1
20
56
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/70491fa17f307e2c0779c94837805a3b.jpg
7b8f25a6cf06f22231b4ca27bed734ec
Still Image
A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
311'. Joe G. Bchmnc, Chic!
Conservation and Rehabilitation Branch
Urban Pomona]. Division
Housing and Home Finance rrcncy
6L5 Peachtroo-chcnth Building
iblanta, Georgia - 30323
Dear Mr. morons:
Scmo tim ago at th mquoc‘b cf Er. William R. Wofl‘ord, tho
Building Official of! the City of Atlanta, you reviewed the
draft of tho ROSA Basic Phasing Code and cu‘mittcfl some
cmcnta. Under separate cover, at Hr. Hofford'c mquoot,
we have sent to you throo ccmlimcntars' copies of this code:
as it. was finally published. ”do am enclosing; a copy of
our Publication and Prico List for your information in tho
event. you have occasion to rcfcr to this and the 1300A codes
in tho areas which you servo. -
-.'c very much coprocicbc your taking the timo to consent on
‘41.
tho early draft. of this cc and must apologize for not
earlier comicicat n; with * co rcgazfiicg this. In the
volume of H031: involved it vac impossible for no to
commmiccto our apprcciction to everyone. Plocso forgive
this oversight.
Your comments wore ccccmlly reviewed by the Committee and _
you may find that. some of tilt-‘5; wom incorporated in the code. '
Others may not have can uoori since in tho ovoroll concept.
of the Code the cormittcc mg“? have felt. it undocirablo to
use them at this time. We anticipate modifications of the
code as oxoorionco indicates accessory and this my load
to the adoption of 5023 of the thingc proviouclr suggested
but. not. accepted by the Comittoc.
Tho BGCA Basic Housing Code io prepares! to. be used in con-
Junction with tho BOG}. Basic Building Code. Togothor they
provide all the: common; authorities for tho minimistration
of regulations gcvoming both old and mm buildimc. Thoy
arc basca on the policy that. all activities dealing with the
buildings in a ccmcnity should cor-ac under the direct. super-
vision of the building; official. Housing authorities or
similar local public agencies, planning boards and other
branches of local government concerned with buildings and their use
should have the full cosporooion of the building department in
dotonnining the physical condition of the buildings and in such
other matters as may be necessary. Violation notices and coroection
orders regarding buildings oiould ho issued by one agency only ..
lino building doparmnontg-«nalthourja tho fire prevention official may
propo‘iy issue notices and orders regarding fire hazards resulting
-rom the prooessos of hand.in;o fflcnmablc materials ovor‘ohich he
has juris fiction, and the ho 1th official may issue orders regarding
sanitation - improper use of sanitazy facilities or unsanitary
practices - which. are and or his juris fiiobion. Ho believe that those
assu.pticno quite well take coro of all noccosary conditions and that
aha? are sound and practical.
Under this arrango.nont appeals from gaginiotrativc orders are provided
within proper limitations throu3.h provisions of the building code.
Such appeals would apply equally to orflors issued in connection with _
corrections under the Housing Code as to those issued under the
Building Code.
We would Holcomo any further comments you may have in connection with
this and tho Insults of your experience or the experience o£ communities
with which you may come in contact in its use.
Sincorcly'youro,
Paul E. Baselar ,
Executive Director
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 7
Atlanta Wall Image
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 1962
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: Atlanta
Geopolitical Entity: Georgia
Geopolitical Entity: peyton
Person: Ivan Allen
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/10c77548ac3d87b3d986653f4e415278.pdf
efd2c6cae22024867b9fbaa0d77be556
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
FOR
THE
MONTH
NO . OF PERMITS
____l~--
27
OF
DECEMBER, 1966
CLASSIFICATION
NO. OF FAMILIES
COST
o__ob__'.....
.bo.....·
Condominum
$_____.1__
Js__.,.....
Frame Dwellings , I F a mily .
$
---+.4,....,2+1-,1...,9.....o--.-oo--
- - - - - - - M a s o n r y Dwellin gs , I F a mily
$ --------
- - - - - - - F ra me Dwelling s, Duplex .
$--------
- - - - - - - Ma sonry Dwellings , Duplex
- - - - - - - Churches & Reli gious Buildings .
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
$ ---+ltti08H-,-t:4rf-i0tttQr-1.Q1-t10't--
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Amusement & Recre ation Buildings
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
_ _ _ _..___ _ Stores & Other Merca ntile Buildings .
s --2~3,...:;7.,_,""'.,'4;-'A-o...,_o~o~
_ _ _ _.,___ _ Service Sta tions .
$
---1"""6.,_.,-e9.-..5fto_,.o'W'o~
_ _ _ _.,,___ _ Reside ntia l Garages & Ca rports
s _____,,,_,-'ll3-Ao•,-,j.o....o~
=l=----- Parking
$ ----<6~0",~0"*00-.O""Q,-
Ga rages .
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- - - - - - - Ga rage s .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Hotel & Motel Buildi ngs .
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
_ _ __.,.___ _ school & Educa tiona l Buildings .
$ ----<7f-fi0f-,+fl0O1-t18,....+011-1Qr-
_ _ ___.~-- Add-Al te r-Repair Schools .
$ ------t-15-.t0-t-:.-+QIHQr--
_ _ __._ _ _ Qffice Buildings .
$ ---t-12~2.,--,-Srt-01110t-.ttQttO-
_ _ ____._ _ _ Qffic e & Wa re house .
$
- - - - J . - - - Ut ili ty Buildi ngs .
s ---4,,_,. .,;florf"l
. o.--.ftoo-
-__,1...,,4....0....., 0....0-0-......0.....
0-
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- - - - - - - Indu strial Bui ldings.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ swimming Pools.
$ --------
87
- - - - - - - Fire Escapes Elevators & Signs
$ _ __..7'-'4~,~9=4=4....,-o-o_
___
2_S_O_ _ _ Add-Alter-Repair, Residential .
$ _ _4~3~2.....,_s_o_6~·o_o_
___4_0___ _
$
-~l~i-1...,,_2-s-9_,_o_o_
$
--~1-1~,,-c,4~0~0........0-Q_
Add- Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs . .
____B
____ Demolitions-Business Buildings .
,... 1; .. ; ..... _ ...
27
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- - - ~ - - - Add- Alter-Repa ir Churches
T"\ _ _
6
$--------
- - - - - - - Apa rtment Houses . · .
71
HOUSED
_n ..... ... :...J ..... _.,;,..., 1
0 .. .. :1...J : ......... ~
1q_21n_nn
-107 _
---
�CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECT OR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
FOR
THE
MONTH
NO. OF PERMITS
1
OF
DECEMBER, 1966
CLASSIFICATION
COST
Condominum
$______1__
Js__..__
oo_._b_.
·. ,b= o;._
·
____
2.._7___ Frame Dwellings, 1 Family .
$ ---+-4~2+1-,1....9.....0...........
00""-
- - - - - - - M a s o n r y Dwellings, 1 Family
$ --------
- - - - - - - F r a m e Dwellings , Duplex.
$- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - ¥ a s o n r y Dwellings, Duplex
$ --------
NO. OF FAMILIES
HOUSED
6
27
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Apartment Houses. · .
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- - - - - - - C h u r c h e s & Reli gious Buildings .
_ _ ___._ _ _ Add-Alter-Repair Churches
$ ---+1}01+18*"-,--l>4ettOttQ-,.0'*0½-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Amus ement & Recreation Buildings
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
_ _ _ _,.___ _ scores & Other Mercantile Buildings .
s --21-'13f-T-7-',1~si-flo,....,.of'Wo-
_ _ _ _.,___ _ Service Stations .
s ---1'H6r-fl9Hi_5cAO-,.Of"l-jO1
- - - ~ - - - R e s i de ntial Garages & Carports
$ ----'7r,-'l3~0....
,-,.of"l-jo-
'!=----Parking Garages .
$
Garages .
$- - - - - - - -
---u6cw-O'""',o,,..o""o.....ok,Ko-
$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- - - - - - - H o t e l & Motel Buildings.
_ _ ___,,,___ _ school & Educational Buildings .
$ ----,17'+-10..,.,H10O1--t10+.-+1811-10-
_ _ _____..__ _ Add-Alter-Repa ir Schools .
$
t-15""'0+-.-+1811-tO-
"'~--Office Buildings .
$
--}t-;2,-,;2>-,.....
SR,oo-.O*O-
_ _ ____,_ _ _ office & Wa rehouse.
$
- - 1......4~0-,,QRi()Flf'()½-.-A()AO-
---.......a.---Utility Buildings .
$ -----#r4-,51r40'W'0......41
0AO$ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- - - - - - - I n d u s t r i a l Buildings.
Swimming Pools .
$- - - - - - - -
87
Fire
$ _ _....7c..;;:4"-l,....9=4=4:..o.•.w0....
O_
Escapes Elevators & Signs
280
s __4....,J...2...,....a...0.....6....o...,o..__
40
s -~J.....1....1_,,....2....s"""9....,....o.....
o_
8
s --~1~1...,,~4_0_0___00_
s ___19____.,2_1~0......a_n_
- - - - - - - Add-Alter-Repair, Residential.
- - - - - - - A d d -Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs ..
Demolitions-Business Buildings .
71
Demolitions-Residential
Buildings .
Total Perm.its
5_34~----
-107
Total Cost ...$.....__ __,,_2,...1-jl~7u,9,-..,-'J~e~41..e.-1-011-01--Total No. of Families Housed _ _ _ _ _.......,,,__-,!_...,,......
33
W. R. WOFFORD
FO"'M NO . 4-2
I ~/;
f)
Insp ector o f Buildings
�CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
FOR
THE
MONTH
NO. OF PERMITS
1.
27
1
87
280
40
8
71
Total Permits
0 F
DECEMBER. 1966
CLASSIFICATION
COST
Condominum
$
bd
·I·
.135 , oop
.,_..
Frame Dwellings, 1 Family .
$
Masonry Dwellings , 1 Family
$
Frame Dwellings , Duplex .
$
Masonry Dwellings, Duplex
$
Apartment Houses . · .
$
Churches & Religious Buildings .
$
Add-Alter-Repa ir Churches
$
Amusement & Recrea tion Buildings
$
Stores & Other Mercantile Buildings .
$
237.750.00
Service Stations .
$
16.9:50.00
Residential Garages & Carports
$
7.305.00
Parking Ga rages .
$
60,000.00
Garages .
$
Hotel & Motel Buildings .
$
School & E duca tiona l Buildings .
$
70,000.00
Add-Alter-Repair Schools .
$
1s0.00
Office Buildings .
$
122,soo.oo
Office & Wa reh ouse .
$
140,000.00
Utility Buildings .
$
4,500.00
Industrial Buildings .
$
Swimming Pools .
$
Fire Escapes E levators & Signs
$
74,944 00
Add-Alter-Repair, Residential .
$
432,806,00
Add- Alter-Repai r, Business Bldgs . .
$
317,259,00
Demolitions-Business Buildings .
$
11,400.QO
Demolitions-Residential Buildings .
$
12,210.00
. _5-4.3""'4_____
Total Cos t
NO . OF FAMILIES
HOUSED
6
421.190.00-
27
108,400.00
-107
~$----,2~
, l1:-i7~91h,. .,)H!61"14,
., -, 1c181"10-0
Total No. of Families Housed - - - - - - - -......- - - ~
33
I fo ,
1
W. R. WOFFORD
FOP'-1 NO. 4- 2
Inspector of Buildings
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
FOR THE MONTH OF —__»ppepvpee te¢6—
NO. OF PERMITS CLASSIFICATION COST . NO. OF FAMILIES
re HOUSED
$ 135,000.00 6
Ce
—_____27____ Frame Dwellings, 1 Family. ......... S 491-190-007
+ . 27
—__ ls Condominum
Masonry Dwellings, 1 Family. ........ $
Frame Dwellings, Duplex .
Masonry Dwellings, Duplex .
Apartment Houses .
Churches & Religious Buildings .
—____ 2. __Add-Alter-Repair Churches .
Amusement & Recreation Buildings
—_____1_______ Stores & Other Mercantile Buildings . .
—___—__—]___ Service’ Stations .
—_______5 ___ Residential Garages & Carports .
4 Parking Garages .
Garages .
Hotel & Motel Buildings .
—____l1_ __ School & Educational Buildings .
—___] _Add-Alter-Repair Schools. . . 1.1...
—_ ___ 4_____ fice Buildings .
oo ES ities & Warehouse .
—__] __ Utility Buildings .
Industrial Buildings .
Swimming Pools .
Fire Escapes Elevators & Signs
Add-Alter-Repair, Residential .
Add-Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs... .. .
Demolitions-Business Buildings .
CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
FOR THE
MONTH OF —-—ykexmpkn,—1966—
NO. OF PERMITS CLASSIFICATION
1 Condominum
—___2]7_ ____ Frame Dwellings, 1 Family .
Masonry Dwellings, 1 Family .
Frame Dwellings, Duplex. .
Masonry Dwellings, Duplex . .
Apartment Houses .
Churches & Religious Buildings .
—__2 _Add-Alter-Repair Churches .
Amusement & Recreation Buildings
—_____i,_____ Stores & Other Mercantile Buildings .
Service: Stations :.. «
—_____ 5. ____ Residential Garages & Carports .
1 Parking Garages .
Garages .
Hotel & Motel Buildings .
—__ 1 __ School & Educational Buildings .
—_____]__Add-Alter-Repair Schools . .
—_____2__ Office Buildings .
a ee ee Sc Warehouse ai a 2 ey ake se
—____] __ Utility Buildings .
Industrial Buildings .
Swimming Pools .
87 Fire Escapes Elevators & Signs
280 Add-Alter-Repair, Residential .
40 : :
Add-Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs..... .
8 Demolitions-Business Buildings .
71
Demolitions-Residential Buildings .
Total Permits 534
FOPM NO, 4-2
COST
$ 135,000.00
NO. OF FAMILIES
HOUSED
6
$ 74,944.00
$ —__ 432,806.00 —
$317,259.00
$ —____11, 400.00
$ ___19,210.00 —
Total Cost $ __2, 179 364,99
Total No. of Families Housed
33
lf
W. R. WOFFORD
Inspector of Buildings
CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
NO. OF PERMITS CLASSIFICATION
1 Condominum
—_____27._______ Frame Dwellings, 1 Family. . .
Masonry Dwellings, 1 Family .
Frame Dwellings, Duplex .
Masonry Dwellings, Duplex .
Apartment Houses .
Churches & Religious Buildings .
/ 2 Add-Alter-Repair Churches .
Amusement & Recreation Buildings
5 Stores & Other Mercantile Buildings. . . .
a EE Service. Stations 2 if <i Go aire geke es Se
—_____5_____ Residential Garages & Carports . . .
1 Parking Garages .
Garages...
Hotel & Motel Buildings .
a School's Educational Buildings .
—____]_ __ Add-Alter-Repair Schools .
—__—__2______ Office Buildings .
oe 5 Serres & Warehouse .
pe es edlity Buildings. - 2
Industrial Buildings .
Swimming Pools .
87 Fire Escapes Elevators & Signs
280 Add-Alter-Repair, Residential .
40 ‘
Add-Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs......
8 Demolitions-Business Buildings .
71
Demolitions-Residential Buildings .
Total Permits 534 =
FOPM NO, 4-2
- $——421-190-00°
COST
$ 135,000.00
NO. OF FAMILIES
HOUSED
Sel 26
——_7-——
Total Cost $—___2, 179,364.99
Total No. of Families Housed
34
, »y>—
W. R. WOFFORD
Inspector of Buildings
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 54
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 179,364.99
Date: 33
Date: 34
Date: the month
Date: the month of —__»ppepvpee
Event: 6
Event: 8 demolitions-business buildings
Event: add-alter-repair
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: —___2]7
Geopolitical Entity: duplex
Geopolitical Entity: garages
Geopolitical Entity: mercantile buildings
Geopolitical Entity: sc warehouse
Law: 190-00
Organization: __
Organization: —_____1
Organization: —___—__—
Organization: —__2
Organization: & warehouse
Organization: add-alter-repair churches
Organization: add-alter-repair schools
Organization: amusement & recreation
Organization: apartment houses
Organization: buildings
Organization: business bldgs
Organization: churches & religious buildings
Organization: city of atlanta report of the inspector of buildings office
Organization: demolitions-residential buildings
Organization: hotel & motel buildings
Organization: industrial buildings
Organization: inspector of buildings
Organization: inspector of buildings city of atlanta report of
Organization: office buildings
Organization: residential garages & carports
Organization: school & educational buildings
Organization: school's
Organization: serres & warehouse
Organization: service’ stations
Organization: stores & other mercantile buildings
Organization: swimming pools
Organization: the inspector of buildings office
Person: _
Person: —_____5
Person: frame dwellings
Person: masonry dwellings
Person: total no.
Person: utility buildings
Person: w. r.
Person: w. r. wofford
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/2698cca648a1b37dd079f3d029c8f180.pdf
3e87f00010a94eda0abfbe5fa9420ef1
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
City 0£ .A tl ~nt ·
.{OUSL. G COD
Pol icy an
I.
G
CO. !l)LIL'CE PROG::'-1:,.;_,1
Pr o c edure Guide
2
'.::.::d::,'c!::: eff orts i1mnediatel y t o sec re µubl ic unders t and i ns o.c
,d benefits of the Housing Co d e Complia nce Program throu gl
L .. ,:
us e
.-a.l s
0.::
)c rs ona l contact, pamphlets, pres s releases and other public i r:L, .:-, .. ;:. .::icn
E.
',:;.~x i r:i_,m coo r dination i mmediately \·1 it h all other public a g enci.cs F .:o
';) 1;::
aff2 cted by , and need to assist in , the conduct and results or ::::~-
~:; r ogran1 .
c.
Co n s ervation of those residential structures in g ood conditio n c o ? ~2v2~=
t,, e s p read of blig ht and decay through encouragen:ent of maintenance -~ i:::o:::t s
_,1d p rote ction from those conditions s uch as overcrowd ing and ur:a_, .:: ~·,,:, :,: ized
conver sion whi ch l ead to blight.
~~habilit ation of al l substandard residential structures whi c h
,)
- ....·.
.._ y
,.:i.suit able for humgn habitation but where i mp rovements c an be ma~2
.c·..:asonable cost
o bring them up to standard gnd where such ren.a;~ :. :'.. i.: .::...o.
d es not conflict with other c omr,1unity g oals by 1971.
~ emo : ition within the C~ty limit s of At l anta o f all residenti al s =r~c - ~res
1'. ic h are unfit for human habit a tion and where rehabilitation wc _i u
j _
t1 rohi · it i vely expensive or would otherwise conflict with other c o::n::..:.,.it: y
boab by 1971.
?
·ievi e:,-; and re - evaluation beg innin g in ·1967 on a continuing basis of t:Dse
�rehab ilitation areas which have been treate<l in previous ye a r s t o
determine their need f or possible f uture systematic re i nitiatio n of
total rehab ilitation effort.
II.
' -:
Ar eas and Pr iorities:
A.
The Hous ing Conditions Map reflecting the survey made in 1963 has been
brought up - to -date.
In this revision, close coo rdination has been
developed between the Planning Department , the Ho using Code Division
and the Direct or of Government a l Liais on.
This has re s ul ted i n an
i~p roved p l an for a city-wide , systematic, comprehens i ve Hous ing Code
Compliance Prog ram.
The basic map o f the revised survey indi c a t es on
a block basis the following c ategories .
1.
Conservat ion (Areas whi ch principally require either no i mprcv e;-;-,ents
or only mino r improveme nts with occas ional rehabilitation).
2.
Intensive Conservatio n (tho se areas which because of certa in £a c to rs
such as age , transition i n occupancy or use, or adverse frin ge
influences, etc., require a g r eate r amount of surveill ance i n o rder
to fores tall blight and decay.
These areas wi ll normally re qu ire
only minor i mproveme nts and spot rehabil it ation).
3.
Rehab ilitat ion (tho e areas in which the majority of struc ure '
requi re rehabilitation wh ich does not excee d 50 per c ent of t he i~
v al ue; some spot c learance is anticipated) .
4.
Clear a nce - Code Enforcement (predominately s maller areas wh~re
t he ma jority of structures should be cleared and the area rede veloped.
It is ant icip ated that the se areas would be cleared
2
1- 1-67
�through code compl iance wit h emphasis . on demol i tion .
The o n i y
other co rre ctive actions to be take n are t 1ose to allevia te
ha zard s and to protect the hea lth a nd s afe ty of re s idents i ~ t h~
area ).
5.
Clearance - Tit l e I Urban Re newa l (tho se areas in which t he r.,aj ority
of structures should be demolished, with some rehabilitation, and
whe re the size and cost of the cont emplat ed action jus t i f i es ·-he
use of Title I federal funds).
B.
The map als o shows division of the city into halves, for supervi so r
re spo ns ibility ; each of these halves is sub-divided into five Sectors .
Each of these Se ctors is ass i gned to a Hous ing Code Inspector, as his
area of individual responsibility.
Co
Th e map als o has on it areas of various sizes outlined showing the
ne i ghb orho od desi gnation with numbers rang ing from
1
65 to
1
69 .
These
a re as indic ate where and when an intensive program of systematic housing
code compl i ance is to be undertaken on a house to house basi s .
Tne
target date assigned to a particular area indicates its relative ry riority .
Those with a high priority ha ve an ear ly dat e; those with a lower p r iority,
a later date .
Pr io rit i es f or the areas have been based on:
1.
The numbe r of compl i ance inspections which t he Housing Co de division
c a n undertake in one year, wh ile maint a ining full cit y-wide cove rage.
2o
The relat ionship of rehabilitat i on areas to s ur rounding or i nte rnal
c ommunity a ctivities , communi ty facil i ty development or Title I
Urban Renewal Projects.
3
1- 1- 6 7
�3.
Gene ral conditions in the part icul ar area .
Those with t ie wos c
pre ssing rehabilitation needs will be undertaken first.
4.
The long range goa l of complete housing code ins pection o f subst ~n<lard
dwel lings by 1970 and compliance in all designat ed rehab i litation areas
by 1971.
5.
An add itional consideration in subsequent revisions will be the need
in the future for more treatment in areas previously covered as blight
reoccurs .
This item represents the first step in the changeover fr om
a program with a fixed completion date to one on a continuin g ba sis .
D.
Proposed Community Facility Locations:
A map has been prepared which indicates the location of all proposed
commu nity facilities and highways (exclusive of urban renewal projects)
in the City of Atlanta .
The locations have been indexed and co l o r coded
to identify them and to indicate the agency responsible for their execution .
III.
Or Ganizat ion and Administration
A.
Organiz a tion and Personnel for Housing Code Comp l iance, Department of
Buildings
1.
Supervisor of Inspection Services
2.
Pe rsonnel, Housing Code Division
a.
Chief Inspector (1)
b.
Field Supervisors (2)
c.
Housing Code Sector Inspectors (10)
d.
Housing Code Insp e ctors General (6)
e.
Hous ing Code Inspect or II (1)
Compliance Office r )
f.
Concentration Area Inspectors (10)
4
(assigned to Co des
1-1- 6 7
�r-g.
3.
B.
Clerical Personnel
( 8)
Re lQted Personnel
a.
~ehab ilitation Spe ci a list
b.
Codes Comp liance Officer
( 1)
(1)
Duties and Resp onsibilitie s:
l .
Supervis or of Inspection Se r vices.
Overall supervision of all
f orms of code enforcement such as plumbing and building uit h
pr i mary emphasis on Housing Code Enforcement, including
c oord ination with other Departments.
2.
Pers o nnel , Housing Code Division:
ao
Chief Insp e ctor
(1)
Overall supervision of i nspections,
field work and administration.
(2 )
Coordination of relocation efforts
with Atlanta Housing Authorit y .
(3)
Pursuit of resolution o f di ff icult cases.
( 4)
Direct sup e rvision of clerical p er sonnel
(5)
Coordination with Codes Comp liance Officer;
R~habi lit eian Sp ei 11st .
(6)
Training progra m for new Housing Code Inspectors .
(7)
Coordinat ion with other Divisions of Departme nt o f
Building s.
b.
Field Supervisors
(1)
Dire c t supervis ion of five inspectors and their sectors
comprising one - half(~) o f the City .
5
1- 1- 6 7
�·(2 )
Supervision o f intensive program teams and Inspectors
General when operating in their on~-half (\) of t he Ci ty .
(3)
In-Service tra ining f or inspectors to include principles
of Housing Code Enforcement, selection and scheduling of
work, and standardization of requirements and acceptances.
(4)
General conduct of housing code compliance program within
their one-half(~) of the City.
(5)
Assistance in resolution of difficult cases.
(6)
Assistance in preparation of court cases when requested
by Code Compliance Officer.
(7)
c.
Other special duties as assigned by Chief Inspector.
Housing Code Inspector II
(1)
Assigned to Codes Compliance Officer to assist in preparation
of cases for Court.
d.
Housing Code Sector Inspectors:
(1)
Conduct of Housing Code Compliance Program in their sector .
(2)
Primary responsibility for resolution of all cases and
comp liants in their sectors.
(3)
Prepare cases f or presentation before the Better Hous ing
Commission and City Att orney.
(4)
e.
Assist in preparing court cases.
Housing Code Inspectors General
(1)
Investig ate , document and prepare cases f or present ation
to Court and appear as witness , at time of trial (th ree
inspectors and one Housing Code Inspector II assi gned
f or this purpose)
(2)
Preparation of cases for
11
In Rem11 proceeding s and J,:!r~olit ion
Gra nt Program (three inspectors assigned to these .::u ac t ions .
6
1- 1-· 6 7
�- - - ------ ---- - - ··-
£.
Intensive Program Housing Code Inspecto,rs
(1)
Operate as team me mbers
(2)
Conduct housing code comp liance prog ram in rehabilitation
areas according to scheduled priorities.
g.
Clerica l Personne l
(1)
Process notices, letters, records and prepare period ic
reports.
(2)
Receive telephone calls, prepare lists for Better Housing
Commission hearings, City Attorney h earings and Court .
(3)
h.
Record minutes of Better Housing Commission meetings.
Related Personnel
(1)
Rehabilitation Specialist
(a)
Public relations--(promoting good maintenance a nd
Housing Code Enforcement~
(b)
(2)
Inspection o f apartment developments (30 unit s and up) .
Codes Compliance Officer
(a)
Re sponsible for preparation and conduct (including
attendance in Court) o f Housing Code Court c as es with
assistance from Housing Code Ins pect ors and Suporviso~y
Pers onnel.
(b)
Advises Housing Code Division on requirements f o r
pro se cution o f cases in c ourt, appropria tene s s of
speci f ic c ase s f o r Court action a nd p r ep a r a t ion o f
charg es.
7
1-1-67
�(c)
Prepares Court calendars and reports on result s of
Housing Code Court hea rings.
C.
Not ices and Follow-up Action
Inspectors will use standard methods and prescribed time interv als as
a guide for their processing of cases.
Written procedure is on file
in the Housing Code Division.
D.
Coordina tion
1.
Re loc ation:
Inspectors will fill out slips (on AHA standard form) to be s i gned
and forwarded by the Chief Inspector to the Housing Authority for
relocation assistance to the families threatened with displacement
by Housing Code Enforcement, such as placarding occupied units, when
a dire ctive is issued to reduce the number of occupants and/or units,
when demo lit ion is :imminent, and for other reasons.
2.
Community Facilities
Chief Inspector will consult map s howing location of propos ed and
s ched ule d conmrunity facilities; will determine agency responsible
for execution; and consult and coordinate with that agency to
d
rmi ne exact extent and st atus of project and th
app r opriate
Housing Code Comp liance Program for the areas at that time.
3.
Publi c Hous ing
No Hous ing Code Inspections required.
(Existing units 8874 ; unde r
construction 650; planned 1140).
4.
Municipal Servi ces
In conduct of the Ho using Code Comp li ance Program, Inspecto rs wil l
8
1- 1-67
�be alert for needed improvements in municipal servic es and
other such prob l ems .
Need will be re cor"d ed and referred by the
Ch ief Inspector to the appropriate governi.uental agency.
Poss i ble referral agenc i es are:
5.
a.
Sanit ary Department
b.
Construc tion Department
c.
Traffi c & Street Light s Department
d.
Pol i ce Department
e.
Water Department
f.
Fire Department
g.
Parks Department
h.
Board of Education
i.
County Departments of Family and Children Services
j.
County Health Departments
Data Bank
The Housing Code Division will participate continua lly ir.. furnish ing
certain types of information, obtained in conne ction wit h its normal
a ctivities, to be place d in the data bank.
E.
Comp la int s
Al l Housing Code complaints received will be recorded on forms provided
and investigated within.one week and appropriate action initiated i mmediately .
F.
Wr itten procedure i s on file in the Housing Code Divi sion .
Handling Unres olved Cases
At the end of each quarter, Sector Inspectors will thoroughl y review their
unresolved case files and de termine what positive action sho uld be taken.
9
1-1-67
�Procedu re for handling unresolved cases is on file in the Housing
Code Division.
IV.
Area Housing Code Compliance Policies
A.
Ge neral:
1.
Placard promptly vacant substandard units and structures
considered unfit for occupancy and cause utility services
to be discontinued.
2.
Promptly report to the Better Housing Commission and to the
Atlanta Housing Authority Relocation Housing Office (for
relocation of families) those occupied units and structures
considered unfit for occupancy.
3.
In order to keep abreast of changing conditions conducive to
det erioration and blight, ea ch Inspector will endeavor t o
observe his entire Sector and initiate corrective action a s
ne ede d.
4.
I t is a nticipated that e a ch Sector Inspe ct or will pr oce s s a
minimum o f 20 new Housing Code major improvement cases per
ca l enda r month, and comply an e qual number per month out s ide
of r~ bil i t ation areas in which t
ms ar e work ing,
Eff ort
should b e made where feasible to ke ep each Sector Ins pec tor 1 s
workload of uncomp l eted act i ve notice s to approx i mat ely 200 .
All Se ct o r Ins pe ctor s combine d should comp ly at l east 3500
units per year .
B.
Conservation Areas (See Ho us ing Map):
1.
Inspecto r wil l encourage maintenance and conserva tio n
10
1-1-67
�verbally where early signs of blight appear but no val id
code violation exists.
2.
Housing Code inspection to be made primarily on a compl a::_nt
basis.
C.
Intensive Conservation Areas (See Housing Map)
1.
Housing Code inspections to be made based on an apparent need.
Accent to be conservation rather than waiting until reh abi litation
is necessary; Inspector will give more attention to details to
discover any signi f icant changes conducive to blight in t hese
areas.
2.
Inspector will encourage maintenance and conservation verbally
where early signs of blight appear but where no valid code
violation exists.
3.
These areas will be closely examined fo~ consideration as possible
future federally assisted code enforcement projects under t he 1964
Housing Act.
D.
Rehabilitation Areas (See Housing Map)
1.
These areas have been designated according to priority of need
and pl aced on a schedule.
2.
(See Map)
The se areas will be intensively covered house by house by
insp e ctors of an intensive program team (2 - 4 men).
3.
Conduct of Compliance Prog ram
a.
All Housing units in rehabilitation are a s will be i ns pe ct e d
and nece ss a ry comp lia nce notices issued or st a tement issued
t ha t p ro pe rty is i n satis f actory condition .
11
1-1- 67
�-
-
- · -
-
· ·
-
·
-
- ·
b.
It is anti c ipated that t hree larg e 3:reas ( appro x i ma · ely
7000 unit~
and t ree s mall areas ( approximately
1900 unit~
will be covere d this year ( approx i reate
t o tal 8900 ).
Any c ases remaining unresolved a t t h e end
o f t h is year will be assigned to Sector Inspector fo r
resolution.
c.
It is anticipated that each Team Inspector will make
approximately 7 new insp e ctions or 7 first follow-u p
inspections per day .
4.
These areas Hill be closely e xamined for consideration as possible
future federa lly assisted code enforcement projects under t he 19 64
Hous ing Act .
E.
Clearance - Code En f orcement Areas ( See Housing Map )
1.
2.
Enforce Code only to:
a.
Placard where warranted a nd seek demolition.
b.
Co rre ct h azards .
c.
Reduce overcrowd ing.
d.
Vacat e unf it unit s .
e.
Clean up premises .
Discourage rehabi litat i on action in indust rial ly zoned areas ,
especial ly in marginal cases.
3.
Se ek max i mum coordination with other divi s ions of Building
Department to discourag e improvements other than to co r r ec t
hazards of any housing units and structures in areas.
12
1- 1- 67
�·;,
Clearance - Title I Urban Renewal
1.
Prop os ed and Planning Stage Projects (See Housjng Map ):
Enforce Code only to:
2.
a.
Placard where warranted and seek demolition.
b.
Correct hazards.
c.
Redu ce overcrowding .
d.
Vacate unf it units.
e.
Clean up premises.
Urban Renewal Projects in Exe cution (See Housing Map):
a.
Issue no notices unless instructed othen,ise by Chief
Ins pe ctor (usually upon request of Atlanta Housing
Authorit y ).
G.
Community Facility Locations, including Public Housing (See
Community Facility Map ):
1.
Scheduled for construction or property being acquired
a.
Chief Inspe ctor will consult map showing location o f
proposed and schedu l ed community fa cilities; will
determine agency responsible for execution; and
consult and coordinate wit h that agency to det ermine
exact extent and status of proj ect and the appropriate
Housing Code Comp li ance Program for the areas at that
time .
b.
Norma lly Inspector will issue no notices unl ess instructed
othen,ise by Chief Inspector.
13
1-1 - 67
�--- - - - ---· - - - ·- ·-- -··-· .
2.
Planned - construction anti cipated but ~ot scheduled
a.
Ch i ef Inspector will consult map showing location of
proposed and scheduled com..rnunity facilities; will
determine 2.gency responsible for execution; and
consult and coordinate with that agency to determine
exact extent and status of project and the appropria te
Housing Code Comp liance Program for the areas at that
time.
b.
Normal action will be to enforce Code only to :
(1)
Placard where warranted and seek demolitio n.
(2)
Correct hazards,
(3)
Redu ce overcrowd ing.
(4)
Vacate unfit units.
(5)
Clean up premises.
14
1- 1-67
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
Policy and Procedure Guide
January
Goals:
A. Maximem efforts immediately to BBeVee public understanding of the .sals
and benefits of the Housing Code Compliance Program throug
personal contact, pamphlets, press releases and other public informecicn
wedia. |
B. Maxirum coordination immediately with all other public agencies wio vill
be affected by, and need to assist in, the conduct and results of tric
C. Conservation of those residential structures in good condition to srevent
tue spread of blight and decay through encouragement of maintenance efforts
and protection from those conditions such as overcrowding and unascnorized
conversion which lead to blight.
D. kehabilitation of all substandard residential structures which are otis «2.
unsuitable for human habitation but where improvements can be mace ic
reasonable cost to bring them up to standard and where such reharilicaczuon
does not conflict with other community goals by 1971.
n
£. Remolition within the City limits of Atlanta of all residential strucctur
wnich are unfit for human habitation and where rehabilitation weule de
prohibitively expensive or would otherwise conflict with other conmunicy
foals by L971.
rr
'
¢
tn
fo
*, Revicw and re-evaluation beginning in 1967 on a continuing basis of
3
ET.
4
rehabilitation areas which have been treated in previous years to
determine their need for possible future systematic reinitiation of
total rehabilitation effort.
Areas and Priorities:
A.
The Housing Conditions Map reflecting the survey made in 1963 has been
brought up-to-date. In this revision, close coordination has been
developed between the Planning Department, the Housing Code Division
and the Director of Governmental Liaison. This has resulted in an
improved plan for a city-wide, systematic, comprehensive Housing Code
Compliance Program. The basic map of the revised survey indicates on
a block basis the following categories.
1. Conservation (Areas which principally require either no imprcvements
or only minor improvements with occasional rehabilitation).
Intensive Conservation (those areas which because of certain factors
such as age, transition in occupancy or use, or adverse fringe
influences, etc., require a greater amount of surveillance in order
to forestall blight and decay. These areas will normally requir
only minor improvements and spot rehabilitation).
Rehabilitation (those areas in which the majority of structures
require rehabilitation which does not exceed 50 percent of their
value; some spot clearance is anticipated).
Clearance - Code Enforcement (predominately smaller areas where
the majority of structures should be cleared and the area rede-
veloped. It is anticipated that these areas would be cleared
through code compliance with emphasis on demolition. The oniy
other corrective actions to be taken are those to alleviate
hazards and to protect the health and safety of residents in the
area).
5. Clearance - Title I Urban Renewal (those areas in which the majority
of structures should be demolished, with some rehabilitation, and
where the size and cost of the contemplated action justifies the
use of Title I federal funds).
The map also shows division of the city into halves, for supervisor
responsibility; each of these halves is sub-divided into five Sectors.
Each of these Sectors is assigned to a Housing Code Inspector, as his
area of individual responsibility.
The map also has on it areas of various sizes outlined showing the
neighborhood designation with numbers ranging from ‘65 to '69. These
areas indicate where and when an intensive program of systematic housing
code compliance is to be undertaken on a house to house basis. The
target date assigned to a particular area indicates its relative priority.
Those with a high priority have an early date; those with a lower priority,
a later date.
Priorities for the areas have been based on:
1. The number of compliance inspections which the Housing Code division
can undertake in one year, while maintaining full city-wide coverage,
2. The relationship of rehabilitation areas to surrounding or internal
community activities, community facility development or Title I
Urban Renewal Projects.
3. General conditions in the particular area. Those with the most
skevciae rehabilitation needs will be undertaken first,
4. The long range goal of complete housing code inspection of substandard
dwellings by 1970 and compliance in all designated rehabilitation areas
by 1971.
5. An additional consideration in subsequent revisions will be the need
in the future for more treatment in areas previously covered as blight
reoccurs, This item represents the first step in the changeover from
program with a fixed completion date to one on a continuing basis.
fo
D. Proposed Community Facility Locations:
a map has been prepared which indicates the location of all proposed
community facilities and highways (exclusive of urban renewal projects)
in the City of Atlanta. The locations have been indexed and color coded
to identify them and to indicate the agency responsible for their execution.
Ill. Organization and Administration
A. Organization and Personnel for Housing Code Compliance, Department of
Buildings
1. Supervisor of Inspection Services
2. Personnel, Housing Code Division
a. Chief Inspector (1)
b. Field Supervisors (2)
c. Housing Code Sector Inspectors (10)
d. Housing Code Inspectors General (6)
e. Housing Code Inspector II (1) (assigned to Codes
Compliance Officer)
Concentration Area Inspectors (10)
Fh
®
g. Clerical Personnel (8)
3. Related Personnel
a. Rehabilitation Specialist (1)
b. Codes Compliance Officer (1)
Duties and Responsibilities:
L. Supervisor of Inspection Services. Overall supervision of ail
forms of code enforcement such as plumbing and building with
primary emphasis on Housing Code Enforcement, including
coordination with other Departments,
2. Personnel, Housing Code Division:
a. Chief Inspector
(1) Overall supervision of inspections,
field work and administration.
(2} Coordination of relocation efforts
with Atlanta Housing Authority.
(3) Pursuit of resolution of difficult cases.
(4) Direct supervision of clerical personnel
(5) Goordinatton with Codes Compliance Officer;
Rehabilitation Specialist.
(6) Training program for new Housing Code Inspectors.
(7) Coordination with other Divisions of Department of
Buildings.
b. Field Supervisors
(1) Direct supervision of five inspectors and their sectors
comprising one-half (%) of the City.
Ce
(2)
(3)
(7)
Supervision of intensive program teams and Inspectors
General when operating in their one-half (4%) of the City.
In-Service training for inspectors to include principles
of Housing Code Enforcement, selection and scheduling of
work, and standardization of requirements and acceptances.
General conduct of housing code compliance program within
their one~half (%) of the City.
Assistance in resolution of difficult cases.
Assistance in preparation of court cases when requested
by Code Compliance Officer.
Qther special duties as assigned by Chief Inspector.
Housing Code Inspector II
(1)
Assigned to Codes Compliance Officer to assist in preparation
of cases for Court.
Housing Code Sector Inspectors:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Conduct of Housing Code Compliance Program in their sector.
Primary responsibility for resolution of all cases and
compliants in their sectors,
Prepare cases for presentation before the Better Housing
Commission and City Attorney.
Assist in preparing court cases.
Housing Code Inspectors General
(1)
(2)
Investigate, document and prepare cases for presentation
to Court and appear as witness. at time of trial (three
inspectors and one Housing Code Inspector II assigned
for this purpose)
Preparation of cases for "In Rem proceedings and Derolitian
Grant Program (three inspectors assigned to these ‘unctions.
6 L-1L-67
intensive Program Housing Code Inspectors
(1) Operate as team members
(2) Conduct housing code compliance program in rehabilitation
areas according to scheduled priorities.
Clerical Personnel
(1) Process notices, letters, records and prepare periodic
reports.
(2) Receive telephone calls, prepare lists for Better Housing
Commission hearings, City Attorney hearings and Court.
(3) Record minutes of Better Housing Commission meetings.
Related Personnel
(1) Rehabilitation Specialist
(a) Public relations--(promoting good maintenance and
Housing Code Enforcement)
(b) Inspection of apartment developments (30 units and up).
(2) Codes Compliance Officer
(a) Responsible for preparation and conduct (including
attendance in Court) of Housing Code Court cases with
assistance from Housing Code Inspectors and Supervisory
Personnel,
(b) Advises Housing Code Division on requirements for
prosecution of cases in court, appropriateness of
specific cases for Court action and preparation of
charges.
(c) Prepares Court calendars and reports on results of
Housing Code Court hearings.
Notices and Follow-up Action
Inspectors will use standard methods and prescribed time intervals as
4
a
guide for their processing of cases. Written procedure is on file
in the Housing Code Division.
Coordination
Ie
Relocation:
Inspectors will fill out slips (on AHA standard form) to be signed
and forwarded by the Chief Inspector to the Housing Authority for
relocation assistance to the families threatened with displacement
by Housing Code Enforcement, such as placarding occupied units, when
a directive is issued to reduce the number of occupants and/or units,
when demolition is imminent, and for other reasons.
Community Facilities
Chief Inspector will consult map showing Location of proposed and
scheduled community facilities; will determine agency responsible
for execution; and consult and coordinate with that agency to
determine exact extent and status of project and the appropriate
Housing Code Compliance Program for the areas at that time.
Public Housing
No Housing Code Inspections required. (Existing units 8874; under
construction 650; planned 1140).
Municipal Services
In conduct of the Housing Code Compliance Program, Inspectors will
8 L-1-67
be alert for needed improvements in municipal services and
other such problems. Need will be recorded and referred by the
Chief Inspector to the appropriate governmental agency.
Possible referral agencies are:
a. Sanitary Department
b. Construction Department
c. Traffic & Street Lights Department
d. Police Debereuene:
e. Water Department
f£. Fire Department
g. Parks Department
h. Board of Education
i. County Departments of Family and Children Services
j. County Health Departments
5. Data Bank
The Housing Code Division will participate continually in furnishing
certain types of information, obtained in connection with its normal
activities, to be placed in the data bank,
Complaints
{11 Housing Code complaints received will be recorded on forms provided
and investigated within,.one week and appropriate action initiated imme-
diately. Written procedure is on file in the Housing Code Division.
Handling Unresolved Cases
At the end of each quarter, Sector Inspectors will thoroughly review their
unresolved case files and determine what positive action should be taken,
9 L-1-67
IV.
Procedure for handling unresolved cases is on file in the Housing
Code Division.
Area Housing Code Compliance Policies
A. General:
1. Placard promptly vacant substandard units and structures
considered unfit for occupancy and cause utility services
to be discontinued.
2. Promptly report to the Better Housing Commission and to the
Atlanta Housing Authority Relocation Housing Office (for
relocation of families) those occupied units and structures
considered unfit for occupancy.
3. In order to keep abreast of changing conditions conducive to
deterioration and blight, each Inspector will endeavor to
observe his entire Sector and initiate corrective action as
needed,
4. It is anticipated that each Sector Inspector will process a
minimum of 20 new Housing Code major improvement cases per
calendar month, and comply an equal number per month outside
of rehabilitation areas in which teams are working. Effort
should be made where feasible to keep each Sector Inspector's
workload of uncompleted active notices to approximately 200.
All Sector Inspectors combined should comply at least 3500
units per year.
B. Conservation Areas (See Housing Map):
1. Inspector will encourage maintenance and conservation
10 L-1-67
4
verbally where early signs of blight appear but no valid
code violation exists.
Housing Code inspection to be made primarily on a complaint
basis.
Intensive Conservation Areas (See Housing Map)
Ls
Housing Code inspections to be made based on an apparent need.
Accent to be conservation rather than waiting until rehabilitation
is necessary; Inspector will give more attention to details to
discover any significant changes conducive to blight in these
areas,
Inspector will encourage maintenance and conservation verbally
where early signs of blight appear but where no valid code
violation exists.
These areas will be closely examined for consideration as possible
future federally assisted code enforcement projects under the 1964
Housing Act.
Rehabilitation Areas (See Housing Map)
These areas have been designated according to priority of need
and placed on a schedule. (See Map) —
These areas will be intensively covered house by house by
inspectors of an intensive program team (2 - 4 men).
Conduct of Compliance Program
a. All Housing units in rehabilitation areas will be inspected
and necessary compliance notices issued or statement issued
that property is in satisfactory condition.
il L-1-67
b. It is anticipated that three large areas (approximately
7000 units). .. and three small areas (approximately
1900 units) ' will be covered this year (approximate
total 8900). Any cases remaining unresolved at the end
of this year will be assigned to Sector Inspector for
resolution,
ce. it is anticipated that each Team Inspector will make
approximately 7 new inspections or 7 first follow-up
inspections per day.
These areas will be closely examined for consideration as possible
future federally assisted code enforcement projects under the 1964
Housing Act.
E, Clearance - Code Enforcement Areas (See Housing Map)
kL.
Enforce Code only to:
a. Placard where warranted and seek demolition.
b. Correct hazards.
c. Reduce overcrowding.
d. Vacate unfit units.
e, Clean up premises,
Discourage rehabilitation action in industrially zoned areas,
especially in marginal cases.
Seek maximum coordination with other divisions of Building
Department to discourage improvements other than to correct
hazards of any housing units and structures in areas,
12 L=1-67
Clearance - Title I Urban Renewal
1. Proposed and Planning Stage Projects (See Housing Map):
Enforce Code only to:
a. Placard where warranted and seek demolition,
b. Correct hazards,
c. Reduce overcrowding.
d. Vacate unfit units.
e. Clean up premises.
2. Urban Renewal Projects in Execution (See Housing Map):
a. Issue no notices unless instructed otherwise by Chief
Inspector (usually upon request of Atlanta Housing
Authority).
Community Facility Locations, including Public Housing (See
Community Facility Map):
1. Scheduled for construction or property being acquired
a. Chief Inspector will consult map showing location of
proposed and scheduled community facilities; will
determine agency responsible for execution; and
consult and coordinate with that agency to determine
exact extent and status of project and the appropriate
Housing Code Compliance Program for the areas at that
time.
b. Normally Inspector will issue no notices unless instructed
otherwise by Chief Inspector.
5
me
Planned - construction anticipated but not scheduled
Qe
b.
Chief Inspector will consult map showing location of
proposed and scheduled community facilities; will
determine agency responsible for execution; and
consult and coordinate with that agency to determine
exact extent and status of project and the appropriate
Housing Code Compliance Program for the areas at that
time.
Normal action will be to enforce Code only to:
(1) Placard where warranted and seek demolition,
(2) Correct hazards,
(3) Reduce overcrowding.
(4) Vacate unfit units.
(5) Clean up premises.
14
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 53
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 1140
Date: 1963
Date: 1964
Date: 1967
Date: 1970
Date: 1971
Date: 67
Date: 8874
Date: month
Date: previous years
Date: the end of each quarter
Event: codes compliance officer
Event: housing act
Event: housing code compliance program
Event: supervisory personnel
Event: the housing code compliance program
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: Atlanta
Geopolitical Entity: inspector
Geopolitical Entity: qther
Law: title i
Law: title i urban renewal projects
Organization: all sector inspectors
Organization: areas (see housing map)
Organization: Atlanta Housing Authority
Organization: better housing commission
Organization: building department
Organization: c. conservation
Organization: clearance - code enforcement areas
Organization: clearance - title i urban renewal
Organization: clerical personnel
Organization: codes compliance officer
Organization: community facility locations
Organization: complaints
Organization: conduct of compliance program
Organization: conduct of housing code compliance program
Organization: construction department
Organization: court
Organization: data bank
Organization: de
Organization: department of buildings 1
Organization: departments
Organization: departments of family and children services
Organization: divisions of department of buildings
Organization: execution (see housing map
Organization: follow-up action inspectors
Organization: housing
Organization: housing code compliance program
Organization: housing code court
Organization: housing code enforcement
Organization: housing code enforcement)
Organization: housing code inspector
Organization: housing code inspectors
Organization: housing code inspectors general
Organization: housing code sector inspectors
Organization: inspector
Organization: inspectors
Organization: inspectors general
Organization: l-1-67
Organization: l-1-67 iv
Organization: organization and administration a. organization
Organization: parks department h. board of education
Organization: personnel, housing code division
Organization: planning stage projects
Organization: preparation
Organization: prepares court
Organization: program housing code inspectors
Organization: public housing (see community facility
Organization: rehabilitation specialist
Organization: revicw
Organization: sanitary department
Organization: sector
Organization: sector inspector
Organization: sector inspector's
Organization: sector inspectors
Organization: sectors
Organization: seek
Organization: supervisor of inspection services 2
Organization: team inspector
Organization: the atlanta housing authority relocation housing office
Organization: the better housing commission
Organization: the housing authority for
Organization: the housing code compliance program
Organization: the housing code division
Organization: the planning department
Organization: traffic & street lights department
Organization: urban renewal projects
Organization: vacate
Person: a.
Person: a. maximem
Person: b. maxirum
Person: clerical personnel
Person: code
Person: code compliance officer
Person: codes compliance officer
Person: discourage
Person: effort
Person: governmental liaison
Person: inspector
Person: issue
Person: l. supervisor
Person: normally inspector
Person: placard
Person: reduce
Person: vacate
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/56983544c5f0ec38bb1374bd96d666b8.pdf
18c11b27002ad606524d2137cbc4fbf2
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF. ATLANTA
DEPARTMENT of PLANNING
700 CIT Y - HALL
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
WYONT B . B EAN
PLANNING ENG I NEER
CO LLI ER B. GLADIN
ASS I STANT PLANNING ENGIN E ER
10:
t
atl
Colltei-
.•
1967
jot'
t~
•
r
t
A.
l.
Coals
2.
,.
U.cta,
�t
...
•
1 ..
.•
Jor
a
to
iJ
co4~
2.
C
3.
( )
)
(c)
s.
Ti 1
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF. ATLANTA
DEPARTMENT of PLANNING
700 CITY- HALL
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 ; ow go
December 9, 1966 f).
WYONT B. BEAN
PLANNING ENGINEER
COLLIER B. GLADIN
ASSISTANT PLANNING ENGINEER
MEMORANDUM
0: Dan Sweat
FROM: Collier B. Gledin e B)\
SUBJECT: 1967 Housing Code Compliance Program
The following major changes ere recommended;
A. Policy and Procedure Guide
1, Goals
Addition of a new gosl of review and re-evaluation in anticipation
of oa need for basic changes in the program in 1968 and afterwards.
Observation from HUD and Atlenta's experience have indicated that
it will be necessary to repeat our rehabilitation effort in areas
previously covered several years ago. This feature is also
vecosmended for inclusion as a factor to be considered in determining
priorities. (Addition of F to Section L)
Orgenization and Administration
Changes in organizetion and administration are recommended to
reflect personnel additions in 1967. The Mayor's public statement
in favor of these increases provides the basis upon which the changes
were considered. (General changes as they apply throughout Section III).
Area Housing Code Compliance Policies
The abandonment of the specific objective of once « month sector
ter Inspector is recommended. Present heavy case
load requires this change. However, the objective is partially reached
the inspector in the course of handling his usual case load,
3 Section IV).
(Continued on Page 2)
Memorandum to Dan Sweat
Page 2
B. Housing Code Complience Prograw Mep - Mejor Changes For Consideration:
1. The ennexed Adamsville area has been added to the mep and a
program for ite treatment will be developed in 1967.
2. East Atlanta has been changed from rehabilitation end code clearence
to Title I Urban Renewal.
3. The Candler Perk area north of Mclendon Avenue, between Moreland
Avenue and the Park, has been changed from rehabilitation in 1967
to intensive conservetion.
4. In view of the city's current inability to initiate urban renewal
ection within the next five years in areas previously deemed suitable
for this type of treatment, the following adjustments have been meade:
(e) Howard High eree (old Fourth Ward) has been changed from
Title I Urben Renevel to Rehabilitation, 1967D.
(b) Cabbage Town (Sevanueh Street) hes been chenged from Title
I Urban Renewal to Rehabilitation, 1967B.
(c} Summerhill hes been changed from Title I Urban Renewal to
Rehabilitation, 1967A, |
5. Since present plans of Georgie Tech do not call for expansion north .
of Eighth Street in the near future, the area between Eighth end
Tenth Streets has been designated for rehabilitation action under
vesponsibility of the Sector Inspector.
6. Areas along Ormond and Atlanta Avenues have been changed from
intensive conservation to 1967 and 1968 rehabilitation treatment.
ce... Pierce
Williem R. Wofford
J. 3. Buchanan
Earl Lenders
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 52
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 1967
Date: 1967a
Date: 1967d.
Date: 1968
Date: between eighth end
Date: december 9, 1966 f
Date: several years ago
Date: the next five years
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: adamsville
Geopolitical Entity: Atlanta
Geopolitical Entity: atlenta
Geopolitical Entity: fourth ward
Geopolitical Entity: Georgia
Organization: addition of f to section l) orgenization and administration changes
Organization: atlanta
Organization: atlanta department of planning
Organization: candler perk
Organization: collier b. gladin assistant planning engineer
Organization: georgie tech
Organization: HUD
Organization: inspector
Organization: observation
Organization: pierce williem r. wofford
Organization: procedure guide 1, goals addition
Organization: rehabilitation
Organization: the sector inspector
Organization: title
Organization: title i urban renewal
Person: a. policy
Person: collier b. gledin
Person: Dan Sweat
Person: howard high
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/573bbe434478b77d068107c3a8729981.pdf
1018c9f12df092d5091d187ebc99fc66
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
Nov 2, 1966
My Dear Mayor Ivan Allen,
I do not know too much about the laws governing the housing code and am embarrassed to approach the subject concerning the aunt of mine who has a mind of her own and has not wanted us to get her away from her home on Pryor St.
We tried to no avail to get her to sell 10 years ago, but she insisted she had to keep it on account of her animals. I have responsibilities of my own and I can't support her large number of animals and her. She gets old age assistance now. She says she is to get out by Dec 28, this year. She insists it will kill her and calls me every day saying she is too sick to move. Really I don't know what to do. My health is so I can't take on more worries. I have exhausted all efforts to get her to give up her dogs, but she won't. She has tied my hands because of this.
I don't know what can be done, but I also know she is stubborn and could resort to harming herself if she has to move. I can't understand why she prefers to live without heat, light, or any way to cook, so she can keep these animals. I would appreciate anything done, but if she wants to remain in this old house, she may die, but she says she had rather die and she may. I have reached my wits' end as to what is the best to do.
I shall leave this up to you, since she is old, sick, and obstinate.
Respectfully yours,
Mrs. Lillian Chancellor
128 Marietta St NW
Re Miss Camilla Stipe
741 Pryor St SW
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
rv. 2, /96¢
a3, - Ce __
2
DO Khe qe Boa Are Hteecel— alrrY Ia, Mawes |
Te speed Ake — emt tthez oe Ceding! as gh L-eclrasrecacd _ |
ta, the
Seaseeee 41tt-Bt. es: hed On fy
Stee ttrtbed ee ply cee ge Foye Steel |
ic eee eg e- here ae -
Lie hme om fage SF J
Le as Bi. "Deed Cosas k Fy St ee asda |
Yo ca os Gah. Giles axe eZ the eke
meen chclakii on ae Cf
aaah WV hee Gay! es Gieiels I=
SA snp) he ae ere Vloen 29, Thai |
seerhet tL ee bent
S ee fool py ge tital & Be. |
eT eS 4? © Caccd Habe om hire _
oko, 2
oe a
} Cee ae
pee ee pidge ea”
a aha Bichon a ies
|
.
ele Cac i Pay a i oid has Sf Sippel
11 (Mian ch cre By. ype Aarectl, A
gk. WB secede 2 Li Dog aa Rehan : C— hez,
hal eben. (Fee ple tad. pf TR sseeree
he Mtee Men
A, oe Boss = x Py ne ae See
old y Botclcm 9 hop ¢ ~
Dee, oo F774, par eid
Merpant fesl syrrte
“Dwe oi ee 2 Clon iraLler.—
c | ; (2-¥ Cage Pe SHAM.
Le- Puae- Gant D Lepr
2¢f/ Foge 97. 0U/,
————
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 51
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
code compliance
Event: 2 do khe
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: botclcm
Geopolitical Entity: gay
Geopolitical Entity: l
housing
letters
Organization: /96¢
Organization: bichon
Organization: f774
Organization: foye steel
Organization: mtee men a
Organization: sa
Organization: sf j le
Organization: sf sippel
Organization: stee
Organization: tr
Organization: wb
Person: ¢ ~
Person: aarectl
Person: boa
Person: boss
Person: caccd habe
Person: cf
Person: dee
Person: ez
Person: fee
Person: gah
Person: giles
Person: hteecel—
Person: li dog
Person: rehan
Person: seaseeee 41tt-bt
Person: wv
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/7686b4c4fa2cc28c6e224e00a00f6342.pdf
420926bcddab279c6c502a479cb6f837
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
C TY
OF
A
LA
TA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
WILLIAM R. WOFFORD, P.E., R . A.
J . S. BUCHAN AN
I NSPECTOR OF BUILD IN GS
CHIEF HOUSING CODE INSPECTOR
ELMER H. MOON, E.E., P.E.
ASS T. INSPECTOR OF BU IL D IN GS
November 21, 1966
Mr. Dan E. Sweat
Director, Governmental Liason
Room 209
City Hall
RE:
741 Pryor Street, S.W.
Camilla B. Stipe, Owner
Dear Dan:
The Housing Code Division has an extensive file on this
property dating back to April 2, 1963. The case has been presented
to the Municipal Court on two different occasions; and because of
age and infirmity, the Court did not choose to impose a penalty.
Miss Stipe lives alone in the property, and she does have
several dogs as pets. Miss Stipe is apparently two years in
arrears on her mortgage payments. The mortgage holder refuses
to foreclose although at one time he agreed to work with us for
the benefit of Miss Stipe. There have been numerous efforts to
assist Miss Stipe, and she has consistently refuted· all attempts
to ass ist.
This property was a part of the "In Rem" hearing conducted
in City Hall on September 28, 1966 at which time it was determined
that the building is unfit for human habitation or occupancy, that
it should be demolished, and the owners and parties in interest
were so notified of those facts.
Mrs. Lillian Chancellor, addressee of the letter you received,
is Claim Supervisor for the State De partment of Labor . In my
opinion, Miss Stipe needs to be removed from this property because
of the hazardous and unsanit ary condit ion of the building; and she
is a l so the sou l remaining white woman living in an all Negro
connnunity. The December 28 date mentioned in Mrs. Cha ncellor's
letter is the expiration date of the notice forwarded stating the
results of the "In Rem" hearing. There is quit e a bit of additional
information on file if it is needed.
JSB:mse
ATLANTA
Tl-IE
DOGWOOD
CITY
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
H | ae ry
ie
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
WILLIAM R. WOFFORD, P.E., R.A. J. S. BUCHANAN
INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS CHIEF HOUSING CODE INSPECTOR
ELMER H. MOON, E.E., P.E.
ASST. INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
November 21, 1966
Mr. Dan E. Sweat
Director, Governmental Liason
Room 209
City Hall
RE: 741 Pryor Street, S.W.
Camilla B. Stipe, Owner
Dear Dan:
The Housing Code Division has an extensive file on this
property dating back to April 2, 1963. The case has been presented
to the Municipal Court on two different occasions; and because of
age and infirmity, the Court did not choose to impose a penalty.
Miss Stipe lives alone in the property, and she does have
several dogs as pets. Miss Stipe is apparently two years in
arrears on her mortgage payments, The mortgage holder refuses
to foreclose although at one time he agreed to work with us for
the benefit of Miss Stipe. There have been numerous efforts to
assist Miss Stipe, and she has consistently refuted all attempts
to assist.
This property was a part of the "In Rem" hearing conducted
in City Hall on September 28, 1966 at which time it was determined
that the building is unfit for human habitation or occupancy, that
it should be demolished, and the owners and parties in interest
were so notified of those facts,
Mrs. Lillian Chancellor, addressee of the letter you received,
is Claim Supervisor for the State Department of Labor. In my
opinion, Miss Stipe needs to be removed from this property because
of the hazardous and unsanitary condition of the building; and she
is also the soul remaining white woman living in an all Negro
community, The December 28 date mentioned in Mrs. Chancellor's
letter is the expiration date of the notice forwarded stating the
results of the "In Rem" hearing. There is quite a bit of additional
information on file if it is needed,
Sincerely
J.S,. Buchanan
JSB:mse aoe hief Inspector
4 ore ia
CR:
ATLANTA THE DOGWOOD CITY
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 50
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: april 2, 1963
Date: december 28 date
Date: november 21,
Date: september 28, 1966
Date: two years
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: Atlanta
Geopolitical Entity: e.e.
Geopolitical Entity: Georgia
Geopolitical Entity: p.e.
Organization: buchanan jsb
Organization: city hall re
Organization: court
Organization: dogwood
Organization: inspector of buildings
Organization: negro
Organization: owner
Organization: s.w.
Organization: stipe
Organization: the municipal court
Organization: the state department of labor
Person: Dan Sweat
Person: governmental liason
Person: lillian chancellor
Person: miss stipe
Person: r.a. j. s. buchanan
Person: William R. Wofford
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/e56b5eaa53c0a90e3a3f499f9b0e9dea.pdf
88bfb4ee5ddf6228a27894c4995213ed
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
TELEPHONE
To
MESSAGE
8 f2
Name-~~- ~ ~
· -~
{
,..___.;2
_=
8_3_______ _ _
Telephone No. _ _ _ _
~ Wants you to call
0
0
Returned your call
0
0
Is here to see you
Came by to see you
Left the following message:
By--------1------------- - - - - - - - -- F O R M 25 • 5
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
five te Mayor
. TELEPHONE MESSAGE
To DEL
Name Deiihe.
Telephone No. K was
[2 Wants you to call (-] Is here to see you
{_] Returned your call {_] Came by to see you
[_] Left the following message:
Besoh fhact, st weputd
be QA book sia. 44,
OO
ele uated thes Vebevee
Date: fe l Time F'.30 a.m./ p.m.
By. f
FORM 25-5
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 49
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Organization: besoh
Organization: qa
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/52751fb388c2cd8a524b4ccf4d102d42.pdf
3af98bca3304a3cda57f0934e6ea0d5e
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
Annual Awards Program for Innovations in Intergovernmental Relations
PURPOSE
This Awards Program is designed:
to identify outstanding cooperative efforts between
local governments and actions to improve State-local
relations, which too often go unobserved; and to
provide for these efforts a measure of the publicity
which they rightly deserve, and
to make available through publication, a selected
number of the outstanding actions reported each year
under the program.
WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE?
Any local governme ntal body , organization of elected off icials,
units of governments acti ng Joi ntly, school distri ct s in cooperatio n with gener al unit s of gover nment, regional bodies, or
State governments , may participate .
JUDGMENT CRITERIA
I. The "improved i ntergovernment al effort i n urban developme nt" should invol ve areas of interes t t o the Department of
Housing a nd Ur ban Development and organizations of publ i c offi cials
(e. g., meet i ng slum probl ems , encouraging orderl y ·urban development, rel ating physi cal development needs t o s ocial, educational
and economic needs in an area, reducing the cos t of providing
publ i c services , etc.).
II . The activity should be i nnovative or precedent-making
and mus t have t aken pla ce in the peri od from January, 1965 t o
the present.
III . The activit y should be appl i cabl e in other communit i es ,
regions , or Stat es .
Examples mi ght i ncl ude such developments as these :
the est abl ishment , in many Cali f or nia counties ,
of local area formation commissions , with regulatory power over t he creation ~r new municipalities,
annexations, and special dist r icts ;
�-2-
•
legislation authorizing local governments to
cooperate in the collection of local taxes in
Michigan;
·
•
the establishment of a State-authorized metropolitan area study ccrnmission in Portland, Oregon;
•
studies initiated by the State of California,
designed to apply aero-space technology to urban
problems;
•
the proposed vesting of regional planning and
continuing transportation planning process responsibilities in the Washington Regional Council
of Governments;
the proposed agreement by 13 municipalities in
Nortlu~rn New Jersey, to establish a single regional
urban renewal agency, and to share property taxes
resulting fran new industrial development within
the entire region.
WHO WILL JUOOE?
Distinguished persons in the field of intergovernmental relations,
including representatives of the various levels of government,
will be invited by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and
Urban Development to evaluate entries and recommend awards.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Annual Awards Program for Innovations in Intergovernmental Relations
PURPOSE
This Awards Program is designed:
to identify outstanding cooperative efforts between
local governments and actions to improve State-local
relations, which too often go unobserved; and to
provide for these efforts a measure of the publicity
which they rightly deserve, and
to make available through publication, a selected
number of the outstanding actions reported each year
under the program.
WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE?
Any local governmental body, organization of elected officials,
units of governments acting jointly, school districts in coop-
eration with general units of government, regional bodies, or
State governments, may participate.
JUDGMENT CRITERIA
I. The "improved intergovernmental effort in urban devel-
opment" should involve areas of interest to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development and organizations of public officials
(e.g., meeting slum problems, encouraging orderly urban develop-
ment, relating physical development needs to social, educational
and economic needs in an area, reducing the cost of providing
public services, etc.).
II. The activity should be innovative or precedent-making
and must have taken place in the period from January, 1965 to
the present.
III. The activity should be applicable in other communities,
regions, or States.
Examples might include such developments as these:
- the establishment, in many California counties,
of local area formation commissions, with regu-
latory power over the creation of new municipalities,
annexations, and special districts;
<-2=
legislation authorizing local governments to
cooperate in the collection of local taxes in
Michigan;
the establishment of a State-authorized metro-
politan area study commission in Portland, Oregon;
studies initiated by the State of California,
designed to apply aero-space technology to urban
problems;
the proposed vesting of regional planning and
continuing transportation planning process re-
sponsibilities in the Washington Regional Council
of Governments;
the proposed agreement by 13 municipalities in
Northern New Jersey, to establish a single regional
urban renewal agency, and to share property taxes
resulting from new industrial development within
the entire region.
WHO WILL JUDGE?
Distinguished persons in the field of intergovernmental relations,
including representatives of the various levels of government,
will be invited by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and
Urban Development to evaluate entries and recommend awards.
GPO 914-632
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 48
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 1965
Date: january
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: California
Geopolitical Entity: michigan
Geopolitical Entity: oregon
Geopolitical Entity: portland
Geopolitical Entity: states
Organization: annual awards program
Organization: HUD
Organization: innovations
Organization: the state of california,
Organization: the washington regional council of governments
Organization: this awards program
Person: i.
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/5bd7214af97dbd1dac5afb12f945540a.pdf
ea044a3effe0188f8e48b2130c4c71cc
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
WASHINGTON, D .C. 20410
r;~~:f~
U\llbl':!;'-cal,
Dear Public Official:
U
c,;'VJ
B. 0 . C. A.
The Department of Housing and Urban Devel opment wishes to announce
the initiation of an annual Awards Program for outstanding contributions to intergovernmental relations in the field of urban
development. This 1966 Intergovernmental Awards Program will
recognize superior , cooperative achievements between local governments and a ctions to improve State-local relations which further
the national objective of helping to improve the living environment of our citizens.
This invitation to participate in the canpetition is being distributed by. the Department in cooperation with the following organizations:
The National League of Cities
The United States Conference of Mayors
The National Association of Counties
The International City Managers• Association
The National School Boards Association
The American Association of School Administrators
The Council of State Governments
Awards for the First Annual Ccmpetition will be made at the
National League of Cities' Annual Congress, December 6, 1966, in
Las Vegas, Nevada.
Sul:nissions to this canpetition are invited. The deadline is
.Applications should be sulnitted to the .
Departmmt of Houaing and Urban Dffelopment, 1626 I Street, H.
November 18, 1966 •
w.,
Washington, D. C. 20410.
Activities which have been initiated since January, 1965 are
eligible for this :rear's canpetition. Kore specific infOl"lllation
on eligible participants and criteria tor making awards ia
enclosed. SUbmission statements should be limited to two pages;
supporting documents will be accepted as enclosm-es.
Please accept this invitation to submit your reccmnendations
We are eager to recogni;e and encourage those
outstanding contributiana to intergovernmental relations which
increase our ability to meet m-ban needs.
for these awards.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
WASHINGTON, D.C, 20410 ‘
| TOME NY ie
OCT 31 1966 ,
Niscacare ia
Dear Public Official: BO.C.A.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development wishes to announce
the initiation of an annual Awards Program for outstanding con-
tributions to intergovernmental relations in the field of urban
development. This 1966 Intergovernmental Awards Program will
recognize superior, cooperative achievements between local govern-
ments and actions to improve State-local relations which further
the national objective of helping to improve the living environ-
ment of our citizens.
This invitation to participate in the competition is being distri-
buted by. the Department in cooperation with the following organ-
izations:
The National League of Cities
The United States Conference of Mayors
The National Assotiation of Counties
The International City Managers’ Association
The National School Boards Association
The American Association of School Administrators
The Council of State Governments
Awards for the First Annual Competition will be made at the
National League of Cities' Annual Congress, December 6, 1966, in
Las Vegas 9 Nevada.
Submissions to this competition are invited. The deadline is
November 18, 1966. Applications should be submitted to the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1626 K Street, N. W.,
Washington, D. C. 20410.
Activities which have been initiated since January, 1965 are
eligible for this year's competition. More specific information
on eligible participants and criteria for making awards is
enclosed. Submission statements should be limited to two pages;
supporting documents will be accepted as enclosures.
Please accept this invitation to submit your recommendations
for these awards. We are eager to recognize and encourage those
outstanding contributions to intergovernmental relations which
increase our ability to meet urban needs.
Sincerely yours,
oe
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 47
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 1626
Date: 20410
Date: december 6, 1966
Date: january
Date: november 18, 1966
Event: tome ny ie
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: las vegas 9 nevada
Geopolitical Entity: Washington DC
Organization: awards program
Organization: congress
Organization: HUD
Organization: niscacare ia
Organization: the american association of school administrators
Organization: the council of state
Organization: the first annual competition
Organization: the international city managers’ association
Organization: the national league of cities
Organization: the national league of cities'
Organization: this 1966 intergovernmental awards program
Person: awards
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/a48d81d62721deefe2e9e3d16cc1bcd1.pdf
70c2ce8e6aca57bb763564372416743d
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
- -- - - - ---- -
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF. BUILDINGS
MEMO
From the desk of· ·
W. R. Wofford, Inspector of Buildings
November 4, 1966
TO:
Dan Sweat, Liaison Officer
The attached was sent to BOCA by the
National League of Cities through our contact
with that association in the "1313 Urban
Affairs Center"o
I am forwarding it to you for information
purposeso
Enco
FORM 4 • 22
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 46
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/003eab2c25b4a7a325c6c428f8374f6c.pdf
ad30b0912211377dbb0ad400d53567fb
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
Superv i s or of Ins pec tion Services
In Rem St a t i s t ic s , 19 66 (Thr ough November 1, 1966 )
I t em
July 27
Hear i n5
Aueus t 24
Hearinp;
Sept ember 28
He ar in8
Oct ober 26
He ar ing
Novembe r 30
Hear i n?,
December 2 1
Hearin,,.
To t al
Sour ce
Hous i ng Code Division
Code s Compl ia nce Of fice
I n Rem Off ice
Ot her
'ro t al
Not Schedu led
Not qua li f ied under c urr ent policy
Othe r solut ion mor e appr opriate
Postponed
To ta l Not i ce s Issued
(Ovme r s and Part ies i n Interest)
Hearing s conducted-S tr uctures
)
(Family Units
Decis ion s Render ed
Demolish
Demo lish or Rehab ilit a te
Rehabilita te
Tota l Or ders Issued
(Ovmers and Par tie s i n Int ere st)
23
0
0
0
23
31
19
5
0
55
22
12
9
0
43
15
0
0
0
4
4
0
4
4
3
0
5
2
0
30
47
70
65
2 12
23
(43)
28
(53)
40
(5 6)
(69)
40
131
( 221)
18
2
3
25
1
2
33
6
1
34
6
0
110
15
6
30
39
62
72
203
8
0
23
20
10
4
20*
10*
0
34
30
131
51
26
0
208
1
1
14
0
8
6
Structures Compl ied
Demolished
Cleaned and Clo sed
Rehabilitated
Tota l
2
2
2
2
Fami l ies Referred f or Re location
5
Note:
~·:Re quested by November 10
.."!:*Schedu l ed
1
8
1
15
,I
�Remarks:
All properties are inspec ted, pictures taken and condition reports prepared prior t o hearings .
and Orders, mailed to owners and known parties in interest, properties are advertised legal ly.
posted, both before and after the hearings .
In addition to Notices
They are also i nd i v idually
Upon completion of specified time for correction, all properties are again
inspected for compliance, before Ordinance is r equested dL:ecting the Enforcement Officer to proceed with Demolition or
Cleaning and Closing .
269 properties were contained on the Conso lidated Master List of Buildings Unfit f or Occupancy Rev ised June 15, 1966.
85 additional properties have been added to the List as of November 1, 1966.
354 Total.
lt is estimated that an additional 300 structures are currently eligibla f or inclusion on the List.
The structura l value (exclusive of land) before d eterioration of the 153 structures scheduled f or the first f ive hearing s
is conservatively estimated to have amounted to $750, ©00 which has been completely lost due to neg lect and laclt of timely
maintenance.
The estimated annual rental on these pr®perties would have amounted to $180, 000 which has been lost to the
owners, due to neglect, and the annual City-County ta;,r: loss amounts to approximately $ 15,000.
r~
·'7"
. /) c
'.
.e..c-.c--d
~
/,
.,,c
~
Malcolm D Jones ~ ·
Superv isor of Inspection Services
2.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
DEPARTMENT OF BULLDINGS
Supervisor of Inspection Services
In Rem Statistics, 1966 (Through November 1, 1966)
| July 27 August 24 September 28 October 26 November 30 December 21
| Item Hearing Hearing Nearing Hearing Hearing Hearinz Total
i
Source
Housing Code Division 23 31 22 15 20 20% 131
Codes Compliance Office 0 19 12 0 : 10 10* “) 250
In Rem Office 0 5 9 8 4 26
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total . 23 55 43 23 34 30 208
Not Scheduled
| Not qualified under current policy 0 4 4 5 1 14
| Other solution more appropriate 0 0 3 2 1 6
Postponed 4 4 0... 0 0 8
Total Notices Issued 30 47 70 65 212
(Owners and Parties in Interest) ie XN
Hearings conducted-Structures 23 28 40 40 32%* 131
S (Family Units) (43) (53) (56) (69) (221)
| Decisions Rendered ‘
Demolish 18 25 33 34 110
Demolish or Rehabilitate 2 1 6 6 ‘ 15
Rehabilitate 3 2 1 0 6
Total Orders Issued
(Owmers and Parties in Interest) 30 39s 62 72 a 203
Structures Complied
Demolished 2 2
Cleaned and Closed
Rehabilitated
Total 2 2
Families Referred for Relocation 5 i: 8 1 15
Note: *Requested by November 10
**S$cheduled
Remarks:
All properties are inspected, pictures taken and condition reports prepared prior to hearings. In addition to Notices
and Orders, mailed to owners and known parties in interest, properties are advertised legally. They are also individually ©
posted, both before and after the hearings. Upon completion of specified time for correction, all properties are again
inspected for compliance, before Ordinance is requested dixvecting the Enforcement Officer to proceed with Demolition or
Cleaning and Closing.
269 properties were contained on the Consolidated Master List of Buildings Unfit for Occupancy Revised June 15, 1966.
__85 additional properties have been added to the List as of November 1, 1966.
354 Total. |
It is estimated that an additional 300 structures are currently eligible for inclusion on the List.
The structural value (exclusive of land) before deterioration of the 153 structures scheduled for the first five hearings
is conservatively estimated to have amounted to $750,000 which has been completely lost due to neglect and lack of timely
maintenance. The estimated annual rental on these properties would have amounted to $180, 000 which has been lost to the
owners, due to neglect, and the annual City-County tax loss amounts to approximately $15,000.
Z alee E2T>
Malcolm D Jones /
Supervisor of Inspéction Services
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 45
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 131
Date: 1966
Date: 23 31 22
Date: 25 33 34
Date: 30 39s 62 72
Date: 34 30
Date: 43 23
Date: 47 70
Date: july 27 august 24 september 28 october 26 november 30 december 21
Date: june 15, 1966
Date: november 1, 1966
Date: november 10
Event: 15 rehabilitate 3 2 1 0 6
Event: demolish 18
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: city-county
Organization: ©
Organization: codes compliance office
Organization: demolished 2 2 cleaned
Organization: demolition or cleaning and closing
Organization: department of bulldings
Organization: e2
Organization: housing code division
Organization: notices
Organization: s (family units
Organization: structures complied
Organization: supervisor of inspection services
Organization: supervisor of inspection services in rem statistics
Organization: the consolidated master list of buildings unfit for occupancy revised
Organization: xn hearings
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/dc9f1ccbf2b897363955c5d9b0fb66c5.pdf
019a6d66d99405ef1b269eb54fed3a24
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
.)
CITY OF ATLANTA
HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE P~ROGRAM
POLICY AND PROCEDURE GUIDE
JANUARY 1, 1965
�Mr. Landers
Pag.e Two
October 14, 1966
CITY OF ATLANTA
HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
POLICY AND PROCEDURE GUIDE
JANUARY 1, 1965
I.
Goals:
A.
MAXIMUM EFFORTS IMMEDIATELY TO SECURE
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE GOALS AND
BENEFITS OF THE HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE
PROGRAM THROUGH USE OF PERSONAL CONTACTS,
PAMPHLETS, PRESS RELEASES AND OTHER PUBLIC
INFORMATION MEDIA. II
11
Critique
The unfavorable publicity of the newspapers and the constant
delegations from various communities indicate little attention has been
given to this provision.
While there has been considerable personal
contact on the part of housing code inspectors, and some handing out
of pamphlets, there have been no press releases issued and little or
no ,attempt to use other available press media to gain support and
understanding of the Housing Code Compliance Program.
Recommendation
I would recommend that provision be made immediately to
utilize the press media.
Some positive steps could include :
�Mr. Landers
Page Three
Oct;ober 14, 1966
1.
Get agreement of newspapers to run weekly court calendar
of code violation cases with names of defendents.
Also run
follow-up report on court verdict.
2.
Develop press releases on major Housing Code Division
responsibilities and goals to go to city editors, editorial
writers and other news media representatives who have
shown particular interest in the Housing C ode program.
3.
Request WSB-TV to prepare 30 minute documentary on
Housing Code Compliance .
City could purchase copies
of the film for showing to clubs and groups.
4.
D evelop public s e rvic e spot announcements for radio and TV
on keeping houses in repair.
The Board of Education ETV
station could produce the spots.
B. "MAXIMUM COORDINATION IMMEDIATELY WITH
ALL OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHO WILL BE
AFFECTED BY, AND NEED TO ASSIST IN, THE
CONDUCT AND RESULTS OF THIS PROGRAM."
Critique
Herein lie s the major problem with the H ousing Code Compliance
�Mr. Landers
Page Four
October 14, 1966
Program.
There is a general lack of understanding among City
departments of the goals and responsibilities of the program.
An
even bigger problem is lack of proper cooperation among the various
divisions within the D epartment of Inspections.
S ome of the key
factors which contribute to inefficiency or confusion are:
1.
Permit values through the years are used as the main
criterion for successful operation of the department.
Subsequently, new construction assumes major importance
and Housing Code C omplianc e is relegated to a secondary
existence.
2.
The Supervisor of I nspection Service is a line supervisor
and coordinator of all divisions and units except the
Liaison and Architect Divisions.
In practice, however,
this official is allowed supervisory authority only over
the Chief Housing Inspector, C odes Complianc e Officer
and Rehabilitation Specialist.
The result is lack of
cooperation among divisions, improper issuing of permits,
an almost total disr e gard of us e of central r e cords and l e ss
�Mr. Landers
Page Five
October 14, 1966
than vigorous prosecution of code violations.
Specific
examples of lack of coordination and/ or cooperation
include:
(a)
There are too many cases where the 6-o·de
·e<irrr]:rlia-n-ce
Officer has issued1 orde~ s for demolition of an unsound
structure and the permit desk has subsequently issued
permits for repair of the same structures without the,
'
~ \
lgiow le.d.g.e....oL the_ C_o_des Complian-e-
effhG~
ol;" Housing
Inspector. ..
(b)
Pr e -permit ins p e ctions ar e r e quire d b e for e issuance
of a permit for rehabilitation of a sub-standard structure.
This is not being followed and permits are being issued
w ithout conside r a tion of the H o using Code Compliance
Program Policy and Procedure Guide.
(c )
Electrica l Divi sion Inspe ctor s r e fus e to si gn inspe ction
cards on H - using C o de Compliance cases, requiring
Housing C o d e Inspe ctors to spe nd c onside rabl e w aste
mot ion obtaining re quir e d s i gnatu re s.
Th e Electri cal
Div ision gi ve s only token coope ration to the H ou s ing
D ivision.
The W ater D e p artmen t and G as C ompany, on
�Mr. Landers
Pag~ Six
October 14, 1966
the other hand, cooperate to the maximum.
(d)
The Central Records are not located near the permit
desk so they can be utilized whenever a permit is issued.
The Central Records are maintained strictly as files or
archives and no attempt is made to utilize them for permit
issuance.
Some of these points were touched upon in the Survey Report
"Government of the City of Atlanta, Georgia" by the Public Administration
Service in 1965.
The following quotations are found on page 34 of the
PAS report:
BUILDING AND HOUSING INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
IN 1964 ATLANTA TOOK A LOGICAL STEP IN CONSOLIDATING
ITS VARIOUS BUILDING INSPECTION AND EXAMINING FUNCTIONS
INTO A SINGLE DEPAR TMENT. FULL IMPLEMENTATION
OF THIS MOVE HAS NOT YET BEEN ACHIEVED AND PROGRESS •
APPEARS TO BE SLOW. FRICTION REPORTEDLY EXISTS
BETWEEN THE FORMERLY INDEPENDENT AGENCIES.
COOPERATION BETWEEN THE HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT
SECTION AND THE BUILDING CODE SECTION HAS NOT YET
BEEN FULLY REALIZED. THERE ARE OCCASIONS WHEN
THE HOUSING CODE SECTION CONDEMNS PROPERTY FOR
DEMOLITION OR F OR MAJOR REPAIRS, AND THE CENTRAL
PERMITS SECTION SUBSEQUENTLY ISSUES REPAIR PERMITS
11
�Mr,. Landers
Page Seven
October 14, 196 6
FOR MINOR OR PARTIAL REPAIRS . INTERNAL
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES TO INSURE THE
ENFORCEMENT OF HOUSING CODE INSPECTIONS
ARE DEFICIENT. THERE IS A BACKLOG OF SOME
4,000 NOTICES TO COMPLY WITH THE HOUSING CODE
AND AN A VE RAGE OF FEWER THAN 10 CASES WEEKLY
ARE TAKEN TO COURT.
"THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT USES A MULTIPLE
PERMIT CARD FOR STRUCTURES BEING REPAIRED
DUE TO HOUSING CODE ACTIONS . THIS CARD PROVIDES
A RECORDING FOR ALL TYPES OF REPAIRS. WHEN REPAIRS
ARE INSPECTED AND APPROVED, THE INSPECTOR SIGNS
THE MUTLIPLE CARD, WHICH IS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY.
THIS FORM SERVES THE PURPOSE OF INSURING THAT ALL
NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED AND WORK HAS
BEEN SATISFACTORILY ACCOMPLISHED. SOME
INSPECTORS REFUSE TO SIGN THE CARD . IN ADDITION,
THE MULTIPLE PERMIT FORM IS USED ONLY ON REPAIRS
ORDERED BY THE HOUSING DIVISION BUT NOT FOR OTHER
REPAIRS . THEREFORE , SOME REPAIR JOBS HAVE CARDS
WHILE OTHERS DO NOT. THIS SITUATION CREATES
CONFUSION EVEN AMONG THE INSPECTORS . 11
R e c o mme n dation :
1.
Spe ll out the duti e s a n d r e sponsibilitie s of the Supe r v is o r of
Inspe ction S e r v ic es a n d gi ve t his position the auth ority to c o ordinate
all In specti on S ervi ce s a s the j ob t itl e a n d orga niz ati on ch a rt i m ply.
This would include autho rity to or d er co operati on a mong divis ions
and change s in procedures of di visions to c o rre c t probl ems .
f ('
�Mr. Landers
Page Eight
Oct'?ber 14, 1966
2.
Transfer of the Codes Compliance Officer and the Rehabilitation
Specialist to the Housing Division, reporting to the Chief Housing
Code Inspector.
These two functions cannot be separated from
the Housing Inspection functions and the coordination of the
Inspectors.
Court cases and rehabilitation efforts are vital to
the success of a vigorous housing code enforcement program.
3.
The Central Records Section should be near the Permit Desk to
provide maximum utilization of records in determining whether
or not a permit should be issued.
The building records lend
themselves nicely to a computer application and should be
computerized at the earliest possible date.
The work done by the CIP at great expense to the City and
HUD in placing records of every parcel and structure on the
City computer must not be allowed to become outdated and
simply electronic archives.
The Building Inspection Department
should be charged with the responsibility for updating computerized
r
building codes data.
A remote display station should be planned as a part of the
City's new IBM 360 System for ready access by the Permit Desk
from central computer records .
�Mr. Landers
Page Nine
Octobe r 14, 1966
4.
An agressive prosecution policy must be adopted and followed
if we expect to achieve even minimum compliance.
The backlog
of pending Housing Code violations will require the services of a
fulltime prosecutor if the Div ision is ever to hope to become
current.
A fulltime As s istant City Attorney is recommended.
I".
\
("Ii
r.
,.
(
• r.,.
,,.,
J
l'£
,vt(
C.
~
'µ('"
,J")
d/
I
C
,('
I
r;1·
-r
S'
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF ATLANTA
HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
POLICY AND PROCEDURE GUIDE
JANUARY 1, 1965
Mr. Landers
Page Two
October 14, 1966
CITY OF ATLANTA
HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
POLICY AND PROCEDURE GUIDE
JANUARY 1, 1965
I. Goals:
A. "MAXIMUM EFFORTS IMMEDIATELY TO SECURE
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE GOALS AND
BENEFITS OF THE HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE
PROGRAM THROUGH USE OF PERSONAL CONTACTS,
PAMPHLETS, PRESS RELEASES AND OTHER PUBLIC
INFORMATION MEDIA,"
Critique
The unfavorable publicity of the newspapers and the constant
delegations from various communities indicate little attention has been
given to this provision. While there has been considerable personal
contact on the part of housing code inspectors, and some handing out
of pamphlets, there have been no press releases issued and little or
no attempt to use other available press media to gain support and
understanding of the Housing Code Compliance Program,
Recommendation
I would recommend that provision be made immediately to
utilize the press media. Some positive steps could include:
Mr. Landers
Page Three
October 14, 1966
Get agreement of newspapers to run weekly court calendar
of code violation cases with names of defendents. Also run
follow-up report on court verdict.
Develop press releases on major Housing Code Division
responsibilities and goals to go to city editors, editorial
writers and other news media representatives who have
shown particular interest in the Housing Code program.
Request WSB-TV to prepare 30 minute documentary on
Housing Code Compliance. City could purchase copies
of the film for showing to clubs and groups.
Develop public service spot announcements for radio and TV
on keeping houses in repair. The Board of Education ETV
station could produce the spots.
B. "MAXIMUM COORDINATION IMMEDIATELY WITH
ALL OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHO WILL BE
AFFECTED BY, AND NEED TO ASSIST IN, THE
CONDUCT AND RESULTS OF THIS PROGRAM,"
Critique
Herein lies the major problem with the Housing Code Compliance
Mr. Landers
Page Four
October 14, 1966
Program. There is a general lack of understanding among City
departments of the goals and responsibilities of the program. An
even bigger problem is lack of proper cooperation among the various
divisions within the Department of Inspections. Some of the key
factors which contribute to inefficiency or confusion are:
Permit values through the years are used as the main
criterion for successful operation of the department.
Subsequently, new construction assumes major importance
and Housing Code Compliance is relegated to a secondary
existence.
The Supervisor of Inspection Service is a line supervisor
and coordinator of all divisions and units except the
Liaison and Architect Divisions. In practice, however,
this official is allowed supervisory authority only over
the Chief Housing Inspector, Codes Compliance Officer
and Rehabilitation Specialist. The result is lack of
cooperation among divisions, improper issuing of permits,
an almost total disregard of use of central records and less
Mr. Landers
Page Five
October 14, 1966
than vigorous prosecution of code violations. Specific
examples of lack of coordination and/or cooperation
include:
(a)
(b)
(c)
There are too many cases where the Godes Compliance
Officer has is sued ordess’ for demolition of an unsound
structure and the permit desk has subsequently issued
permits for repair of the same structures without the
knowledge of the _C aie. Compliance Officersor Housing
Inspector.
Pre-permit inspections are required before issuance
of a permit for rehabilitation of a sub-standard structure.
This is not being followed and permits are being issued
without consideration of the Housing Code Compliance
Program Policy and Procedure Guide.
Electrical Division Inspectors refuse to sign inspection
cards on H using Code Compliance cases, requiring
Housing Code Inspectors to spend considerable waste
motion obtaining required signatures. The Electrical
Division gives only token cooperation to the Housing
Division, The Water Department and Gas Company, on
Mr. Landers
Page Six
October 14, 1966
the other hand, cooperate to the maximum,
(d) The Central Records are not located near the permit
desk so they can be utilized whenever a permit is issued.
The Central Records are maintained strictly as files or
archives and no attempt is made to utilize them for permit
issuance,
Some of these points were touched upon in the Survey Report
"Government of the City of Atlanta, Georgia'' by the Public Administration
Service in 1965. The following quotations are found on page 34 of the
PAS report:
BUILDING AND HOUSING INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
"IN 1964 ATLANTA TOOK A LOGICAL STEP IN CONSOLIDATING
ITS VARIOUS BUILDING INSPECTION AND EXAMINING FUNCTIONS
INTO A SINGLE DEPARTMENT, FULL IMPLEMENTATION
OF THIS MOVE HAS NOT YET BEEN ACHIEVED AND PROGRESS ,
APPEARS TO BESLOW, FRICTION REPORTEDLY EXISTS
BETWEEN THE FORMERLY INDEPENDENT AGENCIES,
COOPERATION BETWEEN THE HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT
SECTION AND THE BUILDING CODE SECTION HAS NOT YET
BEEN FULLY REALIZED, THERE ARE OCCASIONS WHEN
THE HOUSING CODE SECTION CONDEMNS PROPERTY FOR
DEMOLITION OR FOR MAJOR REPAIRS, AND THE CENTRAL
PERMITS SECTION SUBSEQUENTLY ISSUES REPAIR PERMITS
Mr. Landers
Page Seven
October 14, 1966
FOR MINOR OR PARTIAL REPAIRS, INTERNAL
ADMINIS TRATIVE PROCEDURES TO INSURE THE
ENFORCEMENT OF HOUSING CODE INSPECTIONS
ARE DEFICIENT, THERE IS A BACKLOG OF SOME
4,000 NOTICES TO COMPLY WITH THE HOUSING CODE
AND AN AVERAGE OF FEWER THAN 10 CASES WEEKLY
ARE TAKEN TO COURT,
"THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT USES A MULTIPLE
PERMIT CARD FOR STRUCTURES BEING REPAIRED
DUE TO HOUSING CODE ACTIONS, THIS CARD PROVIDES
A RECORDING FOR ALL TYPES OF REPAIRS, WHEN REPAIRS
ARE INSPECTED AND APPROVED, THE INSPECTOR SIGNS
THE MUTLIPLE CARD, WHICH IS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY,
THIS FORM SERVES THE PURPOSE OF INSURING THAT ALL
NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED AND WORK HAS
BEEN SATISFACTORILY ACCOMPLISHED, SOME
INSPECTORS REFUSE TOSIGN THE CARD, IN ADDITION,
THE MULTIPLE PERMIT FORM IS USED ONLY ON REPAIRS
ORDERED BY THE HOUSING DIVISION BUT NOT FOR OTHER
REPAIRS, THEREFORE, SOME REPAIR JOBS HAVE CARDS
WHILE OTHERS DO NOT, THIS SITUATION CREATES
CONFUSION EVEN AMONG THE INSPECTORS,"
Recommendation:
1. Spell out the duties and responsibilities of the Supervisor of
Inspection Services and give this position the authority to coordinate
all Inspection Services as the job title and organization chart imply.
This would include authority to order cooperation among divisions
and changes in procedures of divisions to correct problems.
Mr. Landers
Page Eight
October 14, 1966
Transfer of the Codes Compliance Officer and the Rehabilitation
Specialist to the Housing Division, reporting to the Chief Housing
Code Inspector. These two functions cannot be separated from
the Housing Inspection functions and the coordination of the
Inspectors, Court cases and rehabilitation efforts are vital to
the success of a vigorous housing code enforcement program.
The Central Records Section should be near the Permit Desk to
provide maximum utilization of records in determining whether
or not a permit should be issued. The building records lend
themselves nicely to a computer application and should be
computerized at the earliest possible date.
The work done by the CIP at great expense to the City and
HUD in placing records of every parcel and structure on the
City computer must not be allowed to become outdated and
simply electronic archives. The Building Inspection Department
should be charged with the responsibility for updating computerized
building codes data,
A remote display station should be planned as a part of the
City's new IBM 360 System for ready access by the Permit Desk
from central computer records,
Mr. Landers
Page Nine
October 14, 1966
4, An agressive prosecution policy must be adopted and followed
if we expect to achieve even minimum compliance. The backlog
of pending Housing Code violations will require the services ofa
fulltime prosecutor if the Division is ever to hope to become
current. A fulltime Assistant City Attorney is recommended.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 44
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 1964
Date: 1965
Date: january 1, 1965
Date: october 14, 1966
Date: october 14, 1966 transfer
Date: the years
Event: housing code compliance
Event: october 14, 1966 4
Event: the conduct and results of
Event: the housing code compliance program
Event: the housing code compliance program policy and procedure guide.
Event: the housing code program
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: Atlanta
Geopolitical Entity: city's
Geopolitical Entity: Georgia
Geopolitical Entity: permit
Law: housing code
Law: the chief housing code inspector
Law: the housing code compliance mr. landers page four october 14, 1966 program
Law: the housing code section condemns property for
Organization: a backlog of some
Organization: addition
Organization: atlanta took
Organization: card
Organization: cards
Organization: cases weekly
Organization: cip
Organization: codes compliance officer
Organization: deficient
Organization: division
Organization: do
Organization: electrical division inspectors
Organization: housing code compliance
Organization: housing code division
Organization: housing code inspectors
Organization: HUD
Organization: ibm 360 system
Organization: inspection services
Organization: inspectors
Organization: internal
Organization: jobs
Organization: logical step
Organization: minor or partial repairs
Organization: mr. landers page two october 14, 1966 city of atlanta housing code
Organization: multiple
Organization: need
Organization: ordered
Organization: page three
Organization: permit
Organization: procedures
Organization: recommendation
Organization: rehabilitation specialist
Organization: repairs
Organization: satisfactorily
Organization: single department
Organization: the board of education
Organization: the building department uses
Organization: the building inspection department
Organization: the central records
Organization: the central records section
Organization: the department of inspections
Organization: the electrical division
Organization: the formerly
Organization: the godes compliance officer
Organization: the housing code
Organization: the housing code compliance
Organization: the housing code enforcement section
Organization: the housing division
Organization: the housing inspection
Organization: the inspector signs
Organization: the inspectors, court
Organization: the liaison and architect divisions
Organization: the public administration service
Organization: the rehabilitation specialist
Organization: the supervisor of inspection service
Organization: the supervisor of inspection services
Organization: the survey report "government
Organization: the water department and gas company
Organization: this situation creates
Person: a. "maximum
Person: contacts
Person: critique
Person: develop
Person: herein
Person: landers
Person: major repairs
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/b4638add15aa3b5e772ee22c73b6287f.pdf
61b5e142ac5aae3ae7cf08727a16d2ba
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
The Department of Buildings administers and enforces the
Zoning Ordinance, the Housing and Slum Clearance Code, the Housing
P.emolition Ordinance, the Georgia Safety Fire Law and the Elevator
Ordinance.
property.
Its responsibilities generally regulate the private use of private
The manner in which the department does its job and works with
other agencies both in and out of the City government will be reflected in
the quality of total community development.
Staffing, organization, and
records must be so developed as to have flexibility, comprehensiveness,
and sesnitivity to the needs and requirements of area action.
),
The Department of Buildings has been the subject of extensive
review and reorganization to better prepare it for its role.
of the reorganization is now in the final stage.
Implementation
It would be inappropriate
to attempt to evaluate performance.
Organization
In 1964, Public Administration Service prepared a survey report
relating to the consolidation of inspectional services in the City of Atlanta.
This report reviewed and identified all inspectional functions carried out
among several departments within the City government. The major attention
of the report was focused on the Department of Building Inspections .
The
findings of the report led to recommendations for an expended department of
�Page Two
Building Inspections to include plumbing inspection (from the Construction
Department), electrical inspection (from the Department of Electricity) and
housing code inspection (from the Department of Urban Renewal).
adopted the full report.
The City
The Departments of Electricity and Urban Renewal
were abolished when their few remaining responsibilities were transferred
to other departments and agencies.
No one lost his job or was reduced in
salary due to the implementation of these recommendations.
Consolidation began in July of 1964.
In the beginning little more
could be accomplished than to effect a legal change.
The various offices
l
were spread from the third floor of City Hall to the thirteenth floor.
In late
summer 1965, one year later, major office realignments were made at City
Hall which resulted in the Department of Buildings occupying all of the eighth
and ninth floors.
Further office assignments were made in 1966.
Physical
provisions were made for a central records and statistical unit and the central
permits desk.
Staffing for the Records Bureau was provided by clerical
.. 'h,
• '
personnel formerly assigned to each of the inspection division .
Staffing
13
The Department has a technical staff of 72 and a clerical staff
of 16.
The technical staff includes the department head (Building Official),
an assistant Building Official , two architect engineers, ten plumbing inspectors ;
�Page Three
ten electrical inspectors, two elevator inspectors, nine heating and
ventilating inspectors and engineers, sixteen building inspectors and
J
,.,~,J . .
0
i f.teen persons engaged in housing code enforcement.
either registered engineers or architects.
Six technicians are
Most of the specialized inspectors
are licensed in their trades.
Work Program
Inspectional services are provided to insure the health, safety
and general welfare of the community.
Building inspections insure that
structures will be built, repaired and altered in a-ccordance with accepted
standards.
Plumbing inspections insure that water and sewer facilities
are installed in a manner that will protect the occupants health.
Heating
and ventilating inspections as sure that heating units are installed properly
and include provisions for smoke abatement in order to reduce air pollution.
Electrical inspections insure that wiring installations will reduce fire
hazards.
Housing inspections differ from the above in that the housing
code is concerned with buildings that were built under former regulations
(usually these required lower standards of safety and sanitation).
It is the
general purpose of housing inspe ction to upgrade the standard of liv ing in
e x isting housing.
Zoning ordinance enforcement activities support the
r e gulations of land use , control of h e ight and bulk of buildings, establish area
re qui re m e nts fo r ya r ds and other ope n spaces.
�Page Four
The volume of work undertaken by the department may be
measured by the value and number of building permits issued in the past
ten years.
Value of Building
(Milli ons of Dollars)
Year
76
59
59
10.8
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
Number of Permits
10,613
9,682
7, 791
8,327
8,728
114
91
96
8, 311
10,
9,
9,
9,
117
109
150
158
357
168
142
Building C o des
The C ity of Atlanta p r ov ides through the s e vari ous c odes a hi gh
standard of constru c t ion.
The N ational Building Cod e is ba s ically us e d for
building.( :n 1965 a r e v ise d National Ele ctri cal C o d e wHi
will be adopte d by the C it0
C urre ntly the C ity is us i n g the existin g National
E l e c trical C ode w ith som e l ocal amendment s .
d e vel o ping a H e a t ing C o de.
e, i s sue d which
The C i ty is a l e ader i n
This code has rec e ive d n ati ona l acclaim and has
b een wid e ly a dopte d by othe r citie s .
The Plumbing and the H o using C o d es
a r e not bas e d aft e r any mode l co d e , b u t do incorpo rate high s t a n dards.
,.
f
(
i ,
l
�Page Five
Gene rally, the codes provide for eight inspections to be made during actual
construction.
A final inspection is made upon completion of all work to
assure conformance to land use, type of building, area of lot and other
requirements of the zoning and building ordinances and codes.
A certificate
of occupancy is is sued at that time.
Q.tJ eJJJ e,,
Budget and ~ ~
The department collects in fees enough funds to cover all the
exp e ns e s of ope ration .
A recent surve y of m uni cipal building inspe ction
practices indicated that 72 per cent of 101 cities ove r 100, 000 population
r e c e i ve 75 per c ent or more of the ir oper ating budge t fro m fe es.
Th irty -
t wo p er c ent of these cities rece i ve 100 per cent o r more of thei r operating
budget from fees.
Public C on veni e nc e
The con solidation of i n spe ctional s e r v ice and a central building
p ermits desk serves as a p ub li c convenience.
can get all b uilding permits at one l ocation.
A contractor o r i n d ividua l
He must, however, still go to
several other loca tions within C ity Hall for othe r basi c information a n d
p e rmits.
Water permits, water meters and location of water facilities are
obtained from the Water D epartment; sewer permits, street opening permits,
sewer assessments, curb cut permits and l ocation of sewer facil ities are
�Page Six
obtained from the Construction Department.
Applications for rezoning
and street numbers are provided at the Planning Department.
Copies of the
Zoning Code are purchased from the City Clerk as are licenses to engage
in the construction business.
Complete consolidation of these information
and permit issuing functions requires considerable study and would effect
changes that cross over departmental lines.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
‘ - DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
The Department of Buildings administers and enforces the
Zoning Ordinance, the Housing and Slum Clearance Code, the Housing
Demolition Ordinance, the Georgia Safety Fire Law and the Elevator
Ordinance. Its responsibilities generally regulate the private use of private
property. The manner in which the department does its job and works with
other agencies both in and out of the City government will be reflected in
the quality of total community development. Staffing, organization, and
records must be so developed as to have flexibility, comprehensiveness,
and sesnitivity to the needs and requirements of area action.
.
The Department of Buildings has been the subject of extensive
review and reorganization to better prepare it for its role. Implementation
of the reorganization is now in the final stage. It would be inappropriate
to attempt to evaluate performance.
Or ganization
In 1964, Public Administration Service prepared a survey report
relating to the consolidation of inspectional services in the City of Atlanta.
This report reviewed and identified all inspectional functions carried out
among several departments within the City government. The major attention
of the report was focused on the Department of Building Inspections. The
findings of the report led to recommendations for an expended department of
Page Two
Building Inspections to include plumbing inspection ivom the Construction
Department), electrical inspection (from the Department of Electricity) and
housing code inspection (from the Department of Urban Renewal). The City
adopted the full report. The Departments of Electricity and Urban Renewal
were abolished when their few remaining responsibilities were transferred
to other departments and agencies. No one lost his job or was reduced in
salary due to the implementation of these recommendations.
Consolidation began in July of 1964, In the beginning little more
could be accomplished than to effect a legal change. The various offices
were spread from the third floor of City Hall to the thirteenth floor. In late
summer 1965, one year later, major office realignments were made at City
Hall which resulted in the Department of Buildings occupying all of the eighth
and ninth floors. Further office assignments were made in 1966. Physical
provisions were made for a central records and statistical unit and the central
permits desk. Staffing for the Records Bureau was provided by clerical
personnel formerly assigned to each-of the inspection divisions.
Staffing
The Department has a technical staff of 72 and a clerical staff
of 16. The technical staff includes the department head (Building Official),
an assistant Building Official, two architect engineers, ten plumbing inspectors,
Page Three
ten electrical inspectors, two elevator inspectors, nine heating and
ventilating inspectors and engineers, sixteen building inspectors and
fifteen Batecks engaged in housing code enforcement. Six technicians are
either registered engineers or architects. Most of the specialized inspectors
are licensed in their trades.
Work Program
Inspectional services are provided to insure the health, safety
and general welfare of the community. Building inspections insure that
structures will be built, repaired and altered in accordance with accepted
standards. Plumbing inspections insure that water and sewer facilities
are installed in a manner that will protect the occupants health. Heating
and ventilating inspections assure that heating units are installed properly
and include provisions for smoke abatement in order to reduce air pollution,
Electrical inspections insure that wiring installations will reduce fire
hazards, Housing inspections differ from the above in that the housing
code is concerned with buildings that were built under former regulations
(usually these required lower standards of safety and sanitation). It is the
general purpose of housing inspection to upgrade the standard of living in
existing housing. Zoning ordinance enforcement activities support the
regulations of land use, control of height and bulk of buildings, establish area
requirements for yards and other open spaces.
Page Four
The volume of work undertaken by the department may be
measured by the value and number of building permits issued in the past
ten years.
Year Value of Building Number of Permits
(Millions of Dollars)
1955 76 10, 613
1956 59 9, 682
1957 59 7,791
1958 108 8, 327
1959 > pe 8,728
1960 91 8,311
1961 96 10, 158
1962 117 9, 357
1963 109 : 9, 168
1964 150 9, 142
1965
Building Codes
The City of Atlanta provides through these various codes a high
standard of construction. The National Building Code is basically used for
building In 1965 a revised National Electrical Code Win -be issued which
will be adopted by the City. ) Currently the City is using the existing National
Electrical Code with sone local amendments. The City is a leader in
developing a Heating Code. This code has received national acclaim and has
been widely adopted by other cities. The Plumbing and the Housing Codes
are not based after any model code, but do incorporate high standards,
Page Five
Generally, the codes provide for eight inspections to be made during actual
construction, A final inspection is made upon completion of all work to
assure conformance to land use, type of building, area of lot and other
requirements of the zoning and building ordinances and codes. A certificate
of occupancy is issued at that time.
Reven c
Budget and- Revue
The department collects in fees enough funds to cover all the
expenses of operation. A recent survey of municipal building inspection
practices indicated that 72 per cent of 101 cities spate 100, 000 population
receive 75 per cent or more of their operating budget from fees. Thirty-
two per cent of these cities receive 100 per cent or more of their operating
budget from fees.
Public Convenience
The consolidation of inspectional service and a central building
permits desk serves as a public convenience. A contractor or individual
can get all building permits at one location. He must, however, still go to
several other locations within City Hall for other basic information and
permits. Water permits, water meters and location of water facilities are
obtained from the Water Department; sewer permits, street opening permits,
sewer assessments, curb cut permits and location of sewer facilities are
Page Six
obtained from the Construction Department. hoeite seas for rezoning
and street numbers are provided at the Planning Department. Copies of the
Zoning Code are purchased from the City Clerk as are licenses to engage
in the construction business. Complete consolidation of these information
and permit issuing functions requires considerable study and would effect
changes that cross over departmental lines.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 43
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 1955 76 10
Date: 1956
Date: 1957
Date: 1958
Date: 1959
Date: 1960
Date: 1961 96 10
Date: 1962
Date: 1964
Date: 1965
Date: 1966
Date: 59 9
Date: july of 1964
Date: late summer 1965
Date: one year later
Date: ten years
Date: the beginning little more
Event: 1965
Event: national electrical code
Event: the housing demolition ordinance
Event: the national building code
Event: the regulations of land use
Event: the zoning code
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: the city clerk
Geopolitical Entity: the city government
Law: national electrical code win
Organization: departments of electricity and urban renewal
Organization: inspectional
Organization: public administration service
Organization: the construction department
Organization: the department of building inspections
Organization: the department of buildings
Organization: the department of electricity
Organization: the department of urban renewal
Organization: the elevator ordinance
Organization: the housing and slum clearance code
Organization: the planning department
Organization: the records bureau
Organization: the water department
Person: heating
Person: zoning ordinance
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/b3a918b628eb10ef7bd688d6b5c0e1dc.pdf
0555601c002d4e9d33d07bd2268b0a5d
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
'· }
CITY OF .ATLANT.A
CITY HALL
October 14, 1966
ATLANTA, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404
IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR
R. EARL LANDERS, Administrative Assistant
MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary
DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liai son
MEMORANDUM
To:
Mr. Earl Landers
From:
Dan Sweat
Subject: Housing C o de Compliance Program
In an effort to comply with your request that I look into the
problems and complaints regarding the Housing Code Compliance
Program, I have attempted to analyze the major sources of
difficulty and suggest possible corrective measures.
I am submitting an analysis of the Housing Code Compliance
Program Policy and Procedure Guide adopted January 1, 1965,
pointing out areas where the Guide should be updated and also areas
where the Guide is not being followed or cannot be met because of
inter-departmental or e x tradepartmental problems.
�Mr. Landers
Page Two
October 14, 1966
Included in this report is a brief history of recent changes
in the Department of Inspection and an outline of current organization
and operations.
I have not attempted to analyze the various divisions of the
Building Inspection Department, but to point out areas of concern in
the administration of the Housing Code Compliance Program.
Where
the method of operation of another division adversely affects the operation
of the Housing Division, howeve r, this is noted and in most cases,
suggestions are made for improvements.
DS:fy
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
| ’ a)
“CITY OF ATLANTA
CITY HALL ATLANTS, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404
October 14, 1966
IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR
R. EARL LANDERS, Administrative Assistant
MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary
DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Earl Landers
From: Dan Sweat
Subject: Housing Code Compliance Program
In an effort to comply with your request that I look into the
problems and complaints regarding ie Housing Code Compliance
Program, I have attempted to analyze the major sources of
difficulty and suggest possible corrective measures.
Iam submitting an analysis of the Housing Code Compliance
Program Policy and Procedure Guide adopted January 1, 1965,
pointing out areas where the Guide should be updated and also areas
where the Guide is not being followed or cannot be met because of
inter-departmental or extradepartmental problems.
Mr. Landers
Page Two
October 14, 1966
Included in this report is a brief history of recent changes
in the Department of Inspection and an outline of current organization
and operations.
I have not attempted to analyze the various divisions of the
Building Inspection Department, but to point out areas of concern in
the administration of the Housing Code Compliance Program. Where
the method of operation of another division adversely affects the operation
of the Housing Division, however, this is noted and in most cases,
uggestio are made for improvements.
s stions ar de f pr t
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 42
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: january 1, 1965
Date: october 14, 1966
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: Georgia
Organization: dan sweat subject: housing code
Organization: housing code compliance program
Organization: page two
Organization: the building inspection department
Organization: the department of inspection
Organization: the housing code compliance program
Organization: the housing code compliance program policy and procedure guide
Organization: the housing division
Person: Dan Sweat
Person: earl landers
Person: Ivan Allen
Person: landers
Person: m. moses
Person: R. Earl Landers
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/3288cb360067d3d29291d3e8ed5c5d03.pdf
f8ffb7cd929e0c167d57d32aff9b500a
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
October 13 , 196 6
MEMORANDUM
To : Mr . Bill W o fford
From : Dan Sweat
Thanks for the copy of Dr. Weaver's speech to the Building
Officials C onference .
He had some interesting ren~arks which I am certainl y glad
to get for my file .
DS :fy
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
October 13, 1966
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Bill Wofford
From: Dan Sweat
4
Thanks for the copy of Dr. Weaver's speech to the Building
Officials Conference.
He had some interesting remarks which I am certainly glad
to get for my file.
DS:fy
ae
a ee
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 41
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: october 13, 1966
Event: the building officials conference
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: ds
Person: bill wofford
Person: Dan Sweat
Person: weaver
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/7164aaeadc3aa5cb399df21919313c7d.pdf
f140c13bb5b7f5a2809b1dfb6f6029cf
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
I,
October 3, 1966
D-R AFT
M EMORANDUM
To : M ayor I v an Allen, Jr.
From: Dan Sweat
Subje ct: L :-w Income H using Program, City of A tl anta
In accordance with your verbal d irection of Septe mber 28 ,
1966, the following program i s recommended to meet the requirenients
outlined for acceleration of the City's hous ing code c omplian ce program
an adequat e
and devel opment of :io:xasri:Ewp:J supply of l ow inc ome housing .
The program as outlined herein is deeitmed to accomplish
two major objectives:
1.
Relocation of a maximum number of low income families
from the worst slum areas and demolition of substand rd structures
prior to J une 1, 1967.
2.
A cceleration of construction of authoi-ized public housing
�Page Two
units and d e ve l opment of new publi c hous i ng r e sour ces with tar get d ate s
of June 1, 196 7, and J une 1, 1968 .
In o r der to a cc omplish t hese goal s the following maj or
re c omme ndati on s must be c ons i der e d :
1.
A d opti on by the May or and B oa r d of Aldermen of a s tr on g
polic y o f Ho u sing C ode Enfo rcement and is sua n ce of a clear
implementing directive to a ll offici a l s charged w ith such i mplem e n tation
and opera tion of t he Housing C o d e C ompli ance Program.
(C opy cf
proposed policy a tta c hed)
2.
The Housing Code Compliance Policy adopted January 1,
1965 , be revi sed to provide for priority treatment to "cle a r a n c e ,
code enforcement" areas and firm designation of Title I Urban Renewal
r as on a 2-year maximum delay schedule .
(Copy of prope sed revision
att ched.)
3.
A d dition of
minimum of 14 new positions in the Housing
C ode C ompliance Division, including 10 additional inspectors and four
cleric
employees .
4.
Adoption by the Atlanta H o using Authority of an innov tiv
d energetic progr m of public housing using all
v il bl
resource
�Page Three
of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, including lease
and pur chase of renovated private hous i ng under the ' 'turnkey" pr o gram.
5.
Encouragement of and assistance to private,,. non-profit
and profit housing developers by the Atlanta Housing A uthority for the
c onstruction and d evelopment of private and semi-public housing resources
for low income and moderate income families , utilizing the
11
221"
programs as well as private capital.
6.
Imm.edi te review of all pending and authorized public
housing projects and initiation of necessary action ·to complete all
scheduled proFcts prior t o June 1, 1968.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
October 3, 1966
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr.
From: Dan Sweat
Subject: Low Income Housing Program, City of Atlanta
In accordance with your verbal direction ‘of September 28,
1966, the following program is recommended to meet the requirements
outlined for acceleration of the City's housing code compliance program
an adequate
and development of imaciexnate supply of low income housing.
The program as outlined herein is desigged to accomplish
two major objectives:
1. Relocation of a maximum number of low income families
from the worst slum areas and demolition of substandard structures
prior to June 1, 1967.
2. Acceleration of construction of authorized public housing
Page Two
units and development of new public housing resources with target dates
of June 1, 1967, and June 1, 1968.
In order to accomplish these goals the following major
recommendations must be considered:
1. Adoption by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen of a strong
policy of Housing Code Enforcement and issuance of a clear
implementing directive to all officials charged with such implementation
and operation of the Housing Code Compliance Program. (Copy of
proposed policy attached)
2. The Housing Code Compliance Policy adopted January 1,
1965, be revised to provide for priority treatment to ''clearance,
code enforcement'' areas and firm designation of Title I Urban Renewal
areas on a 2-year maximum delay schedule. (Copy of propesed revision
attached. )
3. Addition of a minimum of 14 new positions in the Housing
Code Compliance Division, including 10 additional inspectors and four
clerical employees,
4, Adoption by the Atlanta Housing Authority of an innovative
and energetic program of public housing using all available resources
Page Three
of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, including lease
and purchase of renovated private housing under the ''turnkey"' program.
5. Encouragement of and assistance to private,, non-profit
and profit housing developers by the Atlanta Housing Authority for the
construction and development of private and semi-public housing resources
for low income and moderate income families, utilizing the '221"
programs as well as private capital.
6. Immediate review of all pending and authorized public
housing projects and initiation of necessary action to complete all
‘
scheduled projects prior to June 1, 1968.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 40
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: 1965
Date: 1966
Date: january 1
Date: june 1, 1967
Date: june 1, 1967,
Date: june 1, 1968
Date: october 3, 1966
Date: september 28
Event: the housing code compliance division
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: Atlanta
Law: the housing code compliance policy
Organization: atlanta board of aldermen
Organization: Atlanta Housing Authority
Organization: copy
Organization: housing code enforcement
Organization: HUD
Organization: immediate
Organization: income housing program
Organization: the housing code compliance program
Organization: title i urban renewal
Person: Dan Sweat
Person: Ivan Allen
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/beed9517b9ad91460c44cf0f1a061939.pdf
b324aff14c797fb0bf42c9f8e982fd19
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
•
September 20, . 1966
Col. Malcolm Jones,
Supervisor of Inspection Services,
Building Depart.~ent,
City Hall,
Atlanta, Georgia.
Dear Col. Jonesa
As you ltnow, Mr. Milton, Codes Compliance Officer, and I review
each case prior to trial each Thursday and determine the penalty and
Court order, which I recommend to the Presiding Judge. I am sure you
will agree that nine times out of ten, Judge Sparks imposes the sentence and order which I request in behalf of the City.
Mr • .Milton and I make our recommendation to the Judge on the
following basis&
1. Number of prior notices of deficiencies by the City to the
defendant.
2. The severity of the violations (whether or not there are a
few minor repairs or numerous violations).
3. Whether or not we feel the defendant's failure to comply is
willful, or whether or not the person is financially unable to make
corrections.
4. Whether or not the defendant is receiving income from the property, is an owner-occupant, or the building is vacant.
5.
The defendant's past record in Court, if any.
6. Whether or not the person we bring into Court has the authority to make repairs (for example, agents, who have only the authority
to lease or sell the property, and no authority from the owner to
make repairs. Also, in ~ases involved in litigation, estates, incompetents, etc. ).
�-
....
,,.
.
7. Whether or not the property is ,located in a "Proposed
Area". Up to the present time, Mr. Milton has advised that it
is th,3 policy of the Housing Di vision to only require minimum
standards of the Code to correct hazardous,· unsafe and unsanitary
conditions, until such time as the property is acquired.
,Joe Sh,1ffer has received one notice from the City and it is
my understanding that this section is in a "Proposed Area". The
tenants have also been cited for violating the Code. I presume
these tenants are destitute: therefore, if a penalty is imposed,
the majority will serve time in the City Jail in lieu of payment
of the fine. If possible, I would like to know whether or not
suitable housing is available in Atlanta at an amount these people
can afford to pay. If we request that these people vacate the
premises immediately, I believe this question will arise and I
would like to have an answer.
In view of the City's policy in "Proposed Areas", and because
of the recent riots, I~~ bringing this matter to your attention,
so that if you deem it necessary, the Mayor's office and Mr.
Wofford might be consulted.
It is my suggestion that we have a confe~ence regarding this
matter, and I am of the opinion that Mr. Robert Lyle . should be
present, inasmuch as he and I have worked on these cases together.
Very truly yours,
(Mrs.) Colette Dusthimer,
MUNICIPAL COURT, General Division,
City of: Atlanta.
CD/dj
CC:
Mr . C. L. Milton, v
Codes Compliance Officere
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
September 20, 1966
Col. Malcolm Jones, .
Supervisor of Inspection Services,
Building Department,
City Hall,
Atlanta, Georgias
Dear Col, Jones:
As you know, Mr. Milton, Codes Compliance Officer, and I review
each case prior to trial each Thursday and determine the penalty and
Court order, which I recommend to tha Presiding Judge. I am sure you
will agree that nine times out of ten, Judge Sparks imposes the sen=
tence and order which I request in behalf of the City.
Mr. Milton and I make our recommendation to the Judge on the
following basis: \
1. Number of prior notices of deficiencies by the City to the
defendant.
2. The severity of the violations (whether or not there are a
few minor repairs or numerous violations).
3. Whether or not we feel the defendant's failure to comply is
willful, or whether or not the person is financially unable to make
corrections.
4, Whether or not the defendant is receiving income from the pro=-
perty, is an owner-occupant, or the building is vacant.
5. The defendant's past record in Court, if any.
6. Whether or not the person we bring into Court has the author=
ity to make repairs (for example, agents, who have only the authority
to lease or sell the property, and no authority from the owner to
make repairs. Also, in cases involved in litigation, estates, ine
competents, etc.).
€,
7. Whether or not the property is located in a "Proposed
Area", Up to the present time, Mr. Milton has advised that it
is the policy of the Housing Division to only require minimum
standards of the Code to correct hazardous, unsafe and unsanitary
conditions, until such time as the property is acquired.
Joe Shaffer has received one notice from the City and it is
my understanding that this section is in a "Proposed Area". The
tenants have also been cited for violating the Code. I presume
these tenants are destitute; therefore, if a penalty is imposed,
the majority will serve time in the City Jail in lieu of payment
of the fine. If possible, I would like to know whether or not
suitable housing is available in Atlanta at an amount these people
can afford to pay. If we request that these people vacate the
premises immediately, I believe this question will arise and I
would like to have an answer.
In view of the City's policy in "Proposed Areas", and because
of the recent riots, I am bringing this matter to your attention,
so that if you deem it necessary, the Mayor's office and Mr.
Wofford might be consulted.
It is my suggestion that we have a conference regarding this
matter, and I am of the opinion that Mr. Robert Lyle should be
present, inasmuch as he and I have worked on these cases together,
Very truly yours,
(Mrs.) Colette Dusthimer,
MUNICIPAL COURT, General Division,
City of Atlanta.
cD/a3
CC: Mr. C. Le Milton, ~
Codes Compliance Officer.
o pry Re ix |
a es |
AIR
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 39
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: september 20, 1966 col
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: Atlanta
Geopolitical Entity: city hall
Organization: air
Organization: building department
Organization: codes compliance officer
Organization: court
Organization: general division
Organization: municipal court
Organization: supervisor of inspection services
Organization: the housing division
Person: c. le milton
Person: code
Person: colette dusthimer
Person: jail
Person: joe shaffer
Person: jones
Person: Malcolm Jones
Person: milton
Person: robert lyle
Person: sparks
Person: very
Person: wofford
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/2d5c8d3944ea5feee48136a1418473ec.pdf
8cbd7a29efbd64d35377eb906ea4e93c
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF ATLANTA
MUNICIPAL COURT
General Division
165 DECATUR STREET, S. E. -
JAckson 4-7890
Atlanta 3, Georgia
EDWARD T . BROCK
Assoc i at e Judge
September 29, 1966
ROB ER T E. JONES
T . C . LI T T LE
Assoc i ate Judge
C hi ef J udge
Mr. Earl Landers,
Administrative Assistant to the Mayor,
City Hall,
Atlanta, Georgia.
Dear Earl:
There has been some discussion between the Building
Inspectors' Office and the Court regarding the Urban Renewal.
I am enclosing herewith a copy of the letter that
Mrs . Colette Dusthimer, who prosecutes these cases, has
sent to Col. Malcolm Jones. Mrs. Dusthime r has discussed
this problem with Mr . Bob Lyle, of the City Attorney's
Office, and I am sure he will discuss the matter with
you. The copy of the letter enclosed is simply for y our
information.
In the future, if any controversy comes up regarding
the Urban Renewal Program where the Courts ·are concerned,
I would appreciate it very much if you would give me a
ring and allow me the opportunity of discussing. the
matter with you .
With kindest regards.
Sincerely yours,
~-
R. E . Jones , Chief Judge,
MUNICIPAL COURT, General Division ,
City of Atlanta .
REJ/dj
Enc l osure
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF ATLANTA
MUNICIPAL COURT
General Division
165 DECATUR STREET, S.E. — JAckson 4—7890
Atlanta 3, Georgia EDWARD T. BROCK
Associate Judge
September 29, 1966 T. Cc. LITTLE
Associate Judge
ROBERT E. JONES
Chief Judge
Mr. Earl Landers,
Administrative Assistant to the Mayor,
City Hall,
Atlanta, Georgia.
Dear Earl:
There has been some discussion between the Building
Inspectors' Office and the Court regarding the Urban Re-
newal. I am enclosing herewith a copy of the letter that
Mrs. Colette Dusthimer, who prosecutes these cases, has
sent to Col. Malcolm Jones. Mrs. Dusthimer has discussed
this problem with Mr. Bob Lyle, of the City Attorney's
Office, and I am sure he will discuss the matter with
you. The copy of the letter enclosed is simply for your
information.
In the future, if any controversy comes up regarding
the Urban Renewal Program where the Courts are concerned,
I would appreciate it very much if you would give me a
ring and allow me the opportunity of discussing the
Matter with you.
With kindest regards.
Sincerely yours,
R. E. Jones, Chief Judge,
MUNICIPAL COURT, General Division,
City of Atlanta.
REJ/dj
Enclosure
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 38
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: september 29, 1966 t. cc
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: Atlanta
Geopolitical Entity: Georgia
Geopolitical Entity: mayor
Organization: court
Organization: courts
Organization: general division
Organization: municipal court
Organization: rej
Organization: the building inspectors' office
Organization: the urban renewal program
Organization: urban
Person: bob lyle
Person: colette dusthimer
Person: dear earl
Person: dusthimer
Person: earl landers
Person: edward t. brock
Person: Malcolm Jones
Person: r. e. jones
Person: robert e. jones
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/ad5a8548ded84a73a02bad9ae45f2f99.pdf
35253514e57bd1958535bc1cc9710a73
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
Properties Referred to the Atlanta Housing Authority
454 Dover's Alley,
s .w.
449 Dover's Alley,
s .w.
456 Dover's Alley,
s .w.
445 Miller's Alley,
s.w.
453 Miller's Alley,
s.w.
s.w.
405 Chapel Street,
409-A Chapel Street ,
s .w.
409-B Chapel Street,
s.w.
s .w.
447 Chapel Street,
R- 447 Chapel Street,
s .w.
s .w.
429 Chapel Street,
412 Markham Stre et,
s. w.
414 Markham Stree t,
s .w.
416 Markham St reet ,
s.w.
418 Markham Street,
s.w.
420 Markham Stre et ,
s .w.
4 24 Markham Stree t,
s.w.
419 Markham Stree t,
s.w.
421 Markham Street,
s .w.
448 Markham Street,
s.w.
4 22 Markham Street ,
s. w.
s.w.
554 Markham Street ,
82 Haynes Street,
s .w.
80 Haynes St r e e t ,
s. w.
72 Haynes Stre et,
s.w.
74 Haynes St ree t ,
s.w.
�-2-
76 Haynes Street, S.W.
78 Haynes Street, S.W.
38 Haynes Street, S.W.
89 Haynes Street, S.W.
179 Chestnut Street, N.W.
382-384 Foundary Street, N.W.
R-359 Magnolia Street, N.W., #1
R-361 Magnolia Street, N.W., #2
106 Randolph Street, N.E.
448 Whitehall Terrace, S.W.
240 Mangum Street, N.W.
242 Mangum Street, N.W.
238 Mangum Street, N.W.
395 Mayes Street, NoW.
501 Edgewood Avenue, N.E.
718 Capitol Avenue, S.E.
460 Arnold Street, N.E.
457 Arnold Street, N.E.
859 Center Hill Avenue, N.W.
721 Tifton Street, N.Wo
780 Capitol Avenue, S.E.
754 Capitol Avenue, S.E.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Properties Referred to the Atlanta Housing Authority
454 Dover's Alley, S.W.
449 Dover's Alley, S.W.
456 Dover's Alley, S.W.
445 Miller's Alley, S.W.
453 Miller's Alley, S.W.
405 Chapel Street, S.W.
409-A Chapel Street, S.W.
409-B Chapel Street, S.W.
447 Chapel Street, S.W.
R-447 Chapel Street, S.W.
429 Chapel Street, S.W.
412 Markham Street, S.W.
414 Markham Street, S.W.
416 Markham Street, S.W.
418 Markham Street, S.W.
420 Markham Street, S.W.
424 Markham Street, S.W.
419 Markham Street, S.W.
421 Markham Street, S.W.
448 Markham Street, S.W.
422 Markham Street, S.W.
554 Markham Street, S.W.
82 Haynes Street, S.W.
80 Haynes Street, S.W.
72 Haynes Street, S.W.
74 Haynes Street, S.W.
=9-
76 Haynes Street,
78 Haynes Street,
38 Haynes Street, S.W.
89 Haynes Street, S.W.
179 Chestnut Street, N.W.
382-384 Foundary Street, N.W.
R-359 Magnolia Street, N.W., #1
R-361 Magnolia Street, N.W., #2
106 Randolph Street, N.E.
448 Whitehall Terrace, S.W.
240 Mangum Street, N.W.
242 Mangum Street, N.W.
238 Mangum Street, N.W.
395 Mayes Street, N.W.
501 Edgewood Avenue, N.E.
718 Capitol Avenue, S.E.
460 Arnold Street, N.E.
457 Arnold Street, N.E.
859 Center Hill Avenue, N.W.
721 Tifton Street, N.W.
780 Capitol Avenue, S.E.
754 Capitol Avenue, S.E.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 37
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: dover
Geopolitical Entity: s.e.
Organization: alley
Organization: Atlanta Housing Authority
Organization: capitol avenue
Organization: miller
Organization: s.w.
Organization: s.w. 179 chestnut street
Organization: s.w. 405
Organization: s.w. 409-a chapel street
Organization: s.w. 409-b
Organization: s.w. 414 markham street
Organization: s.w. 416 markham street
Organization: s.w. 418 markham street
Organization: s.w. 421 markham street
Organization: s.w. 424 markham street
Organization: s.w. 429 chapel street
Organization: s.w. 447 chapel street
Organization: s.w. 72 haynes street
Organization: s.w. 74 haynes street
Organization: s.w. 80 haynes street
Organization: s.w. 89 haynes street
Organization: s.w. r-447 chapel street
Organization: whitehall terrace
-
http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/files/original/225a86b5e5320294aef70f5cbbf846af.pdf
c2c54303e80795750490db1da3ef29e7
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
C
A LA
TY O F
A
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
J. S . BUCHANAN
WILLIAM R. WOFFORD, P.E., R.A.
CHIEF HOUSING CODE INSPECTOR
IN SPECTOR OF BUI LDING S
E LMER H. M_OON, E.E., P . E.
ASS T. IN SPECTOR OF BU IL DINGS
September 15, 1966
Mr. Dan Sweat
Governmental Liason Officer
Second. Floor, City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia
Dear Dan:
The Housing Code Division has requested. the Atlanta Housing
Authority Central Relocation Service to offer relocation assistance
to the tenants in the herein listed properties. These properties are
in the Markham-Haynes Street, Incinerator, and Capitol Avenue Areas.
Hopefully the funds now available through the . EOA Program can
be utilized to overcome some of the tenant problems in regards to
relocating. We will continue to refer these situations to the
Atlanta Housing Authority, as they come to light, with special emphasis
in the area of Capitol Avenue and Washington Street.
Sincerely~
--
() /
~
.
'
J.S. Buchanan
.
Chief Housing Code Inspector
JSB:mse
cc:
Sup ervisor of Inspect ion Services
ATLANTA
Tl-IE
DOGWOOD
CITY
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
WILLIAM R, WOFFORD, P.E., R.A. J. S. BUCHANAN
INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS CHIEF HOUSING CODE INSPECTOR
ELMER H. MOON, E.E., P.E.
ASST. INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
September 15, 1966
Mr. Dan Sweat
Governmental Liason Officer
Second Floor, City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia
Dear Dan:
The Housing Code Division has requested the Atlanta Housing
Authority Central Relocation Service to offer relocation assistance
to the tenants in the herein listed properties. These properties are
in the Markham-Haynes Street, Incinerator, and Capitol Avenue Areas.
Hopefully the funds now available through the; EOA Program can
be utilized to overcome some of the tenant problems in regards to
relocating. We will continue to refer these situations to the
Atlanta Housing Authority, as they come to light, with special emphasis
in the area of Capitol Avenue and Washington Street.
Sincerely,
J.S. Buchanan |
Chief Housing Code Inspector
JSB:mse
ec: Supervisor of Inspection Services
ATLANTA THE DOGWOOD CITY
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 1, Document 36
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 1
Date: september 15, 1966
Folder topic: Building department | 1964-1966
Geopolitical Entity: Atlanta
Geopolitical Entity: buchanan
Geopolitical Entity: e.e.
Geopolitical Entity: Georgia
Geopolitical Entity: j.s.
Geopolitical Entity: p.e.
Geopolitical Entity: sincerely
Organization: Atlanta City Hall
Organization: Atlanta Housing Authority
Organization: capitol avenue areas
Organization: dogwood
Organization: eoa program
Organization: inspector of buildings
Organization: second floor
Organization: supervisor of inspection services atlanta
Organization: the atlanta housing authority central relocation service
Organization: the housing code division
Person: Dan Sweat
Person: governmental liason
Person: incinerator
Person: r.a. j. s. buchanan
Person: william r
Person: wofford