ilk Bottom s P r oj ct Area d e s i gnation R-101 . Ori · a.1 Bedford ... Pin Project de sign tlon nd, late r, the d s i.gnation of th cornbin d pl'oject ar a GNRP Ci n ral Nei ghborhood R n w 1 Plan s S ul'v y and Planning p ELA Early Land Acqui ltlon �
  • Tags: Box 3, Box 3 Folder 6, Folder topic: Housing department | 1969
  • Record Created: April 18, 2017
  • Record Updated: December 29, 2017