Dublin Core
Title
Box 1, Folder 3, Document 17
Text Item Type Metadata
Text
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR Of BUILDINGS
800 CITY HALL
TEL. JA. 2-4463 EXT. 321
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
t.'cb 17 , 1 969
MEMORANDill4
TO
Y...arl A. Bevins
J a ck C. Delius
Ray A. Nixon
Paul ieir
FROM
W.R. Woffo~
Gentlemen :
In J uly, 1 966 , in accordance withe memor ndum f rom
Mr . Landers we established a policy of holding plane i n
the Building Department fo r a thr e-day period o that they
could be reviewed by
represent ative of your department who
would come to t he Building Departu1ent each orning for that
purpose.
Mo.et of you are sending
repr esentative to tho dep rtment
ae previously arranged. However, the three day waiting period
fr~quently seems top as without a repr s ntative from eom
d partm nte revi vtng plans on file. When this happens, w arc
re.quiring th contractor to contact your offic and secur
approval. from you . So e of the contractors have objected to
being sent to various other City dep rtmen , part~culnrly tho e
located in the City Ball Annex, inc they claim this is n
inconvenienc to th
If you are not now ending a re r sent tive to the Buildin,
D p rtment ea h mornin to cb.Gck plane on fi1, I wish you
would do o ; oth rwi c. I hall b compelled to is u a building
p rciit wh re the pl
have remained on fil for
p riod of mor
than t hr
d y
contractor requ ats pproval.
cc . . Mr • • Earl Land rs
�
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR Of BUILDINGS
800 CITY HALL
TEL. JA. 2-4463 EXT. 321
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
t.'cb 17 , 1 969
MEMORANDill4
TO
Y...arl A. Bevins
J a ck C. Delius
Ray A. Nixon
Paul ieir
FROM
W.R. Woffo~
Gentlemen :
In J uly, 1 966 , in accordance withe memor ndum f rom
Mr . Landers we established a policy of holding plane i n
the Building Department fo r a thr e-day period o that they
could be reviewed by
represent ative of your department who
would come to t he Building Departu1ent each orning for that
purpose.
Mo.et of you are sending
repr esentative to tho dep rtment
ae previously arranged. However, the three day waiting period
fr~quently seems top as without a repr s ntative from eom
d partm nte revi vtng plans on file. When this happens, w arc
re.quiring th contractor to contact your offic and secur
approval. from you . So e of the contractors have objected to
being sent to various other City dep rtmen , part~culnrly tho e
located in the City Ball Annex, inc they claim this is n
inconvenienc to th
If you are not now ending a re r sent tive to the Buildin,
D p rtment ea h mornin to cb.Gck plane on fi1, I wish you
would do o ; oth rwi c. I hall b compelled to is u a building
p rciit wh re the pl
have remained on fil for
p riod of mor
than t hr
d y
contractor requ ats pproval.
cc . . Mr • • Earl Land rs
�
Comments