.MTc5OA.MTc5OA

• ,. _ - , . -...,... ,,.· ...... - ~ -.a".. ·ei·.;;"<'te~~-., -·;. ~-- ----------------~--:·- -------'-'--'-.. .....,-' . :.... w.-~~ ~ Secretary Romney -" ·:..:~-~--· i cc: I Secretary Volpe . - ------- -· -··------- - '" -----·- ·-- - ---------··- ------ --- - --· ···-- .. . __..._. ..... _ . . , w - ~...... - · --- - . :- - ._ ~~ - ~ -- -- - - •.:.........t_. - ~ -- . .... -· - - . ' . -- ~ _ _ __ _, ___ ._ _,_. __ _..:. _ ·-.~ -- ·---'--'----"' . ... -·- __ _ .. _ _. __ _-::=:_..:.. __ __ ..,_ . . . l ... ; INTRODUCTION

"'-1: -: :. :" .

•

~ ·: :- ,_~.: ·;. -

'_J
C..

! .., · --: , ...... . I~ - - • . - 1 ,·. - ,I • -·• , · · \. ... ·- · · .. . .;.. . . __... .._~; ·_. .

~ ~ ..:. ~ . -. :·")

··

. ·,.. I \ · This study design describes a process for d~veloping an action program. The overall study covers a total of_18 months. Part I of _this process, covering the first ten months, will provide a review of major imminent projects as well as produce a preliminary plan. Dµ~ing Part II, the . last eight moriths of the study, a comprehensive planning program will . be developed for adoption along with a method for continuous planning •. and programming for the future. l I -. : .. __ .\ ~- _-; . . \ . - ··

.. .,.__. . : - ._ -. .. :_:_ ~ ... .. The study design emphasizes planning and programming in accordance I wi_th specific goals and objectives. Provision is made for frequent re- I view of the goals and objectives and proposed programs by public officials, ,.-_ - the businessmen and citizens concerned with the central area. ,. . .. pose ~f this continuing policy review is two-fold. The pur-· -

.

First, the plan and - < ' · the program resulting from the proc~ss will reflect the desires and '· aspirations of the people who will_ live, work and do busines_s in the area. Second, it will generate support for the program. - .... - . - ... · ;; -- y-, . . . - .. ~ --· . - . .. . .. ._.

_. •. :. .

· 1 . . . .- - -. .s.. The program will be carried out by a special team to be created and staffed by local government and ·business through the City of Atlanta and - Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. (CAP), with staff assistance from tech. nical consultants. The community will be involved in special aspects J' • - • •.- ' of the study program. In particular, it is intended that private industry and/ or local colleges be involved in special studies of urban problems as they at:fect the Central Atlanta Area. The involvement of the business community is considered essential. CAP will be responsible for con- . tinuing liaison, reporting and solicitation of suggestions frorl?- the businessmen who w~ll be most affected by downtown plans. - ., . - .

..,· .. :.•

., _, . :.: \.=. . .·- . . I"- ·.J I ..-.· . • .- . ...:~-. . -~ , _.. ..... --..._. • w-4 • •, -lt- • .- - · - · , ,c• ._.. ,., • '

•... _ r �> ~_l I i

=:t

~,P -···- 1 i.., - __., _ ---- ----- -· -.. ·- ·-··- --···-- .--·--·- -·· -- -- -·--- -----·-- ·--··· - ·-· ···· ··-: · ··-.---- --- --- --- ------ · - -- -· __ .,._______ . . . ·- ·,-" ·- ......- - ,. .....,....~·- · - - ······ - ---

! --~~·__~~

/ w S e cretary Volpe · ···- - - · ---·· ~ -- - ~ -- - - -· - - -· - ~ · · - · · - ·- - ··· - - ~ - - - · · · ,_ ....,._ · -. · . ~ . ~ - · ~ · . .......... - · ·- ·· - .. . - - - · · · - · - - -· - · - . l .-2,. The work program places primary emphasis on t~e ;:i.nalysis and inter. pretation rather than the collection ?f data. . Most of the information wh~~h will be neede~ is already available from studies (co...:cnpleted or in ,/ ·-, . .:. .:i progress) by the City of Atlanta, the State Highway . Department of Georgia, . . . the Atlanta Area Transportation Study, the Atlanta Regional Metropolitan Planning Commission, and the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transi't Authority. This coordination is essential for the successful implementation of both studies. The timing is designed to exploit the general findings of the cur- rent area transportation study. The Central Atlanta Study and the area transportation study are mutually complementary.

! '

•: Figure 1 indicates the work program by tasks and time sequences. It is intended that this model be used as a guide for man8:gementJor the study program. I ··' ..-· .·. · i, i' . It is recognized that all studies are subject to modifica- . tion and adaptation to the exigencies of unforeseen circumstances. How-

ever a it i8"believed that the schedule as indicated in Figure 1 is reasonable

and can be accomplished with satisfactory results in the time periods indi- cated. Inherent in this study design is a flexibility which will permit the constant evaluation of proposed projects that are relevant to the Central Area while the study is in progress, to give views on the impact of these projects on the interim plans and objectives for Central Atlanta. T' . ,, STUDY AREA ~ ·t ... .; . • I •. I ~ ·~ The proposed study area is shown in Figure 2. The boundary which is f.· ·l defined by the circumferential railroad lines will permit analy~is of various projects on the downtown core. The core area itself w'ill be th~ subject of .. the most intensive analysis wherein data collection, analysis and fore custs ' ,. : J .1 . will be related to"· small zones, usually blo.c ks. . .: \. . •. . ·.·:.:. "·i

.:,-:. ~ ~- ~ -. . .

! lj i i I . i =-1 transportation alternatives and reflect the impa ct of major r e dev elopment -- I . l ·. ,, ~ i �~- ..-~ ....- ---·- · -· -~ -· - · . ~·- ,;---~,: :, )\low;# cc: . ··----,-- - - - - -----'------...:.-.-.....-"-'--""".,._,""--=...a.;.,...~.;....,.,~·.·•:..

··"'c.._·..,.~ ...:..-....,..-'.'-"- -..::.-·~---~

· ---·~·"'··- SecreU1ry Romney Secretary Volpe -~ ---~....._ __ 'I, / .. -· --- ........... - ---·· . . - ~.,,_ .. - - - . - - ~ - . ' --- ·· ~ ----·- -------------- - ·----- - - -·· . ---- . . . ..

i...-...

' . •• -· - - - ' -- ~ -~- -

· ·· - · - - - - - ~ . - - ·- - - · ·· • • - - - - -- - · -- - -- · . , _, • ___ ,.,_ . ___ _ _ ..._ . , _ _ _ _ _ ,. .., ..·-. .• . __ .: Figure 2. �~:-::.:--.::~~=::-"""'=-:S.:·:::...--::~.:: ~-.·,:~. ~. .2;.:::-2.._J.~:.:__~,_-_,.__. -~ . . _-;;;_:.:.,.·2:=.f-;S~:t--~.:-~ --~~:;., ·r.:=- Z ·· ~ .... -··· c ... . Sc cn:br y Ho mn c y S e c r etary Volp e ·:1•i ·. i __... --- --·------·-- ---- .. :f

a --:.~--•.-:- · ~- ~

- -----· -- -~- -- --- . - -..... - .. -·---:--.--13:12, 29 December 2017 (EST)__,_%:-:~-.: .. · \ · ·· · ·11 ·· ________..,_

-- -

\ .

·---:-~-- -.- --- ----~-·-·--· ---·----~ -· --1 J. ____ __.-~-_: -~-·-----~~---- -~----:-----~·----~--

·:: 1 . - --·- ------ -- ·-·.

_··.... --- ~ , ! ~- J, - - • - - • ,....,~.--, ·- - ·- , ___,__ ..:, ~-~---·-·-- --- - - ··- -~ ·~ --~-.,...--~---- · -·. -· . -.

.. ~ .. . .' •· 1 .. -_ • ... · , ; ,·-·- ' - . , " .. "": t ·,; .. _.. i:. ....:. .· ·.. t. .- , ·· :::- · .- ·-~-·- . -. ·. ~ . J I I.. ·I I . ·1 ._- _.. . ·. ··::.< ·... ;

", ·:

POLICY REVIEW PROCESS .- . , .-., : · .:.:,I :: :.· . T •PUBLIC RELATIONS r I lI •j -~ .. ..... ·-· STUDY DIRECTOR~' LEAD CONSUL TANT TECHNICAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE I l ' .I '· l .t !,. l . Figure 3. .' , .•· ., I , .· .· f' . t .,.. . 1 ,,_ I r !"1, • • S- • , .. . ' • . . .. . ,-:-~~

\~-143.215.248.55?~~:~;-143.215.248.55:;!?:~:,~,J,; ~:::·? :,-,·143.215.248.55/ ~~ .,_';'.";';~?::-~

):. ~_:-=_::?::~~:t;,'.t'-~--~:~~t:-·~-143.215.248.55?:'.':\-·~?~f.-:-'·-~· :·:.~~-7tJ'.~'-;-'.J.·~'.\ -,~.'7:.143.215.248.55U:.1:~_~.>r_.:t :Y:.'~>~~/,:1·/~. .. .: . .. - ... ' ~ ,, . ..,.. • ' • . ••

, ·-;,

-

,._. • • • ~ • I • ' •

,,' .:.'. • - ~ '• > •., ,• • • • '• 'I �