.MjM5NQ.MjM5NQ

February 22, 1968 Memorandum To: ayor Ivan Allen., Jr. Thi is more detailod follow up report pertaining to our brief di cussion yesterday re the Turnkey project on Gilbert Road S. E. Tue day, Mr-. M tt Bystry of Whiting-Turner, th conetruction firm building the 220-unit Turnkey project, cnlled me d advised that he is having di£ficu1ty in getting his site plan f ort project proved by the Sewer vision; that they aro oparently satieficd v.i.th it, in ao far as pertains to the sewer plan for the site it..,el.f_. but that t,o serious off site problem have arisen: (1) Heh e be n dvised by th Sewer Divi.sion th t thQ project cannot ti into th sew t Fl1tm Road because it is al.re dy ov rloaded, and . r Division insists th t the project provide for the off 1 er clr-.u-Ml+'::v for appro tely ½ mile down stre • whi ob • Byatr,y cl will cost him 2s,ooo to 30, 000• (2) torm • By tr:r further et t~s that he has r uctantly eed to provi the entire ving ot Flynn Ro d, which is City dodic ted treat,, but t t be is not prepared to provide th off site storm ew r draina.g , nor does he think the Feder govern... twill allow this a project cost. !r. tterf1eld turth teel t t in Turnk 7 project is b und r contract with tbs Houaing A.uthol'it7 to pure tor Public Ho-~ un tt that the Coo tion A • t hOuld also project# th gh the proj eta ctual.13" b 1ng built by • Satterfield auggec.,ted g tting ruling n th1 point tr the C1t7 J.t.T.n-rn....., as 1 t will pr bably crop up 1n rel tion to other Turnkey proj eta • . �Page 2 Memorandum To: Mayor Allen, Feb. 22, 1968 I h :ve contacted Mr . Bowden as to whether, under the Cooperation Agreement the City would be obligated to provide off site improvements for essential facilities for 'l'urnkey projects ., as it is obligated to do for conventional Public Housing projects? Mr. Bowden has suggested that Hr . Satterfield attempt to determine informally from the Federal people 11hether they will allow inclusion 0£ such off site improvements in the purchase price of Turnkey projects. Mr. tterfield has agreed to discuss this matter with local HU officials and mil advise me of their position. I have also contacted the Wat r Pollution Control Division and this is ho the matter current.l.y stands with them: The sewer site plan itself i s essentially atisfactory • • Morriss has now agreed to l et the project connect to the existing Sanitary sewer near~ Road, as the site plan ealls for, and has also eed to make the necessary improv ents to the e.xi.ating off site Sanitary sewer line, at City expense. Mr. Adair estimates that due to the development, the site area itself will genera'te ) ore run off than t present,. He bas proposed to the deVi lop r' a engineer thn.t the 42• storm e er which will a rv'i the project be extended off site for only bout 400' and that an open dr nor fl be provided tor an ditional 2600' off ite down stre to channel th run off from the 42" storm ew r, plu other surface run off from the g neral • He thinka that perhap portion of this open drainag may have to be riprap d • • Adair estimates the cost of the off sit atorm drainage, if done in this rnanner, woul.d b 1n th neighborhood of 14, 0CO and s a ked th Whiting-Turn r engineer to ea det led surv y of the ar involved to confirm the f ibility ot thi proposal and its eat· tcd cot. The ngineer agreed to do thi8 and Mr. Adair expect hi report thi eek. (How ver, I h ve just learned toda;y th office of Whiting--Turner has instructed their engin er to hold up on this, p ruling th outcome ot my report to you) . ed to assist th d veloper or It ear to e th t th olution hi ch I ha By 't17 contends how Flynn Ro front ag; &inst which that City should pron. tor all oft ularl)" o it ie al o n ded to relien, dditional pr rti in tt. .are . �Page 3 morandum To: Ma_y-or Allen, Feb. 22 , 1968 Mr. Bystry is to advise me this reek s to whether his company is agreeable to accepting the comprOll'lise solution proposed by the Serer Division. Respect.ful.ly• Malcolm D. Jones HousiDg Coordinator J ee: Mr. Dan E. Sweat, Jr • • �