.Mjk5OA.Mjk5OA

REPORT ON LOCAL COALITIONS Indicated below are the cities from which The Urban Coalition has received either from the mayor or other connnunity leadership expressions of interest in forming local counterpart coalitions. We are now in the process of exploring the reality of that interest in these cities and the possibility of Coalition assistance in response to requests for organizing and programming help. Phoenix, Arizona Saginaw, Michigan Little Rock, Arkansas St, Paul, Minnesota Compton, California Kansas City, Missouri Oakland, California St. Louis, Missouri Pasadena, California University City, Missouri Richmond, California Omaha, Nebraska Riverside, California Las Vegas, Nevada San Bernadina, California Atlantic City, New Jersey San Diego, California Paterson, New Jersey San Francisco, California Buffalo, New York Denver, Colorado Syracuse, New York Hartford, Connecticut Char lotte, North Carolina New Haven, Connecticut Fargo, North Dakota Wilmington, Delaware Akron, Ohio v Savannah, Georgia Cincinnati, Ohio Honolulu, Hawaii Columbus, Ohio Chicago, Illinois Portland, Oregon Des Moines, Iowa Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Kansas City, Kansas Providence, Rhode Island Topeka , Kansas v Lexington, Kentucky '-"Nashville, Tenn. Chattanooga, Tenn. Louisvill e, Kentucky Seattle, Washsngton Baltimore, Maryland Tacoma, Washington Boston, Mass9chusetts Beloit, Wisconsin Jackson, Michigan Madison, Wisconsin This list does not include cities where we are informed local counterpart organizations are either already formed or nearing formation. Those cities are as follows: �- 2 - v Atlanta, Georgia Detroit, Michigan Minneapolis, Minnesota New York, New York A full report on these efforts will be made at the Steering Committee meeting on October 9th. �