.MzMzNw.MzMzNw

PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 Mr. Walter M. Mitchell Division Chairman �~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - , Mrs . Pa--ne , Secy - 261-6700 PUBLIC SERVICE UNTI - 70 Mr. R. G. Murphy - Unit Chairman Vrr . E. William Bohn - Vice Cha i r:nan ~ex Broad casting Corp. 1601 W. Peachtree St. N~W .

'el. 892-3l.i 56

Sears, Roebuck & Co . 3060 Feacr,tr~ e Re' . N. ';J . At l anta, Ga . 30305 Te l. 261- 6700 Ext. 321 .I Division - 71 Ci t· Governme nt Mr. E. C. Walker Retired,. Sears 978 Winall Down Rd. , NE AtlRnta, Ga. 30319 Division - 72 County Government Mr . Walter M. Mitchell Cha i rman Board of Fulton County Commissioners 165 Central Ave. S. W. Division - 73 Federal Government Col. Dea n Van Lydergraf Commanding Officer Atlanta Army Depot Forest Park, Ga 30050 Tel. 363-5201 Divi si on - 7L Hospitals Mr. Robert W. Biccum General Attorney Retail Crenit P . 0, Box Lo81 6100 Peachtree St ., N.W. rPe l: 237-2943 Tel. MT . R. L. Lancast er Tel: 875-8321 ') i.vision Chairman Division Chai rman

- - - - ----

572-2791 Co-Div Chai rman- 363-5621 Division Chairman Division - 75 Schools & College s Mr. Albert Griffin, Jr. Second Vice Pre sident Tllst Co. of Ga. M3.in Office, P. 0, Box 441E Division - 76 Socia l Agenc i es Mr . W. K. Mat tison Retired, Sears 210 West Pace's Ferry Rd. N. W., Atlanta , Ga. 30305 Tel. 588-7129 Tel: 237-273 5 Di vis ion Chairman Division Chairman _____________ Division Chai rman .,_ l Di v ision - 77 State Government Lester G. Madcl ox Governor Sta te Capitol Atlanta , Ga . 30303 Tel · 721- 1776 Wm . H. Burson , Direc~or State Farnil~' &. C;-,ilr: ren Service 118 Capi tol Square, Tel: 522-87 10 Divi sion Chairma.n EYt . 73 �lJNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT - 70 2 Year Comparison 'I, of RE C AP - 70 %of Increase or (Decreas r:> ) Amount Given AverPer Capita age Gift 90 . 5 73,980 10.09 11.14 28. 8 6,566 86.5 83,541 11.00 12.72 12.9 4,985 2, 360 47.3 19,369 3.88 8 .20 ( 13 .4) 1969 4,985 2,411 48.3 26,254 5.26 10 .88 35.5 1968 29,032 27,973 96.3 366,147 7.03 10 . 94 9.6 1969 28, 799 27, 313 94.8 338, 221 11.74 12·;38 10.4 1968 8,666 4,750 54. 8 26,020 3.00 5.47 h3 .7 1969 8,956 4, 96!r 55.4 30,474 3. 40 6 .13 17.1 1968 25 , 995 16,723 64.3 226, 566 8.71 13. 54 22 .6 1969 26,450 16,177 61.1 234,464 8.86 14.h9 3.4 1968 3,276 2,756 84.1 68,358 20.86 24.80 15.3 1969 3,898 2,749 70. 5 76,082 19.51 ':!7.67 11.2 1968 6,014 3,081 51.2 20, 879 3.47 6.77 8.1 1969 6,739 4,203 62.3 ':!7,329 4.05 6.74 30.8 1968 85,299 64,562 75.0 741,319 8.69 11.48 14.8 1969 87,715 64,383 73.4 816,365 9.30 12.67 10.1 Year No. of Prospects No. of Gifts 1968 7,331 6,639 1969 7,591 1968 Camp. Participation CITY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 71 COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 FEDERAL GOVERNMENr DIVISION - 73 HOSPITAL DIVISION - 74 SCHOOLS & COLLEGES DIVISION - 75 SOCIAL AGENCIES DIVISION - 76 STATE GOVERNMENT DIVISION - TI TOI'AL �UNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 2 Year Comparison COUNTY GOVERNMENT - 72 Department No. & Chai:nnan 7212111 Fulton Count y (All Depts) Fulton Co . Court House, 165 Central Ave . , S . W. Camp. Year 1968 1969 1 0 7232111 1968 DeKalb County (All Depts) DeKalb Co . Admn Bldg., Decatur, Ga. 1969 1 0 7242111 1968 Cobb Count y (All Dept s ) Cobb Co . Court House, Mari etta, Ga. 1969 1970 7252111 1968 Clayton County (All Dept s ) Court House J onesbor o, Georgia 1969 1970 7262111 1968 Gwinnett County (All Depts. ) Court House Lawrenceville, Georgia 1969 1970 1968 No. of Prospects 1, 600 No. of Gifts 996 1, of Participation 62.2 Amount Given Per Capita 13,556 8 . 47 Aver.age Gi ft 13 .61 1, of Increas e or {Decrease} 9.2 (!?, 'J '(J()) 1, 600 950 59.3 15, 054 9 .40 15.81 11.0 2,200 975 44 . 3 5, 000 2 . 27 5. 12 ( 16.6) 2, 200 1, 025 44 .3 10,000 4. 54 10 . 25 100 . 0 600 325 54 .1 . 53 . 98 600 316 52 .6 1.16 2. 21 119.4 325 36 11.0 1. 20 10 .83 82 .2 325 75 11. 0 390 (r-tj v) 420 1. 29 11. 05 7. 6 260 28 10 .7 104 .40 3.71 260 45 9. 6 80 .30 3 . 20 (23 .() ) (/~; {I-(/()) v3:k) 700 (~~) (71. 7) 4, 985 2, 3~ 47.3 19, 369 3. 88 8 .20 ( 13. 4) 4, 985 2,411 48 .3 26, 254 5.26 10.88 35 . 5 T<JrAL 1969 1970 �UNITED APPEAL , COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS 6 Y.RZ\R COMPARI SON COUNTY GOVERNMENT - 72 Camp . Year No . o f Pro spects No . o f Gift s 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 , 1969 1 5 34 1 535 1800 1800 1600 1 600 1235 1535 1648 902 996 950 196 4 196 5 1966 196 7 1 968 1 96 9 1 75 0 1 750 1 000 1400 22 00 2 200 1964 1 965 1966 1 9 67 1968 1969 1 964 1965 1966 1967 1968 196 9 % of Participation Amoun t Given Per Capita 80 .5 99 . 9 91 . 6 50 .1 6 2. 2 59 . 3 9 ,402 1 1, 291 1 3 , 665 14, 94 2 1 3 , 556 15 , 05 4 6 . 13 7. 3 5 7 . 59 8 . 30 8 .47 9 .40 800 1025 1000 97 5 97 5 + 1025 45. 7 58 . 5 100 . 0 69.4 44. 3 44. 3 6,14 0 8 , 200 4, 200 6 , 0 00 5, 000 1 0 , 000 3 . 51 4. 68 4. 20 4.27 2. 2 7 4.54 230 230 391 3 91 600 6 00 67 11 216 325 325 + 31 6 29.1 4. 8 55 . 2 8 3. 0 54.1 52 .6 856 215 1,246 1 , 128 319 700 3 . 72 .71 3 . 18 2. 88 .53 1.16 162 162 232 232 325 325 37 21 11 30 36 75 22 . 8 13. 0 4.7 12.9 11. 0 11. O 291 164 121 214 390 4 20 1. 80 1. 0 1 .52 . 92 13 0 90 68 52 25 28 45 69.2 52.3 32 . 5 32.5 10.7 9. 6 F UL'IDN COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY COBB COUNTY CLAY'ION COUNTY 1.;w 1. 29 rui;l;NNETI . CO!,!t!l'X 1964 1965 1 966 1967 1 968 196 9 130 160 160 26 0 260 593 302 104 104 80 4. 56 3 . 18 1.88 . 65 .40 .3 0 17,281 20,234 19,484 22,389 19,369 26,254 4.44 5.31 5.,44 5.61 3 088 5 . 26 414 'IDTALS 1964 1965 1966 1 967 1 968 1969 3894 3806 3583 3987 4985 4985 2229 2659 2927 2 257 2360+ 236 6 57.2 69.9 81.6 56 .6 47o3 4 7.4 �UNITED APPtAL, COliMUNITY CHiST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION (Date) DIVISION CHAIRl1AN 1 S REPORT ON SECTION CHAIRMEN ENLISTED: The following have accepted appointment as Section Chairmen in this. Division in this year's Campaign. They have been personally interviewed and have agreed to follow through on the various steps necessary to complete the organization •. Section Chairmen B:us. Address Telephone Zip Code Name Section Number Name Section Number Name

Section Number Name

Section Number Name

Section Number NarrB Section Number Nan@ Section Number Name Section Number This report is made by Chairman_________________lli.v.#_ _ _ _ _ __ PLEASE FILL I N AND RETURN TO P. O. BOX 1038, ATLANTA, GEORGIA KEEP DUPLICATE COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS 30301 �UNITED APPML, COMMUNITY CHiST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION (Date) DIVISION CHAIR11AN 1 S REPORT ON SECTION CHAIRMEN ENLISTED: The following have accepted appointment as Section Chairmen in this Division in this year's Campaign. They have been personally interviewed and have agreed to follow through on the various steps necessary to complete the organization •. Section Chairmen Bµs. Address Telephone Zip Code Name

Section Number Name

Section Number Name Section Number Name

~ Sect ion Number Name Section Number NaITB Section Number NaITB Section Number Name Sec ti on Number This report is made by Chairman_________________Div.#_ _ _ _ _ __ PLEASE FILL IN AND RETURN TOP. O. BOX 1038, ATLANTA, GEORGIA KEEP DUPLICATE COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS 30301 �S pt mb r 18. 1969 MEMOR NDUM r . Johnny J hn o To. Fro D S 1bj ct: A· mini ·tr tiv Pl'oo C'ty. E . S e t ,. Jr. u.r �• 'I �.1em..o t J ohnny Johnsca P gc 'l'\"o Sept m.b r 18. 1969 inclttd blbhin th.e :,.O 1 Cltie org nlzation unrl r the dmini trati upe ision of the Stall of the yor and B o :i- 0£ l rmon in p , ctic ~ 11 technic y . T ill occ rily inv lv me cho.n e in your d y to d y op r tio s f l' s your l'-el tion hip ith th s rvice p tme of the City. ln dditio~ it ill involv gl'e ter p rticip tion of the ayor•a Offic: in th pl n1n· .. operation of th od 1 Cities Progr • lll'e Pr to ~ t ,,you. I c: ve du.ti e r.ned v b d n op o:rtunlty to r o that c n proc d D Jr:j le oo _tact m for • �September 19, 1969 Mr. P . A. Wood 762 Boulevard,. S. E. Atlanta, Georgia 30312 Dear Mr. Wood: This ill cknowledge receipt of the copy of your letter addressed to the Honorable Lester G. M ddox, Governor of Georgia, in reg rd to the xit signs on 1-20. ~ I a:m sendin your 1 tter to the Model Cities Office, so th t your tat ment concerning code violations may receive consideration. Sine rely yours, Ivan Allen, Jr. M yor lAJr:lp CC: Mod 1 Citi s Director �September 3, 1969 r. att.h e S. Faerber La Office 112 Bell vue Avenue Ne ort,, Rhode 1 land 02840 Dear r. F erber : Thank you tor your letter of Au £ sibllity of a 10 cant huttle bu Atlanta. od l Citiea ar a. t 30, co cerning t- e ervice for the I am for rding a co y of your lett r to Mr. Johnny Johnaon,. Direc:tor of our Model Citie · program, o t your pl-an may b giv n co11 ider tion. Si Iv: U.Jr:lrd CC: r. Jo y .Johaaon . rely yours, All yor , Jr. �LAW OFFICES MATrHEW J. FAERBER /\ J 112 B ELLEVUE A VENUE NEWPORT, RHODE ISi-AND 02840 (P, O, BOX 175) 847- 0034 Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. City Hall Atlanta 0 Ga. 847- 1112 August 30 , 1969 RE: Model Cities Program Dear Mayor Allen: I am taking the liberty of writing to you at the suggestion of Gove rnor Bllis Arnall to whom I wrote recerltly in connection with an item appearing in "Fleet Owner , July , 1969" concerning the l0cent shuttle bus service for the model cities area . I am enclosing an e x tra copy of this letter for Mr. Johnny Johnson , whom I under stand is Director of Atlanta ' s Model Citie s progr am and I am also sendi ng a copy to Governor Ar nall . In my Washington office I have the good fortune to represent the City of San Juan, where last November they elected a very ener getic y oung l awye r, Car los Romer o Barcelo a s Mayor . He is 36 year s o f a g e, a g ra duate o f Yale Univer sit y i n 1953 , and o f the University of Puer to Ri c o Law School 1956 . He inherited a very difficult situation with r espect to his Model Cities pr ogr am which had been commenced under the precee ding administration wh ich had f a i l ed to take car e of many e ssen t i al i tems . The p r o gr am was in jepoar dy when Mayor Romer o t ook over but a s of several weeks ag o , h e was a s sur ed by f o r mer Mayor Hyde o f Fr esno , now a t HUD , t h a t the p r o gr am i s go i ng thr o ugh s atisfac tori ly . Coincidental ly , t h e Federal I mple men t a t i o n Gr a n t f o r Sa n Juan is $7 . 1 mil lion wh e r eas I n o tic e At l ant a's Mode l Ci t ies Progr a m is b udg e ted a t $7 . 2 mi l l i on . The principal reason for th is i nq uir y to you , a nd t hrough you t o Dir ector Johnny Johnson , i s that San Juan has a ver y difficult t ran spor t a tion pr oblem and the plan wor ked o ut i n your city with re s pect t o 1 0 c ent shuttle b us s ervic e thr oughout the 3, 000 a cre model cities area might well b e a Godsend. It is interesting to me to note that a mutual friend of Governor Arnall and mine, the late Wa l lace Ro Bu rke, fo rmer l y of the Interstate Commerce Commi s sion 6 sugge sted a n almost identical plan to Mayor Romero in my prese?ce in San Juan on 31 March,19690 �-2- Mayor Ivan Allan , Jr. August 30 r 1969 If it is not an imposition, and if Mr o Johnson 1 could send me data which would help me advise Mayor Romero along these lines 1 I would be indebted. Very truly yours , '>t~ Faertfr Hon. Ellis Arnall Fulton Federal Building Atlanta , Ga. 30303 CoC o _ �LAW OFFICES MATTHEW J. FAERBER 112 BELLEVUE AVENUE NEWPORT, RHODE ISLAND O2B4O (P. O . BOX 175) B47-OO34 B47-1112 September 9, 1969 Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor , City of Atlanta Atlan t a , Georgia 30303 Dear Sir: May I acknowledge your letter of September 3 , 1969 for Judge Faerber who is in Puerto Rico on business until Thursday of this we e k. Your letter will have his attention and appreciation at that time. c~yrr:u:s~-w~ fw Secre t a ry to Matthew J. Fae rber �' I 123 Vanira Avenue, Southeast Atlanta, Georgia 30315 September 2, 1969 Dear Comrades: It is with deep regret that the program that was conceived for t he purpose of motivating more resident participation and training has taken on the pattern of not more, but a fewer number of residents taking part in the program. The possibilities of helping the cit i zens of the Model Cities connnunity grow in stature has been placed behind a painted wall by a few of the residents that were elected to serve without bias for the betterment of a total corrnnunity with funds funneled into the target area for that purpose. As of now the residents ha ve the chance to do for themselves a job that was long needed - to be able to think of expa ns ion areas and the correct way t o expand. It is within this structure I pray the Mode l Cities Mass Convention, Incorporated will operate in the future. The juvenile acts that are taking place in the operation of t he Board of Directors at this time can only l e ad to a state of dictatorship that .can impede the growth of any worthwhile organization. At t he t ime of t he e l ect ion f or offi cers of t he Mode l Cit i es Mass Convention , I ncorporat ed, I was e lected treasurer, but fi nd I cannot , nor ,·rill ~ot , a ssume the responsibility of t hat office U...'1der the conditions listed herein: 1. When advanced funds wer e received fr om EOA to t ake care of t he community workers payroll, t he Chairman of the Boar d , Deac on Pet ers , inst ructe d the secretary t o make the ba nk deposit, secure checks ~nd pa y off the workers. 2. The aforeme ntione d assi gnment was l ater delegated t o Mr . J ohn Hood ; a Board Member. 3. Mr. Hood st ate d that he was requeste d , but refused to pay from these monies the salary of a secretary that is not officially on t he payroll of Mode l Citi es Mass .Convention, Incorporated. �September 2, 1969 Page 2 All of these transactions took· place without the benefit of vouchers, drafts, etc., that would enable the treasurer to keep accurate records. Under the existing conditions the need for· a treasurer is nil. Therefore, before more valuable time is lost by the Board, certain guidelines should be studies and become a workable pattern. I recognize the fact that no individual or group can exist without making errors, and the experiences gained by such means should prove of value for future operations . I hold no animosity toward anyone in the organization and shall continue my support for the total program, but with the slovenly methods used to date, I have no alternative other than tender my resignation as treasurer effective innnediately. Respect lly, '--/ _,,. _ ) '£-eff/,..,,:?) CC: cu.@.,-;s Deacon Lewi s Peters , Chairman , Board of Directors Mr. Johnny Johnson, Direct or, Model Cities · Mr. William W. Allis on, Executive Administrator, EOA Mayor Ivan Allen �~--.:· . . -..>" - ,, ~ p ~ •• c ::..:;,?:i:CE O F MODEL CITIES PROGR .t\.M 67 2 c~. ::,:to: Av~r:ue, S.W. A tt:.,1 t a, G z . 30 3 15 (, j q 577 - 5200

v s.n Alle n J-..· ., M ayor

J. c . Johnson, Direct o r .Mr s. Ma : : - t ha L . We ems 1039 Ridge Avenue , S . W. 3 031 5 At lant a , Ge o rgia Dear l.lr s . Weem s : Your l etter o f Sept embe~ 2 , 1 ~ 09 i n whicn y ou t e n dered y our res i g natio n as Tre a s u r e r of M:ode l Ci t i es ~a s s Co nvention , Inc., ha s cau sed s e rio u s con c ern o n o y p a:ct abo~t the future o f t h e o rgan i z a tion . The questions y ou r a ised i :-i your l e tte:c , o.s to proc edur e and autho ri ty , were v alid a nd sh ould c a use t he Bo a rd to c arefully r e - exami n e i ts existing method o ~ oper ation . My Pro g ram Management s t a f f ,,:i l l b e happy to a s s ist y o u a n d t he Ci t iz e n s ' Boar d i n est ablish i n g p ro per p ro c e dure s f or o per at i on wh ich will be i n f ul l corr.pli a.n c e with t he requ i rements o f the City o f At l a n t a a nd t h e De p art1 e n t o f Ho u sing a n d Urba n De ve l o p ment . I a m a s ki n g .Mr . Sam Ru s s e ll t o p rovide y ou a nd al l me mbers o f the Citizen s ' Bo a r d with copi e s o f "F i s cal and Administ r a t i ve Proc edur e s for Operati ng Agenc ie s o f Mode l Cities Pro j e cts ." These p roc edure s will be a par t of your co n t rac t v,i t h t he Ci ty when i t i s e xecuted in t h e n e ar fu tur e . Be c a use I f e e l that b-1is g-roup n eed3 the v a l u a ble e x perienc e y ou o ffe r it , I h o p e that y ou will re - consider y our t e nde r of r e signa tio n , and t hat the y wi ll n ot s ee fit to ac c ept your requ est. Sin c e r ely , / ~ J, J·ohnny c ·. Di rector· JCJ:vlc cc : / . ,y " . . , ·~~ ·. -;_; ~.i:.y Johnson ' "" Mayo r I v a n All en , J-r . .Mr . Wi lli a m Al lison, Exe cuti v e Adm i n i strator , EOA B:>a r d Members o f r,.,:ode l Ci ties Ma ss Co n v entio n , Inc. �MEMBERS NON - PROFIT DEVELOPERS TRUSTEES 940 McDANIEL STREET, S. W. CHAIRMAN OF BOARD ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30310 Joe Stallings VICE-CHAIRMAN TELEPHONE: 523-5166-7 Rev. J. L. Marshall SECRETARY CLARK MARTIN AVERY SHIELDS NATHANIEL PROTHRO SAMUEL COCHRAN REV. AUSTIN FORD PRINCE MARTIN. SR . HAROLD OWENS CLAUDE BARNES REV. JOEL W. MARSHALL TECHNICAL ADVISORS August 28,1969 TREASURER C. G . EZZARD C. BRON CLEVELAND PAUL MULDAWER ELIZA PASCHAL Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. City Hall Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mayor Allen: As Chairman of the Board, I would like to express my appreciation for your vote of confidence in the Special Executive Committee Meeting for the contract with Model Neighborhood, Incorporated. I want to assure you that all of the Board members will work hard to make this project a success. we are seeking to have our project to be one of the things Atlanta can be proud of and one of the things that you can point to in the future with pride. we greatly appreciate working with the threeman committee that you appointed. The Board have e x pressed a desire to develop a continuing relationship with this committee. We would appreciate you using your influence to help us develop this relationship . Thank you very much for your concern and cooperation . Sincerely your..,s , J~/eab �EDWIN L. STERNE LE ST E R H. PERSELLS CHAIRMAN G E OR GE s. r:xccUT I V C 0 1RF.: CT O R I'd.::> S CCR E TARY CARL TON GARRETT CRAFT 0 1rn: c T OR er FtNANCC VICE CIIAIRMA~I C, IL 8E RT H. 80GC.S l' t11 r c:1· o n at,· II CIU~ INC HOWA R D O P E NSHAW J. B. S L AYTON DIR E C TOR OF R ED E VE L O PME N T FP.ANK G. ETHERIDGE GEORGE R. SANDER T E C HNI CAL D I RE C TOR JACK F . GLENN 82 4 HVRT DUILOINC ATLA NTA . GEORGIA 3 03 03 JA C KS ON 3 - 50 74 A gust 25., 1969 Mro ,Johnny Joh.nson Director of Model Cities Program. 673 Capitol Aven e So Wo A"i:.lant~., Georgia 30315 De ar Joh..nny: Th is is to confirm t he proced •res agreed. upon in :my office on August 29., 1969 wit,h respect, to exped:l"l;in.g hous ing c onstruction in the Model Cities NDP area s: l o Parcel C-4 ,_,. Mro Stan Ay r 1 s s ne plan prov iding f or for ty (40) townhouse n its approve do Meeting to be set up with Urban East and Mro Wri ght to r eview pla..n. submitt al of appli ca t i on to FHA s election of non.,,,profit s pons ors ., e t c,, YJro Openshaw to procee d with FHA on establishing pri ce of land~ pr eparing d is position doc uments applying to City for c ommunity unit plano 20 Temporary ho sing site T, 21 (G orgi a Aven ue and Cori_,_"lalJ..y Street) .,. Mr ., Joe S.m.ith., Archit ect r al Consulta.11.t to :,he Housing Author i ty., proposed 16 .mobile ho.mes on t his 2o5 a cre siteo ~ousing Authority to study possibility of .mor e reloc atable units., exped i te constr uct i on o Mro Collier Gl adi n to pr par a a r Gsol1::1tion per.m.itting use of reloca.,, table housing units in t he Model Ci t ies areao 3:, A revie~-.r of -t,he o~-~9r :::.:i:n..'3 -;-,(:_....,:pora:>'."".f hoL,sing sites in the 1969 NDP areas of Model c .:.ties i ::.dic2.-:~es :.O:ce. fcD _o'.·J::.::'.lg a ct i on : ao The :fousir.g A;::·0::.ori·':-:y ·t o :.)l"Ocee'.J. -,rit.h -;~~e a cqui s ition, relocai;,io::1. of f2..'l'.l.il ~. es R.na. e:;o1it ion of s tructures on T...5., T-12_, T...,~_6: T• '~-7 a..d c:(93c ::.te constructi on of relo ca·'"able hot·.s i :'.'.:?; ·-.:.~.:.-':,;; o:. . t::-:.ss e. s~:: esl) 2~," bo 0 The Housing Ac:tt:.-:.or:::'·.y -:·.o " ;:p:!..ore possfoi~.H-y o.f leas i ng '.i:'-10 for r eloc2:'"-2.Y_" :i.c·~s :>s w .c.1 pro~a 3~L i:::.·0h acqr:isiti on of s:t,e o �Mrs JolL'11...n.y JolLn.son Augus t 25., 1969 Page Noo 2 Co The rema1n:mg ten;porary hous i ng s1-c,es., T-18., T-9., T-11., and T.,.19 t o be t h.e l as t order of business as these involve sever e topogr aphi c or acqui s i t i on problems, the latter sit e .having been developed. by the Board of Education for a school pl aygr ound o 4o The Housing Authori ty to pr oceed Jith relocatable housing on the block north of Richar dson Street., betYeen Ira and Wi ndsor St reets in t he RawsonWashington Urban Redevel opment Areao 5o The block b ounded by Georgia Avenu e Capitol, Bass., ,a nd Crew Streets to be leased to Model Cities fo r housi ng cent er a...n.d par kingo The block bounded by Georgi a Aven ue., Cr ew., Bass , and Washington Streets t o be leas ed by the Hous ing Authority for stadium parkingo Land to be offered for s ale f or co.nun,ercial uses compatible wi t h stad i um as soon as documents have been prepar ed o _ ease advis e if you have a."1.y ques ti ons pertaini ng to t he above., Very tr' _y yours , Ho:-rc:.:'.' ~ Opens haw Director of Redevel opment HO:vw cc : Mr o J ames Wr ight Mr o Coll ier .Gladin Y.Lr o Thom.as Eskew �August 19, 1969 Mr. M yles G. Smith 25 Inman Circle, N. E. Attanta, Georgia 30309 . I Dear Mr. Smith: Since Mayor Allen i out of the city, I should like to acknowledge receipt of your lett r of Augu t 17th, expres ing your views about Model Neighborhood, Inc. and your endor ement of Mr . Edward Moody. M yor Allen h s already appointed a special committee to make recommendation about the structure of Model Neighborhood, Inc., and that l"Cport i due hortly. May I a sure you th t your letter will be brought to hi upon his return. attention Sincerely, Mrs. Ann Mos a Executive S er t.ary AM:lrd �2.r fa,.,,~;, C - ~/e- J ~4.~h / ac;7i'~ 47u.rr / 7/ //.,., <1 ,-q c ?' ~,1. c;7 ha-, ,4'&,'I 7 _.. .- /J/E' Jo 3 07 /?~? I ,.-,/' ~r' A'r/4,.. /4 ~tY /Ir/4 ~ /..c _, 0e-7 "; flu 47,,... ~ / ~ ~//e~ : ~ ~ ~ J ~r~ /4~ J ~ . ~~ /4~r' r ~ ~ / , r· ... f? ~ - d~ JI ~ z- ~ ,F ~ _,/4. 7 ~ - 143.215.248.55 /,,/,.,7 L ~ /~ ~ ·/ ~ ?ac " -~~ ~ /4 ---4 ~,~~ ~ ~~ ~ ___&~ / ~ ~r<- ~ - , , - < ' a r c - -., ~c< -<" -- . _.,ef ~~ �143.215.248.55 J ~ ~ r~~ .d47,,; / ~. r - f -; ? ; ~ __,- ~ J ~ ~// ~- ~~7ze ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ ~/r~ ~ -~ ,,/4_. ~ - ~J _;_r ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ -I ~ - ~ / ~ ~ - ~ ~~-~ ......... ~ ~

z;,(';;j

< F"'-<c.•:r/ ~ ~ ~~/ _ ~c-e . /4; 143.215.248.55 ~ ·?-r-r --? /4~ ~ ~ - I( -._ i ... y - ~ / L: /-r/_~ . =~ 7(- ~~ - • - 7? ~~/ ~ 7,/<-'••.t:e -C4t~ . �3 ~- ~ ~ -4 ~ ~< ~ ~ ~~ - 143.215.248.55 d. ~ ,_:_ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J ,f°#Vl.L / ~ , ,.r~ ~ ~ ~ -9 / ~ -..cj- ~ / ~~ . .... rt - , _:._~ .£.-4:., ~ ' ~ ~ ~-~ ~

~~ ~,~~ ~ 143.215.248.55 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

If'

~ 7 ~,,_,,- ~ /J ""'- A143.215.248.55 ~ ~~ ~ , .~ r--- ...c-.. ~ ~-~~ ­ ~,.7 _;;7%, . ~ - - / ~ ~- -r- - �143.215.248.55 /~ ~ ~ ""

d'

r - ~ ~ -d. ~ - , ~ ec),,,f- ,, ~~z-X--~ / ~ _, ~ /4 / d 143.215.248.55 ~ 143.215.248.55 15:39, 29 December 2017 (EST) ~ ~ . JD ,-Z /Ac . , , ~ ~ r/~ ~~.. - ~ ~ L... ~ z<- ~ - ~'7· 143.215.248.55%~~ ~ ~~ ~~r

If

_;tS"- ,r~ ~r ~ /. -wr- ~ /..' Crh~ /#7

d7 ~~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ A--ze _:._ ~ _L_H~ ~77 . ~/ J ~7 ��COST CONTROL STATEMENT AS OF : _ _.,...J~uwnw;ea.-3+10+c- l+--9~G~9----___;..---CITY OF :_-1-A-lrl.,.t""l+-iru-:1-Ft.;;ia,__,,,...G ...,e ...o ........ r"-lg....;.._.a.,___ _ _ _ __ MODEL CITIES. PROGRAM NUMBER:

BUDG ET ESTlMATES

Total Amt. Ptir Cum. Est :i.irk"l tc I. Lates t Approved Budget COST CATEGORY Program Administra tion Through Current Quarter COST INCURRED Total for Tota 1 Reported Cumulative ·Month Through Reorted Month $618,66 3 .00 2os,ooo.oo TR003N Intra-Neighbo11hood 'Bus System 14,009. 72 14, 009.72 ·14,009. 72 14,009.72 Subtotal ~GfR~AN~D~T~O~T~AJ~,--_j_-~d,i...ru:l~~L-+...J....!143.215.248.55 15:39, 29 December 2017 (EST)1~-~l~l~8Q.L..12~0~3~•.~5~4.!-.----i.1_1~8~,.2.0.3.54

• . Certified Correct Signatur e This cost includes those ex penses incurred ~uring the 90 day interim budget, _March-June 1969. Title F.UD-W-:,;h., O. C. ). Date �C I ,\ C {) ~ Farm <>pproverl 1',.di;;,• B.,, ,.a-., No . ~3 - Rl 16, N T ,~ ~ ,1 1; ~ 1 • \ ,, ,. •· ,\In ·. l. _

. :: •. \

Ci ty of l\ tlan ta , Geor,::; ia f FlNANClA.L C NPi YION ST Al' EMEH 'f MODEL CIT Y PLANl'ilMG GR.A.I~ r L68 Mitchell Stre et C . , S T .). T

. 1 '

• 1£. C O C- E Jun e_ 3 0_,___ 1 96 9 , (H I ~ L_ At lanta, Georgi a 30 30 ,.... MF C 0t-JT l-1 A C: T 10 -- 001 P ROJECT OR P AOC ~ J\ M . ' 1.l MBE ~ NO . A$ EH Cash : $ 6, 6 79 . 62 Cash P etty C ash $ Total Cash 6 16 7 9 . 6 2 Accounts Rece ivable : -o- P l ann i ng Grant CDA Contribut ion - o- -0 -· Other T otal Accounts Receivable 306 , 90 8 . 00 3 1 3 ,5 87 . 62 C os t Co ntrol --- -- ---· -- -- -----~ TOTA!. ASli EH LIA.ll!I ILITI ES AHO CA PITAL ---·- -- C urrPn l L iabi liti f's - 0- Accounts Puyab!P Acc rue c! L iab ilities T otal C.:um·nt. Lia bilit ies 6, 6 79 . 6 2 Deferred Credits . -0 ·-0- unf,a tni•d Pla r111 in1; Grant u nearnr,d CD/l Contribution T ril<.1 l Oflie ff'd C r,'dirs -o- 6,679. 6 2 TOUL LIA BILI TIE :S Capital: 61 , 4 08 . 00 2 4 5 ,5 0 0 . 00 CDA C on tr i bu:ti on P !anrang Grant ~06,908. 00 Tota l Capi.tal 31 3, 587. 6 2 v ________,___________________ ~ - ' i EP Al~ TIJ! E t•• OF H 0 1,1S,l~! G A l~ :J !.>'HI "'- "'-' O E V F.: Ll1C>MEl'J "r il> MO OE I- S T A 1 EMEN T OF f' !NANC l .t L. C ON~H 101'1 n:naa.p Hm:>-~',1111h .. o,. C IT , t!-:$ c:.

-- - --

PfH)c:;~.._M HU D-70 411 .. 6 ) �~ - -~~J.:.; - - ~ ~:-: ri _ .. : ~ : ~ -~-- --·.:__ -- - . · · ..•• .. · •. Y!i-;r ,,: r- uu 1 :. _ _ _ _ Prog~a.,,71 Di r ector ___ ____ . __ { "\ i.t!t>i Jul y 10.,___ 19§9 __ ·---·-··- ··---· ____ _ ( r:.:t t c ':-u tJtq 1. t: r t d) r i I .... _____ ______ ·----·- ···-~----- ---· ____... --- ---·-·--- ·-·· .... . , _ ..-... ... --..····--··- ------· ------ --- -- - ·---< �MIN UTE S - - ----- - MOD.EL NEIGHBORHOOD EXECU'rIVE BOARD Tuesday , J u ly 1 , 1969 10:00 a.m. The monthly mee ting o f the Mode l Neighborhood Executive Board w_as held on Tuesday , J u ly 1, 1 9 69 a t 10:00 a.m . in Committee Room #2, City Hall. 'rhe following membe r s wer e p r e sent: Mayor Ivan All e n, Jr . , Chairman Mrs. Mattie An s l ey · Mr. Claren ce Colema n Mr. Joh n Hood Alderman E. Gregory Gr i ggs Alderman G . Eve r ett Mil l ic an Mr. Walter Mi tche ll Deacon Lewi s Peters Mr . J. D. Newber ry Dr. c. Mi l e s Smith Mrs. Martha Weems Mr . Bill Wainwright Mr. Jo e Wh ite ly Absent : Mr . Sam Ca l dwell Other City o f fic i als, r epresentatives f rom n eighborho o d o r ganizat ionB, and tlle pr e ss were al s o present . The Chairman, .Mayor Ivan Allen, J.r . , called the meeting to order . He t hen e nt e rtained a motion for the ado p t ion of the June 10 Minutes. It was so moved a.nd unanimousl y appr o ved without correction. REPOR~r OF THE MASS CONVEN"rION STEERING COMMITTEE Deacon Peters distributed copies of the Minutes of the Model Cities Mass Convention which met on June 15 and he stated that he was very impressed with the participation of the residents since the program moved into imple:rnentation. Mr. Wainwright moved that the Minutes of the June 15 mef~tinq be a.ccepted by the Board. The motion was seconded and! unanimously approved . �2 REPORT FROM· S PECIAL :EMPLOYMENT COMMITTEE Iv.tr. Coleman read and distributed copie s o f t h e r e solut i on p r e pared by the Special Employment Committ e e. The re solut i on est ablish ed g u idelines fo r t h e Mode l Ci t i e s Progr am and contracting a gen c ies to fol l o w in the i r emp l oyme n t p r actices . The resolu tion s p e ll ed out a progr a m t h at · a ssur es Mod e l Cities jobs wi ll go to Mode l Neighborhood res i dent s. Mr. Mi ll ican sta ted t hat he f elt the req uirements l i sted i n the resol u tion wo uld tie t he hands of the c ont r ac ting agencies in fil·l in g posit i o ns. He specifically que stioned t he proposal that Model Ci tie s r e s ide nts b e give a base "re sid ent p r efe r ence" of 10 points or ten per cent and that all firms o r ag·e nc.ies contracting to d o proj e cts in t he Mo de l Cities area b e b ound by policies set by the Board. Mr . Millican s tated that he had prepared another resolution t hat was a l i ttle les s strict in its requirements and that he h a d confer r e d with the City Attorney on its Inerits. Mr . Coleman then moved that the Boar d adopt a nd appr o ve his resolution and r efer: i t to the City Attorney for lega l i n t erpretation . Mrs. Ansley seconde d t h e mot ion. Mr . Whitley brought out the fact that Mr. Millican had ·the righ t to read his resolution to the Board as a mi nor ity r e por t . Mr. Mi l l i can sa i d that h e preferred not to read his resolut i on a s a mino r ity r epo r t. Afte r further discussion o n whether t o a p prove the reso lut ion or t o j ust a c cept i t as i nforma tion, Mr. Coleman reword ed his moti on. He mo v ed t hat t he Board refer the reso l u tio n to the C ity Attorney f or a ruling ; i f i t is a legal document t hat it becomes a po licy o f t h e Boar d, if not , t hat i t be r eferr ed b ack to the Board. 'l'h e mot i on was s econded by Mr. Ho o d and approved by the Board. Mr. Cole man t h e n s ub mit t e d a r e s o l ut i on that called f or the c r e ation o f a new po s itio n on t he Mode l Ci t ie s Staf f of Resident Employment Opportunity Coord i nat or, whose r e spons i b i lity shall b e t o impleme n t the employment pol icies of the Board and assure compliance of the a genc i e s o r o r g anizatio ns contracted b y t h e program. Copies o f t h e reso l u t i on wer e distr i buted to al l Board members . Mr . Mill ican mo ved that t he resolutio n be refe rred to the Per son n el Comm i t tee for their revi ew . The motion was secon ded and approve d . Mr. Coleman a sked that the c omm i ttee report at the next meeting . REPORT FROM THE REVIEW COMMITTEE Co pies of the recommendations from the Review Committe-e.~ wer,e d istributed t o a l l Board members. Mrs~ Weems moved that the recommendations be a c cepted. ·r he motion wa s secon.de d . Mr. Hood a s k e d that a br i ef discription be given of a l l pl'.'ojects that were a p proved by the Committee. Mr. Johnson proce eded to give a discription of t he projects as they were l isted i:n the recomme 1ndation. A discussion was opene d by Mr. Whitl e y conce rning Project SS-049N ,, Project Expand, which gives Economic Opportunity Atlanta, Inc. $140,000 to set-up and staff a Neighborhood Service Center in G.rant Park and Adair Parle r.tr. Whitely stated that a majority of the �3 residents of Grant Park did not want an EOA Service Center in the area . Deacon Peters said that only a small segment of the r e sidents did not want the EOA Center and that the othe rs fel t that the re was a real need for the center . Mr.Newberr y , speak i ng for Ada ir Park., said that he feels that the p rojec t was needed by t he people and should not be deleted Mr. Whitley then moved that Project Expand be deleted from t he Program. The motion fa i l ed due to the lack of a second. Dr . Smit h then moved to a pprove the four projects listed to be carried out by EOA. The motion was seconded and approved by the Board. The four . projects are: SS-028N, Neighborhood Consumer Program ; SS-049N, Project Expand ; TR-OOlC , Specialized Passenger Van Service; EM-024N, Resident Emergency 1\s~'- istance Fund to Job Applicants. It was moved and seconded and unanimously approved that Proj e ct . SS-009C, Crisis Oriente d Counseling, be approved. Mr. Wairri:-rright moved that Project SS-033N, Multi-Day c a.re Services, be approved. Mr. Mitchell . seconded the motion. Mr. Coleman then asked for a report on the status of the Southside Day Ca re Association. Mr. Shimkus reported that the Model Cities Program was very much interested in relating to the Southside Day Care As sociation in a funding position, and that a proposal had been recei v e d from their staff which was being review for funding in next yea r' s program. Mr. Coleman asked if it were still possible to fund a part of the Southsid e fa cility this year. Mr. Shimkus answered y es . Mr. Coleman then asked that the Review Committee rev i e w the Southside proposal and report on it at the next meeting . A v o te was then taken on the mot ion t o appr ove the Multi-Day Care Services t o be implemented by the Senior Citizens Services of Metr opol itan Atlanta. It was unamiously approved . It was then moved and s econded and unanimously appr ove d that Pro ject SS-O llC , Homemaker Services; Project SS-026N ~ Legal Educat ion and Project SS- 27N Model Home Managemen:t, be app:x~oved . It was moved and seconded that the two projects t o be implemented by Model Neighborhood, Inc., be approved . Deacon Peters said that the Steering Committee met to discuss Model Neighborhood , Inc., and recommends that Mode l Neighborhood, Inc., not be appro ved t o r -e cei ve the $35,000 in Model Cities f unds. The Mayor then stated fo r the record that he does not think Mr. Moody is qua lified to car.ry out the projects. He said that he questioned the validity of Mr . Moody's ability to carry out the pro jects because of his past employment record with the cit y. For these reasons, the Mayor feels that he cannot endorse the pro j ect s' implementation by Model Neighborhood Inc. Dr. Smith sai.d that since Mr. Moody has obtained technical people to assist him, that he strongly endorses the projects. Alderman.Griggs said that he was reluctant to t rust the Board of Model Neighborhood, Inc. with that amount of money because of tht~ir in·abil ity to get together. M:': . Mitchel l said Ju~ was r.elllctant because of the Mayor 's statement and suggested that the Boai:.·d post.ponia: action on the projects until the next meeting. Dr. Smith asked foJC �4 a r oll c al l vote s o that the peop le will know how the Boar d feels. Further discu ssion followed ·w ith other Board meroJ)ers expressing their views . Mr. Hood then offered a subst: i.tu.b~ motion to the original mo tion tha t Model Neighborho od , Inc ., projects be t abled until the next regular meeting in or der to aive them time to reorgan.i.ze and restructure their progra.n, . Mrs. Weems seco nded the motio n. The motion carried with 8 voting for approval and 3 o pposing . .Mr. Wai. n.w:c ight stated that some one should g ive MNI d irection as to what the Board expects. Mr . Millican s uggested that MNI prepare a written s t atement showing what. they are go:i..nq to do with the mo ne y. JvJr. Newber r y said that he would like to know who the expert s are on the MJ.'fI staff. The Mayor .said that the Reveiw Committee would meet to d iscuss the pro jects with the Board o f Directors of MNI. A discussion the n followed on the expansion of the Re vi e w Committe e to include the entire board. !V'ir. Mitchell moved t hat t he personnE-11 of the Review Committee be the same as the personnel o f: the Executive Board. The motion was seconded. Mr. Johnson cautione d the Board that the Rev i ew Committee should be prepared to meet weekly or bi-weekly. Dr . Smi th brought out the fact tha.t a quo rum wil l be necessary b efore any official action can b e taken . Mr. Hood then offered a. substitute motion that the Review Commi t tee be expan ded by two members and that they be community residents. Deacon Peters seconded the mot ion . After a discussion on the me ri t s of expanding the Reveiw Committee by two members or expanding it to i ncludrc. the entire board, Mr . Hood withdrew his motion and a vote was take n on the previous motion. The mot ion wa s carried with onP (l)op r.,os ing. Mr. Griggs moved that the balance of the proj e ct s recommended by the Review Committee b e approved. The motion was seconded and approved by the Board. The other projects are! EM-019N, Staffing Cent.rai Faci lity and Mechanism of Serv ice; EM- 0 2 3N , Direc t Me dical Maintenance; EM-015N, Re sident Work Attitude Chanqe ; EM-00lC, Mode l Cities Mass Convent.ion, Inc.; RC-003N, Purchase Vacant La n d for. Block Parks a nd Playlots, RC-005N, Mobile Re creatio n Cen ters. 01J) BUSINESS Mr. White ly said tha t because of the meeting be ing held a week early , he was not prepar ed to g ive hi.s report on relocation; but he would give in in the August me e t i n g . DIREC'.!'OR I S REPOR'I' Mr. James L . Wright, J.i:., Director of Physical Developmen t q ave a re~rt on the r eloca.t i on a ct ivity out s i de of th.e Urban Ren ·~wa l j!\n:ia. . The meet i ng was a d j o urned at 1 2 :20 p . m. A P PROVED :: APPR0\17::D: I ,. h ... '·~ ·-.u .. ,•dl ;"( - - - ~ ~ . J i ... . -, ~~- -' · r ~ • · ·-· _ _ _ _ _ , ..... ~- - - - -- · ,'Johnn.y-.... c. Sohn. son, Di r e ctor �NON • PROFIT DEVELOPERS TRUSTEES MEMBERS 940 McDANIEL STREET, S. W . '#.!~MAN OF BOARD rnll###~' AVERY SHIELDS NATHANIEL PROTHRO SAMUEL COCHRAN REV. AUSTIN FORD PRINCE MARTIN, SR. HAROLD OWENS CLAUDE BARNES REV. JOEL W . MARSHALL ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30310

/;f,.fficHAIRMAN

JOE STALLING TELEPHONE: 523-5166-7 SECRETARY CLARK MARTIN TECHNICAL ADVISORS C . BRON CLEVELAND PAUL MULDAWER ELIZA PASCHAL TREASURER C. G . EZZARD J uly 9_,1969 Mayor I van Allen Jr . 56 Mi tche l l Stree t At lanta ., Ge orgia De a r Sir : The Board of Dire c tors of Model Neighb orhood Inc . request a meeting with you on Friday J uly 11., 1969 to dis cuss the circumstances around the funding of our o!l'.!gantzation . The purpose of this meeting is to c l ear up the position you have t aken and to answ e r any questions about thi s matter. Sincerel y yours Joseph Stallings Cha irman., Board of Di re ctors �' - CITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING C OLLIE R B. GLADIN , Directo r July 9, 1969 Mr. Johnny Johnson, DiNctor Model Cities Program 673 Caplt,ol Avenue, S. W. tlanto, Georgia Dear Johnny: to your verbal re st bock In the sprf rtlcl tlon by tt-. ~annl . 0.par t stoff in the phyaicol p lanning effort. However, to m"f our 1969 pr , hcav. .In writing octly hat i kt you with us to perform, whot mnn0t1WAt you think It wfll requl,.; nd whtn the work mutt be accom fished . Without such Information, It Ill b• y dlfflc lt for ua to ..scono ny furthe t This letter 11 In r• for more we already havtt. 1d l.fdt'9, • wtll •ffi Jn -1 Cftl• In the ntl... city. ve phyu for • nw.. ,., �Mr~ Johnny Johnson July 9, 1969 - 2- hav- xp,vaiM:JU b for • The d. partm nt wi 11 b unobl .. to accept tota I r sponsibillty in th or. a of citlz ns' involv ment . The respon.siblllty of w obtafning oltfzen review ond approval must contfnu to rest with you.r ·a g ncy which was stofh,d J .r this urf>O" during at least th 1969 planning y r. Oth•r t.hcin this singlt, limitation we ore wlllln to do ev rythlng w can to support th Model Cities Pr ram. Sincer, ly yours, ~W> Collier • GI. · in Planning DlfOctor C G/bls c:.e: Mayor Ivan Allen, J, •.....Mr. ney Cook Mr. G ry Grf J Mr. Everett MU II can �~ ~ITY OF ATLANTA CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Dir ector July 9, 1969 Mr. Johnny Johnson, Director ~ I Cl tias Progrorn 673 Capitol Avenue, S. W. Atlanta, Gaorgia . Dear Johnny: This lotter Is In res;x:me to your verbol request bock In the &pting for mora po.rtici;>atbn by tha Plcnning Oop•.:utm&nt staff in tha A.'ooel Citios physical pfanntng effort. Ho-waver, to meet our 1969 prQgrcm , we must have in writing exactly what tasks you wish m t~ P3rt0rnl, whot mon»ower you think It will require,. ond whoo the work must be accom;:,Hshed . 'Nlth-:,ut such Information, it will be very difficult for us to respond any further than we a lready hove. As you kn'lW, tho !)hyslcol plcmnfng efforts should mesh closely within the proposed 1970 Nefohborhooc.l Davelopment Program activities ond your own 1970 action year program development. Since Neighborhood C.velopment Program deadline, ore a~oaching with bewildering a ~ , every day that paaes maket the time factor more critical. We wlah .to- do all we can to help but our other commitments must ~ met also. So It 11 ~ tiol .thot we n;ceive a concrete expression of your needs tight' away. At we have 10id before, we will do everything WO can to alJt the physical plannlng efforts In Model Cities in ochi ving the maximum benefit for that area ond the entire city. There Is, however, one limltatlon which �/1,,\r. Johnny Johnson July 9, 1969 - 2- we have e.mpressecl before . The deparhnent will bo unable to accept total resporuibility in the a rao of c;tizens• involvement. The respomibility of obtaining citize n review and C!pprovol mv:it coni-inua to rest with your agency which wos ~toffed for this purpose during at feoot the 1969 planning year. Other than this single li mita tion we am willin9 to do everything w con to wpport th$ WlodeJ Cities Pr-:igram . Sincerely yours, Co!lte r S. G l<X!in Planning Director ·caG/1,b ccr Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. Mr. Rodney Cook Mr. Gregory Griggs Mr. EVGrott l'v1iliicon --~ · -' ·~ �I . . I I I model APRI L 5 M Y W T ... l 2 6 7 R 9 !3 1-1 I~ 16 ZO 11 '11 23 lil'AV r i 3 4 lil ll G U T W T >

z

11 18 19 Zl ZS 26 vnn n . .... p s .. .. .. . I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 il 14 !5 16 17 JS 19 20 21 Z2 7.l 2( "• n •N~ ~ Bl-MONTHLY REPORT . • . - · - - . . . ··· - · - -~- _ ____ ,. _ _ _ _..._J �APRIL-MAY MONTHLY MILESTONES: HUD and the City of Atlanta signed the official implementing contract for supplemental funds. The first delegate agency contract - the intra-neighborhood bus system - was being finalized and was expected to be effected the first part of June. A thorough review of all 1969 pro- jects was initiated and nearly completed. The majority of adm.Lnistrative staff positions was filled.

MILESTONES NEXT PERIOD: to be promulgated. uation system Many delegate agency contracts are Finalization of the is to be effected. be completed ..

Plans and Eval- ' ,. · Staffing is expected to �CONTRACT NO. MP.-10-001 City of Atlanta Model Neighborhood Program 673 Capitol Avenue, s .w. Atlanta, Georgia 30315 Johnny c. Johnson, Directok April-May Bi-Monthly Report June 10, 1"969 Report No. 7 Frepared By Alan Wexler Technical Write INDEX Page .MA.JOR DEVELOP1'1:E:NTS. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 General...................................... 1 Administration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Social Services Planning................. Physical Planning... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Economic Development..................... State Participation...................... 1 2 9 12 Data Collection.............................. Problems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 12 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE ••••••••••••••••••••••••• . • 7 13 Policy 1and Advisory Groups.................. Staff .. .................... 13 13 RESIDENT INVOLVEMENT.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE. • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 15 0 .................. 0 �I • MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS A. General, Project Status, and Other Related Projects Under Coordination A.l. Administration A.l.a. The City of Atlanta and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development officially signed ·the $7.175 million supplemental funds contract May 20. Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. signed for Atlanta and Ed Baxter, Regional Administrator, signed for HUD. Present for the ceremony were Earl Metzger, Regional Model Cities Director, and Johnny c. Johnsor Atlanta Model Cities Director. A,l.B. On May 29, the City officially designated the Negro-owned Citizens Trust Company to be the officiaJ depository for supplemental funds. This represents the largest account ever e143.215.248.55:ished by the City of Atlanta in a Negro-owned Bank. A.l.c. Also on May 29, Model Cities signed its first delegate agency contract - with the Atlanta Transit System for a $205,000 intra-neighborhood ~us system. Mayor Allen, other political leaders, business leaders and news media representatives were given a tour of the bus route, which officially was to start June 4. A.l.d. Other priority contracts were scheduled to be signed during the coming reporting period. A.l.e. A comprehensive rev iew of a ll supplementallyfunded projects was completed by the Plans and Evaluation and Program Management Divisions. This review was designed and executed to assure that each project was pronP.,..1~ A.-:: :=:.:..... '1 and ad".\ressed itself r~ ~he ~pacific objective for which it was designed. In addition, pre- contract reviews were held with a specially- appointed review team from tha Model Cities Executive Board. A.lof. The Plans and Evaluation staff began formalizing a Resident Service Information System which would l �-2- permit Model Cities to serve more adequately each resident who comes into contact with any project in the program. The system would involve nonsupplemental-funded as well as supplemental-funded agencies. Contacts were made with p~ivate firms which might be capable of designing the system. A.2 . A.l.g. Also included in preparation for implementation was a comprehensive salary study regarding simil ar job classifications in the various components. The purpose of the study was to discover salary differences in positions which will require the same type of work. Wherever such disc:r.ep:mcic s were found, the appropriate agencies were asked to review their salary scales. A.l.h. In accordance with a HUD request, Model Cities submitted an overall survey regarding in-house and on-loan administrative personnel. The study includ ec salary scales, recruiting pract ices, and types of positions . HUD h ad requeste d such action to compare similarities and differences among the various Model Cities programs throughout the nation. A.l.i. Concentrated work continued on planning for the t e nagency multi- pur pose cente r scheduled to be c omplete < by July 15. Commodore Corporation of Omaha, Nebrask, was the low b i dder for the modular-constructed, 20,000 sq. ft. facility. The contract with Commod oi i s e x pected t o b e s i gned during t he c oming repor t ing period. The contract with the Atl anta Housing Authority for t h e l and is also expected to b , s igned dur ing t h e corning r epor tin g p eriod. Social Services A.2°a. HEW initiated a signoff system whereby any of its future projects affecting 5 00/4 of the Model Cit i es area residents would require a certificate of approval from the Model Cities Director. A.2obo Several meetings were held with the ten agencies wnich will be housed in the temporary multi-purpose facil~tyo · Among the major results were establishment of an operating committee to oversee the quality of services to residents and the resolving �-3- of various adminis trative matters (decentralizing phone service~ system f or paying utility bills,etc~ ), The Committee will include agency r e presentative s and re~Jdents. A.2.c. With the Work Incentive Program (WIN) scheduled to begin L"1 July, Model Citie s established a WIN program 'l'ask For c e for the Model Cities are a. This ·Task Force will include repre s e ntative s fr om the State Department of F~mily and Children Se rvice s (DFCS)° , Fulton County .DFCS , Georgia State Employment Service, Senior Citizens , and Model Cities . Its purpose will be to develop means of coordin ating whatever services ar~ needed to make WIN successful(day care, e t c.). A.2.d. Several meetings were held t o discuss the problem of hunger. The participants were convened by federal HEW officials and i n cluded representatives of federal and local agenc ies. Subsequently and as a result of the meetings, Model Cities convened a meeting of several community-based agencies at which a U.S. De partment o f Agriculture off ici al explained the new Food For C11i ldre n program. As a result of · that mee t ing, s ome c ornrnuni t:;;"- based agencies actually fi led applications f or t he p r ogr am. A.2 .e. Representative s from the Wa.,;1 ington and Regiona l office s of HEv1 's Social Rehabilitati0n Serv ice met in an all-day briefing s e ssion with Model Ci ties staff members. Thelr purpose s were to learn how the various Model Cities p roposals r e lated to their particular work and to study Model Cities needs. A.2.f. Severa.l meetings were held with the Fulton County DFCS, and Senior Citizens in developing a protec tive services project for senior citizens. A.2.g. Contacts were made with the Board of Education to develop a training program for senior citizen s . This program would train senior citizens who would be working in the Model Cities progr am and person s who would be· working with the senior citizens. �- 4- A.2.h. The proposal by the Fulton County DFCS for Housing Aid to the aged was submitted to and reviewed by Washington federal officials. The program would coordinate information flow on housing for senior citizens and would also emphasize social services . A.2.i . . The he a lth component project entitled Health, .--• Education and Services was not favorably considered by HEW's r egiona l Technical Review Commi ttee . This project, which was for $1.3 million of the total $2 . 9 million health component budget,is considered vital to the over all program. It would provide pre-pai d health care, family outreach workers and dental serv ices . A.2.j. At least partially because of the unfavorable review on the above project, three other projects will probably b e temporarily delayed• 1"hese projects are the Health Facility building, the Group Practice Project a nd the Multi-phasic Screening Center. The latter two projects would have been housed in the Health Facility. Model Cities officials felt tha t without the Health, Education and Ser vice s Pr oject, t he other three proj ects c ould n o t f ully achieve their objectives. A. 2.k. The Family P lannin g Clinic project was still being considered by HEW's Children's Bureau and was expected t o be funded when some r elatively minor matters were resolved . A.2.1. Favor able response was also expected from HEW's Social Rehabilitation Service regarding the pr o pos ed Me nta l Re t ardation Workshop project. A.2.m. The menta l He a lth Plann er pro ject wa s still under in-house review. A.2.n. The Preventive Dental Care Project was rewritten prior to first submission. being A.2.o. Georgia State College was funded by HEW to train the e i ghteen residents on the twenty- five-membe r �-5- Better Health Corpotation Board. The Board, incorporated in January, also has seven professionals. A.2.p . .·,,_ll,," .. . ,) · ' , ;; / ~:: -.;J. ime prevention, major emphasis was in : developing the best possible relationship with every known criminal justice agency working in the area and/or that will have an impact on the area. Contacts included the Atlanta Police Depar t ment, the Fulton county Juvenile Court, Fulton County Probation Department, Fulton County 2arole District Office, State Board of Pardons and Parole , State Division of Children and Youth, State Board ' of Corrections , National Council on Crime and Delinquency, etc. A .2.q. Meetings were held with members of the residents' c rime prevention committees and with members of the profess jn~ ~l-Tech r. ical AdviBory Committee. The 1969 crime prevention plan was introduced and discussed at the meetings, and t he committees were asked to make input for 1969 implementation and · 1970_ planning. A.2.r. The Cr i me Prevention Planner did detailed work in p r eparation for implementation of the crime data compi lation project. This project, the planner f elt, should be one of the fi r st to be implemented in his program be cause it is so interrelated with all aspects of his 1969 program and with future planning. Most of t he negot iations were arranged with the Atlanta Board of Education regarding the ~un~rous educational projects which will receive supple mental funds in 1969 (Total supp lemental funds: $ 2 ,.159,00). F i nal d~tails w !re expected to be worked out in t he coming report ing period. A planning committee was formed to work on key issues which will be involved in the proposed educational complex. Included on the committee are r~presentatives of the Board of Education, Model Cities , residents, consultants, the Housing Authority, and the City Planning Department . The need for more land or a cutback in the program we r e two issues which were fa c ing the committee. �-6- A.2.u. Three meetings were held with regional federal officials, Model Cities officials and Board of Education officials. Discussions centered on new or existing possible funding resources. From these meetings, the Board of Education and Model Cities proceeded on devel oping proposals for money available throught the 11 Talent Search" project. �-7A. 3. Physical Planning A cooperative agr eement was developed between Model Cities, the Atl a nta Housing Authority and the Ci ty Housing · Code Inspection Division regarding propert i es inside and outside 1969 clear ance and rehabil itation areas. Basically , in 1969 Rehabilitation Areas, the Housing Authority will obtain a list of structures which have met city code enforcement standards in recent years. Owners whose properties cur rently mee t the standards will have the option of either taking advantage of possible gr a n ts or loans under the Housing Authority's r ehabilitation program to meet project standards or continuing to maintain structures in compliance with the City Housing Code. A.3.c. In future-designated rehabi litat ion areas other than those o f 1969, t he Housing Code Divis i on will participate on a c omplaint basis only. A .3.d. The Housing Authority will be fully responsible for demo lition activities in 1969 clearance act i on areas. A.3.e. In future-clearance areas the Housing Code Division will become involved only on a complaint basis, Generally, no new equipment installation will be required unless the residents' health or safety would be a factor without such work. A.3.f. The Housing Authority, the City Building Department and Model Cities developed policies and procedures for i nspecting and approving new prefab housing. A.3.g. Model Cities worked with the Georgia State Employment Service {GSES) to plan a construction training program for residents. It would be administered through the Model Cities Housing Center. A.3.h. Meetings were held with representat ives of the Citizens and Southern National Bank regarding their possible assistance in ~taking money and technical assistance available for housing rehabilitation and construction (See Economic Development Section.). �-8- A.3.i. A cooperative agreement was arranged with the City Planning Department which will allow Model Cities to receive adv ance notice of all Model Cities area zoning requests. The advance notice will allow Model Ci ties to review and comment on these important matter s . A.3.j. Discussions were held with representatives of t he Greater Atlanta Housing Development Corporation. The purpose wa s to persuade the Corporation to provide seed monies and technical assistance in HUD'~ 2 35 and 236 h ousing construction p rograms and in 235 ~J rehabiliat i on p ro jects . The Corporation is a private-non-profit group sponsored by Atlanta Businessmen . A.3.k. The Housing Authority, -!:he Greater Atlanta Housing Development Corporation and Model Cities agreed to explore the feasibility of relocating existing house s wh i ch are in the path o f the present Atlanta Airport construction program. A.3.1. Model Cities began rev iewing an Urban Design Framework Pr opos al for the areas. The Proposal was developed by a team of professionals. A.3.m. Model Cities worked with the Hous ing Authority in developing a project management control system for the Authority ' s Neighborhood Development Program (NDP) • A.3 .n. Pittsburgh neighborhood businessmen discussed with Model Cities how they could become involved in building businesses in renewa l areas and in becoming active in other areas of the Model Cities Program. A . 3.o. It was agreed to submit design plans to the City's Civic Design Commission. ,A. 3 .p. The nation's first deleqate agency contract was signed with the Atlanta Transit System for initiation of the intra-neighborhood bus system. (See Administration Section.) A.3.q. As of the end of the reporting period, the Atlanta Housing Authority had completed approximately 85% of its rehabilitation area i n spection work. A total of 25 grants had been made , ranging from �-9- $2,800 to $3,000. The total figure for all the grants was $73,576 . Housing Authority Officials said numerous persons in · the area were not qualifying for the gra.nts because of the $3,000 yearly gross-income limitations Eight to ten grantees had completed their rehabilitation work as of the end of the reporting period. A.4. A . 3.r. Regarding loans, between 50 and 60 were being processed for possibl e activation after July 5. Loan applications in the region had been terminated for the 1%8-69 fiscal year, but HUD officials indicated that sufficient monies would be available in the approaching fiscal year. In all; some 150 loan applicat ions had been filed, althoughmany of the applicants were e xpe cted to have yearly gross incomes exceeding the maximum ($8,400 for a family of seven ). A. 3. s . Housing Authority o ffi cials initiated action designed to i n form members of the U .S. Congress that the gross income loan limitations were too low. A congressional act in 1968 had established the limits on any NOP pro ject begun after August 1968. The a ct did not, however , affect previouslyapproved Urban Renewal efforts . Therefore, in the n earby West End Urban Renewal area, there are no i ncome limitations. A.3.;t. In clearance activit ies , 4- parcels had been acquired of the 378 parcels sched uled for 1969 acquisitions. Appraisa ls of. approximately 800/4 of the 378 parcels had been made. Most parcels were e x p ect e d to be acquired within approximately 3 months . A.3.u. Four consultants were hired by the Housing Author ity to work with residents in preparing the land-use plan and a 1970 Neighborhood Development Plan. By the end of the reporting period, two communities had met with their consultants. Economic Development {Employment and Industrial-Commercial Development} A~4.a. Intensive recruiting was curtailed during most of the reporting period because of the delay in ·funding. �-10- .--- -- However, the May 20 Atlanta-Model Cities - HUD supplemental-fund contract signing was to result in much g re ater a ctivity during the coming reporting period a It was d e cided that the Economic Opportunity Atlanta Neighborhood Center Manpower Units would conduct the call-in and referral work for the program. A.4.b. Atlanta Model Cities fa iled to convince the U .S . Labor Department and HUD that federal training f u nds should b e used to train residents in power sewing machine operations. The significanc;e of HUD's inabi lity to fund this pro j ect was that it would almos t be impossible to assist several companies which h ad expressed previous intere_st in locat i ng o r expanding their operations in the are a. Hundre ds o f res ident-filled j obs would have been involved. A.4.c. Southland Engineers and Surveyors Corporation decided to apply f o r an MA-5 contract under the National Al liance of Businessmen's program. The appli c a tion would be for fi v e app licants to be trained as rodmen. If accepted, i t was expected to be signed in early June. A.4.d. Discussions were held with Army/Navy recruiters to respond to their questions relative to the Department of Defense's lowering enlistment standards for ghetto r esidents. A.4. e- 'P. meeting was h eld with Church's Golden Fried Chicken to d e termine the feasibility of its establishing t wo s tores in the Model Cities area. _Each store would e mploy as many as eight to ten residents . Fu ture meetin g s were to be held when plans were more definiteo A.4 .f. Model Neighborhood, Inc ., a resident, non-profit development corp oration, received a grant from the Economic Development Administration for approximately $87,000o The money would be u sed to provide technical assistance to new businesses, t? identify and develop businesses which would be owned and managed by .MNI, to help develop manufacturing facilities in the area, to provide technical assistance to neighborhood groups seeking to establish local deve~opment corporat i ons, etc. �-1 1- A.4.g. In add i tion, MNI req uested $35 , 000 in supplemental funds from Mod el Ci ties . The money requested would be used t o supple ment its programs listed above. A.4.h. MNI had previo u s ly been given an EDA g r ant of $6,000 through Mod el Cit i e s a nd the City of Atlanta. Most o f those f u nds had b e en used to b e gin initial developmen t o f a shoppin g center . MNI a lso had developed a s e wing ma chin e operation in the area. It employs appr oxima tely 13 women . A . 4 .i . The Mode l Cit i e s Economic Development staff studied t he p roblems of a r e s ident busine sswoman to gain an ins igh t i n to some common obstacles fac i ng many a r ea business pe ople . The woman's main problems c o n c erned relocation o f h er customers because of urban renewa l a n d unco o r d i n ated efforts b y public a g encies. A.4. j . Techn i c al assist ance was give n to the JohnsonFluker Candy Company on -var i ous employer p rograms offered by the Ge orgia Stat e Emp loyment Se rvice . A.4.k. An important meeting wa s held with a rep re s ent a tive of Stokes and Wood Consultant fir m of Washington, D . C.; and HUD representatives. The pr i mary purpose was to e~plain the firm ' s agreement with the U.S. ~ Department of -l.,p.bor to promo te union involvement in the Model Cities Program. It appeared that local unions in Atlanta do not desire to recruit individuals who have no experience in t he building trades. A.4.1. Attempts to receive b ids for the leasing o f two jobmobiles resulted only i.n the possibility that three companies might submi t bids. The main reasons for lack of definite bid submittals appeared to be the cancel l ation clause after one year, high insurance risk, and low resa le value. The jobmobile was still scheduled to be one of the first 1969 employment projects. �A.5. State Participation A.5.a. Model Cities continued to keep various State departments i n formed as to its plans . Especially active during thi s reporting period was the Georgia State Employment Service. GSES continued ·to supply one coordinator, one planner, and three other staff members. Mod el Cities was expected to reimburse GSES for pers onnel e x penses this year. B. Data Collection B.l.a. There was a delay in releasing preliminary reports on the important 10,000-interviewee surve y being conducted b y the U . S. Department of Labor ' s Bureau of Labor Statistics. Atlanta's survey is being conducted in the area served by the Concentrated Employment Program (CEP) and in more affluent sect i ons . B . l . b. Or iginally, a general r e por t was to have been released in Ma rch . By t h e end of the reporting period, BLS o ff icials sai d the earl i est a p r e liminary repor t would be released would be in or after August. The final rep or t , which wi ll contain more specific information, was not expected to b e released b efo re December o r the first part of 1 97 0. B.l . c. All interviews were expected to be completed by June 30. c. Proble ms c.1. The major p roblem concerned the many scheduling adjustments made necessary by the delay in funding prior to the May 20 contract signing. Delegate agencies were required in some instances to change significantly their scheduled milestones. In at least one instance, a consultant told Model Cities officials that he might not be able to begin his project because he had had to place his manpower and machines on another project. �-13- II. c.2. Another major problem resulted in the refusal by HUD and the U.S. Department of Labor to allocate monies for the training of sewing machine operators. (See industrial <'levelopment section.) C.3. Labor unions did little to ensure that they will significantly assist ghetto res~dents to obtain union membership . (See industrial-commercial section.) C.4. A third major problem was the prohibition against granting any rehabilitat ion l oan s to any · family uni t ear ning more than a maximum of $8,400 a y e ar. Many needy familie s were not mee t ing the min i mum income limitat ion s a s of the e nd o f t he r eporting period . (See Physical Services Section.) ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE A. Policy and . Advi s ory Gr oups A.l . a. B. No changes were made on the Executive Board, the highest p o licy-making g roup i n the program. Howeve r , negotiat i on s began with s ome potent i al new member s t o t h e Technical Ad visory Bo ard , a gr ou p comp o sed of pub lic a n d p rivate exp erts in variou s dis c i plines . The new me mber s would f unc tion as a dvisor s t o the Plans a nd Evaluation staff. Staff B. l .a. The Direc t or for Program Manageme n t was appointed and approximately ten other n ew staff members were e mployed. The two ma jor vacancies wer e in the Direc t orships of Plans and Evaluation, and Economic Development. Other v acancies still existed in Program Management and the cler ical staff. Bol.b. Staff turnover was almost n on- existent, as it had been in the past. �-14III. RESIDENT INVOLVEMENT A. Activities Incorporation procedures continued for Stadium Heights, Inc., t he new name for the resident involvement organization . The incorporation and structural matters were expected to become offici al durin g the coming reporting period~ Four consultant fi r ms wer e hired by the Atlanta H9using Authority to work with the six neighborhoods in developing land- use plan and the 1970 Ne ighborhood De velopment Pr ogr am (in cluding clearance and rehabi l itation) . By the end o f the reporting period , one firm had met with one of his two neighborhoods and the other firms had made p l ans to meet wi th t h e i r c ommun i ties durin g the coming reporti ng period. A.l.c. The Atla nta Community Relations Commission conduct e d t wo 11 t ownha ll 11 me etings , one in Gr ant Park (s eventy people ) . and on e i n Me chani c s ville (f i fty peo p le) . Mode l Citie s rep resentatives dis cussed t he p rogram and answered residen ts ' question s a t tho se meetings. A.l.d. The 7th Mass Convention was he l d, wit h o ver onehundred peo ple attending. Howev er , since .t he supplemental-fund contract had not been signed and since most subjects h a d previously been discussed , n o official business was conducted. A. l .e. Four of the six neighborhoods met to work out procedures for di s tributing the approximately 865000 gallons of paint recently reserved for the a rea by the General Services Administration . Only resident homeowners will be eligible to receive the paint . I t was e xpected to be d i stribute d s ometime in June. �-15- IV. A.l.f. Planners met with residents of the Sugar Hill community and patrons of the Fellowship Mission to discuss the possible clearance areas which would affect them. F urther discussions were expected to be held during - the coming reporting period. A. l. g . The Communit y Affairs Division sponsored a tour of the soon -to - be -initiated intra-neighborhood bus line. The Mayor, many other public officials and s ome key residents took the tour. A.l.h. A group of residents apµ-oved the designation of the Model Cities Steering Committee to be the recipient of some $72,000 in OEO training funds. The Steering Committee was s chedu led to incorporate under the name o f St adium Height s, Inc. sometime in June. FEDERAL ASSISTANCE A . l.a . Washington and regional officials continued to provid e technical assistance. Espe c ially helpful were discussions with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and HEW's Social Rehabilitation Service (See Social Services �~ J:-'1 /J1t /L'-J~ '· tf. , (..... I c.:c. J une 9 , 1969 Mr. T . D. Allisandratos General Manager Albeni Corporation P .. o. Box 606 Tarpon Springs, Florida Dear Mr . Allissandratos : Mayor Ivan Allen has referred your letter of June 3 to our office for respon e . I am enclosing a copy of the summary of the one- year and the five-year foreca t. This summary list the major objective and approaching to solving the problems of the Model Neighborhood Ar • If I can provide you with let m know. ny furtb . information, please Sincerely, Johnny C. John on Director vlc Enclosur cc: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. (,,4' r,;1 ��DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PEACHT_REE SEVENTH BUILDING, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Room 645 REGION Ill June 3, 1969 IN REPLY REFER TO: Code 3RF Mr. George L. Aldridge, Jr. Director Community Improvement Program City Hall 68 Mitchell Street, S. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr . Aldridge : · Subject: Proj e ct No. Ga . R-97(CRP) Community Renewal Program Approval of Housing Cost s Study The Housing Costs Study for the Atlanta Community Improvement Program has been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. It is recommended that the Model Cities Agency be advised of the following : a. To consider the recommenda tions and conclusions contained in the Housing Cos ts Study in planning relocation resources, especially as they concern housing p r ef erences, timi ng of development of resources, treatment of particular neighborhoods or sub-areas, the style and cost of housing and full utilization of HUD-assisted housing programs. b. To coordinate the Study recommendat ions with proposed NDP activities within the Model Cities Area. c. To include in the Relocation Program for the Model Cities Area the matters included in paragraph a ab ove, in addition to reviewing estLuates of displacement found in the Study. d. Relative to housing resources proposed for relocation of residents in or from the Model Cities Area, displacement should not exceed the supply of new housing which can be assured of development within the same displacement period. In view of the experimental nature of t he Model Cities effort and the . recommendations in the Study to use all possible methods and programs to keep housing prices low, it may be necessary and desirable to show resources on a year-to-year basis with first year displacement limited to the resource supply for that �2 year, allowing the time for development of innovative housing programs and in attaining necessary sponsorship on an open-ended basis. This would require assurance that displa cement and resource supply will be reviewed annually wi t h ame nded Relocation Programs provided to HUD for concurrence before displa cement occurs. Sincerely yours, Q\) I' \

r·

() I.- ( / ; · ,; \ 9A1 ~f'i \ )>\ John I'.' '.Ed!n'unds .... ..... cc: Mr. Fountain I \ ~ . ( ) J'I: ) / ,}1{.V / -· Assista nt Regiona l Acl~ini strator for Renewal Assistance �DEPARTMENT OF HOU S ING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PEA C HTRE E SEVENTH BUILDING, ATL ANTA, GEORG I A 30 323 REGION I l l Offic e June 3, ]969 of Administration IN C i ty of Atl a nta Cit y !!all Atl a nta, Ge or g ia R E P L Y 30303 Ge ntlem e n: Att a ched is a cop y o f l e tt e r of credit numb e r 8 6 - 03-0009, a uthorizin g y ou to drawdown funds a g a inst the total am o unt a uth o ri z e d b y pr ese ntin g F o rm TUS 5401, P ay me nt Vo u c h e r s o n L e tt e r s o f Cr ed i t , to yo u r l oc a l c o mm e rc ia l ba nk . A ll fund s r e s u lt i n g from such vouch ers sh a l l imm e di a t e l y b e d epos it e d i n y o u r a cc ount w ith th e loc a l co mmerci a l b a n k , R S indi c at e d o n t h e l e tt e r of c r e dit. Si n c e r e l y . (7 1 y ou rs , , 1 , , - !-- _,,,,,, _ 7'/ ,/ ;, ,,, / >./fy,,-,-11·7' ~-> ' _., / ,, ' /

) ,

-) ~ Di re c to r , Fi a n ci a l Re vi e w a nd Ac coun tin g Di v i s io n R E FE R T O : �~---- ---...__.______.-· 10 0 0 h,ra l ~t'rv l <.:C" , Uuri·.,u of An:o urH!, LETTER OF ISSUING AGENCY t . S . Dept of Housing and Urhan DevclopQCnt 645 Peachtree 7th Bldg WE Atlanta . Ga. 30323 A<..,F.'.':CY ST AT I ON SYMI.\CJL LETTER OF CR ED IT NUMBER 86-03-00 09 CREDIT Au di: TR EASll l:Y DE P A RT MEN T C IH C l lLAll No. 10 7 ~. R t·v iscd 668/90133 (I f(Qirit 86 - 00 - 9703 Al\1ENO~-ff.1" T i'J (IMBFH. __·_ _ EF FECTIVE DATE ( FO R AGENCY U SE ) June 1 0: 30 1969 AT

~-! ! n :1ccord.1!"·<· wi:1, the ;;u:hori·, ,!,!\/,1 of the Fiscal As, ;,r.11H ~'l'<.TcLiry, Trca,ury Dt:j".1n 111 •: !! t , ciic re 1s hc:n· h y ,1 i.rli or i1 c J fo; d ,c ::c co un l anJ rcspo n , ihility of che is<. u ing a g(' ll C)' ;i l<:tCc1· of c·rc<l i, : ' 1 l :--.J ~FA

VO~flf lO ~l'

l ~ ! I' l I I t 0 t l ~·-nt·~~,-~-- -- ~ - - --·~··----,..-f(=) ~R~ L)=E•-POSrf"()Nl.Y Atlanta , Georgia ,\ M()l ':'JT AllTIIO l,i Z ED 30303 D D PRIOR AUTI!ORlZATION I ACII f\lONTH I'} 0 ".) (' () THIS EACil QUA RTER $ - f SEE NOTE s 7 , 1 7 5 > 0 0 0 O0 0- .J M~·r_· _ _= _ ACCOUNT C-1 ,'.:,c t: I ncr,·.» ,· E~.~~-··-· !~-~·:.=~:. s 7 , 1 7s - -.. Citi zcno Tru9t Co mpany Post Office Box 4485 Atlonta, Georgia 303 02 a y TO -~~=~~u C _ _ _...'., The un pa id b. d :inn: of chi ·: lt:1 te r of c r ~·d it will r e m a in avail a bi c: u11 £il D Treasury Depart:r;~·,,1· tft:,1. tl1i -. ktt" r l1;; :, l>L·(·n revol;crl . Dene», you arc adv ised ;n ,._ ri li ng b y the OR 0 The u11paiJ b.:lanu· ,,f chi ·. kc1,·r uf creJ it is revoke d at t he end of each pnio<l indicated ,wd the full n·(",l ,1hl i,l11·d :1: 1lw h, ·g i11111 111.: of ,: ... f.,11,,win~ period un t il yo u arc ,1d\'i,cd in wric ;ng bv t!.c Treasur y Dc·parcmuH that clt i~ k ite r l1.1 :, hec 11 revoked . a1110111H I T he amount of this lurer of credit is ht·reby certifu,:d to be dra w n again st, u pon presenta tion to you of Form TUS 5401, Po1 1 1JH.:11r Vo:1cber 011 Lcf.ter of Credit, by the o fti. cial ( s ) of the recipient orgar1i ;'.,1tio11 whose signac11~L·(s ) artH·.,r(s) o n t he Sc.1n ,lard h,r111 ll9f, Authorized Sis nature Card for P;iy!1\e nt Vo u l: :cr~ on Letter of Credit, act,1 d 1c:d t1<·rt·c,, or prC'viously or \ubse•-1 uently furni,hed you thro u gh the Treas u ry Dq,artment. The amo u nt of c:1cl1 payme1 t vou<.her paid by a Federal Reserve Ba n k or branch to a dc,i g na ted com mercial hank fur crc·dit to ,he account of the rec ip ien t organization shall consriatte p:iymcnt to che recipient organi?.1t1on by the I !11ircd St.Hes. I certify to the Tre:is ury Dep:irtrne nt that the payments authori1cd hen::in are correct and proi)er for payment from the apprnpriarions or funds lega lly committed and available for the purpose, when paid in accord ance with the terms and conditions cited above.

t10TE:

T~e naximum anount that roay b~ requested durin ~ n calendar month i8 limite<l to $1,435 9 000 000. nroject Contract DATE CERTIFll-.D . _ ,{1-;-1n-no1 1 F'- 10-()•11 .J.une,_.) ~ l <J 6 ') ~ ncdfc~n, Ccrtifyic~ ~fficrr TYPED NAME AND Tl I'LE 1193- 10 2 �---CITY OF .ATLAl'JT .A CITY HALL June 3, 1969 ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR R. EARL LANDERS, Admini strative Assistant MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison MEMORANDUM To: Mr. R . Earl Landers From: Subject: Dan Sweat Review of Code Enforcement Policy in Model Cities Area Attache d is a copy of a m emor andum from Jim Wri ght to me spelling out the revised policy of the Atlanta Housing Authority and the City's H e-using Code Division in the Model Cities ar e a. This came about as a result of probl ems b eing called to our attention in the A d a ir Park Area w h e're the city had -compl e te d a hous e by house rehabilitation program within the last few years. You might r ecall at the time we were discussing the Model Cities Pro g r am with r es idents of that area, the y were very much concerned with hous ing code ac tivity which was going on at that time . We assured them we would not place them in double jeopardy when the Model Citi e s Program started. There were indications that we were doing this by requiring the same property owne rs to bring th e ir prop e rty in line with th e new code s t anda rds of th e Atlanta Housing Authority und er the Mod e l Citi e s Program. This r ev i sed polic y was adopted ,after a m ee tin g in my offic e with officials of the H o usin g Authority, the Buildin g Department and M o d e l Cities. DS:fy cc: Mayor I van Allen, Jr. Mr. Johnny R obinson �..I i::' . -· 0 'r, May 29, 1969 OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Ga. 30315 404-524 -8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Dan Sweat Director of Governmental Liaison FROM: Jame~ L. Wright , Jr.i~w,tt. Director of Physical Develo~~ent SUBJECT: Atlanta Housing Authority and Housing Code Division Activities in the Model Neighborhood Area Attached hereto, is a revised copy of the policy regarding AHA and Atlanta Housing Code Division in the Model Neighborhood Area. The addendum to the original policy which was developed in February of 1969, refers to properties wh ich have, in rec e nt years, been brought up to City Housing Code standards. This policy is outlined in paragraph 2 under the heading Rehabilitation Policy - Model Ne ighb orhood Area . The Atlanta Housing Authority will obtain a list of structures ·which have met Code Enforcement standards o f the City of Atlanta Building Department in rec ent years. Owners whos e properties currently meet these standards will have the option of either taking advantage of possible grants or lo an s under the Atlanta Housing Authority rehabilitation program to meet project standards or continuing to maintain structures in compliance with the City Housing Code . . As you know, it was formulated by Messrs. Lester Persells, Executive Director of Atlanta Housing Authority; C. M. Smith, Architectural Engineer; James Smith, Chief Housing Code Inspector; Ma lcolm Jones, Chairman of Housing Resources Committ ee; and myself, representing the CDA. This agreement was reached during the meeting with you in your offic e on May 26. The purpose is to provide the most equitable arrangement to benefit property owners in the rehabilitation program. cc : Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. William Wofford Lester Persel ls C . M. Smith Malcolm Jones James Smith Johnny Johnson �I' • •• . .. •.• ! 01··~-~·-~\:-r ....._C '-" f... C"'J>•_......:,.-;·,_ , ___. . . ..:,-1 , 1 ~--. It_ ··-J"..,~ '. __ T_ ..•r-u. May 29, 1969 OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Ga . 30315 404-524-8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson , Director Policy Regarding Atlanta Housing Authority and Atlanta Housing Code Division Activity in the Model Neighborhood Area Rehabilitation Policy - Model Neighborhood Area The Atlanta Housing Authority will obtain a list of structures which have met Code Enforcement standards of the City of Atlanta Building Department in recent years. Owners whose properties currently meet these standards will have the option of either taking advantage of possible grants or loans under the Atlanta Housing Authority rehabilitation program to meet project standards or continuing to maintain structures in compliance with the City Housing Code. In rehabilitation areas other than those of current year action areas, the City Building Department will participate on a complaint investigation basis only. New enforcement cases will be undertaken in accordance with De partment personnel capability and on a full code compliance basis. Demolition Policy - Model Neighborhood Area The Atlanta Housing Authority is fully responsible for demolition activities in NDP current year clearance action areas. When emergency situations occur necessitating prompt action on particular structures in th e clearance areas, the City Building Department will become involved for enforcement efforts. In demolition are a s other than those of current year action areas ~ the Building Depa rtment will become involved only on a compliant basis to ef f e ct full code compliance with the e x c e ption that generally no inst a ll a tion of a ddition a l equipme nt will be r e quired . A possibl e excep tion will a rise if it is determin e d that the failure to install a d dition a l equipment may r e sult in j e opardy to the h e alth , safety on general wel f are of a structures inhab itants. �., l· CITY OF .ATLANT.A May 19, 1969 / OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue , S.W. Atlanta, Ga. 30315 404 -524-8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson, Director M E MO R A N D U M

TO Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. FROM Johnny C. Johnson, Director SUBJECT: Technical Assistance Funds The attached spells out the requirements for training and technical assistance funds in Model Cities. been offered $70,000. JCJ : vlc At t achment Atlanta has �PROPO SAL FOR A Gi<M~'! TO - ··-- --·--FOR TRt.l NlMG AND n:c !INTCAL ASC STANCE I N MODE!. Cl.TI ES

L BACKGROUND AND PU RPO SE: The purpose o f thi s program -L s t o build t h e ea.p acity of HrY.lel Cit i e s resid e nts i n ··---- -·---- --·--·--t;c, l:e £-> p nJ k nn 1_.tlc rJgcah ly n nJ t:: f f ecti. v d .y to th e r equi reme 1,t s of ti1 c f'hdc l CJ l:i·:!s P rogr2m 1:-y csto.bJ -~sh:fng responsi ble neighborho o d ·orgarr.i.?.at k,n s s o thll t t li,~y c:nn asses s thci r prob 1 em s a nd ca. n work e f fect ive l y wi th ci· .y gove n in1 e1:i and o th er l o<!al ins ti tu t:!. ons i n th e planning . execu tio n t1nJ e \ ·a l u ti ur~ of pr,..,gn1rn s . I t :i.s o ur und e r s tanding tha t the H,>dc.,t Ci.Lie s .l\dm i n is L'ra t:i. n n a n d 0E0 will j oi n in this p ro jec t a s part o f an ef f o rt t 0 bu -f.ld cffccti •,e a nd TE'. Gp ;i n s ibl(' commun ity p a rti c i p ation and to make avai. l a bl e ft ncl~ u id <i.t;s i s t nnce to .od ~l n ei ghbor.ho d gro u ps 'f. n both first nd scc _ n r oundcitie s . 'h,r. major obj e cU.v e s of th e prngni.. fl r c: 1. To p rov id e c it ze. ;; wj ·ha d ive sily of experie nce end c apabi.lity in lo c-n J :t nst:l tu t :ilH1c11 pl n ~r,jng , progt·n<n i ,nrteme ntat5. on an d prog ram e v lua.: i on. fun ct ion l y CAA t1t1d CD:\ (! i g ;1bnrh0,.)cl gn,ups a 1d to plan an d m,,ve t 0 wa r d the nvcntuc\ l C'O n~;r.,lid a tiur of r~sidr~n t partic ip at i o n lnhe1· rit. ;n rnaking t heir rraJ.ni ng, '. E:" l-mi.ca l assi st :illt::e , and p l anning fu11ds a vail a ble i s t h e ass11i.1ptj on by or:o and HU.G t h at citize 1s l-u ve �'· - l- major rol e t o pl a y :i.n bo th t he Communi ty Ac t i on Prog r am and the Model Citi es Program. Further ~ bot h OEO' s and HUD' s philoso phy ,- -acknowledges th~ r ight of peo pl e aff ec ted by publi c pr og r ams to h av e access t o and influ er.c e on t he proc e s s by whi ch dec ~s ions abou t t he i r live s ~re made ; -- a cce pts t h at ma ny of the be st i nte nt ioned of fi ci a ls a nd ~ echnici aris a r e o ften, bi the i r t rai ni ng, experi e nc e s , and l ife-styl es , unfamiliar w:t.th o r even insens it i ve to t h e prob lems a nd a s pi r at ions of mode l naigh borhood res ide nt s ; therefo re , resident ideas and prior:i.ti e s can resu l t i n mp r e re l evant , sensi t i~e , a nd eff ec tiv e plan and programs; -- r ecogni zes t hat the pr ocess o f participation makes it po si ble for tho s e citi~en~ forme r ly out s ide t h e sy s t em to learn how it functio ns a nd ho w to make it f unc t ion i n the ir i nt c r ~st - and t hat the process mak e s it po ssib l e fo r r e s i de nts t o s t rengthe n existing skil l s and to develop th e kind of new s kil ls needed for ef fe ctive d . ti zcnsh:ip b eyo nd as we l l a s wi thin the Mo de l Ci t i e s Progra m. In ligh t of the above a nd in o r de ·· to ove rcome t hese probl ems , OEO and HUD arc e ncou rag j ng CAAI s, CDA' s ond the ne i ghborhood g r oup s t o test thi s te chnica l a s s is t ance st ra t egy t hrough the us e o f the s e f unds . Funds alloca te d to ne i ghborhood groups under t he s e g r a nts may be u sed to prov :tde p l a nning , tra:f.ning and tecl n:f c al rws i<·tance se rvice s l o �,- J- rwio.hb o rhoo d r.r.: s id<~11t s in .J.udlng bl.,l t not: J·i.mi te d Lo th e fo ll ow i. ng : l.

Vul.1 -J:}. mr:i s t a f f for n o ighbo r l.1ood g ro up s t o r l an and

develop s erv i c c•s u ndo I'.." t h ec e p r ngn:.in e. · 2. Pon11a l tra ln 'I. g p r o g 1wn R .or n s.:ighbo 1:·;-1o o d r e sid e n t gr·-ciup s a nd Staff. 3 . ·. Coll e ct i o n a nd lis ~;emi. niLU ,- n ::.i f r •J l.cv nn t infon11~t:fo n a h.o u t Mo de l .-r. Ci t: -J e s and rci1nted p rog r :, rns t o nl': i g hb o hoo d rE!s j_d e ti:; . 4 ,1 · ReLHi nfrig c1:, 11sult m1ts . l lD ,1y (•r. ;:;, c ornmu nit. y 0 1.·g an i z ers , planners, a nd pb n ni ng. _5;. To d e\· e l op 6. Ai1d c ,H ry 1., u t •:i. ti:,,: ~ n c-va l.u a io n o f l h e r-fod e l Ci. ti. e s A por tio t1 of g n m t .:u n d~· rrm ' b r:- u s ;:. d by nd g h bo 1:h o . d grn1}ps t0 co n t r a. ct d:ir e c t i. y 1-,J t h o ·r._, a ni·-:.:at II , I' OCES 5 P..R IOR TO WOI,K J RO L Th e .')i1 1:'i e f t h e.it· o wn c h oos i ng whi c h

i,

1 N

AA a nd CDA ~r1.l l di.c; c u !; s 11t :; r:n:og 1·,<;r:1. (d c. t c i e n· ma i. ndc t· o E s cnt e n(; e .) 2 , Th ey r-,i l.l d i.s c.:us '., t_ ne i gh borhood grou µs . c:i · ccrnirn5. t nic fl i. fo: th8 n e xt- t we lv e mo;i ths o f �..,. -4·,. 3. Designa tion of neighborhood groups to pl!)-n t he program and receive funds ,l~ th e C£1_A .a nd CD/L 4. The neighbo rhood group with a. ~rnis t:a nce acceptable to ir from th e CAA and CD;\ will rle cid0 who. t training and te chnical assist a nc e they re qui re f or the devalopmen t of the propos~l for neighborhood -g roup s up port f unds. 5. If this assistanc e i s no t av a ilabl e in the c:i.ty , the CAA and CDA wil ). make every e ffo r t to ob t a in it. We. hope 0E0 and the other Fe de r F.1 1, s tnt e and local age nc ie s invo lv e d i n the Model Cities Progra m wi l l mak(? it ava.i lahle to the ne ighb orhoo d group -- assistan c e whi ch f s a ccep t a ble to the group. , 6. If th e nei ghbo rhood group or grou ps f e e l tha t p r omised t r aining . and tech~i c al a ~si st anc e i s not b e ing reGei ve d o r is inadequat e, we, the CAA and CDA will use 2£!:. good offic e s to remedy t he situation . III. Wo rk Program. l. The neighbo r hood group with the above t echn ica l - a ssi s ta nee wi 11 pr.e pare a form l wri t te n a pp icatio n . a s umma ry o f Th ey wi lJ a l so prepar LhaL a pp li ~at i 0n for ci r c ul a tio n to resident s of th~ m del neighbod1ood. 2, After the interim bonrd and/or membership o f the n e i.ghborhoocl group has appr:ovcd the appUcation it should l e submit ted through the CAA a nd CDA to om and a copy se n t to HUD. l f CDA funds are not included in the a pplica tio n , th ey must _be :integrated i,nto the a.pplicatfon . Pd.or to this submission, the CAA, CDA �•• ,

.' ..· ·,·· .~ \.. ~s·a nd reside n t groups sha 11 me et together t o dis c uss t he:t 1: re~ations h ip s 3. i., l Lh i n t he fr a;11cwork of the proposa l . Inc h ide d in th e: f inal o.ppliuLtion w J J. be a dc sc: r:i pt i ve h istory of t h e wa ys in which th e steps in tl, e wo1:k p roces s o u t l i n ed n bovo hAvc be e n me t. The a p p li c ation wi ll al.l;o indic a t e t he ways CD.I\ funds a n d L1. as si stanc e wi ll b e rna clc avai labl e to t h e neigh bo rh ood group . ., 'f h e ap p ].icn t ion J:!i-.!l. r:; how as speci.fica l l y a ~: pC1ssib l c wl, at ·t kinds of a c t-:l.vi Uc s wi 11 he _u nch! r lak c n, wh e n an d h ow . 5 , Th e . a ppl_:lcation will a l so dcscr:i.be wha.t , when and how o f t r aining dur i ng t h e program ye, ·r. 1 6. The applic.:ation will als o specify lo\·1 con s ult a nts hired by the nei ghb rl1ood group wi 11 b e account a ble to t he ne i.ghborhoocl group or groups. 7. 'I'h e Hppl:t ca t.icn w:i.ll. a l so desc:d b c how t h is trnini.ng nnd techni c a l assis t ance i s rc Ja t od l o Cl~ e nd CAA p l a ns end prcig r ams. 8. The: wo rk p rog r am wi.11 Gpc ll out h i~i.ng pro ce dures: pn rt:i cu l a rly the righ t~ end rec, po ns :i.Lil:U- i e s of th e nc:i.ghbo r ho o cJ g 1-ollp, the CAA and CDA. 9. The wor1• prog uu n ui.l l al r-o i ndiq:1. t c by nanie wh e n \Ve.t- poss:i. bl e specific C/\ /i-Cl)i\ s Loff. and sl aff of nc::iehhorhoo cl 01.;ganizations who wi.11 b e i nv o l ved in imp l emc nti11g thr..! progn1m . . �~6- 10. We a r .e committed t o ob s erv i ng the t e r ms o f th e HUD/0E0 Agre ement o n l ocal coordina ti o n i n t h e de.vclopment a nd of t h i s wo rk p r:ogta:n. ' , __ I,V·; :1'.ime Tag l e / >;-,)':;i:;,:!, ):'.~fJ ', . •. _.__'·:·_: . ' :. : ' .• ~, Z~.\·:,,~·:,,;-1if,·zd),.:,_.'.i..De si:gn?:lti'on r:,-·~-\ ~~:1 ~(~:/·· :!.;~!~,:-~ .--~~. :~-. -:_ ~· ·: t han 2·. o·f t h e n eighbo rhoo d g -roupc, wi l l o c cur no la t er 3d da y s a f t er the gra n t fu nds ha ve be en obliga ted. The ne i ghbo r hoo d g r o up will compl e te th e t rai ni ng p l a n no l ater tho~ 60 days a f t er .t he f unds have been obl iga t e d . 3. The fir s t draf t o f t h e prop0 Dc1.l and the summary f o r commur,j_caU.on t o ne1.gh bo rhoo ci r es i dents s hould b e c o111p l cted no l a t er t han 75 day s after the f unds have bee n obl iga t ed . 4. ·, V, The fina l wo rk p rogram wU l b e submitted no lat e r t h an 90 days aft er the gnrn t f unds have been obU ga t ed. Budget Sampl e CAP 2.5 . . 80% Staff 20% space, overhead �,.: , • • 'l .·_~. v· SPECIAL CONTHTTONS The Region ma.y wan t t:o sped.a l c ond:L t::l on· the g rant to insure p e d .od:lc progr.c s r. . ~po.r t s . Ot:he r de ,, j r a ' 1 (, s p ~c :iJd e:ondi t. i ,) ns ~1hlch Re g i c, ns 1 . may ,want to c r:i nw!.der a r e: -1. . No funds und~t' thi !> g ran t 01..gh ... to h1:· expended un t il OEO approved tlie 90 de.y propo s n l which 2. emerg e 11 f r o m the work p r ogram de s cribe d Incorpore.t ion :l.t, not ne c cssfn·y f or re l ease. o f .funds from 0 E0 provide d . t ha t. t he CAA i n conju nc t '. o n wi t h CDA llgree t o !=:Pend the fu nd s as reque sted b·y t h e ne -.l g hbo dv o d ;_,,ro u p ~ind . n d ·.~at e r, he mechanism with whi ch it wi ll ma ke fU:c al r:1c co·~intab:i. 1.i t v. to and f o i:_ t h e group. �