.MTUzNg.MTUzNg
t ( • •' Exc:erot fror;1 Rev:..sed C::s? Handbook (T his .portion reviewed and ipproved
-.y the ~-thite House on 9/25/68)
~. 550
RelaUonshi ns Beti..re~n CE?
2. :1d
Y0de 1 Ci t j es
The City DemonstratioE Age::ncy , or CDA, is the sponsoring age ;1 cy for t r, c:,
lv'.odel Ci ti es pr0 gram in tr.ose cities selected for fodel CJ.ties .:\::., d:.. ,.i .
The V..odel Ci ties prograL", is administered by the Depart;aent o:~ Ho'..l.si n ;:,
and Urban Developme nt (HUD) in cooperation with other Federal uge;1cics
administering programs focusing on urban problems.
This program call::;
for a comprehE::nsive attack on the social, economic and physical prob-t8~G.
in seh,cted slum::; and blignted areas through conccnt. r atio n ar.d coordi n.s.t.ic::-.
of both public a:-ic. r,r:..v&te , Fei e ral, State and local efforts.
A,
Bai:-!kr<-ro unrl
Th r~ St!crr-::tary of Eousir,g and Urban Development is authoriz ed to m.s.ke
grants to, and to contract with, city demonstration agencies only if
h ~1 h,ij d,~t c r mined that th1:: r e exists--
all relEJ.t ed planning of loca l a gen cies canoe ·nchi e ved.
11
�•
L
.
\
- 9 -
"evidence that necessary cooperation of local agencies
engaged in related local planning can be obtained.
11
~
11
administrative machinery ••• at the lo cal J.eve: for ca:c:ryi~c
out the program on a consolidated and coordinated basis ..• 11
B.
Poljcy on Role of Local Chi ef Execut ives
Therefore, it is the policy of tLe federal government that ~he
chief·executives of the cities (and counties, where applic~ble)
should be encouraged to play a major role in coordi~ati~g v.a~pow~r ,
as well as other programs, in the ~odel neighbo~hoods.
ihis ~ll
require that the U.S. Departme~t of Labor in the course of initial
planning and annual renegotiation consult with the local chief
executive in regard to the following issues as they affeGt the
conc entrated e~ployment programs:
1.
Sponsorship of the CEP.
2.
The area boundari e s of the CEP.
3.
The cititen participation structure associated with
the CEP.
In order to r:.eet these stat u-c,o ry tests, the c::nnmuni ty must :-,P.ve
ar,
effective mechanism for coordi~ating CEP planning and action
components with other V~del Cities plans and activities.
This agreement among the Departments of Labor and Hou.sing and Urcar.
Development 13.nd the(-Office of Econor.J.c Opportunity is intended to
complement other agreerr.ents re gardi ng local coordination re ached
by DOL,
OED, HUD, and
H...,T.'1,4.
r
•
r.
�-
[
(
•'
10 A major empha sis
gh ,.ori
ori. . ty__. ._of
Ci
s .•_:nr
Of!:Ca.::-,_ I, is
__.. ,,_....,..and
_ _ _ti
_____
_,_ , ____
_ - •.-t ..he
...... .,,. Vi:ide
,_.~ , ,_.. ._,l, ..,..,.,
,. ti
° .._..e
__..,.._
_ ,--,,.
• · · - ::. • '
J
__ , - -alleviating
t h e proOlens
of t :le lli~ e~nloyed in each c:i.ty.
'-'---.-..::___ ;;._ .... _ ____, _ ., .,. . ., ,. . . ___ , . ... _ . ,t,.._. _ _ _•. _~-- --- · :..:- - _ _ _____ __ _ , __ _.,,_. T:1e ..-: •;--1 - - - ~.... Department of Labor is tully co::r...- ;utt ed to the i--:')de l Citi (; S p:..~oz{:~a ::;, - - - - · -·- -· · _..,_ •.ra-,_ •. • ··- - ~ . ...., ....- . . ~-- --· ' ·- - - - - ·- _ _ .,. -. . ..... ..... · - - ---~ ·- - - -· · - - • . and CEP is the primary vehicle for providing re sourc e s ar.d s e ::--vico!': · - · -- -· - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - " ' " · " -- -.. - to. support the Model CHies effort. ~ ~ -~-- ,c. ~-:-.~ .-.~ ..._,...;_-:~ -.: ":1 ~ -.-. - ·- · - -: : · ~ - - -- - · · , . - - .-r-. ..- - • ~ - ........_ _ _ _.,.._ ___ _ , _ ,:,.- - ··· - -.J , • .. ~ ·· - · - . _ _ .,. CEPs have been (or wi ll b e,) installed in as many selected V.ode l Cities a s r e so-..irce s As: means: of a ssuring max i m.u.11 tie-in with Y.o_de l Cit ie s t oper;;,tio r,s, -- instructions to prospecti VE: CEP spon sors require t h.s.t t he CE? :..a :-~c:,t area encompass the proposed V~del City target area. ~ ---.. .,. ._. -·---J._--.. . .-- ... _,,_, ,..- - - --·· .. ··- ------.--·~-- -··--- ·--··-:--
~
This :nea:is t11a t . ,-- all Model City t a r get area r e sident s will b e eligi b l e for CE.P ... ~~---- ~---.-···- -, --··· ·:- ......,, ,..,.. __, . . ..,,._. ,.,...._ :-- · - ···· manpowe r s e rvice s. In those s electe d Mod e l Citie s whe r e a CEP _has b een ( or will o e) - - - - -- ---- -~=-·,---·- - .....,:,.,.~, -:- ___,._... ,:··-..,. .. ,....•·.-.... __,.~., . . - in.s talled , the CEP soor.so r will be oper a t ional coo r c.i,,ator fo r J. _ '----------~-------·- ~----..·~ ______ _., _ __ .. _ _ , ...- . : .•• .:..- : - · - - · -- ______..... - --.,. •• • • - man~owe r service s and programs f or Vnd el Cities' areaJ th~s .,,._,,__._. . .................
avoiding J h~_est _~ ?~.2:3~'9...~-?.£~--~o mp_
t~! ~~.:..~?.~ ? ~~-i ?ati v e manpowe r
agenci e s •.
Overall coordinatio n a nd planni :-ig of manpowe r act i v ities in cor:.nc:;\'.t, ie,,.
wit.h CEP and Model Ci t ie s must b e accompli shed ut i li zi ng t r.c CA.tv.?3
~
-. . ; : - ._,.
~ - - ·-
··
a r ea coordinating corr.rnittee .
..- ,..,,._ .. _ .(_
• .J· ~·t:1.· • .., ...._
· ~ - - - - _ . , _- -
i
~---
HUD, which is a sien;i_ture agency to
t h e· inter-de partmental CP..i'1? S agreement , has info rmed CD As of the
n ecess ity of working clo sel y wi t h the l oca l CA.JV:PS COIT'u-;1itt ee .
A:n·a
coordinating committees h a ve been established in all cities select ec
as Model Cit ies and mayors h ave b een encouraged to r,,ssu.T.e leadership
--
•
�L
(
•'
- :1.1 in the cstablish:nent and structuring of these corrJid. tte e s in order to
-- ·1=)-ro.vidc direct local government input for CEP/l'l.odel Cities planning .
•
In. addition to the role mayors have in the CAMPS mecnanism, the
fb1llowing avenuE:s for cooperative participation on the part of the
ma1,or will be provided in cormection with CEP:
l..
Target P..rea
·The: CEP target area will be selected by the prime sponsor i::.
consultation with the CDA and the local chief executive .
W}1r2r~
the· CE? is located in a Xodel City, the policy shall be that the
CEP target area embrace the ~~de1 Neighborhood area •
....._
2..
Sn:.rnsor
The prime sponsor of the CEP is the CAA.
Howev er , wnere a .Ct:.?
is. located in a ~~del City, it shall be the policy of IDL to
cc,n.sult the local chief executive r egarding sponsorship of -th f.,
CEP •.
'When. the sponsorship is dis puted by the Mayor , the ,.Regior,nl
Manpower Administrator will consult with the Regional Direct.ors
or· O:ED, HUD, and HEW be.fore making a decision.
Cooperative
effo.rt.s should be made by the Regional Jvl'.odel Cities Coo r d i no.t ir. £
Committee to consili at e l ocal differences .
J.. Pl,mrd ng
The P..'l.npower .Administratio;i f i r-' ld r epr e s ent ati v es (MAR) are
- - - - - .-r-..-. - ·~ ....-.•-,..,-....,......---.... a • •., • • _r--=----.-.>"-~ '--·"'· •.,.-c!, ..,i:.,"4 ""'..r-,.-
. - ~... ~u - ..
,
inst ructed to brin g to gether representati w ·s of the CDA , CAA
- - ~ - - - - - . . , . _ _ _.._ _ _ _ _ , . . . ; _ . _
_. ... _ •
..,_,,._.
-
~,,~..-
- ·,... • • _,.,_ -:._ .....
.c.. , ,o.·,.\. ....
..., _.
..,
~-
a nd ES when making his i niti a l cont a ct in a city in connectic~
..._,__ _
_.....__..._...,..;...- - i ; o ~ ~r-.·~~
·-·- : l >a....,., :..•- n . ,._.._, _ ...1'-ti,__•_··-.-....r.-,, _.,_ ._ ,_ f �. • ' ( - 12 - with the develo pment of a CEP. --. ---- opportunity . to de si gnate a The Y.a.yor will be provided U-,e representative to p~rticipate in tte .. ~ pre-operational pla!1:1ing and structuring o.f the CEP. P..ny existing municipal manpower corr~Qttees should also be consult ed . The .t:".iayor•s office will be provided the opportunity to review the final CEP plans to assure their consistency and continuity with the ¥~del Cities plans . ~- Ope rational Phase Any· major operational restructuring required during the life of the CEP cont ract will be brought to the att ention of tne 1/~yorrs office to assure such change will not conflict with ~bde l Cities 1 pr:)gra..'4:'ling. 5.. Commu."1-aty Part.icio2.t ion The Mayor is encouraged to play a major role in promotir,g tr.e. CEP program and in obtaining the needed cooperative support of citirens, t h e business community, labor, and both public and priv.ate agencies of the city. It shall be the policy of 001 that citizen participation a::::-rangements 1,:i th r eg.qrci to CEP programs be integrated with overall YDdcl Cities citizen participation arrangements in a manner prescrib ed by local agreement. The si~e and sco pe of a CEP project within each ~Ddel Ci ty will, of' course, depend ·upon the availability of Dcpa.rt rr,ent of Labo r funding.. In most instances sufficient financi al resources will nat. be available to accommodate the complete manpower pror,rarr.minc L �. •' I ( 13 sBt forth in the llidel Cities plan. In such cas8s it ffiay be possible --.. --~·~ to augment the CEP with V.odel Citie s funding. In addition, it is also likely that there will be a considerable nu.T.ber of !·~d~l C:±ties, whi ch will not receive any CEP :r:esources. In these ca ses, the Labor Department will make every e ffort to tailor _its s c-para t0 p:.rograms .funded undC::r both the MDTA and Economic Opportunity Ac:+.. to: the needs o f :tvbdel Cities target area re s idents. The first generation of Kodel Cities applications submitted by d t,J gpv.ernrnents included many potentially effective, as well as innovative, manpower p rojects. ...,_ Such locally conceived projects could greatly,, e nrich the CEP operations and multiply the potential for se:::-ving 0 greater numbers of disadvantaged residents . These efforts should oo.t be abandoned b e caus e a CEP operation has b een initiated . The th.rust of the Model Cities l egislation is fo r increased conc er,trc.t io:-. . cr>:ordination a.."ld coope ratio~ of local, State and Fed e ral efforts; t:-.'= Mode l Ci ties program provides an ex celle nt opport U."li ty;i .for E::xpan.:'iir,r: the. CE.P potential for pr.,)viding improved and expanded services, particufa:rly the much needed supportive 3ervic es . Is-sues growing out of implementati on of the above policies whi ch cannot. be re solved at the region.::i.l level will be r eferred to the Washington offices -of t he r e spectiv e agenci es for decision . �