.MzMyNA.MzMyNA
(l) Al '1 -~~ ~1DIX I 8: JO-S1: .15 CD/1 ;Jo1r:.l me -•l:,s Special Are a ConsuHant. 9:L15-ll) : J0 Vil'JA ::irid Cnnsultc1nt. 9: L5-10: JO Non-t·:IJA rnembers · and ConsuJ.tanto Sach e: roup u:i.11 0.lect le.:ide:r to act as chair;nan and member to ;:crve as r e cor i:kr and/or fcp,YrLcro Sessions will be !:,aped , both HW\ ,1.nri Non-rZ·:A
_:1·oups ·d ll he rli.scus sion seminar s
1.
th t1-1 0-f0ld purpose:
To enablr. part tcipants to partic:i.pa te in some: dee Lsi0n 1::ak:i.n;
or
proc?f>s in terms
2.
wj
orcanizati on- ·:>.10.cti,)n
o:
chairman and recnr rter.
To discuss t.he implica ti.on of the consultant I s morn:~n~ present:itinn
·in terms of the
11
50 11 and what eff8ct the croup could have on the
Grea ter C}ic1U a noo:;a- 11 Thi.nk Tank" for what conld take place t.hrou;h
1975.
· 10:J0-10:~5 Coffee Dreak.
l0: L.::-11:15 .Simul:.il:,i :m ".:;;.;:crcisc basect on weekly format-Leo, a pic:torici.l .
rep rese:nt,:d;i-)n of a philiso phy expressing opposition to th-3 need for a
~'.od:; l Cities Pro:·;ro.m i.ri Chattanooca o
This will alss, be structl1red to s erve
as a catal;;st for a sensitivity exercise.
1::.:15-12 :30
F'ive s ma ll discussion broups will be formed-leaders and recorders
will be elP.cted by each group.
Tapes provided fo r some --Vi deo Tapes of othe rs.
Discussion will proceed on the basis of attcmptin::; to formu l ate 3.n acc e;:-ta~le
decis t0n C'Jncernin;; the nature of the pictorial pres e ntation.
.1 :ember shi;;-,
wi ll rc r.1ain the same for first five session-then r ar. d0r:1 s e l e ction o: :ive
n e ,v croups o
Iloarr:l m~r.ibcrn will re :orm as- CDA Board duri;--i,; last 20 mi:,ut c~
of t h~ proJram o Brief report fro m each group chairman or record er.
'
.e:r.a-5:icer
�(2 )
I.
L)f
rc1·j :)Ll srcnt
i11
olrl:,.:t:in:int; the co11scn0u s o.f the
.'.lC'. l~cpt,tbl,~ t.o the :_;roup.
11
)0" in tcn.1::; of.' d cc isi:m(s)
�(J)
APl ';.i;NDI X JI
CD!\ Doard and Cc111sultan~,.
8:JL)-9:.':;
9:)1S:-l'.J:J0
tJi ;A i3 oarcl ancl ConsuJ.ta nt.
9: 1_:~-' -10 :J0 Non-NtL\ Doani .cind Consultant.
T1-10 _;rou~)S me e L independent-~,, ele ct chairmcm a nd recorder s , disc uss
H:C'ir un:iq11e role as individuals in the total ctedision-makint_; structuri:
,v
of th i::- CDA Bna1·d.
cr i tique
or
Hep-'Jrts of chairmen of the tuo ~rou ps, Discussion and
the reports in terms of total interaction of the participants.
10:J0-10 :L5
Coffee Dreak.
10:L5-ll:15
Sj_intilatbn Exercise.
Role l'l;:iyjn 1_; --~rnrc1se designed to enhance the authoritorive structlcre of
an or~anizatinn in terms of decision-making.
ll:;15-12:J0
Five Reports--CDA. Boa rd structures a model for interactbn
based on principles acceptable to the total Boardo ·
�8: J0-9: /15
CD/\ Doard meets Special Consult.:tnt.
9: !,5-l'.1: JO i'iJ.JA and Consult.ant.
9:LiS-l·J:J0
~:on-l'-,NI\ me mbers.
ElFcti•m of cliairm:in .:incl recorckr.
Discussion seminar·s for Loth 2roups~ . .
Two-fold purpose:
1.
To participate in decision making process by clcctin.; .chair:nan.
2.
To disc11ss an issue as unique to the 1;roups,ioe.; the l•l}JA mer.ibe rs
and the effort of non-participation in decision-:n.aking in the
Chattnnoo 0a City Goverrunent--the Non-MNA membGrs anr:1 the d (: sirability
of bcin:.:; in a position to effect a decisi0n with the city goverruni:; nt.
l0:JO-lO:)i5
Cof.fco Brea ko
10: L5-ll: 15
S:i.mulation Exercise.
Role playin[; by selectccl r;r ciup.
"i iilit::?.nt Citiz ens"--a confrontation between a' group of citiz e ns ;ind
'
.
i n~trl r->qua t P. police protection or n.n inadequa t") schoQl cur :-- .i.c 11lu..'n.
Problem
based on -Zcono:, ics--I-fow to cope wi"t.h sec11rine enployment.
11:15-12:JO
Five discussion groups--ele ct leader and r e corder. Disc uss
acceptable solution to the problPm pres e nted.
ques tion pe r i od.
wi ll b e mad e
Simula tors ava ilable for
Report of the r e c ord ers to the full CDA Board .
An at tempt
to obtain a cons e nsus of opinion as to the be tter solut ion.
Vi deo Ta pe Re c orde r to r ecord the de ci s i on- making proce ss.
mi nu t e s for self-eva l ua t ion of problemo
Use l a s t
15
Use
�('.:S )
/1YPENDIX IV
Au:_;us L
J()
8:J0-9:L ~ CDA GoarJ.mects Spec ial Area Consulta nt.
?: L5-:i.0:30
n~J.\. .:i.nd Consult:int.
9: L5-10: JO
}\111-l\en:bcrs NHA.
Each r,i~0up 0lP.cts chairrna n and record12r
co:.c e r:1in G e:ich groups
I
o
Sessions ta pedo
Serni_nar discussi -Jn
uni.queness in terms of the consultant 's presenta:.iono
Two-fold purpose:
1.
To strcn ghtcn total participation of all memb8rs of the group.
2.
To disc 1-<s s t:1e decision-making process as related to Nl":A and
Non-Nl'"IJ\ o
l0:J0-10:L5
Coffee Break.
10:L5-11:15
Sbu l atLon Sxerci se .
35 r.m pictorial presenta tion of a
,_
"Cit-izr=m 1 s Participation S t,ructure" wh ich does not reflect the r;oals
of the 1-lodel Cj t-,y Program.
Problem of making acc~ptah l8 decision by
the sroup is prcs~nted to the CDA Board.
11: 15-12: JO . Sma 11 grjup discussi :m of sinula tion exercise--5 l eaders and
recorde rs are ele cted.
1.
Discussion will proceed on the ba sis of:
How could the structure of the board be c hanged to make the board
more effective?
2.
What alternatives are available to th e group in t eTiils of maktr.e
an acceptable decision as posed by the problem.
Brief repor t fr om Chair~an--Remainder of time spent by CDA Board ma.kL~g
a dec ision based on da ta presented in problem.
�(6)
APJ 'ENDIX V
Scptc:;ll.iPl' 6
S:J0-9:)_Jr.
CD;\ !Jo:wd m0cLs
Spcci:,l Consultant.
~) :!1)-10: JO
}lNJ\
and Consultant.
9: l,S'-10: JO
Non-MJ'li\ and Consultant.
- Each group · electr·leader and recorder.
Each group will decide the·most
seriol1s problem confront:Ln~ the CDA Board in terms of the consultant's
cU ~cussion.
10: J0-10: )15
Coffee Drcak.
10: 16-11: 15
Simubtion ·Exercise
11
Con.D ictir1e Priorities" a pictorial
representa tion of priorjties beinG established with adequate participation
of thP. area ciUzenry.
ll:15-12:JO
Small group seminars.
group establish priorities.
Elect chairmen and record8rs.
CD/\ group meets.
Zach
Chairmen report briefly.
CDA attempts to estahlish priorities acceptable to total Board.
�('I)
i\Fl'~ NDIX VI
Sept.crnb cr 13
8:J0-9://;
C:DA J10.1rcl meet::; S;;8c :i'11 Area Consultant.
9: ){;-Jo: JO
MNA :rnr:l c,~nsult-1 .nt.
9: L~-1 1"' :JO
l'fon-MN1\
and Con:rnltant.
Two-fold pnrrosc:
1.
D:lch grou p elect chairma n and recorder.
2.,
Each group discus3 the role of the total CDA Board and
11
Subtantive
I:npost" with specific reference to (a) physical problerns; (b)
ec -:momic problems; (c) social problems.
(Use Video if available)
10:JJ-10:L5
Coffe e Dreak.
10: !.;5-11: 15
Simulation F.xercise--Hypothet ical Problem prrnented to CCA
parti::i.p:1nts.
Short skit developed for purposes of drama tizinz a spe cific
-r'-1bl,,r;i arisinc within tb i=
!fodel Area.
11 :15-12:JO
Small 3roup disc ussion of pr obl em ~ nd. solutions.
rr.cets as unit.
3rief reports fro~ r ecord~rs.
CDA Board
An Analysis of the proble ~
by to t~ l group and an .acceptanc~ or reject~on of the five solutions --a
c onsensus of the group is formed in terms of articulating a decision 'oy
the tot3l group.
(taped)
�(fl )
AP l "~ImIX: VII
,S:J(l- 0
CD,\ Doard rr.i--ets Special Area Consu ltant.
//
9:l,S-JJ:JO
Nt-"·/\ and Consult::i.nt.
9: lt-JO: JO
Nim,..}17',1.f\. anrl Consult-1.nt.
Two- :·o·Jd !' ;1rpose;
1. Elccti.on of chairm=rn and record er.
-
2. Group disc11s sinn jmplcmcnt the discuss:ion of the CDA to the '.:.hr"'e
s;-,ccific ar eas as seen by the two groups- -city Government, nei;;hborhood, nnd Model City Staff.
l0:J0-10:L5
Coffee Dreak.
10:IJ5-ll :15
Simulation Bxercisc~
<~erci se-pi dorial will present .a problem (5 ) which will involve .a high
de~rcc of rolarizntion of three aroas of interest groups--goverru, ental
officials, nej.-:;hborhooct organization, and Hod el · City Sta ff.
11:15-12: J O Sma ll group
(5)
discus s ion with lea der a nd r ecord er.
An
analysis of th'? problem(s) ancl altr,rmitives available to the to tal CDA
group as seen by the s ma ll gr 0up.
Report of five chairme n:
An ana lysis
by the CD!\ group as a comm i tt ee of the whole:--What is acceptable i..n terms
of a decision to the pictorial problem.
�(9)
S0.;.:,tenl.'c r 27
8: JCl-9: )(
CD!\ l30.:1 rd mecl,s Special /1.rca Consultanto
9 : 1:5-10: 30
JWa\ anc1 . Cons u 1t.:1nt.
9: /J.5-10:30
n:in:..t!Ef\. and Cons nli;,anto
~:-ic~ ;roup meets:
1.
To elect chnirnmn and recorde r.
2.
To discusf specific ques tions arising out o.f th~ co nsultant .ts
present,,. t i on with an emphasis on th~ uniqueness of int er actions
as ar~i'l ic.::ihle to each croup.
10:J0-10:L5
Coffee Break.
10:)15-11:15
Simulation Exercise~ ·
i'ictor:i ~l presentation of problems which set the sta ge for prob l0.m- solvin.::;
in th~ are a of tech nical assistanceo
11:15-1?.:JO Fiv e e roups rltscuss ann formnlate ·action pro~ram based on
t ecbnic.;il assis tance .
t o CDA Boarrl.
CDA Board ll)eets as a group.
Five chairmen re port
Discussion of concl1Jsio n by tota l Board .
�(10 )
1\ PP !~NDIX IX
Oct.0b0.r Ii
n:3(1- S' : //
CD,\ Bciard meets Spccia l Arca Consu1 Lant.
9: lt-10 : JO
tiNf\ Boarrl niemb Prs and Cons11 1 t :rn t..
9:/.5 -10 :JO
Non - MN.~ Bo.J.ril m0.rnbe rs and Consultant.
-1.
2.
Slec-t Je3.r:l 0r.~a nd r ecord er.
lrnplC'mcnt.ntion of clisc us si0n by consulta nt, with emphas is on
r0le1tinnsh ip
nicl c oord in 3. tion.
10 :J0-10:~5
Coffee Dreak.
10: L5-ll: 15
S i.1n111.:t t i on Acti.vity o
Pictor i.al presen t G.t ion of a hy potr;etica l
case of thr in-• bili t y of a boarJ to make a decj_sion bec.J. use of an inadeqt.:a te
c ,11-rd; r.,1tin:1 anrl informa tion structure within the total organization.
( a nother a~;ency (i.P.s) within the Model Neighb orhood Area )
11:15-12:JO
Sma ll discuss_ion groups.
di scussion :;roups.
Ele ct chair ma n and r ecor der.
Tape
Purpose _of group is to :~naJ..;ysts the problem pre sented
in the sir-iul3.terl experience an d attempt, to select a lt ernate soJ.1;.tions in
tN; 1.s o.f a value d eterminent .
Comparison of solutions by group presentation.
A sohition or" a ·b etter -solution by the CDA. Board. ·
�(11)
APPENDIX X
8:JC>-9 :li~: CDf\
9:l15-10 :Ji1
2.
Bl):ll'd
(tnd Cn11s11ll,ant.
J·!on-!'r~•lp r::, ,111°1 Cnnsult.ani..
Contj1111.·.lt:i.on of Consul tan l,'s theme in terms of:
(1) Sensitivity to ncedG of all membrrs of the CDA Boarrl .
(2) i\n ex1111:in.1t·Lon o f the group 's responsibility in s e ttin3 cr o.;p
fi01ls anrl makini progress.
10:J0-10:L5 Cnffc e Br~~k.
10:l:5-11 :l;'.
Sjmul"ltinn :T.xercis c .
Selected croup portrayine; a 6 roup of r epr8-
sen bt-~ve youn;: peop1€' of the Model Neighborhood Area Thmne of sir.rul::i.tion
~:-: r_, rcise is a rlir~ct confron t d ,i0n b2t1-reen one se;:;ment o~ the r-ItrA anr:l the C'..)A
B,,ar <~.
Impli.cati,..,:i.s for authorH'lri rm decision-riakin.; .1r.d p.1rticipa tory
deci.si•Jn-m,:1. Jci.n:;; are pictoriA-lly portrayed tb the group.
11: 15-12 :30
Small 6 rciup disc 1tssion.
Slection of 6 roup l eaner and r ecorde ro
." n J.n:ilysis of th8 ty I') cs or ctecision-ma ki.ng as portr3.yed witi1 an atte::i,,:Jt to
$tri1ct.ure a mnre ae c eptab l0 procc2:=, . for arrivlnG at a dccisiono
f_;rot:p rP~ort, to the cnA. group by chairmen.
T.'lpe o
CD.t..
The CDA, · q.ctin6 as a unit, is
prF?ssured to. for mulate de finitivP. .:;oals for the c;roup with ne eative stirru l a t ion
bdnc c011st," lntly p!'ovided by '::'Xtcrnal force --Consultant 0r member of the ?·:nd e l
CiLies Teqm.
body.
RPaction of group in terms of cohesiveness as a decisi0n-rna k i n;
Video t ape.
�
