.Mjc4.Mjc4

NALL , MILLER, CADENHEAD & DENNIS ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAMUEL A. MILLER A. PAUL CA DENHE A D D O UGLAS DENNIS J AM ES W . DORSE Y ED WA RD S . W HITE DON A LD M . F A IN THEOD O RE G . FR ANK EL MI C H A EL D . A LE M B I K ROBERT E . CORRY , JR . GERALD A. F RIEDL A NDER DENNIS J. W EBB T H O M AS S . C A R L O CK B AX TER L . D AV IS P RIC E S . W ILLIA M S , .JR . J ON 0. F ULLERTON LOW ELL S . FINE RO N NIE L . QU IG LE Y 2400 NAT IONA L B ANK OF GEO R GIA BUILDI NG ATLANTA , GEORGIA 30303 C O U NSE L August 21, 1969 A. WALT ON MO R TY N H AM ILT ON DOUGLAS (404) 522-2200 Mr . Dan E. Sweat, Jr. Of fice of the Mayor City Hall At lanta, Georgia 30303 Re: Inter pr etation of Sec t ion 114 of Atlan ta Plumb i ng Code Dear Mr. Sweat : On August 15, 1969, when I dis cussed with you the problem of the interpretation of Sec ti on 114 of the Plumbing Code, I stated that the Section was enacted in December, 1966, on the recommendat i on of HUD and t ha t the curr ent interpretation by the office of the Chief Plumbing Inspector which, incidentally, began dur ing t he admini stration of the former Chi ef Plumbing I n spector , is attributed by Mr. Wylie Mitchell to HUD. See the mi nut es of mee t ing s of the Plumbing Advisory Boar d held on March 18 and April 15, 1969, a c opy of each of wh i ch i s en c l os e d . Under t ha t i nt erp r et a tion t he u se of wiped lead stubs is r equired on all fl oors excep t s lab on grade. There is a seri ous que st i on a s to whe the r HUD intended or expected that such an interpreta ti on would be given to Section 114 . At your sugge stion I have drafted and enclose herewith a letter that you can use to ask HUD for its position on this matter . Your help in getting this issue cleared up will be greatly appreciated . yours, ' ESW : erm Enclosures N A LL K , ZIE TZ wtx_ �