Box 6, Folder 10, Document 10

Dublin Core

Title

Box 6, Folder 10, Document 10

Text Item Type Metadata

Text

/
SUMMARY OF MARTA REVIEW OF "RAPID BUSWAYS 11 PROPOSAL.
As requested by Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. on June 28, 1967,
MARTA and its staff and consultants have reviewed the proposal made
by the Atlanta Transit System for 11 RAPID BUSWAYS" in Atlanta.
The proposal was given serious and objective consideration
and study over a period of approximately five weeks. Contact was
made with Atlanta Transit System personnel and additional material
was obtained from them.
MARTA reports three basic findings:
1.
The costs to develop the busways were seriously underestimated. MARTA estimates that the costs would be
three to four times the amount noted in the proposal.
2.
Time schedules also were seriously underestimated. No
busway could be made operational in less than 3½ years,
the same time required for the East Line of rapid transit.
The interim between completion of busways and completion
of rail rapid transit would range from a minimum of one
year to a maximum of three years.
3.
The amount of busways coinciding with MARTA routes is
no more than 50 percent, and quite likely would be no
more than one third and require considerable expenditures which would never be recovered by MARTA.
MARTA makes two recommendations :
1.
Because of the high cost for very short term relief , _ implementati on of the "Rapid Busways 11 proposal should not
be attempted .
2.
If the public interest demands an e x perimental development of buswa y s , it is recommended that any expe r i mental
busway be bui l t f i r st along MARTA ' s Ea s t - We s t Li n e .
The attac hed r eport p r ovides deta il s f o r the above find ing s and
recomme ndat i o ns .,
- 1 -
�CLOSING SUMMARY
Based on MARTA's study and review of the " Rapid Busways" proposal , MARTA concludes that the implementation of the busways proposal
as it now stands is not practicable e
--The time required to complete a specific busways and rapid
transit line (except where subway is concerned) is virtually
the same. The " interim" between operational busways and
operational rapid transit would be almos~ entirely consumed
by the laying of tracks for rapid transit .
--The total cost of busways is not $52 million as described in
the proposal , but , according to MARTA engineers, more like
$150 million.
--While $150 million is indeed much less than the cost of rapid
transit , busways so constructed would not do the job of
relieving traffic as will be required for a permanent longrange solution for a city of 2 million people.
- -Although there is a great differential in costs , it would be
much more wasteful to spend $150 million for an inadequate
interim system than to spend $350 million for permanent and
eff i cient relief .
MARTA ther efore :
1.
Di sappr o v es of busways as a permanent solution and
r ecommen ds against its i mplementation as an interim
mea s u r e ;
2.
Co n c l udes that the e x per imental route p r oposed b y the
At l anta Tr a p s i t System as an interim soluti on would be a
wa s te of p ub li c money ;
3.
Recommend s that i f i t i s deemed nece ssa ry by t he Atlan ta
c ity o ffici a ls to dev elop a n e x perimenta l s e ction , t h at
the e xperime n ta l s ection s houl d ut ilize MARTA ' s Ea s t - We s t
Line s, a nd u se them e x c l u sive l y and n ot att emp t to u se
rights o f wa y wh ich wi l l n e v e r b e o f any v alu e t o MARTA .
-END-

Social Bookmarking

Comments

Transcribe This Item

  1. http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/originals/ahc_CAR_015_006_010_010.pdf

Document Viewer