.NDU2Ng.NDU2Ng

Department of Planning MEMO FROM: _ _----'~=---:-~-----'----'=--=-:=--·· _ TO: _ _ _ _ _ DA TE: _,G"""'t-~=~=-- -- --- -- ~ ~ For your information O Please make necessary reply D Ad v ise status of the attached FORM 30- 13 _ TIME : _ _a_cJ,__·-~ _ _ _ __ �ATLANTA,GEORGIA ROUTE SLIP FROM: Dan E. Sweat, ~ your Jr. information 0 Please refer to the attached correspondence and -make the necessary reply. D Advise me the status of the attached. FOR M 25-4-S �FROM: Dan E. Sweat, Jr. [B"'For your information D Please refer to the attached correspondence and -make the necessary reply . D Advise me the status of the attached. F ORM 25·4-S �I Box 2 62 - Barksdale ATLANTA UNIVERSITY \ \ ' . ~ ~ - ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30314 . ~~L '·jj -_. ', -·--=-·_!__·~ , ~ -.- ·.,

'-- ;,: -~ ' '-......___/ - I / ·"""" >e:K -j ., , . "~ , ! · \ :_ :\: i . :._

..._!_d Jil_ 

_ \ : '

_ - -- ,.1; rFJJ)l r\ Slll~Nj9" ..... E-< E-- •

1 I ~ v, c::, "' !:: z

,

The Honorable Ivan AllenP Jr., Mayor City of Atlanta City Hall Ai.tlanta, Georgia 30303 I �-- ~- . --· · : iflJ r-:- ·-I Ul 0 0 A

,

~ I j .. -ll,/ ' -"\ �I e eri AssociatWnef rms f9! .Afurseries ATLANTA, GEORGIA 1e2ort-196s - 1966 �lI ! 13oard of'7Jirectors L. SPRING, JR. President MRS. HARRY MRS. H UGH NUNNALLY, JR. President-E lect M RS. JAMES H . CRAWFORD MRS. THOS. C. SHELTON 1st Vice-President 2nd Vice-President MR. GEORGE E . SMITH MRS. JOHN L. TUROFF Treasurer Recording S ecretary MRS. JOHN R . MADDOX MRS. GRIGGS SHAEFER Corres. Secretary Dues Treasurer MRS. HAROLD McKENZIE, JR. MRS. HAROLD J. HERTENSTEIN O.S. Nursery Chmn. D .A . Nursery Chmn. MRS. W. S. OBENSHAIN, JR. Historian MR. E . C . BARR MR. FRANK L. BLOCK MR. HARVEY BOOTH MRS. ELYEA D . CARSWELL, JR. MR. ELYEA D . CARSWELL, JR. MR. ALVIN B. CATES, JR. MRS. L. NEIL CONRAD, JR. MRS. IRA FERGUSON, JR. MR. MR. Jos. E. J. MRS. J AMES S. D UDLEY, JR. MR. THOS. T. FLAGLER, JR. FORIO DR. DIXON FOWLER w. HAMILTON, JR. DR. ELLEN KISER DR. WM. H . KISER MRS. WM. C. LEA MRS. CHAS. M . McCULLOUGH MR. FRANK MAIER MRS. JOHN O'NEILL, JR. MRS. ROBERT SHELLEY MR. WILLIAM SIMS MRS. T. WELLER SMITH, JR. MR. HAL TRIMBLE MR. ROBERT WIGGINS MR. H. DILLON WINSHIP, JR. �1965 Operating- Ixpendimres -1, 10, 26G.1G Sheltering Arms provides facilities for protective care, guidance and training during the day for children-primarily of working mothers of low income. These may be extended following investigation to those having special needs. Sheltering Arms is open Mondays through Fridays 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. The Nursery provides care for boys 2½ to 10 years of age and for girls 2 ½ to 12 years of age. The fee for day care at Sheltering Arms is based on individual family income. Each family pays according to a fee attainable within financial limits. Most choose to be as self-sustaining as possible. The Social Worker assists the family in determining whether we are the appropriate agency to meet their child care needs and in setting a realistic fee for service. �Sheltering Arms operates year round with a staff of director, social worker, educational consultant, two center supervisors, sixteen teachers and assistants, a secretary-bookkeeper, two part-time pediatricians and five maintenance personnel. D uring the summer supply teachers are added to st aff. M ISS MARGARET L . COLBERT . . . . . . . . . . Executive MRS. LOIS HANCOCK .. . ... ...... . Educati onal Consultant MRS. WILLIE MORROW .. . . . . ....... .. .... Social MRS. RITA M . TUCKER .. .. . . .. Su pervisor, MRS. LYLITH JOHNSON . . . . . S u pervisor, MRS. EVELYN Director Worker Osgood Sanders Dorothy A rkwright s. GREEN . . .. . .... . . . Secretary-Bookkeeper �Presidents 1?..eporf- -19G5-1966 Dear Members: How could a year be so short and yet so full of problems and pleasures for Sheltering Arms Association . If it were not for t he interest and support of each of you my job would have been an ard uous one. This you recall was the year in which we faced an operating defici t . However, friends came to our assistance and we will be able to maintain our services of the highest quality because of t heir generosity. We have 6,500 hours of volunteer service from yout h groups, garden clubs, civic clubs and our own members. They provided an enriched program for our boys and girls throughout the year. The committees all did their jobs as assigned and I am indeed grateful to each chairman for the work which you did to keep t he agency operating at top efficiency. It would seem appropriate to mention a few highlights even though each committee could not be included in my brief report. The Personnel Committee had a particularly busy year in assisting the Executive Director in replacing eight key positions. In each case we felt that we secured very well qualified persons to fill the vacancies. The salary scales have been improved each time t he budget has been presented to the Chest. �The Building and Grounds Committee has spent time, talent and funds on repairs and redecoration of Osgood Sanders Center and Play Equipment needs were met at Dorothy Arkwright Center. The Wayside Garden Club, Magnolia Garden Club and the Atlanta Junior League have made substantial contributions for capital expenditures. Social Work Advisory Committee assisted our new Social Worker in orientation to the agency. They set up procedures for an annual review of each client to set fees for service. We are most careful to adhere to health and sanitation regulat ions and to serve adequate, well balanced meals which our Nutrition Committee r.ecommends. Our clinics are operated by qualified Pediatricians and the Medical Committee carries out their suggestions. The Finance Committee built and structured the operating budget for providing service to the 350 different children in our care last year . This was done at a cost of $2.40 per day per child. We are justly proud of our economical operation of our two facilities. The United Appeal is our chief source of income and we are indeed grateful for their understanding and support of our high quality of day care services in t he community. To serve as your President has been a source of great pleasure to me and I do wish t o thank everyone who has made my year a happy experience. I particularly enjoyed the privilege of working with our fine Executive Director, Miss Margaret Colbert. Sheltering Arms had a richer program because of the active interest of our Board of Directors and the splendid service of our entire staff. Sincerely, Mrs. Harry L. Spring, Jr., President �Paa- Presidcn,ts Shdter~Arms Associat~

Mrs. A. B. Patterson .

. 1888-1 908

Mrs. Preston S. Arkwright, Sr . .

. 189C-1 900-1 916

Mrs. T homas Martin .

. . 1895-1 896

Mrs. George Howard .

. 1905

Mrs. P orter King ... .

. ..... 1906

Mrs. Robert Alst on . . . .

. .. 1907

Mrs. William Kiser .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . 1909-1 915

Mrs. W. S. Elkin .

. .. . 1910-1911-1 914

Mrs. Gilbert T. Fraser .... . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . 1912-1 913

Mrs. Bolling H . J ones . .

. . 1917 Mrs. E . E . Dallis . . . . . . . . .. . .. 1918

Mrs. James E . Dickey ... .. ....... . .. ... .. ...... . ... ... . ... 1919

Mrs. W. D . Ellis, Jr. .

....... ............. . 1920 Mrs. Prince Webster. . . . . . .. 192 1

Mrs. H . Frank West . . .

. .. . .... 1922 . ........ . ...... 1923-1 924

Mrs. Mari on Harper . .

. .... 1925

Mrs. Preston Arkwright, Sr . . .

.... . .. . .. 1926

Mrs. J oel Hurt, Jr . .

. . 1927 Mrs. Glen ville Giddings .. . . 1928 Mrs. Prince Webst er . . . . . 1929 M rs. Victor Smith . . . . M rs. Campbell Krenson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1930

Mrs. Edgar N eely, Sr. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. ..... 193 1-1932 Mrs. Cam D orsey ._. ..... ..... . .. . . . ... . 1933

Mrs. Philip Alst on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . 1934 Mrs. William Akers. ...... .. . ...... . ... 1934-1936 M rs. E dward Hi t t . . ... . 1937 Mrs. Griggs Shaefer . . . . .. . . . .. ....... 1938-1939 Mrs. I rwi n Stolz . . . . . .. 1940-194 1 Mrs. Ra lph Paris. . .... . . .. . . . . . .... .. . ... .. . .. ... 1941-1 942 Mrs. R ussell W. Michael . . .... 1943 Mrs. Don Cathcart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . 1944-1946 Mrs. Wm . G. Grant . . . . . .......... . 1946-1 947 Mrs. Jasper Highsmith... . .. ..... . .. . .. . . 1947-1949 Mrs. Claude Griffi n ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1949-1951 Mrs. Geo. Fred Olsen .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1951-1953 Mrs. Asa W. Candler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1953-1 954 Mrs. Lewis H awkins . .. .. .... ......... .. . . 1954-1 956 M rs. Geo. Fred Olsen .. ... ...... ... . ... . . . . .. . . . . . . ... 1956-1 957 Mrs. Wm. C. Lea. . . . . ... . . .. . .. . . . ........ 1957-1 958 Mrs. Earl Metzger. . . ....... ... . . ...... 1958-1 959

Mrs. E . S. Candler .. . ... . . ... . .. ... . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. ... 1959-1960

Mrs. Paul Burt. . . .... ...... . . . ..... . .. . 1960-1961 Mrs. Samuel W. Hart, Sr.. . . . .... ... ............ . ... 1961-1963 Mrs. Frank Gaither . . . . . ... . . . ... .... . .. . ....... 1963-1964 M rs. E lyea Carswell, Jr.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1964-1965

Deceased

�.. Licensea, by the StatlDepartmenb qf F""mily ~ ChvUrens Services f,, Ji ser-vice efyo1,1,r United, :Appeal, . (The publication of this report is a contribution of friends) �ATLANTA, GEORGIA P HON E JA . 2•4463 R . Earl Lander s 7i~ 2,;f/~' o/ M tt ~..., ......., , .. /.I ~,{,,.., ~ /-c,,,c_ /1'/H"- / p 7%.,,,_ / , .I&- /; £_/e d' /;, ~;,-/~/~ c:-7 ,/,- ~~e' /%e- i1J, C?P/4 fo~/4//21/,..,,e f,, ~ ~if ~ee./. , ,?e,z J1C- ,I{,~ ,i e;_,,#, /f ,L , ft >// e r °&>;L c:;h_L 7 ~ 17 , - ~ ~ e.-,h; '// 11/'7 ~ ,/h/. e1 4# ~

I W / c.-/ · /JJ1 /, ~,~,,~ ... ~ ~ clt:5!- /4 -K- ,,_, / k ~ s, '1//1,,..s , e- �Department of Planning MEMO FROM: __E_r_i_c_H_a_r_k_n_e_s_s_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ DATE: __2_-_2_2_-6_7_ __ TO: Mr. Earl Landers ~ For your information D Please make necessary reply D Advise status of the attached TIME: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Attached is a copy of a letter which was sent in answer to each of the enclosed letters. �' December 26 , 1967 Mr . Alex W . Smith , Pre!; dent c~ntral Atlanta Pro gress , nc . 2 Peachtree 5treet, N . W., Suite 27 40 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Alex: V/e have rev i£wed the report "Stvdy 0csi~n for tho Central Atlanta Planning Process" whic was prepared by Alon M . Voorhe es & As:;ociotes, Inc . for Central Atlanta Progress, Inc . and the City Planning Department . Our foeling is t1ot the approach sugges d by ' is report is much too exi'c nsive for th is sf'og~ of the gc:-ne a d has one g laring weak , ess in tha t it proposes o form out a rea t por ion of the re:;eorch to private c on:u ltiny firms . Our exper ience has been that it is

..uch more so isfactory to op2roach th is type of proje ct slowly, uti lizing the

rc~urccs of those who ore the most v itally c oncerned . We propose tha~ the tech nical work b<J do .c by the planning staffs of tho City Pionning Deportment and Central Atlanta Pro . ress, Inc . ond that the ir wor 1 l:e done under the direction of and in cl o:ie coo)eration wi h a c omm ittee to be maJe up of .,yself as chairman , three members of the Bocrd of Alderme n and three me.. b rs of t:1e CAP Execu ive Boord . Th is committee would insure thot the interests of boti1 the C ity at Iorgo and the in~erests of th.::i property owners and me rchants of the Ccntrol Business Distr ict were well r\,;presented . \Ve further propose that this corr.miUee m~ot several times with staff members of the City Planning Department and CAP to aiscuis the objectives that should be pur~uec..l in o study of ti,e Control Busines!> D htrict . We think thot the mambers of this committee, as well as tile staff members , should hove a dGfinite and clear-cut k!Ga of just what is to be accomplished by such p s~uc!y . We think it is at this point that we con decide how much outside technical support will be necessary to enable us - �2. Dc cc ,nbcr 26 , 19l7 to occo.-np i::;: r' e o b jcc ·ives w '1 ic h ' .ave bee n set-, ho ,ever, I 1c..ve oreo t confi de ce in sta) o·f th e City Pla nni •D De? 'l"ii e nt, a :; wc il as C AP, e nd fee l that a n: ·ori ·y of i'h\; . tac hnicc l work con a nd wo uld best be don~ by these t-. 10 sro ps . I hope thcr this oltern tivc p oooso l vvill meet wi ·h your a pproval o nd owoit you r ·c ci sion in f is r;;igcrcl . $ ·nee e ly , yours , Jr . lAJr/· cc •• Mr . Joe Tarve r Mr . obert M . Wo od �cember 26 ., 1967 Mr . Howard B. Connell , President Continental Investment Corperation 426 Decatur Feder 1 Building Decatur, GeQrgia RE: Contract for th of 7 . 6 Acres on tJieuoa Road Robert L. Wright - Purch a r Contin ·ntal Inv stment Corpor tion - S ller ar Howard: c mb · r 21, 1967 to are to unfo tun t pplicaUon on te of th r -zonin be an rty , Pl se advi _d th t th zoning application w s rson -11y deli\t red to, by my s or t r y Mr. • Pruitt, nd cc pt d by Mr. Thom Shuttl worth and Mt . Jo h McC nnon at ppro~i t ly 3:30 P.M. on Friday, c b r 15, 1967, In order ti£ Ction of veryone to -e t Ple sa ratandtng to th mutu augg ation for rli t conv n nc. d\Ji e . ..,.-,· TMH:jp CI Mr. C. ~ ef1 ld Mr. cott Candl r 1 r. Ho rabl• My r f the Ctty f At1 nta t~ ar f Alde n f the City An f Atl nt 1 �CITY OF, .ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Cod e 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COL LI ER B. GLAD I N, Dir ec tor December 20, 1967 Mr . Rodney Cook 34 10th Street, N . E. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Dear Rodney: This letter is in response to one sent by Senator Dan McIntyre to Mayor Allen about the traffic: problem in Buckhead . His major concern is the proposed implementation of the Buckhead loop by Fulton County. As you may remember the Buckh ad loop was conceived by this department and totally rejected by Buckheod . However, In passing the 163 Bond Issue, th people in Buckh ad convinced the County to include some prefects that, in ff ct, do begin creation of portions of the loop at a low r level of rvice, i.e., collectors rather than limited ace $S freeways, As th present time Bill McGeorge. of Fulton County Public Works is actively pushing for completion of the loop up to a point (Se I on Figure I) . He ha be n working with us on it and has a ked for our support which we are now pr par d to giv with som r servations and conditions. One r s rvotion is that the propos d north t rminus ot Wieuca Road will probably create more problems that it will solve. The loop shou Id be brought back into ochtr e Road or at I t to P achtr e Dunwoody (Se 2 on Figure 2) . The cond r aervation cone rns proposed widths which vary from two to thr e to four Ian s. Th rood should be a coll ctor with a uniform four Ian s · from beginning to nd. Th bridging of f-()56 north (North Fulton Expr ssway) should reflect this width. Last, but not least, our support is condltlonol on a full und rstanding of our complete position. This loop may h Ip Buckh ad•s interval circulatlon problem but that is about all. It is not soluti n to the Peachtr Road corrldot traffic pr I m which begins fn D Kalb County and ends south of ookwood St tion. (Se attach d r on Buckhead traffic probl m nd Figure 2, e clally No. 2). I y this to �Mr . Rodney Cook 2. December 20, 1967 attempt to establish priorities . The overall benefit to the total community is Iimited . Since capital improvement funds are in very short supply, they should be spent on pr iorities which are more urgent in nature and w ii I resu It in greater overall benefit . I am su re that you are aware the City is actively participating in and receiving data from the Atlanta Area Transportation Study . Up to now, this has been conducted\ \ mostly by technicians with little involvement by pol icy makers . Recently, a polrcy committee was formed of which the Mayor i a member . I sent you a short paper on this'for your consideration . The nature ~f the Buckhead problem, in fac t many of the traffic problems throughout the City, such as Campbellton Road , and the patchwork manner in which they a re being handled leads me to soy that some more log ical, comprehensive approach must be adopted by pol icy makers for considerfog our transportation problems. \I ,\ ,, . ,\' Sincerely, \ Collier B. Gladin Planning Di rector CBG/ip Enclosures �DAN I, MACINTYRE Ill MEMBER F"ORTiETH ..D I !trRICT 11 P.£ACHTREE ST,, N,E, A,'{_ANTA, C3EORDA 3D309 i.:z COMMITTEES: APPROPRIATIO N S COUNTY & MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT EDUCATIONAL MATTERS INDUSTRY & LABOR RETIREMENT COMMITTEE IDlre g,tatr ~ruatr ~ttratt (l!quiuhtr Atlttuttt November 22, 1967 The Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr., Mayor, City of Atlanta, City Hall, Atlanta, Georgia Dear Ivan: There is concern in the Buckhead area about the growing traffic problem on Peachtree . Several people have inquired about the proposed Buckhead Loop which would relieve the traffic on Peachtree north of the Roswell Road-Peachtree intersection. This loop was i ntended to connect the Lenox Square area with the Buckhead area without crowding the Peachtree road itself. With the new Phipps Center on the old Alexander property, the problem will be impossible unless something i s done. It is my understanding that the County has reconnnended a plan, but when your Planning Department was consulted no one could tell me of any definite progress in this area. I talked to Rodney Cook this morning and he was very opposed to the County plan, but in order to relieve the condition the city will have to come up with some counter plan. This problem is tooaccute t o remain unresolved. I have tried to talk to Collier Glad~en several times but have been unable to contact him, but it does appear to me that the City Planning Department should immediately tackle this problem and come up with a constructive workabl~ solution to the traffic problem in the Buckhead area. If I can do anything to help, please let me know. Sincerely, ~~ DaHf MacIntyre, III., Senator, 40th Distr i ct. DIM:ms V ~ , t.7~ ,/'>" ~ · (7() rr~ I (_,.,..,/'. (""G.~7 lr 9 ,___.l / ( /2< ,..,_,"'(;:;!' ~ /7?'---,,..- P'----z.

>"

~ /I ,,,._,,,,,.--"(( . c--.~ .... ' ,..

,

" �December 12, 1967 MEMORANDUM Collier Gladin nd Karl Bevin TO FROM

Ivan All n , Jr. The attached corr pondence from Se tor D n M clntyr r g rclina the rowing tr ffic probl m in ckh ad i Uexpl natory. I would like for the two of you to get to ether with Se M clntyre nd pur1u tht matter immedi t ly. IAJr :am Attachments tor �December 12, 1967 Honorable Dan I. clntyre, Ill The S te Senate lll2 Peachtree Street, N. E . Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Dear Dan: gree with you completely regardin the t-raffic problem in the a.ck.head r • I rowin masking Collier Ciladin, the City Planner, and rl Bevin , th Traffic Engineer, to get to ether with you immediately d aee t can be done. I If 1 may furnish you any additio.nal iniormatio pl ae dviee. Sincedtly, I IA.Jr: cc: C 111 r Gladi rl Beri nAll 111 Jr. 1 �December 6. 1967 Mr . Marble J . Hensley. Sr . Hensley-Schmidt. Inc. 222 Chattanooga Bank Bnilding C ttanooga, Tennessee 27402 De r Mr. Hensley: Thank you very much for your letter of December 5th telling me of your firm 's experience in pr paring nnexation tudie • May I a sure you that we will keep this inform tioD. in mind hen our plans develop. Sincerely your , lv n Allen, Jr. Mayor lAJr/br CC: Collier Gladi n �CITY OF ATLANTA OFF ICE OF COM PT ROLL ER CITY HALL Atlanta, Georgia 30303 CHARLES L. DAVIS COMPTROLLER EDGAR A. VAUGHN, JR. DEPUTY COMPTROLLER .,.p Mr. Colllk Gl Ju,-,uni r. C City of tluta tlant , or i ar Colli r: l cloaf.u id1 I , I . , aanitary amt •to of cornapond nee I • • reeei - d f _ Black, CT for a f deral d natratiOtl a~ t cm,ar:tna u.n,ax• •• the federal Water 11 ~ti ·

Bluk1 Ct: tO • 6 Ii. . . .•• l - . n.t11:a.Y....lllllt'. f �lfr. Colli r G1*lin Page 2 r 1, 1967 that it ould • woncle1:ful v tut'• for: th · Cit y to Ullden tht.a . ~ogr , partieul•rly tn rev1 in th b• ite tb t would accur to th UIIIIRVll~tratic,sa Citiee u a. t you .i t like to bn thil info tio pric,r to f iuU.af.l\g your a r·e•aenta with th re•••ch 1:0UP and with tbe orgia institute of T ,. uology. lt "' ld tao · h lpful if 1 cout· n • t · your c nt · to the al of thU progr ad how it ould r · lat to OIUltr ation Cttl. • ., an on a crltlc 1 t ~h*«hal; y Dec . r S, an ..l'lY decision Your• wry truly, tt/4~~,,..__ Charles L. c CLD:dhf 1 eun a. larl t.anel•r• V Mr . / tro11er vt et t•in tbi �,, ,, ,· ?1. ..- / , ... c PA'tNCtPA L 0Fr1cc: 100 / RCG IONAL sou111 cAST r11 I RD

Trn. cr. c1\ I Nc::.v I LLC,

o,-nc c ,;: ATLA NTA , G [ORGIA / OOCA RATON.FLO RI DA / ,~.-;...:_I' ru FL0rt1D A CL CAR WATC R ' FLOr<1DA NA P LES, FLORIDA /SA N JO SE,COSTA RICA CADLE ,\DDRi:SS'. BCEGNVFLA T'I//. O i0/75 1- :,~7 $ Nove::rnbc:r 2.9) l'-Jb? }.;1r. Robert H . Morriss Ass i s t a nt C h ief of Cons t ruction D epar tn1ent of Con struc tion C ity o f Atlanta 301 City Hall Atl ant a ) G e or gia 30303 Re: . Aerial Mapping Di stricts I) II) III) IV) V) VI) and VIII Dear Mr . Morriss : In a ccorda nce with our rece nt d i s cussions and as reque s .. ec , we he r eb y submit this proposal to provide aer i al photo g r ammetry se rvic es in accordanc e with our agreement dated Augu s t 7, 196 7. T he wo r,< set forth in this pro p o sal includes the referenced Dr ainage D ist ric ts within the city limits) an d is more specif ically outlined as follows : 1. H orizontal coordinate s will be established for at le2.s t one po i nt in each land lo t in the City . Coo rdinates to be established by computerized control. Elevated benchmarks w ill be established within eac h land l ot of the C ity . There will be app ro ximate ly two benc hmarks establi shed per lanci lot . Elevations will be established by the use of computer and field methods . 2. The Engineers shall furnish the C ity .ae rial photo graphic plan vi e w maps o f t he r efe r enc ed Dr ainage Districts, within the city limits to be studied , on reproducible cronaflex having a scale of one inch equals two he.ndre c. feet ( 1 1 1 m 200 1 ) . These maps shall b e co mplete w ith · identification) City of Atlanta title blocks, border, etc . T he h orizontal contr~l will be devel o ped from the work i n c luded under the previous paragraph o f this proposal. The maps will be complete wi th an index aerial cover sheet . �' . M r . Robe r t I-I. Morris s 3. Nov e: rnoe r 2 9 ) 1967 -2 - E 11g i11cers sha ll f ur 11i s l1 tl1 c City \ ;vi t 11 a e r i a l co nt o ur 1naps o f the refe r enced D r a in ag e D istricts w i t hin t h e: ci ty lim.it s t o b e stu d i ed ) o n rep ro ducible: crun <-1.f e::;.: ) havin g a sc a l e o f on e inc h equal s tw o h undred feet ( " = 20 0 ' ) . T he co nto u r s shall be d e v e l oped a t 2-foot i nterv als anci i n a ccor danc e with natio n a lly a cc epted sta nd a r cis f o r utili z<-1.t ion i n p l annin g and d r ainage w o rk . I n a ddition t o c o n tour s ) th e 1naps will s h o w r o adways , r ai lro ad s, lak es , riv ers , c r e e::ks , and othe r o utstandi ng feat u res . 1"'11e T he engi nee ring fe e for the abov e d escribe d se rvic es will be F i ve Hundr ed Ei ghty Thou sand Fiv e H u n dr ed Do ilars ($ 5 8 0,50 0) , p a y a ble a s out lin e d under our co nt r a ct dat ed A u gust 7 , i 96 7. · Th e flyi n g for t his t y pe w o rk m u st be a c c o mplished d u ring the wi n ter s ea s o n . V e r y trul y yours, }3 LACK , C R O W AND EIDSNE SS, 0 ~~,--· /------0 /; / ~~ F . A . Eidsne s s FA:::::: :r bs cc : Mr . C har l es D a vi s , Co mp:.. ll1.: r I -c . I /; lL .::--~ / 6 �I ... I ]3LACJ(, C1-:o,v &. E1DSNESS, INc . CONSULT I XG ]3 :i",;"GI NEJ::H.S PLEA:;£ R EP L Y PRIN CIPA L OFF/CC: 700 SOUTH CAST THI RD STRE ET, G Ai N ES VI LLE, FLO R IDA RCGIONAL OFFICCS: ATLANTA, GEORGIA / CLEARWATER, FLORIDA BOCA RATON,FLORIDA / NAPLES, FLORID A/SAN JOSE,COSTA RICA C AB L E ADDRESS : BCEGNVF LA ro · ATLAIITA,GE OR GIA 30309 17 20 PEACHT R EE ROAD , N. W. 404 / 8 73-21 5 1 TW X 8 10/75 1-3 575 November 28 , 1967 Mr . Ro be rt H . Morriss Ass i stant Chi e f of Con st ruc t ion D ep a rtm e nt o f Co nst r u c ti on C ity of Atl an ta 301 Ci ty H a ll Atlanta, G e orgia 30303 Re: Aerial Mapping South River & Intrenchment C reek D rainage Districts Master S t orm Drainage S tudy D ear Mr . Morriss : In accordance with our recent discussions and as request ed , we hereby submit this propos al to provide aerial photo g rammetry s e r v ic es in accordance with our agr eement dated August 7, 1967 . The w or k set forth in this proposal includes Sout h Riv e r and Intrenchm ent Cr eek D rainage Districts within the city limits, and is more specifically outlin ed as follo ws : 1. Hori z ontal coordinate s w ill be establis hed for at l east one point in each land lot ,in th e City . Coordi nates t o be established b y computerized control. Elevated benchmarks w ill be established with in each l and lot o f the City. There w ill be approximately two benchmarks establishe d per l and lot. El evation s '\vill be established by the use of comput e r and field methods . 2. The Engineers s hall f ur n i sh the City aeria l photo g r ap hic plan view maps of the South River a nd Intr e nchment C r e ek Drainage Di st ric ts , with i n the city limit s to b e s tu d i e d, on reproducible cronaflex having a scale of one i n ch equ als two hundr e d feet {l" = 200'). These maps sha ll b e co m plete with ide ntification, City of Atlant a title blocks, border, etc. The horizontal control will be d e v e lo pe d from the work includ e d un der the previous p a r agraph o f this propos a l. The maps will be compl e te wit h a n index aerial cover sheet. �. Mr. Rob e rt H. Morriss 3. -2- Nov ember 28 , 196 7 Th e Engin e er s sh a ll f ur nish the Ci t y with ae r i a l co ntou r m ap s of th e Sout h Riv e r an d Intr e nch ment Cr eek D r a in ag e Districts, withi n t h e city limits to b e studi ed , o n r cpro ducibl e cronafl ex , h a vin g a s cale of on e inch equal s two hu n dred f ee t (l" = 200 1 ) . Th e contours sha ll b e d e ve l oped at 2-foo t i n t e rv a l s a nd in a ccord a nce with nation a ll y a c c c pt e d s tan d a rd s for ut ili zation in plan n ing a nd dra i nag e work. In add i ti on to co n tour s , t he m aps will show r o ad ways, railroads, l a kes, rivers, cr e eks, and oth e r outstandi ng f ea t ures. The eng ine e ring fee for the above described services will b e T w o Hundred N in e teen Thousand Five Hundr e d Dollars ($219,500), p ayabl e as outlined u n der our contract dated August 7, 1967. It is the recommendation of our firm tha t we be authori z ed to proceed with this work. Very truly yours, FAE : rbs cc : Mr. C har l e s Davis, Co mpt roll e r City o f A tl a n ta �.. CONSULTI NG t-:NG TNE J~HS fJLC/,~C IIC P LI' TO : PRINCIPAL 01--FIC C : 700 SO UT H CAST THIRD JT r(C£T , GAINCSVILLC., FLO R I DA RL" G I ONAL OFF/CCS: ATLANT/, , GCOf1G IA / BOCA RATON,FLOAIDA /N A P LE S , F LO RIDA / CABLE ADDRESS: C LEARWATC R , F LORIDA SAN .JOS C,COSTA RI CA BCEGNVFLA TV//. 01U/7 S".1 -:; s75 Novemoer 28 , 1967 M:t. Robert H . Morriss Ass istant Chief of Construction De partm.ent of Co nstruction C ity of Atlanta 301 City Hall Atlanta, G e or gia 30303 Re: Attached Propos a l for Aeria l Survey and Mapping of Dis t rict 7 and District 9 Maste r Storm D rainage S tudies De a r Mr . Morriss : Th e completion of the work outlined unde r the attached p ro p o sal is required prior t o finalizing the Master Storm Drainage Studi es for t h e South River a nd Intrenchment Cr eek Dr a inage District, whic h is includ ed in the gra nt reques t to the Federal W ate r Pollution Control Administr a tion o f the Department of Interior. The co mpl etio n o f thi s w ork will provide the City with curr ent aer i a l photographic and contour maps of the ent ire Model City Neighbo r ho od Area presentl y under study . These maps will be of beneficial use in the Model City study and other planning or study undertakings by the various de partments of the City of Atlanta. We fee l that the contribution by the C i ty of thi s aerial work w i ll e nhanc e obta inanc e o f the demonstration gr a nt f o r s torm d r a inage pollution study of South Riv e r and Intr enchment Cr eek Dr a inage District s . This work s hould be authorized a s soon a s possibl e so t hat aer ial photogr aphy m a y be completed by March 1, 1968 . This p hoto graph y m u st b e a ccomplished dur i n g the winter s e ason s o th a t pho tographs w i ll cl ea rly expose phy s ic a l features and be us a ble for d e v e lopme nt of contour s. If you have any questions iri re g ard to the proposal, kindly advis e . FAE:r b s cc: Mr. C harl es D a v is, �November 28, 1967 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. From : R . Earl Landers Collier Gladin i electing a small rea that meets the r quir m nts for nnexation under th 1951 Annexation L w. When th area ha b en lected and property identi!i d, we will meet with Henry Bowden to proc ed with the deafting of th resolution nd nece ry petition to the court. REL :lp �November 28, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO Collier Gladin FROM Ivan Allen, Jr . Please a.ave someone in the Z.oning Department prepare for me a listing of all tracts of land of five acres or more within the city which is already zoned for apartments. IAJr:am �CITY OF A.TLANTA CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Direcror November 27, 1967 • Ray Nixon,. Chief of Public Works Mr. Kori Bevins, Traffic Engln r City of Atlanta Atlanta, G orgia Gentl men: Atlanta Iv a Transportation Study h nC7tV mow.d Into Phos II of ita transportation network testing . This consists of th• reconstruction and wld nlng of xlsting str b tom et the of 1983 traffic volum s . Improvements to the thoroudlfare system will consist of four claue, of streets: six•I ne arterials, four-lane at tals, four•lo coll ctcrs and two•lane llectors. T In conJunctlon with any lmprov m nts recomm ded by th Atlanta Alea Tr sportatlon ..,tudy, th City of Atlanta should s:tabllsh o t of str t crousectlons to ~" spond to th various classes. Th present standards u d by th City do not meet the minim II uirements for otlons and safety r Ir by the Gd rol Governrn nt. If Atlanta Is to recefv F r I or Stat aid for future thorou f improv menb, th se standar s must I>. Improved. The proposed cross- ctl pr nted here point for dlscuulon . Y01Jr com nts and suggesti pefully, through Inter-de~ entol cooper tlon, th be n tabIlshed. Yours very truly, ~ Ill r • GI In I nlng Dir t r /t C •• ncl �' - "T..-<L-f-t,,::; 60.-.de..- Pa.rJ,:,.,5 ... , . 1I' a' - -- -- - . . . - . .- ..., t I' , i,.- \ v · -'>t<-- -~ -1--- '>I- -- - 3 0_1 _ Borde..- I"'· ~-

,t '

~ , _ ___ so' -- -· - -- If.._}!>orde,.. ., I f"-"' k 1n ~ ~.}~ ~-"'o_" ....::...':f_h _ I _J..1- ,; _..-_a._ff'_, c:- _av_lc_,.,_,~_B_o _r-d_er_ 1~P. = - - - ~--.t.tt------i L-L t----- - - -~-!1-.....,0=-'- - -- ~--,.i>I ~- --- - - -- - ~p' - -- - - - - --6, ~ LOCAL STRE~Ts \N \-\\ 6\-\ DE.NS \1Y AR \=:..A~ - - - - · �'corder I-< Po..-/c111s, ~ Pa.~k.,n'J t. Rv.sh /<.oJ,s>, tiO"r Hov>'" T r4 -ff,<. Tro.:ff,.,. Border -=---------"+- - -~'>k,--- - - ,;,. 'T'h Y-o 11gh Tra.f-frG >-I'<- >-I... , 11- - ·>l ,~- - - - - - --4-~_,_ - -- -- -~ '4.----- - - - - - - - - __ ,o' ___ ______ _____ FouR LANE. ."'1 CoLL'E:c.ToRs . I . - - - - -- - -·-- ·------ ' I 2.' I . >+-.- - - - - -::,f- - '~ - - ·+-<!.4 . ·- .. ·-··--- -- "">I I "L-_,,, I~· - ~-.p1If- - ,,....t--~ ---'--~"+'--- _ __ z +~·- - -~ --- - · • ' I ' ' ,---...j _______ ... __, �I; f-<; 'oord e I- f<:.= ,,~ f"'\ed,a.., > I -. k:. ~ I<- 12 ' ~ \ z.' >t<-- I '2... I ">i<: l G;' ...j<. I -Z. . I ~ I z... 3 G. 36 \}O' LAN t;. - *- \-Z.. . ,..j<-. 11' -""I �: I' ,.· C C ITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLAI\NI '.'/G COLLIER B. GLADIN, Director Se ptemb er 7, 19 67 M EMO RAN DU M FROM: Collier Gl adin SUBJECT: Tree Ordinance (i~~ '(}µ J Atta c hed is the late st draft of the Tree Ordina nc e for your rev i ew wh ich represents th e work o f the Planning a nd Law Departments to re draft the ordinance a ccording t o the instruc tions of t h e Planning a nd De velo pment Committee . 1-Je believe t his to be a reaso nab le and workab le ordi nanc e in whi c h mo st o f the stated obj ecti ons have been · worked out . Please a ttend the Planning and Development Committ ee Meet i ng o n September 13, 1967, at 10:00 A. M. in Committee Ro om #1 or address comments to Rodney Cook , Cha i rman, Planning and Devel opment Committee Planning Department; City Hall, not later than September 11 . CG/ml c �October 18, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO Collier Gladin FROM Ivan Allen, Jr. After reviewing your plans and those of the Atlant Hou ing Authority, please advise me if there is any contemplated urban renewal action or city acqui ition of the property at 501 Auburn Avenue. IAJr:am �October 10, 1967 Mr. Robert W . Haver Co- Chairman SWAP 430 Lynhur t Drive Atlanta, Georgia 30311 D ar Mr . Haver: May I acknowledge receipt of your letter d the petition on behalf of SWAP reaarding the future houa site • 1 am fCd'Wardin this information to th Planning D partment of the City for official recording. S rely y lv Alleu, Jr .

yor

IA3r/br CC: Mr. Collier Gladin �CANDEUB., fLEiSSIG A D ASS OC!A ES Planning & Community Development Consu ltants DO DJ September 27, 1967 Mr. Collier Gladin Planning Engineer Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Mr. Gladin: We are happy to announce that Mr . . E. Bruce Wedge, former long-time southeastern regional director of urban renewal for the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, joined our organization on September 3, 1967. Mr. Wedge will serve as Special Advisor to the pr'incipals and staff of our organization on urban renewal, community planning a~d related programs. Sincerely, ~A - ~ John A. Brown, AIP Vice President and Regional Director JAB:me SUITE 341, 1365 PEACHTREE STR EET, ATLAN TA, G EORG IA 30309 TE L. AR EA COD E 404/875-0721/2 �September 28 , 1967 Mr. Robert L . Schwind 1078 Canter Ro d , N . E . Atl nta, Georgia 30324 Dear Mr . Schwind: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of September 27th containin several sug estions reg rdin our city. I am forw rdin thi information to the Plannin Department a I am ure they will apprec · te reviewin your recmnmendation • Sincerely your , Iva Allen, Jr. ayor IA3r/ r CC: Mr . Collier Gladin �September 27 , 1967 MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Collier Gladin From: R . Earl L nd rs Pardon my del y in · nswering your memor ndurn of Septemb r 13th. I think that recent statement by the Mayor, will nswer your question a to a possible bond is u in 1968 . As to the matter of seeking State legi · lation enabling us to is•u g neral obligation bonds without a ref io ndUJll, l offe,: th following confidential opinion: 1 think it would b mistake for such leghlation to be approved as Con titutional am ndment fol" Fulton County for the rea on that thi would put Fulton County in position to is ue g n r · 1 oblig tion bond contrary to our wi he and to the detriment of the citiz na inside the City of Atl nta, without those citizen · h ving n opportunity to approve auch n b w .• l refer p cific:ally to po . •ible 11ewer i ue, by Fulton County. W have diecuaaed many tim • th ct tit would b xtr m ly unfah:· for Fulton County to finance its portion of n ded c pital improv m nt in th f of ter pollution control by the i auanc of g · r 1 obligation bonda, 80% of which would b td by ·t he citi• ene of Atlanta, wh.U tho• me tlant& citi payln ~w .r s -:rvtc• chars; to pay th. City' for 1uch capital impi-ovem nt · • Under th · p.r ••nt aetup. Atl n cltiz-• n . would at l t hav th oppo~tunity to dbapprove th• l•s~nc of auc:h bonds. l think we ahow.d m ke very effort to def at W• Con Ututional amendm nt £or Fulton County, a-n if we asewn · tbi tton, uld hardly ·a t th• -.irn" aak f r such l• ialad.v approval for Ctty. EL:lp �CITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DE PART MEN T O F PL ANNI N G CO LLI ER B. GLA DI N, Di recto r September 13, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Earl Landers FROM: Collier SUBJECT: City Bond Referendum (') 0...Y"\ "'-J JJ J This is, more or less, a follow-up of our brief conservation of a few days ago concerning this subject. I feel that some serious consideration should be given to the question of when would be the most advantageous time for Atlan ta to consider another general obli gation bond referendum? The funds from the last two bond issues are nearly exhausted, and the City ' s Capital Improvement Program reflects over $400 million dollars in unfunded capital improvement projects. The Planning Department can continue to prepare survey and planning applications, applications for code enforcement programs and updating of the Community Facilities Plan, however, we need some firm guide as to future financing of the se projects and facilities, plus we would like to make the Capital Improvements Program functional. There are several events that .we know will occur and others which are being considered, for example, the national elections in the fall of '68 and the city election in the fall of '69. The Transit Authority is considering, as I understand, a bond issue for financing a transit system in the fall of '68 (along with general election); the Atlanta School Board is considering another school bond issue in the Spring of '68. I am concerned that if consideration is not given soon that the right time may not be before 1970 - can we afford to wait that long? Your thought s on this matter would be e x tremely helpful. Also, I would like your opinion concerning the desirability of state legislation enabling the Mayor and Board of Aldermen to issue General Obligation Bonds without referendum, amount to be limited by State Legislature. Similar legislation has been passed for Fulton County which is awaiting approval by the voters as a constitutional amendment. jp �September 20, 1967 MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Collier Gladin From: R . E d Landers Aft r you hav looked ov r the attach d, plea we can di1c:u s . REL:lp Attachment contact m so �CITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL September 20, 1967 ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR R. EARL LANDERS , Administrative Assistant MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary DAN E. SWEAT, JR ., Director of Governme ntal Li aison MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Earl Landers From: Subject: Dan Sweat ~ Housing Resources Clerical Personnel The correspondenc e from Cecil Ale x ander , Chairman of the Housing Resources Committee, to Mayor Allen requesting an additional clerical p e rsonnel be made available to the Housing Resources Committee for the purpose of bringing the CIP data and statistics on low and moderate income housing up-to-date points up the need for a fulltime City research and information capability. I do not argue with the HRC request. However , I believe that this function should be part of the on-going responsibility of the Planning Department. It would be a shame for us to have spent $ 750 , 000 on a Community Improvement Program and not have the capability of maintaining current data in a use able form after th e CIP project is finished . I think all of us are aware of the tremendous value of the various CIP reports. For the first time we have had information on housin~ including individual computerized information on each structure as well as projected requirements for the future. This information made it possible for us to launch the critically neede d housing program almost a .year before the complete report was finished . �Mr. Landers Page Two September 20, 1967 I am sure that we are going to find that we will be able to use the information and recommendations in other reports to implement timely action in other areas. However, unless we are able to record and document what action has been taking place and complete at least an annual review of progress with updating of our facts and figures, I am afraid the CIP will have missed its mark. I think that we also should give careful consideration as to exactly what we want the Housing Resources Committee to do - how big an operation you want to make out of it. I think the same thing holds true for every other quasi-governmental authority or agency that has been set up in the City, particularly the Atlanta Youth Council and the Community Relations Commission. It might be wise for a special committee of the Board of Aldermen to take a good look at these agencies before the budget is finalized this year. I do not mean to imply that they should be cut out or cut back. It might be decided that they are woefully underfinanced. My concern is that we all know exactly what the purpose of these agencies is and more importantly that those people who run these agencies know what the City expects of them and if we are going to continue the operation they should be given the tools with which to operate according to the wishes of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen . DS:fy �CITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DE PARTMENT OF PLANNING CO LLIER B . G L A DI N, Dir e ctor September 26, 1967 Kr . Charles Davis, City of Atl nt Atlanta, Georgia Co troller Dear Charles: Re: Visit of Toronto nd Montre 1 Transit Systems. • In my efforts to seek involvement on the part of many of the ldermen as it relates to rapid transit planning, 1 m continu lly confronted with the feelin that rapid transit is even to ten y ara • ay and th re is no need for 1mD diate cone rn . While this ayst ha• been in various stags of pl nning since 1962 th planning ph a will soon b ov r nd th citizen of Atlanta will be fac d with a d cision to pprov or disapprove bond issue for construction. By Sp~ing of 1968, lllOSt of th planning will be complete, at lea t the detail alt nt and st tion loc tlons. By that t uny of our policy k re 1hould bav seriously evaluated the yat and the 1 ct on th corridor throu h which it passes . Atl nt has the et to gain or loa through the prop r pl nning of a total tr neportation ayste • The policy kers of this city will shoulder large p rt of th re ponaibUity to insure the pa11ag of a bond is ue to pay the city'• sbar for tranait which ta to be held th1rtee nths from now, in Jfov r 1968. 1.be · lanning and D v lop nt Co itte haa be n rev1 th pro re•• of 4Ull~'-A nd their con ultanta. Thy have ridd n the ntir ali nt and discussed the poaaible act on adjac nt prop rtiee, 1tatto locations and their acceaalbility. lde n Cook baa attended tranait · etin I in 1bington and Visit d the eat c eat ayatem, hlch brio• to the point of thia re ueat. Alderman Cook, aft r dlacus,tn the Toronto and ntr al transit ayat a with conaultant1 a other• bav vtait d the1e ay1t , haa ask d t t 1 request f nds for h ad I to vialt both of these citie in order to have • first ncl kno ledge of eir la nt progr cd transit 17et deal t of the cltiea tra ait pro r ar unique ln deal n and r res nta • oft e st �Mr . Charles vie Sept'1!11lber 26, 1967 -2- ex 1 sin the world of the tremendous develppment ttr cted to transit corridor and the controls that have been used to uid this development . For these re son, 1 would like to reque t that funds be made avail ble in the amount of 665 . 00 to visit th se two <lain citieo betwe n the 10th of October and 15th of October. (See ttached Schedule F). Siner ly ~ ~B. Gl din Pl nning Director CBG/jp cc •• Rodney Cook Barl nder Attac ent �- M,E MOR AND UM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Karl Bivens, City Traffic Engineer Mr. Charles Davis, Ccm;.1troller Mr. Jack Delius, General Hana3er, Parks Mr. Collier Gladin, Planni.n~ Director 'Mr. Geor:;e Goodwin, Peachtree Center Association Miss Nary Louise n.heay , Actin 0 Director, Atlanta Fublic Library Mr. _Ray Ni:x:on, Director of Pnblic Works Mr. M. B. Satterf ield, Executive Director, Atlanta Housing Authority Hr. Dan Sweat, Director of Governmental Liason Mr. Paul Weir, General Manager, Water Department Dr. Darwin Womack, Assistant Superintendant of School Plant Planning and Construction Eric Harkness, Long Ran~e Planning Division Urban Reautification Implimentation It is expected that the city's 1967 Urban _~eautification Application will be funded by the end of October. ~ In April you were notified that the city had received a Letter of Consent from the Department of Housing and Urban Development notifyin~ us that ex?enditures for any activity ideniified in the Urban Beautification application would not subsequently be disallowed soley because they were made prior t o the approval of the ap plication, providin3 expenditures so made were in foll conformity with the application as it might be approved, the terms of the contract for Federal grant assistance and the policies and requirements under the Urban Beautification and Improvement Program. The city has only 312 months to finish or have · under contract all activities listed in the application. To make sure the city meets its commitment it is requested that all participatins departments review their programs and forward their Urban Beautification schedule to Eric Harkness, City Planning Department, to determine where we stand on the overall program . If some activities in the application are not underway, the y should be made ready and the contract let by the end of December, 1967 . The city must make every effort to bez in all activities in the 1967 ap plication or the cit y 's eligibility could be jeopardized if the residentially related activities drop below 60% of the cost of activities included in the appl i cat ion. I f cir cums tances have produ ced changes or deletion of any of the 1967 activities , pleas e infor m me because i t may be necessary to substitute othe r activ i ties in or de r to -ma i nt a i n our 60% minimum. Such changes can be made eas i l y pr ior to a ppr ov a l of the applica tion but a f t e r appr ov al would r equir e an amendatory appl ication . The 1967 application was a lso fo rwa r ded t o you in April. The on l y changes which have been made are in the Parks and Schoo l Departments activitie s . If you have any questions, please contact me at 522-4463, Ext. 325. , �September 19, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO

Collier B . Gladin M. B . Satterfi ld FRO

Iv: n Allen, Jr. I m interest d i: t · 552 Irene Stre t in t etatu of the piece of pJ'0perty t tate of M 9"N l OD M ot • Can you iv me unofficial decision city would cquir thi property or if it for ur n re wal project? IAJr: m hen the o d acquire �y Septem.bei- 19, 1967 Mr. J . O . Thomas 212 Griffin Street, N. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30314 Dear M r . Thomas : Thank you very much for your letter of Septemb l' 15th. I am grateful for your chairtnanship of the coordinating committee, and I am certain that this will be an outstanding example of cooperative planning and action. In ans er to your first question concerning the 1i t of names in the new releases; the full committee per the ched 1i t was submitted to the new media. The ne media then mades their own determination a to ho xten iv a article will be and, ppa.rently, did not deem it nece a.zy to list all the m ember o.f the committe:e. Thi letter confirms tho attached list which you ubmitted and which th ,c ity . ccept a representative group. In ans er to your seco d que tion, I am sendin copy of the letter to Alderman C ok nd r. Gladin. a kin them to confer "th you as to the te rrangementa for the type of meeting yo suggeat. With ppreciation for your effort , I am Sincerely. Iv: AU • Jr. JAJr: 1. / �September 15, 1967 Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor, City of Atlant a City Hall Atlanta, Georgi a 30303 Dear Mayor Allen: I am sure you would be interested i n learning of the reactions of the members of the Nash-Bans Coordinating Committee to the progress report made by their selected r epresentatives who met with you in your offic e on t he morni ng of September 13, 1967, at your invitation. The extent to which the cooperative relationship being pl anned between t he committee and representatives of t he departments of the City Government havi ng responsibility for Urban Development to i nhance the welfare of all the people l ivi ng in the area can be outstanding; if the sentiments expre ssed become a functional reality. There were two questions raised however , that the committee could not answer : (1) 'Why the names of the total membership of the Nash- Bans Committee which the special committee was authorized and instructed to pre sent to you, did not appear i n the news release? It would helpful if you would advise us as to what circumstances could be indicated that t he names were presented to and accepted by you. (2) I n t he light of the agreement reached which provides that all future developments in the Nash- Bans area would r epresent a cooperative enterpri se i n which t here would be participation of representatives of the nei ghborhood, this would suggest that at an earl y date a conference might be held with Mr o Rodney Cook, of t he city department of Urban Renewal, Mr- . Collier Gladin, of City Planning and Dr. F.d.ward S. Cook , of the Board of Education~ Through such a conference a complete picture of the calculated developments in immediate contemplation may be given. This , of cours , would include schools, parks, playgrounds ets. It would also answer the quest ion as to the extent to which the building of a school should take i nto consideration the overall plan of development f or the Nash-Bans Area . I f you f i nd yourself in agreement with what is being suggested it would be appreciated i f you would give the persons at the top operative levelsthe benefit of your reaction. cc:

Mr . Rodney Cook

Mr. Collier Gladin

~Jl~.s,+ ~ - Thomas

z \ ')_

Gv ,· ~\\'~ tJ V°'- rf tf �,' ,..,"'.• C 0 .AT .' CITY HALL .. , ! ' I '// ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLAl'\NI N G COLLIER B . GLADI N, Dir c ccor September 14, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Aldermen FROM: Collier Gladin SUBJECT: Tree Ordinance The attached draft of the Tree Ordinance includes revisions suggested during review by the Planning and Development Committee on September 13, 1967. There will be a joint meeting of the Pa rks Committee and the Planning and Development Committee to discuss this latest dra f t on Monday, September 18, 1967 at 1:00 P. M., Committee Room #1, just prior to the 2:00 P. M. me eting of the Board of Aldermen, at which the Tree Ordinance will r~ceive first reading. �- M.E MOR AND UM - TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Karl Bivens, City Traffic Engineer Mr. Charles Davis, Ccm11troller Mr. Jack Delius, General Hana:;er, Parks Mr. Collier Gladin, Plannin~ Director Mr. Geor::;e Goodwin, Peachtree Center Association Miss Hary Louise P-.heay, Actin0 Director, Atlanta Public Library Mr. _Ray Ni:x:on, Director of Public Works Mr. M. B. Satterfield, Executive Director, Atlanta Housing Authority Mr. Dan Sweat, Director of Governmental Liason Mr. Paul Weir, General Manager, Water Department Dr. Darwin Womack, ·Assistant Superintendant of School Plant Planning and Construction Eric Harkness, Long Ranee Planning Division Urban Reautification Implimentation It is expected that the city's 1967 Urban~eautification Application will be funded by the end of October. ~ In April you were notified that the city had received a Letter of Consent from the Department of Housing and Urban Development notifyinti us that ex?enditures for any activity ideniified in the Urban Beautification application would not subsequently be disallowed soley because they were made prior to the approval of the application, providin~ e xpenditures so made were in full conformity with the application as it might be approved, the terms of the contract for Federal grant assistance and the policies and requirements under the Urban Beautification and Improvement Program. The city has only 3,½ months to finish or have . under contract all activiti.es listed in the application. To make sure the city meets its commitment it is requested that all participating departments review their programs and forward their Urban Eeautification schedule to Eric Harkness, City Planning Department, to determine where we stand on the overall program . If some activities in the application are not underway, they should be made ready and the contract let by the end of December , 1967 . The city must make every effort to bee in all activities in the 1967 a pplication or the cit y 's el i gibility could be jeopardized if the residentially r elated activities drop below 60% of the cost of activities included in the application . I f circums t ances h av e produced changes or dele t ion o f any of t he 1967 activitie s , ple a se i nfo r m me because i t may be ·necessary to subs ti tute othe r activ ities i n or de r t o ma intain our 60% minimum. Such changes can be mad e easily prior t o ap proval of the application but after appr ov al would r equi r e an amendat ory app lication. The 1967 application was also f orward ed t o you in April. The only changes which have been made are in the Parks and Schoo l Depa rtments activitie s . If you have any questions, please contact me at 522-4463, Ext. 325.

�. ITY OF A.TLANTA. CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel . 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Director September 6, 1967 Alderman John Flanigen Chairman, Zoning Committee Board of Aldermen 245 Third Avenue, S. E. Atlanta, Georgia 30317 Dear Mr. Flanigen: Since my return to ··' the City this week, I have reviewed the Dari' Williams court case involving the property at Greenwich Street and the Southwest Connector, which took place during my absence. Although the ruling by the court was unfavorable to the City's interest, I understand that the matter may be appealed by the City within thirty days of that ruling. From discussing the matter briefly with the City Attorney's office I find that they would be agreeable to the appeal action and have some reason to feel that the City might be successful in this effort. Becaus e of the importance of this rezoning action upon the We st End Urban Renewal Project Area and the influence of this use upon other properties similarly · located along the Southwest Connector, I would strongly urge that you and the Zoning Committee seriously consider asking the City Attorney's office to appeal this recent court action . Thank you for your consideration of this r equest. Yours truly , ~PS) Coll i e r B. Glad i n Pl a nni ng Dire ctor CBG/jp cc •• Rodney Cook Hugh Pierce Everett Millican / May~r Ivan Allen &,, ,""'" Les Persells ~-- ._ �August 29. 1967 M:m.orable Walter M. Mitchell Fulton County Commie County Acb:ninistr tion · ng Atlanta, Georgia De r Walter: I appreciate your l tt r and I am delighted to receive th community tudy of Broo ood Hill • It i xc:ellent. I am forwarding it to th Planning D pa111:nent of the City for furt.h r study. Sine r ly. Ivan IAJ'r: m cc: Mr. CoW r Cila n llen, Jr. �Auguat 21. 1967 Mr . A . Fred. rick Smith A i tant Regional Admini tr tOJ' Progratn Coordination and Service Division. D rtJ:n nt of Hou ing nd Ur n Develo . ent Pe cht:re S nth Building Atlanta.. Georgia 30323 D ar Mr . Smith: ipt of youJ' l tter of Augw,t 18th for imn,r,i-m, nta a City'• Workab usz1-1e11tnt:ma l am f l"WU'ding thi• to t e a ~ action ma rtmen.t in Sincerely y I nA yen- lAJr/b"'I CC: Mr. Collier Gladin •, , Jr. r �I. C ITY OF _ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR R. EARL LANDERS, Administrative Assistant MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governm ental Liaison . August 16, 1967 Mr. · Jessie O. Thomas, Chairman Nash-Bans Citizen's Advisory Committee 220 Griffin Street, N. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30314 Dear Mr. Thomas: Thank you very much for your letter of August 8 with regard to the scheduling of future meetings between your committee and City Officials. Inasmuch as the responsibility for the planning of any city action or improvements within the City of Atlanta lies with the Planning and Development Committee of the Board of Aldermen, I urge that your committee meet with Mr. Rodney Cook, Chairman of the Aldermanic Planning and Development Committee and Mr. Collier Gladin, Planning Director, at your earliest convenience. This office should be represented at these meetings by Mr. Johnny. Robinson, Communjty Development Coordinator. As I mentioned in my earlier letter I. will personally lend my support to any plans which may be developed through the efforts of these responsible officials and your committee. Again, let me wish you and your committee every success in undertaking this challenging responsibility of making your area a better place in. which to live. _), ." IAJr/ jp • �Augu t 4, 1967 Mr-. J . Thomas Stuart II Georgia Tec h Box 37265 Atlanta, Georgia 30332 / De r Mr. Stu.a.rt: Thia, · ill ackno ledge recei pt of your latter zpre eing concern bout tree ordinance in AtlaDta . 1 am aking the Planning De l!'trnent to dvise you concerning the City'a po•ition. Sincerely y Iv n Allen, Jr . ayor IAJr/br CC: Mr . Collier Gla d i n �Augu t 3, 1967 Mr . Je O . Tho a , C irma. N h - B n Coordinatin Committee 220 Griffin Street. N . W. Atlanta, G orgi D r Mr. Thoma : Thia are . r. Colli r I' t t th Sine -rely yo Iv All Ma.yo:r 1.IJr/br ~ . CC: Mr. Collier Gladin Mr. John R~binson 11, , Jr. �August 2, 1967 Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor, City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Mayor Allen: At a recent meeting of the Nash-Bans Co-ordinating Committee a unanimous decision was reached instructing the Chairman to send you the enclosed petition which is self-explanatory. As you have been previously informed, the Co-ordinating Committee is composed of pastors of all t he churches in the area, or a member of t he off icial board designated by the pastor to represent t he church in question, the pres idents of the Parent Teachers Association of the three schools located in the Nash-Bans area and representatives of fraternal, business, civic, and professional organizations . In order that the organizations represented by the members of the Connnittee shall be made intelligently aware of the manner in which t heir representatives shall cooperate wi th the Mayor and other appropriate city officials i n the overall Urban Renewal Program, calculated t o improve the housing and living conditions of the citizens of the connnunity, the Committee is very anxious to have an off icial statement fr om the Chief Executive of our political subdivision and those associated with him as suggested aboveo Hoping t o hear from you in response to this inquiry at an early date. I am sincerely yours, ([-.1!~~ Chairman Enclosure JOT: ew �July 27, 1967 PETITION OF THE NASH-BANS COORDINATING CO}1MITTEE In view of the unsuccessful attempt on the part of the organizer, E. M. Laws, of this committee to arrange a meeting with you and appropriate city off icials having responsibility in Urban Renewal Development; we the undersigned wish to register in the form of this pitition our desire to meet with you, Mr- . Rodney Cook and ~fr. Collier Gladin, a t t he earliest possible moment in order to be officially informed of the extent and manner in which we may cooperate in Urban ��3 �Augu t 1, 1967 Mr • Donna Meare Georgian Clinic State of Georgia Depa~ent 0£ Pu.bile Health Alcoholic Rehabilitatio Service 1260 Briarcliff Road, N . E . Atlanta, Georgia 3.0306 1 regret that my •chedule i i o heavy at this time that l will not have n opport\illity to me t with you a . your fellow studenta. contact r . Collie~ Gladin, Dir ctoz of the ~u~mg :Pepanment of the City a he is ell qualiiied to disc a the ~ tlanta community. Sincerely yours, Ivan Allen., Jr. ayor 11wr/br CC: Mr. Collier Gladin �CI"TY OF .ATLANTA CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Direccor July 26 , 1967 Mr . iobert Div n cutiv Director Centr l Atlant Progr s , Inc . Suite 2740, 2 P achtr Str t Atlanta. G orgi• 30303 D r Mr . Biv Subject: l b of cour ~u• CBJ> Pl n with th Mayor concerning thi ion with th yor nd etin with yo~ and J)o rat CAP. of c:o ree, dov to • t • r with t • Cit:,. All tbt e1:1pu1::ut or int i-eet of ce • maat "' uai••tl •• the '-IMAll'l-. t •llov the.-e thr e �Mr . Robert Bivens -2- July 26, 1967 data nd talent of th s organizations . it out t wholeh . rt support of each of th se bodies, there i question in my mind wh t 'h er the pl n q«m be uccessfully implem ted. CAP r present the 1 aders of th busines co ity wbose pt"ope:rty end bu i ss intere ts re involv .d and ho e political support 111 be nece s ry to carry out the plan. Most of th fund tQ c rry out the pl n will, no doubt> co from bond funds p id for by th City of Atlant and will r quir the support and approval of the Mayor and Bo rd of Ald rm n. Ao.y Pd ral funds, oth r th n urban renewal, u ed in the· pl nning pba e ust b chann 1 d through ABHPC TA, th · gency r ponsible for the gre test st.ngl · future development of th CJD. or through i et on th B sed on. the Coo . the foll 1. 2. 3. 4. bove, I b ve reco end d to the y.or 1.nfh which both feel th. y could upport. nd Alde n �Kt- . Jul y 26, 1967 - ·.3- ppro 1 of p,:oJ ct staff t .s. yo r /J C •• �CITY OF .ATLANTA CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Direccor July 27 , 1967 Kr . Ch rle D vis Co troller City of Atl nt Atl t , G orgi De r Ch rles : Att ched is copy of a dep rt ntel r que ted cone rning n ov r 11 review of nt d t proce ing ctivitt e nd to describ th v riou probl m which ust be corr cted in order to wr pup rel ting to ClP dat nd its updat nd to de dli of J nuary l, 1968. Thi 1 the d t t t hr Ind x must be c l t d for us by th Bur pilot run prep r tio~ for the 1970 C nsus Aft r you h bad ti to review theo probl m, I lik tog t with you to discuss this furth r . ould Sine rely, ~ l~ lannin C /J cc . . rl Lander• loaur• . Gladill Dir ctor �CITY OF .ATLAI'JTA. CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Director July 12, 1967 Mr . E. M. Laws 137 Griffin Street, N. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30314 Dear Mr. Laws: We are pleased that progress is being made in the organization of a coordinating committee for the Nash-Bans are a . In order to keep the Mayor and Aldermen fully informed, I would like to request the following: Information concerning the organization you referred to in your letter of July 6, and a list of committee chairmen and something about the makeup of the committee and also information about how you have approached the task of establishing this organization. Based on this information, Alderman Cook and myself will be glad to work with you in s etting up a meeting date. Sincerely, .~~]~~ Planni ng Director CBG/ mlc cc: Mr. Rodney Cook Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr .- �v· 7 July 1967 Ur. Thompson H. Shuttleworth. Chief Land•Use Control Division Departnent of Planning City of Atlanta Atlanta. Georgia 30303 Dear Mr. Shuttle orth; This is to acknowle dge your letter of 27 June 1967. I have communicated its oontents to members of the Boulder Park Association of' Civic and Community ~ llied with us in our efforts to effeot the Clubs and other groups who best pos ible land•use control in the Adamsville community. The membership will make every effort to comply with t he wishes of the Ald rmanio Zoning Committee by the September l deadline. e are being temporarily delayed in our attaok on the zoning problem beoause of the oommunity•s pr ocoupation with Projeot 00S Ope,rationa Cool Summer) hioh involves a major total are commitment to eue neighborhood tenaiol'l.8, particularly in the shopping oenter area, nd avert the threat of m1d•eummer violence. Our p rtioul r ooncern is with unemployed teen• era and t hose rchants who a.re not in complete sympathy with n: ighbor• hood improvement programs. Significantly. our big handic pis a laak of recreational facilities in th area -- no awi i ng pools, no oommunity club houses, no CA nor YWCA, no library, no supervised reore tional tao111tiea. hope, t hrough Project 00S, h~ ver, to adv rtise our needs nd enoour e a little more effective oooper tion from City H 11. Admittedly, the D partment of Pl nn1ng is not 1 dia.tely oonoerned with an area's teenager problems, but wi e urb n planning does involve £uhioni for the eff otiv abeorption ot burgeoni area populationa. So this probl does at le t lie on the periph ry of your depart nt•a are of cono rn. As for the specif1o re tionaa tter of th (1) first, Io r zoni petitions , l haff hree per on l ot pera onally oonour with the vi wt t v ry n 1 hborhood · st have ulti•family units in order to be considered · ll•b lanced• community. A 11..._bal d oommunity, it 1e to , 1s one th t ha1 1utti len vi•• to oo od t t n of it• oitiz nry. po,e ulti•fa.mily unit on a.n are 1 oki the erTioe1 bri & pr oarioua imb l oe to �{ 2) Seoondly11 it seems to me that, by giving the oommunity a de dline, the Zoning Committee hu rolieve4 the petitioner of the burden of the proof and pl oed it on thG oitizenry. Inatead of the petitioner bav6ng to prove- g zone change should be granted, the oom• m.unity l bei~ aaked to oonoede that the petition hu ve.lidity and recommend reaa for multi-tamily ellinga. In other ords, e are being subtly inveigled to cooper• ate ag inst our beat interests. { 3) Finally, l think th t all petitions for zon cbang e for building multl•fa.m.1l y units s hould inolud "bard" pl ns for build1?lt; &djaoent sohools and reore tional fa.cilitie , s • 11 as a. tr ftio tudy of the a.r i n wnioh the unita are to be oonstruoted. In oth r ord, tho petitioner should provide tne ioni ~ Committee th a "pa.ck e 0 plan, a.e t illng the inst lle.tion of seFVioea to ooommod te the oitiiens who will 11"9 1n the multi-family unit• I haaten to - d that oh of the abov represents my pr on point or view. In the ks to follow. l plan to oonter with so of fri n.da in HUD and ted r 1 and publio hous ing in order to become more informed. In th antime, aa our pl ns to cooper 1:e with tlt Zoning Committee, • will pl'ob bly o 11 on you tor uid o and bt e. Richard K. Be.rksd le, Chairman Boulder Park Aaaooi tion ot Cb·1o and Oo o a Th Honorabl 8v ror, City or Atl Jr-. unity Oluba �July 3, 1967 \ Mr . Collier Gladin ~Planning Dir4ctor City Hall Atla.nta, Georgia Dear Collier : 1 am ttaching h reto letter r ceived from Malcolm Jone reg rding th city-owned trip of land in the West End r a . I hav heard om ny different stori • reg rding the use of thi land until l really don't know ju t what i proposed. Is there ome w y w and for ll,I> could g t them tter 4i posed of one Sincerely yours, R. E rl Lander .Admini traUv• A al tant REL:lp Attachm nt �AN ORDINANCE BY PLANNI NG AND DEVELOPME NT COMMITTEE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDE RMEN of the City of Atl anta as f ollows: SECTION 1. Purp os e and I nt e nt . The purpos e of t hi s ordinanc.e is to est ablish prote ctive r e gul atio ns for trees in the City o f Atlanta in order to b e tt er contro l problems of fl ocding , so il conservation, a ir pollution, and noise in the City of Atlanta and t o make the City of Atlanta a more attractiv e , he al t h ier and sa f er pl ace in which to live . SECTION 2 . Tree : D~finit ions . Any woody plant ex cept Do3wood that has a sin3 le trunk wi th a caliper of f i ve inches or more at six inches abov e the ground. A Dogwood with a cal iper of t wo inche s or more six inches above the eround i s de fi ned as a tree. Street: Any officially rec.o gnized public right-o f -way in the City o f Atlanta. Bu ildable Area: That part of any lot exclusive of the front, side and rear yards as established by the Zo ning Ordinance. Par !< Any publicly owned land set aside for park and r ecreat i on purposes . Public Places: ·All lands located in the c ity of Atlanta which a r e ow ned by t he c i ty of Atlanta or any publi c corporation or authority c re a ted by Ge org ia law benefitins residents of the city of At lanta. Tree Prot e ct i ve Zone: That portion of a ny lot covered by the f ront, side and rear yard requirements as establishe d by the City of At l a nta Zoning Ord i nanc e. General Manager: The Ge neral Mana ger o f the De pa r tme nt of Parks and Re cre a tio n or his author i ze d represe nt ativ~. Annual Tree Permit: That written cons ent g iven by the City Arborist to pers on , pub l ic or pr i vate firm or agency to prune , tre at or remove any tre es in the Ci ty of Atl ant a . �SECTION 3 . Ci t y Arbo ri s t . The po s it ion o f City Arb or i s t shall be cre at e d wit hin the Ci t y Parks Depart ment . The Ci t y Arbo ri st, a s the agen t of t he City Park s De pa r tment, shall dire ct , re gulate, a nd c on t rol the care of a nd neces sary removal of all tre es growing now or he re a fter in t he City of Atl ant a. SECTION 4. Off icial Tr ee of Atlant a. The Dogwo od (Co rnu s f lorid a ) sha ll be the offici al tre e of Atlanta . SECTION 5. Tree Planting and Ma intena nce Re gu l atio ns . The Gene r a l Manager s ha ll pre pare _Tree Planting and Ma int e nance Re gul ations s ubje ct to t he app roval of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen to implement t his or dinance. SECT ION 6. Tr ee Proc t e ct i on Pri or to Development To pr event the unne ce ss a ry destruction of tre e s on land wher e a bu i lding pe r mi t or s ubd i v i sion app roval ha s not been issued,the destruction of mo re t han 25 per cent of t he t re e s on any one parcel of rea l pr ope rty wi th i n t~e City-' without prior a pproval of the City Aborist shall be prohibit ed. SECTION 7. Tr e e Prot e ctive Zo ne . The Tr ee Protective Zone shall correspond with that portion of the l ot cove red by the fro nt, side and rear yard requirements a s establish ed v by the Zoning Or dinance . Tb prevent the unne ce s sary destruction o f trees d uri ng develop me nt or redeve lo pme nt of any t ract or lot wit hin t he City of Atl ant a , t r ees sh al l not be cut , othe rw i se damae e d or de s troyed within the Tr e e Pr ot e ct ive Zone except in a cc or d ance with the Tre e Planting and Ma i ntenance Re gulat io ns and ~ he pr ovisio ns of t his -ord i nance . SECTION 8 . Submission of Site Pl ans f or Develo pment t o Ci ty Arborist . A s ite plan for the deve l opment or imp roveme nt of any tra ct of land l ocat e d in t he City o f Atl a nt a shal l be s~bmit te d t o t he City a l ong with the applicat ion f or a building pe rmit . No buildi ng permit shal l be issued until the s it e plan has be en r ev iewe.d and a pprov ed, in writ in:3 , by t he C:i,ty Arborist and a permit as pr ovide d in Se ct ion 10 has been iss ued . -2- �-. Such plans shall be rev i ewed and either a pproved or denied a nd a le r mit as pr vided in Section 10 issued or denied within fourteen (14) days of suh mittal otherwise such plans shall be cons i dered a;lproved and such pe rmit considered issued by the City Arborist. In the event such plans are denied t he reasons therefore shall he reported, in writing, t o th~ a ppl icant . s i te plan shall show, in addition to the usual requirements t he The ollowin~ information. A. All exis ting trees wit hin t he Tree Pr ote ctive Zone whi ch a re at least 5 inch cal i per at 6 inche s above t he ground and all Dozwood trees wh ich are at least 2 inch caliper at 6 inches above the ~round. B. Trees to he removed and trees to be ma i ntai ned . C. Sne cifications for the remova l of existing trees and protection of existing trees during construction . D. Grade changes or other work adjacent to a tree which would affect it adversely wi t h specifications on how the g rade, d.,.a ...,, inage and aeration will be maintained around the tree . The function o f the City Arborist in the review of sit e llans wili be to see that trees are retained in lawn or paved a re as wit hir, the Tree Protective Zo~e without making demands on the owner which would de~y him the reasonable use o f his land. SECTION 9 . Tree ·protection Durin5 Development . During any building , renovating or razing o erations , the b11ilde r shall e~ect suit ab le pro t ective barriers fifteen feet f rom the trun~ of t he tree around al l trees specified to be ma int a ined and shall not allow storaze of equi pment , mate r ials , debris or fill to be placed in th is a rea except as may be necessary fo r a r easonab le time if no other storage space is available . SECTION 10. A. Permit s . None of the f ollowing acts to any tree shall be c0mmi tted without the proper permit of the Cit y Arb or ist, exce,t as pr vidcd in Secti n 1 1. Cutting , pruning, damag in~, r emovin~ or killin~ a t~ee by any means . 2. Cutting, disturhin~ or j ntc~ferin3 in any way with any root of a tree by e~cavatinz soil, e "ther f0 r irading , irenchin~, ditching , or tun 1elin~ within fif teen fee t of the trunk of a tree . - 3- �3. l3 . Pavin;; with concrete , asph al t or other im:,~rv·i_ous mat~rial within 5 fe et oft e outside diame ter of tree . A ,vritter a)plic< tion for a permit is req1:.'.red fc-. r any wo rk on or affectin~ trees as listed in s~ ction A above . 1. Such ap~l ic a t i on for a permit must be made to t he City Ar orist a reasonable length of time in advanc ~ of.the t i me the work is to be done . 2. The City Arbo rist shall spe ci fy the work t o be d o~e, acco r <linr; to t he T!"ee Plantin~ and Ma int e nance Re;:;u~a tions, and may ins pect t~e wor k in prog r ess 2nd rnakr a fi nal in s pection u2on the comJletion of t . e wok i~ ne ce ssar y . SECTION 11. A. Pe r mits - Exemptions . Public uti lity comp anies, governme ntal ag enc ie s a :,d ;) r iva t e companies empl oying tree exper ts shall b 2. e:<e~pted from the provisions o~ t 1is ord inance, provided, howeve r , that such comp anies or agencies shall obtain f r om the City Arbo rist an Annual Permit. Such ?ermit s ha ll certi~y the cam i liarit y c f s uc h co~7anie s or agencies and the ir a~ r eement t o comp ly with the Tree Pl ant i ng and }1a i ;i -:~·_ t.%;,Ji tenance Regu l ations following their i s suance and approval . B. ThE: ow"1ers of propert y or their aut;10rized re )resentatives in areas zoned R- 1 throui h R- 7 wi ll not be subject to obtaining permits £or wo rk t u be performed on trees located on such prop~rty und e r the p rov isi on s of Section 10, except where more t han two adjacent lots are being developed at one time . SECTION 12 . Bni ld:i.n3 Hovin,c; Permits . The City Arborist, along with any ot e r affe c ted cit y departrn nt, sha ll r e v iew and approve all ap lications fo r building moving pern its befo r e the City will Br ant said permit . SE CT ION 13 . Tran sm ittable Diseases . The City shall have the authority t o i ns ist tha t property owners treat , or require prope rty owners t o have treated any tree s or s tored portions of trees containing tree killing insects or v ectors 0£ tr e e di eases. If the City Artoris t determines the disease war r ants immediate actio-.1. to c~rb its spread to healthy trees , the C\ty may cut or destroy said trees rrstored portions t1:creof usin3 the minimur. action reqt 1 ir .d to spread of disease . r eve t t:1 �SECTION 14 . TrAes Interferin~ with Use of Streets. The City Arborist shall have the authority at any time to remove any tree or part s thereof , growin3 on public or p rivate p r operty whi ch inte r fer es wit h or end ange rs the use o:£ .'.l street or ot he r public placein the City of Atlanta . The owner , where practicable, shall be notified i n wr iting by certified ma i l of the exi stence of the condition i nterferin~ with o r endange r i ng the us e of a stre et or othe r public place in the Ci t y and give a reasonable time f or its correc tion or r emoval. If not corre cted or remnved , ithin t he time allotted, the City Arborist shall cause the c ondition to be co rrected or r e moved. SECTION 15 . Emer 0 encies . In case of eme r genci es such a s windstorms, ice st orms or other disasters, the req u irement of Section 10 may be waived by the G~nera l Manager d uring the emergency period so that the requirements of thi s ord inance wou ld in no way hamper private or public wo rk to restore order in t he Cit y. SECTION 16. Enf or cing Authority. ~The . Atlanta Parks and Recreation Department shall be charged with the enforcement of t h is ordinanc e . SECTION 17. Vi o l a tion and Pe nalty. Any person violating or failin:; to comply Hith any of the provisions of this ordinan ce , upon conviction thereof, shall be fined a sum not exceedine $500.00, or may be imprisoned for a t erm not exceedin~ 60 days , or both. SECTION 18 . Appe als. In the event any person is dissatisfied with a dec ision of the City Ar bo ri st adve rsely affecting such person involving the a pp li cation of this ordinanc e, such per son may make a written request to the Ch.'.lirwan of the Parks Committee of the Board of Aldermen, which Committee, together with the Build ing Off icial, shall hear any complaint s of such person . After a full and complete hear ing of the complaints. of such perso n, the appeal board consisti ng of the above -named parties shall render its ·w ritten opin ion affirming, overruling or modifying the decision of the City Arborist as mny be fit and pro per under the existing circumstances. -5- �SECTION 19. in0.s . Money collected fr om fine s shall be deposited in th., City ' s General Fund. SECTION 20. Other Ord in ances Re1ealed . . Any and all ordinances and parts of ordinances in confl ict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 21 . I£3alit of Ordinances or Parts Thereof . Should a ny section, c lause or provision of this or d i nance by declared by the court s . to be invalid, t he same shall not affect the validity o ~ any other provision of this ordinance. -6- �AN ORDINANCE BY PLANNI NG AND DEVELOPME NT COMMI TTEE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDE RMEN o f th e Cit y of Atl anta as f ollow s: SECTION 1. Purp ose a nd I nte nt. The purpos e of this ordinance is to est a blish protective r e eulat ions f or trees in the City of At lanta in order to better control prob lems of flooding , soil conservation, air pollution, and noise in the Ci ty of Atlanta and to make the City of Atlanta a more at t ractive, healthier a nd safer place in which to live. The intent of the ordinance is to encourage the protection of t ree s for which Atlanta is nationally recognized and which the City stands to loose unless p~ot e ctive measure s are taken. The intent is not punitive; or to cause hardship to any individual, government a l ag ency, private or public company who use every care and diligence to protect trees within the City of Atlanta; nor is it meant to inflate the cost of development over a reasonable value of the trees involved. SECTION 2. Tree: Definit i ons. Any woody plant except Dogwood that has a single trunk with a caliper of five inches or more a t six inches above the ground. A Dogwood with a caliper of two inches or more six inches above the ground is define d as a tree. St reet: Any officially recognized public right-of-way in the City o f At lanta. Build ab le Arc a : That part of any lo t exclusive of t he fro nt, s ide and re a r yards as establishe d by the Zoning brdinance. Park: Any.publicly owned land set aside for park and re cre a tio n purpos es. Pub lic Plac e s: All lands located in th e City of A ia nta which a r e owned by the City of Atlanta or any public corpor ation or authorit y created by Georgi a l aw benef iting re s idents of the City of A lanta . Tree Protective Zone: That portion of any l ot covered by the fr ont , s i de a nd rea r yard re qui rement~ as est ablish ed by t he Ci y of Atlanta Zoning Ordinanc e . �. General Manager : The Genernl Ma nager of the De partmen t of Parks and Re creation or his a uthor ized re pre s e ntative. Annua l Tree Permit: That written consen t given by the City Arborist to a pers on, public or priva te firm or age ncy to prune , treat or remove any tree in the City of At l anta . SECTION 3 . Ci ty Arborist . Th~ position o f City Arb orist shall be cre ated within the Department of Parks and Re creat ion. The City Arb o rist, as the a gent of the De partment o f Parks and Re creat ion, shal l dire c t , regul ate, a nd control the ca re o f and necessary removal of all trees growing now o r hereafter in the City of At l a nta . SECTION 4. Of fi c ial Tre e of At l a nt a . The Dogwood (C ornus florida) s ha ll be the off icial tree of Atlant a. SECTION 5. Tree Planting and Ma inte nance Reg ul ations . The Gene ral Manager sha ll prepare Tree Planting and Ma intenance Reg ul at ions subject to the approval o f the Mayor and Board of Al dermen af ter a publi c hearing with reasonable no ti c e of t he hea ring to those affected, t o impl ement this ordin.a nc e . SECTION 6 . Tre e Prot ect ion Prior to Developmen t. To prevent the unn ecessary dest ruction of tree s on land where a building permit or subdivision app roval has not been issu ed, the destruction, withi n a ny f ive - year period, of more t han 25 per cent of t he trees on any one pa rcel of re~l property within the City, without prior approval of the City Arborist, shall be prohibited . SECTION 7. Tr ee Prote c tive Zone . The Tree Protective Zone sha ll corres po nd with that port i on of t h e lot covere d by t he front, side a nd rea r ya rd requi re ment s as establish ed by t he Zoning Ordinanc e . To prevent the unne c es s ary destruc t ion of tree s duri n~ develop ment o r r ed eve lopment of any trac t or lot with in t he City of At l a nt , t r ee s sha ll not be cu t , otherwise damaged or dest ro ye d within the Tr ee Prote ctive Zo ne excep t in a c co rdanc e with the Tree Pl a nting a nd Ma in tenance R gulations a nd th e provisions of this ordinanc e . -2- �SECTION 8 . Submissi on of Si t e Pl ans for Dev e lop me nt to City Arborist . A site plan for th e develo pme nt ·or improvement of any tract of land located in the City o f At l anta shal l be submitted to the City a long with the appli cati on f or a bu ild ing permit . No building permi t shal l be issued until the site plan has been r evi ewed an d approved, i n writing , by the City Arborist and a p ermit as provided in Sectio n 10 has been issued. Such plans shall be rev iewed and either app roved or denied and a permit as provid ed in Se ctio n 10 is s ued or denied within fourteen (14) day s of submitt al. Otherw ise s uch plans shall be considered a pprove d and such permit consi de red issued by the City Arborist. In the event such plans are denied the reasons therefore shall be reported, in writing, to the applicant. The site pla n shall show, in addition to t he usual requirements the following information. A. All existing trees within the Tree Protective Zone which are at least 5 inch caliper at 6 inch es above the ground and all Dogwood trees wh ich are at l east 2 inch caliper at 6 inches above the ground. 'B. Trees to be removed and trees to be maintained. C. Specifications for the removal of existing trees and protection of existing t r ees during construction. D. Grad e change s or other wo rk adjacent to a tree wh ich would af fect i t adv ersely with specifica t ions on how the grade, drainage a nd aerati on will be ma intai ned around the tree •. The fun c tion of the City Arborist in the review of s it e pl ans will be t o ass ur e that trees are retai ned in l awn or paved are a s within the Tree Protect ive ~o ne without making demands on the owner whi c would deny him the reasonable use of his l a nd. SECTION 9. Tree Prote ctio n During Deve lop ment . During any building, reno vating or razing .operat io ns, t he builder shall ere c t ' sui tab l e protecti ve barriers around al l trees spe ci f i ed to be ma in tained a nd sha ll not allow st o rage of e quip ment, m3terials, debris ... or fill to be pla c ed in thi s area exc ept a s may be necess ary f or a re~s onab l e time if no o ther storage spa c e is availab l e . SE CTION 10. A. Permits . No ne of t he following ac ts to any tree within the Tree Protective Zone or on publi c property shal l b e committ ed wi thout t1 e proper pe rmit of the City Arborist , exc ept as provi ded in Sectio n 11 . -3- �B. 1. CuttinB, prunin g , damag i ng, removing o r kil ling a tree by any means . 2. Pnving with c oncrete, nsph alt or other impe rvi ou s mat e rial withi n 5 fee t of th e ou ts i de diamete r of tree . A wr i tten appli c ati on f or a permit i s req uired for a ny wo rk on or affe c ting trees as l i sted in Se ction A above. 1. Such app licati on for a permit must be made to t he City Arboris t in advance o f the time the work is to be done. 2. The City Arb ori s t shall specify the work t o be done, accordi ng to the Tree Planting and Ma i nt enanc e :!:{eg ulations, and may ins pe c t t he work in pro gres s and mak~ a final inspection upon the complet ion of th e work if ne ce ssary . SECTION 11. A. Permits - Excrnpi:i o o.s. Publi c u t ili t y companies , governme nt a l agen ci es and p rivate compan i es emp loyi ng tree experts sh a l l be exempte d from th e provis io ns o f thi s ordinance, provided , however, that such compani e s or agencies sh al l obtain fr om the City Arborist an An nual Permit. Such permit shall certi fy t he familiarity of such companies or a ge nties and their agreeme nt to comply with the Tree Pl anting and I'~ intenanc e Regulations follo wi ng t heir issuanc e a nd approval. B. The owners of pro perty of t he i r authorized representatives in areas zoned R-1 thr ou gh R-7 will not be s ubject to obt a ini ne permi ts for worl to be pe rfon~d on trees locat ed on such property under the provi s ions of Se ctio n 8 and 10, exce pt wh ere more than two a djacent lots are b eing deve lo ped at one time. SECTION 12. Bui lding I'-::oving Permit s . The Ci ty Arb ori st, along with any other affe cted ci ty de pa rtment, s ha ll re vi ew and approv e all a pp lications for building movi ng permit s be fo re the City wil l g r a nt said permit . SECTION 13. Tran sr,1::_i: t::ibl e Diseases . The City sh a ll h nv e ti1c a ut hori t y to re c1uire that riro pe rt y owner s tr e at , or rc~ui r e pro? ert y owners to have trea t ed any trees or s tor ed port ions of trees cont a ining tre e killing ins e c ts or ve c tors o f tr ee disea ses . If the City i\:rbori st dete r mine s t he d isease wa 1.-ra nts i m,ned i ate <l c-i:io . t o curb it s spread to he a lthy trees , the City ma y cut or destroy s a id Lrces or stored portions thereo f us i ng the mi nioum a c tion requir e d to pre ve , t the -L+- �sp read of di s c ~s e . SECTION 14 . Tree s Inte rfc r :;.n3 ,.J:i.th Use of St r ee t s . The Ci t y Arboris t s hall have the a uthor i ty a t any time t o remove any t r ee or parts the r eof, gr owi ng on publ i c or pr iva t e property wh i ch i nte rfere s wi t h or endange r s t he use of a s t r eet or other publ ic p l a ce i n t he Ci t y of At l a nt a . Th e owne r , where practic ab l e , s h a ll b e no ti f i ed in writing by c ertified mail of t h e existe nce of the condi t i o n i nter f eri ng with or endangeri ng the us e o f a s tree t o r othe r public pla c e i n t h e City and given a reas onab le time for its corre cti on or removal. If not c orre c ted or remove d wi th i n the time a llo t t ed , t he Ci t y Arborist s ha ll c ause the c ondition t o b e corre c t ed or removed . SECTION 15. Eme r ge ncie s. In c a se of emergenci es such a s wi ndstorms, i c e storms or ot her disas te rs , the re qu ireme nt of Se c t i on 10 may b e wa ived by t he Ge nera l Hanage r during the eme.rgency pe riod s o tha t the requireme nts of th i s ord ina nce would in no way hampe r pri va t e or publi c wo:dc to res t ore orde r i n t he Ci t y. SECTION 16. Enf orci ng Author i t y. The Dep~r tme nt of Parks and Recreatio n s ha ll be c ha r ged with the enforc ement of t h i s ordinance . SECTION 17. Viol a t i o n and Pe na lty . Any pe rson v iolat i ng or fa i ling to comply tJi t h a ny o f t he provi s i ons o f th i s ordinanc e, upon convict ion the reof, sha ll be fi ned a sum not exceedi ng $500. 00, or may be i mprisoned f or a te r m no t exc eedi ng 60 days, or both f or each offe nce . SECTION 18 . Appea ls . I n t he ev e nt any pers on i s dis s ~t i s fi ed wi th a de ci sion of t he City Ar borist adve r s e ly affe c t i ng s uch pers on inv olving the app l ic at io n of th i s ordina nce , s uch pe r son may make a wri t te n reques t to the Ch air~an o f t he Pa rks Com.rnitte e of t he Board of . l de;:-me n, whi ch Commi t tee , t oge t he r ,vi t h the Bui ldi ng Of fi ci al , s ha ll he ar a ny compla int s of s uch p er s on . Af t e r a f u ll a nd compl e t e he ari ng of t he c ompla i nts of s uch pe r s on , t h e app eal boa rd consist i ng of the ab ov e -named pa rt i es sha l l r e nder i t s wri t t en opi ni on a ffi rming , overruling or modifyi ng t he dec is ion of the City Aroor i s t as may be fi t a nd p roper under t he exi st i ng c ircums t anc es . - 5- �SECT!ON 19. Fines . Mo ney coll e c ted fr om fines shall be deposit ed in the City's General Fund . SECTION .20 . Q.ther .Ordinanc es Repea l ed . Any a nd a l l ordina nces and parts .o f ordinance s i n co nf lict herewith are hereby rep ea l ed . SECTION. 21. Lega lity of Ordinances or Par ts The r eof . Shou ld any sec t ion, claus e or pr ovi s ion of thi s ord inance be dec lared by the cou rt s to b ~ i nvalid , the same sha ll not affe c t the va lidity of any ot her provision of this ordinance . SECTION 22. This ordina nce shall become effective upon adoption by the Board of Aldermen _and approva l of · t he Mayor. -6- �r , /e./,, 5, e,J_ (c ,,. ,.-; r (' / ..,,-.,, / - 6 .3 - / CITY OF ATLANTA DEPARTMENT of PLANNING -~ -~. ........ .. ..- 700 CITY HALL . -.

--: .·

. ... , ~-- ~ .. ~- ' ..- ... Atlanta, Georgia HHI ... . • j . • • .,. .;• WYONT B . BEAN • :• I • '" LANN I NC. l: NC.INl: C fl COLL IER B. C.LAOI N CMICP' "-4NNll:III .' J ,, ••• To: Mayor Allen rrom: Wyont Bean Ray Nixon ~rl Bevirua Subject: The Alignment of th • Data1 October 5, 1964 Southwaat Connector-.- During the month of September, 1964, Alderman Jack Summer• and a representative of Fulton County Public Work• Department, Kr. McGeorge. met with the reaidents of the neighborhood which ia generally located in the Weatview Drive, Lawton· Street, and the L & N l&ilroed area to diacusa the relocation of a new atreet connector. The project in question ia the $1,700,000 Southwest Connector, a 1963 Fulton County Bond Project, which was for the conatruction of a n.ev four lane connector between Cascade Road - Gordon load and the four lane Marietta Boulevard. This included an interchange with the Waat Expresava7 which will relieve 1erioua traffic problema on Northaide Drive and the entire vest aide of Atlanta. · ,, The general subject of Alderman Summers' meeting was that the home• owners felt that this project, if developed as planned, would destroy the neighborhood they had worked so hard to develop. They felt that the other alternatives should be conaidered. Some of the suggestions were to align this roadway with Ashby Street, another was to dev lop the roadway either over the L & M lailroad or within the railroad right-of-way thereby eliminating that eection of track. Still an.other suggestion vas to generally follow along the vat aide of the L & N llailroa.d. At the request of Alderman Jack Summers, on Tuesday, Soptember 22, 1964. a delegation of approximately twenty fin reaidenta of the Westviev Drive, Fountain Driv., and Bu.nter Place led by Senator LeRoy Johnaon, Mr. and Mrs. G. L. Ch&ndler, and Mr. K. L. Mt witll Hr. Karl Bovina. Mr. Wyont Be&A, &Del Mr. Collier 01.adia aDCI preeeutd tbe1r,Y1na. Tba ia purpoee of the Go•• ., •. ..' �.. . ' -- . -. C.:to~-:r S, 1964 _.Paga 2 citizen• preaent v~ a raquaat to ~locate t facllltJ ao u not to affect tho•• preaut and.the cGnr •111ty of tbeir 1-erea~ aDd lf the officiala preae11t coulcl DOC acooapllah tlaia CUii&•• Co vboll coulcl tU, ap~al. · l'ba officlala pnMllt ~ t e d Ci.all to oouU.r tlli• Yi..,. After further illftatigatio11 1 tlaia paper vu prepared to repre•eDC the finding• of the Coutruccioa1 1'enniaa ad 1'rafflcilqiueriq I . l>epartmanta. . ·.' . The .Joint Atlanta•Pulto11 County lo1ld Proaraa~ vhich vaa approved_ by the people May 15 1 1963 1 provUed tbe fwada to be1i11 tbia connector road which vaa firat pl~cl 4uriag or prioi- to tba aecoad vorld var. During tbia time, tbe devalopaeDt of a lara• auaber of apartment• 111 tba I vicinity of Simpao11 load, tba 1Dterchang• vttla the V.at &xpraaavay, and the underpaaa with Weatviev Drive, which 1a DOW unclar coutructicna, have limited the poaaibilitiea to tvo alternative•. rirat, the alignment vbicla 1a generally along and adjace11t to tba eut aide of the L & H Railroad right-of-vay from C&acad~ • Cordon north to Marietta Boulevard . The eecoa4, would be paralleling th eut aide.of the railroad north from Gordon load to a point juat north of Waatviev Drive tbe11 bridgiq over the railroad and generally beiq ali&ned and adjaceat to -tba veat right-of-way lina of the railroad, th.ea recroaaing the railroad aorth of Bankhead Avenue. Eitlwr of theae alternative• would tbarafore follow a facility which preaently fonu the boundary line of- ••v•ral naiahborbooda. To vary away fro the railroad would further aplit &Dd daatroy the alty of adjacent neighborbooda.·

.

• I f In taking a clo•• look at tbia connector, you find. that it will be the exteuion •outh of Marietta loulevarcl &Dd 011 further aoutb you fia,d the . underpaaa at Waatview Drive. which 1a under coutruction, and the underpua and ramp• of the Weat Expreanay vhicb 1• alao under con•truction. Th• moat direct rout• between tbeae reatrictive point• 1• tba general align• ment along the L & 1' Railroad. In decidiaa vbicla •ide of the railroad ri&ht-of-way will be leaa daaagiq on the adjacent uighborhooda and individu l famili•• effected and vbich aide will be the moat economical uae of the tax payer• dollar, ve smat couider that the general alignment along · the we•t aide of the railroad vill effect approximately twice•• many familiea ancl vill require three major cro•einga of rail facilitiea while the a•naral location along the ea1t •ide vill effect fever familiea and require the cro1eing of only on• rail facility. Al•o conaiderina that in addition to thia four lane aoutbweat connactor in tbe future will requi~• the widening of Aahby Street where proviaion b&v• already bean made in the developmen~ of the Weat lxpreaavay as:ut tbe A.Ibby Street interchange for thia future wideni11g. Couiclaring the large IWlll»er of lDcluatri•• as:ul coaaercial activitiea that require railroad for aupplJ that lt wo•l4 not be poaalbl• to eliminate thi• rail facility aDII tlaa areat expeue aDll •naiDeeriq probl. . ~ -..~be 1Dcurn4 '"81opiq a elnat.. roadwq Oftr tba L a. I ript• . of-way. . , ' \ \ {... :: ,.,:.1,(L-V\/ . ~.. b, ,, ~ .. '"',.~ - .. ) .,. ·. ~ - - · - ' I ' • •, . • �Mellorandua October S, 1964 Page 3 After further wef.ahing the•• fact•, the City of Atlanta feel• th&t the phyaical, acoooaic. and •octal ••pecta of tbia clanlopaant have been thoroughly recouiclered and that it would 1110t k to the cit'j..81 beet intanaC in raquoati.J:ls a ch.age 1.11 the aonaral al~ut of the aoutme•t connector along the eaat aids of tM L • N l&ill'INMI ri3ht-of-,,q. hrtbor. that d.ace thia 1a a hltoa Comity project. it will k tM OCJ1mC7 nopoui'bility for epociflo lec:&tiea ef dlu roeduaJ u kM4 oa 4'.etail . ~llllNrllll n• ... ( ·.:t··'.:~.. ,a1naras•. _,: ,i '. .• ~ , . .., :·· "... ·,/ ( ... ~ .: . ' • • ' I . r i ·.' 4 \ ,.. •:. .. ' . 'l . ·;~. -~·t t.., ' , . ..t ". .... . " .. . .. I ... ,, ,, ·.... : ·t>. . ' ,, . ,., . ~ . ~ :.' •I I; :'4 /~... : t, r, ... '. . ~.\ .• .· ..,. ·1. . . • ... .1 .,..·:~ "',., . t' ' • ' L'l'! • ,:.:: .. ... . . ' . .. .. ... I ,~ ... ,·. . :, •.·~ . , .,.': . .• .. . ' ...., ! • . . . ·~ .

...·/ .... ... ····· ~, .., I~ . \ ~• • _,. ,, •

·. , .'• ·

\ \ .. . •. l,i .. . -~i i .. ..!:·:·:, ·. •. ·.~ . .. . 4 \ ' . ·:

... ' ..·, ,·. , .l ', , , \ "l r I •

,• I I ; . · ,' •• ,'.,( ~ _ \ , . ' 'j , ._ \,- ., ... .. ,I,~ ., I ·,."'-. ·, .. . f ... • ~ • • \ r ~J.· . . •·t . . 1 .• . ~· ·' ~!' ' , t' ' >· 'O . ' '. • .... '

••• 1 ,· . ... ·r,' ' '. ... ·' . I , '. . ,· .... •, h ~ .'; , I. ,;, I , ' ' .. . ,, . . '. : ,... ,, . ·• ·. , ·t . ·. , ., ' , ,• ,. ,. ,· • ,.... ..:..-i., ~~- _.y-.... -~ .: ',• . ,.•.~;r::_:·~ ·?-~~., .:..,.. . :· ..... -~ . .. '• ,·•. ..., If • "° ;. ·, ...·,. ~,..-:-.. · .·~....

ll' '< · 't ·, ( · ' •7 ... ·,. 'fl..t . . ' .' I +-

,l' .

.,' ... ' . .' '. ,,, - . 'f '.' ·. ~--, _.4 , ·"' ,~ !· • . ~'..' ~ ~ - '

..· .. '

~ '. ·. . I ~' . \ r ... •, ,., ... l I' . ... ·· ·. ' . ~:- ...; ~.;t- ) . i ... ': ·, .. . .' ,·. · . .... ·, ,. ·. ·. ···/; .• \. ·, ·! . , , ' , . •. ~: . :&.',:f \°'.•. . I.,"' ,..•. •., ~-..'

- .

. , • ' ·. .. I . ~ ,., . . I . ... .. ., 1· I ~ '°t ·• • ,, · I . ' . ·--.. - ,... .' ,.'. I ·< '

, . ~.

, · ·; : ·. I ' •:. . ... . ..

t r· i, ,.r-~:

. . · ·"'1--. .' "·'··.·. . ..·-:·. .t \. ,; > ; ' I'· ·•, '{l. :•f ·. I · • . .... '; • ..,...' ··' JO . -r\,.._ '.\ ':., . .., ·' . .' .,., '. .. .. \. •• ...\: ··~. ..... ~- ~ ·i ·• ,, . . ·r ., • • ~ - .. .. ~ I .. . . ' . , .. . .-. : '··,. . ..., ..... ., , :--... i°"?·.~··,, ..'..'., i '• I-~ ,.. ..., • . • I :• ....., ·~ '="' ·.• "' . \\. ,.·.~ -~:-. .. ,, ..·,. ' • .• :. ·.,.·.:-' "

.·; · 1 • •

.... . . ; : '• ·:I · \ .

,

t: ,L

,· . •• l '~ ' t .· ·.' • ·' · ,, . . • .,. ·'. I •• - -- -- - ~ - • ~- . .. . ~ .. ·· .,· JI "- " ' ) .• • . • '

' ..

'f

~:, ~~ I , . ,' .,_ .... . • . • .." •. ' ~ ~ ... .tt . ·' ·. ;,._. ·,., ( f,. . , • '• .; ,.;t ~ ' _l I • ",' • , .1 ,\ I • · ." f. . ., • . . ... ' . •, . .·. ,·... . :._;, ·- ·,.. .. · 1. .· ~. • 'I . " .. • ', I' { l~ :• • • ..· ~ ., I. ,. _..,· - .. ,' ~. '· . ·.•' ., ', ... 1"1, t ,. . ~~ •• • . ·, . ~. ~· \· -:~ I. I \ ... ,·. -·, , ' . _, ., • �June S, 1967 Dr. A . H . Letton Atlanta Me diralll Center 340 Boulevard, N. E . Atlanta, Georgia 30312 Dear Dr. Letton: Thank you for your letter of June 1st concerning the Atlanta Medical Center properties. We are di cussin thi further with Mr. Collier Gladin, the City Planner, and Alderman Rodney Cook, Chariman of the Planning Commib • Sincerely, Ivan Allen, Jr. IAJr:am �June 1, 1967 Mr. Collier Gladin Head, Department of City Planning City Hall Atlanta , Georgia 30303 Dear Mr . Gladin: This is in respons to your request for Atlanta Civic Design Coimniesion Review of the report on D,esie prepared as part of the City of Atlanta ' s Community Improve nt Programcy Candeub , Fleisaig and Associat s, Planning Consultants . In gen r 1 found the report to be informative and useful in th general discus ion of design pr1ncipl a and objectivi s. We also thought good job w doo 1n identifying ao specific proble requiring attention 1n the J.tl nta are • We r particularly impres d with the choice nd range~ photographs and graphics used to point up th se problem. area • In hort, the comm.1tte ould have littl quarrel with th g neral m teri 1 cont ined in the body ot th port. On th other h nd, it is the consensu of the C 1ssion that the report as extremely k in the ares or jor concern to both public official an int r s d citizens nd of s ci 1 aonc rn t o mbere o! th Atlant Civic Design Co is ion--n ly in the r ·a of peeific propo als nd r oomm ndation. would b less than frank 1l we f il, d to tat th t had hoped for more cif'ic dvic a to wh t tep this community should be takin no to acM.i e b tter urban de 1gn in th futur . • Ot nin 1te included int S ry of Major Re ndations (P•i 3 ot th r port) find only two th tare re sonably speoif1c•-on c lling for CBD plsn and th other calling for an ordin nc tor late t oval ot tur tree • Unfrotunat ly • even thes r comrut~ations r ak n d omewhat by their position st th tail nd of the 11st, The other v nta of en ral n t d. r r he it d rsther th.an fir ost rt h y �Mr . Collier Gladin June 1, 1967 -2- in the United States t oday. They do not, unfortunately, reflect some of the thoughtful analysis contained in the body of the Design Report itself . Taking the points covered in the reconnnendations in the order of their appearance, we would make the following comments: (1) The statement of need "from the public and private leadership of Atlanta to a goal of a 11 designed city and to the progrom needed to achieve it" would certainly have the support of every Design Commission member. We do wish that more emphasis had been placed in the study on the development of such a progi-am. (2) The Con:anission ould agree that "Physical Design plans related to the Community Improvement Program must be carried out by the best professional designers available . 11 We would have appreciated some specific recommendations as to how this might be accomplished. For example.., believe that more us might be mad of design oo titions and we had hoped to see some discussion of whether and under what oiroumstanoes the consultant would support or oppose such procedures~ Also, some coneideration of an "awrds program" might have b en i:;rovided in the r port. (3) The Co isaion would probably support th id that stTh city must pr pal" and adopt o d sign ...growth strategy." Th r port, how r, is not too cl ar on what suoh a tr t ~ would con iet of or ho to achi ve it. (!.) (5) (6) Th Oommi s1on would most lik ly support th consul nts' reOonJm ndstiona th t de 1 n control n ed to be pro d "through stren th ning of the Subdivision and Zoni.Jlg Or-di• nc s" and prob bly that th Ci ic D sign C i sion n d to b trength n d lo, but r not too clear as to how thi 1 to b socompllshed. It would hlv. be n helpful if the Consultant could h v . prov1d d p cifie a ndm ts (in rough dr ft) for consider tion ot public offici 1 and Co is ion m bra. �Mr . Collier Gladin (7) Jme 1,. 1967 -3- The statement that "a formal design review procedure " is needed is confusing insofar as the Atlanta Civic Design Commission is serving such a function t the pr sent time. If the intent was to requir that all major private oonst ruet1on in the oity be made sub ct to suoh review, we wish it hed been stated more clearly. Under this circumstance,. we also would like t o see some consid ration of recommended limits and cut-off points fer review of private construction . (8 & 9) .Again, we wupport th r col!lmendations that a CED pl an and tree ordinance bed~ loped . e would have pref rr d to see th se itBms headipg this particular list b cause the bottom position does ap r tow ak n them. · In summary, 111e feel the report f lla short in the most important area--the are of recommendations . We are concerned both with the recommendations ctuslly pres nted and with those that were not. We beli th t the hand of public agenoiea cone rn d with d s i gn m t ters in the city would have been str ngthen d by l) a much stronger statem-nt of the case for a CBD plan; 2) a strong r commendation that a visu l survey nd design prQgram be dev loped and implement d with sp cific reco nd tions s to how this might be done, 3) a draft of pecific emendlll.ent to the subdivision ordin no, oning ordinance, build!ng cod , etc . ; 4) firm recommend tions for a tudy of the impact of ad valorem t xation on design; 5) r co nd tions for dev lopment of n incenti s program (swards or oth r) for encouraging good d sign; 6) reco endatio r arding wheth rand how deign c.om.pet1t1on might b mploy din th .turtheranc of good de ignJ 7) reoomm.endat1ona r g rding doption of ign ordinenc s 8) recomm nd tion r arding th d lopment of desi n plans tor speoU'io jor str et, e:xpr _s ys, r pid tran it st m nd public o n p c , and o forth. thinking 1 _ incorporated in thank yo for the opportunity- of renewt thi ri l. .. nr ti e, pl.ea e teel fr to 11 o u · for further ry truly yours, JO ph . • Perrin Cha1r J ' �CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Director June 2, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Notes and comments on workshop session No. 2 with Candeub, Fleissig & Associates The Planning Staff has not been satisfied with the work of Candeub, Fleissig & Associates who have been responsible for the following studies: Planning, Fiscal, Economic Base/Marketability, Equal Opportunity in Housing and Design. Although this firm enjoys a national . reputation for its work in the field of planning and connnunity development, we have found their work to suffer in Atlanta for the following reasons: (1) Most of the interim and/or preliminary reports and memoranda submitted to date consists of a parroting back or rehash of locally available facts, statistics and data. Often the facts and information submitted to the consultant or generated and gathered by them have been either erroneously used or applied with little, if any, attempt made at verification prior to the incorporation in a report or memoranda. All of this appears to point to one or more of the following: inadequate research, local consultation, follow-up, and/or general negligence on the part of the consultant. (2) Based on the reports and memoranda submitted thus far, little if any attempt has been placed on analysis of the facts, their impli~ cations or consequences, or to relate one report to another. Few conclusions and recormnendations have been drawn . Where conclusions and reconnnendations have been drawn and set forth, it is difficult for the planning staff to see how, from whence, and on the basis of �Page 2 Notes and corrnnents on workshop session No. 2 what evidence, they were drawn. In short, the reader finds conclusions and recommendations drawn not predicated on facts or analysis of the facts. In reading the reports and memoranda, the planning staff has been constantly confronted by questions in his own mind of why, how and for what reasons - the answers to .which are not forthcoming by reading further. (3) In general, Items 1 and 2 apparently have led to the conclusion that many of the technical reports and memoranda could be applicable to any City USA. Most often the reader is left unconvinced that Atlanta is the City in question in each of the technical memoranda and reports. There is a general failure on the part of the consultant to relate what is being reported, discussed, concluded, or recommended with the physical, social, economic and political environment of Atlanta. The staff has employed every known tactic to encourage and to literally force improvement in the quality of their work. But, we have not seen any appreciable improvement which we would call satisfactory. Flat statements, sweeping generalizations, techniques, approaches, reconnnendations and assumptions made in today's meeting - all must be challenged by the staff and the Planning and Development Committee. The Program for Improvement Action being recommended by the consultant is heavily weighted toward physical improvement. This is probably the strongest part of the Program and basically represents materials provided the consultant by the Planning Department. The Program is weak, shallow, sketchy and in some respects not feasible on the social and fiscal facets. We have not seen much of th? economic materials to date and thus cannot comment. Consequently, the Planning Staff along with the Planning and De velopment Connni t tee should prod the consultant with the "Whys" , "Hows", and "Wher es" until we ge t satisfactory a nswer s and an accep t able Pr ogram for Improvement Action . �Page 3 Notes and comments on workshop session No.2 Set forth below are some examples of questions. These will give the committee some idea as the types of questions that should be asked the consultant: PHYSICAL --Shouldn't your recorrnnendations for renewal treatment cover the entire City, particularly those areas to the extreme North and Southwest which apparently have been omitted1 --What are the side effects 9n adjacent areas of renewal treatment in any given area? How is this overcome? --Define types of treatment; which renewal actions should be public, which private and in which areas? --How did you determine priorities and how can we best make use of this priority classification system on a continuing basis? --What is the value of your priority classification system to the Planning and Development Committee and how will it help us in making decisions for projects in various areas of the City? --What are the alternatives of your priority classification system? --What projections have been made on land needs ana resources for the future development of the City? What policy implications are involved? --How have you treated Rapid Transit and Interstate Highway Locations in this broad scale program? Should these facilities be planned to serve exi s t ing neighborhoods·, commercial and industrial areas or should neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas conform to the physical locations of the se facilities? --What additional physical planning should the City become involved in as a follow up to your broad .scale program? --What is the reasoning of the consultant in determining the s cores assigned for each staging area? �Page 4 Notes and comments on workshop session No. 2 SOCIAL --What and how have social factors entered into your broad scale program? --What are Atlanta's socio/economic problems and how have you approached them in this program? --How do you go about getting citizen involvement in such a broad scale program? gram? How will th e citizens of Atlanta benefit from such a pro- How can we best convince them of the need fo r such a program assuming we are in agreeme~t with it? --How do social problems relate to physical problems and how can the approach to both best be coordinated? --What social costs, if any, are involved in such a large scale program? Are these social costs reflected in the overall program costs and how are they to be financed? ECONOMIC --Are your land use recommendations . based on market factors, purely suggestions for development, or a combination of these two? --What ar e the most potential markets for Atlanta, (Scientific research and other us e s for e xample) and how can Atlanta best accomodate them wi t hin t he existing City boundar ies? --Jobs , i ncr eas ing indivi dual i ncome , hous i ng and edu cation are the . - .ii<. City's mos t pr ess ing probl ems . Wha t approa ches ar e you r ecorrnnendi ng t owards re s olving thes e problems ? --How can the City implement s uch a br oad s cale program with the apparent housing shortage and fin ancial limitations which the City currently has? �Page 5 Notes and conunents on work shop session No. 2 --What is the relationship of the broad scale program to the City's overall capital needs? --What sources of revenu e (existing and potential) do you foresee the City using in financing its program? --What alternative methods of funding this program are available? What, if any, financial limitations must the City overcome in financing this program? What changes in and what additional state enabling legislation will be required? GOVERNMENTAL --How do you foresee the City managing and coordinating this broad scale program? Who should be responsible for administering it and coordinating it? --What staffing arrang ements will be required at the sector and/or the staging area level? What will the administrative costs be? - - What, if any, other cities have tried this broad scale program approach? What administrative arrangements did they make ? GENERAL --What i s t he logic behind or why the need for a broad scale ur ban renewal program i n At lanta? -~ --How should the City go- about implement i ng such a br oad sca l e program? --What policy determinations (phys i c a l , so ci a l & economic) should t he Mayor and Board of Ald e rmen cons i der in light of the future development and redevelopment of the City? �Page 6 Notes and comments on workshop session No.2 --In your opinion is the broad scale program practical and feasible? --How does the City go about up-dating your broad scale program? --What recommendations have you made for the City to carry forward what you have done in each of the studies on a continuing basis? --What are the consequences of undertaking such a large scale program and what are the alternatives? --Are the time periods being recommended, i.e., 1967-1970, 1971-1975, 1976-1983 realistic? Do you expect the City to accomplish the recommended actions of the first time period (1967-1970) on time? Would it not be more realistic to revise these time periods to say begin in 1970 instead of 1967? �CITY OF A.TLANTA CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B . GLADIN, Dir e ctor May 19 , 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Allen Dan Sweat FROM: Collier SUBJ ECT: Charles Harr visit with Mayor the mornin 1. Attached is a general outline. I also plan to have this a more detailed f o rm by Monday morning. 2. Following is a list of those to attend the meeting in the Mayor ' s office and the ones schedul ed to take the flight: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. 1 Mayor Allen Glen Bennett Dick Rich Charles Harr Ed Baxter Charles Sonoborn Dan Collier 3. I have talked to Mr. Sonoborn concerning the details of the meeting and he suggested that Mr. Baxter be invited. 4. As I understand a press conference has been requested. I would suggest that this be ~cheduled around 10:00, prior to the flight. 5. I have been in contact with the pilot and we are to make detailed flight plans on the 23rd. �--.- ,,i .C ITY OF A.TLANT A. CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522·4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PL A NNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Director May 19, 1967 TO: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. FROM: Collier B. Gladin SUBJECT: Outline for Discussion Meeting of Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. with Charles M. Harr, Assistant Secretary for Metropolitan Development, HUD, May 24, 1967, 9:30 a.m. - 12:00 noon Suggested items for discussion, Mayor's Office 9:30 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. I Physical and Economic A. B. c. D. E. Population statistics - city and metro area. Quality of Atlanta as a place in which to live and work. Urban Renewal Program• number, size and scope of projects. CoJIDDUnity Facilities (Regional in scope). 1. Airport facilities and expansion 2 . Atlanta Stadium 3. Atiditorium and Cultural Center Trans portation Facil ities. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. II Ai r Railroad Bus Trucking Expressways Rapid Transit Social A. B. C. D. Atlanta-Fulton County Economic Opportunity Atlanta (EOA) Program. Social Outlook and Trends Need for Regional Approach to Social Problems. Rapid Transit-concern for its impact on social and physical character of the City as well as economic impact. �Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. -2- May 19, 1967 III Governmental A. B. C. D. Atlanta's government; setting within 5 counties. Number of governments in metro area. Metro Cooperation. 1. Atlanta Regional Metropolitan Planning Connnission 2. Metropolitan Atlanta Council of Local Governments 3. Metropol 4. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Future Outlook - need for consolidation of governments along function~l lines. IV Adjourn for airplane tour of City and metro area, 10:30 a.m. to ll:30 a.m. �May 2J, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr , Collier Gladin FROM: Mayor lva.n All n , Jr. Ple se adviee me if the property referred to in the attached letter i in an ui-ban renewal area and the atatu of the acquj,sitlon. Pl e ~turn th corr the nece ·ry l'eply. pondence in order that l may make Sincerely yO\U" , lv · n Allen, Jr. Mayor JAJ~/br cl ure �M y IS, 1967 Mr. Paul Scovill 3678 Ros · B. d , N . E . Atlauta~ G ·or ia D 'I! Ml' . Scoville: Thi will ac owledge l"eceipt f your letteJ:" t"eg ~ding the zo • , appllc tion in y r ighborhood~ l forw r: Committee Opel" CUUl,iu.: • Sincerely y U CC: Mr• Collier Gladin , Jr .. • �CITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA , GA. 30303 Tel . 522-4463 Area Code 404 DE PARTMEN T OF PL ANNI N G COLLIER B. GLADIN, Di r ecto r Ap r il 5 , 19 67 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayo r Ivan All en, J r. FROM: Collier Gladin SUBJECT: Relo cation - Sheltering Arms Day Care Cent e r R t\ \_ \.._W) I have turned to the Atlanta Area Community Council for support on proposed site locations, as we would normally do with a request from a civic agency. The Planning Department is very interested in supporting Sheltering Arms and other social oriented agencies in the selection of sites to best serve this growing community. As you know, the Community Council is responsible for the coordination of social planning activities, thereby providing the City with one agency who knows the goals and activities of all the community organizations. This enables us to select sites which will allow the least chance of service overlap. I will furnish you with site proposals just as soon as possible. CG/jp �CITY OF .ATLAN :A CITY HALL ATLANTA. G A. 30303 Tel. 522 -4463 Area Code 404 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR R. EARL LANDERS, Adm ini strative Assist ant MRS. ANN M. MOSES , Exec utive Sec retary DAN E. SWEAT, JR. , Director of Governmental Li aison March 23, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO Collier Gladen FROM Ivan Allen, Jr. As I intrepret it, the Sheltering Arms is a civic agency and is interested in establishing a new day - care center. Is it within your planning function to make an unofficial recommendation as to a good location for the m to c onsider? It may be that the Community Planning Counc il would be a b etter source of information for me t o go to . Pl ease advise. It appear s that the officers of Sheltering Arms lean towards staying close to the downtown area, but realize that this is not n ecessarily the right thing to do. Pl ea s e furnish m e your suggestions and return this file. IAJr:am Att achments �Sheltering Arms ASSOCIATION OF DAY NURSERIES 214 Baker Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia OSGOOD SANDERS DAY CARE CENTER 214 BAKER STREET, N.W.-ZONE 13 DOROTHY ARKWRIGHT DAY CARE CENTER 89 MEMORIAL DRIVE, S.E.-ZONE 12 525-5765 524-5747 March 8, 1967 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1966-1967 MRS. HUGH NUNNALLY, JR. PRESID ENT MRS . HAROLD MCKENZIE, JR. PRES I DENT-ELECT M RS. L . NEIL CONRAD, JR . 1ST VICE - P RES IDENT MRS . JAM ES 5 . DUDLEY, JR. 2ND VICE- PRES ID E NT Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia M R. G EORGE E . S MITH T REASURE R M R S. D . S , M A NNING AS ST. TREASURER M RS. GRI GGS SHAEFER DUES TRE AS URE R M RS. WM . C . W ARREN, Ill RECORD ING S E C RETA RY MRS. A . E . THOMAS , JR. CORRES. SEC R ETARY M RS. JAM ES H . CRAWFORD HISTORIAN Dear Mayor Allen: Mrs. Harold McKenzie, Jr. and I are looking f0rward to meeting with you at 2:30 P.M. March 22nd. We wish to discuss the program of Sheltering Arms Association of Day Nurseries and long range plans for relocation of one of our facilities. MRS . FRANK E •. SCOTT 0 . S. NU RSERY CHMN. M RS . J OHN P . K E RN 0 . A . NU RSERY CHMN . We are grateful for the opportunity to discuss our agency with you. Sincerely yours, M RS, J O HN B . ARMI STEAD /~--~ 7r~<-<,7 MR. E. C . BA R R MRS. FRANC IS B ENN ETT MR . HARVEY B OOT H MRS. PAUL BURT (Mrs.) Hugh Nunnally, Jr. Pres ident - 1966-67 MR . JOHN M . D E BO RDE Ill M R . T HOS. T. FLAGLER, JR. MR. E. S, F OR I O D R . C. D I XON FOWLER MN:eg M RS . GLENV ILL E G I DD INGS D R. ELLEN KI SE R DR . WM . H . KI SER M RS. CHAS . M . M C CUL LO U G H MRS . JO HN O ' N E I L L, JR. MR . GEORGE M . POO L E, JR . MRS. R OB E RT SHELLEY MR . WILLIAM S I MS M RS. HA RR Y L . SPR I N G , JR . M R , WM . C. W ARRE N I l l MR . ROBERT W I GG IN S MR . H . DI L LON WINSH I P, J R . E XE CUTI V E D I RECTOR MI SS MARG ARE T L. COLB E RT 1/ ,1/;.• ') · / A Community Chest Agency · I / ... I I I of your United Appeal �CITY OF ATLANTA DEPARTMENT OF SANITARY ENGINEERING Atlanta , Georgia 30303 March 24., 1967 S . W. G RA YOON Sanitary Eng inee r R . D . SPEER Assistant WILLELA OSBORNE Office Manager Hayor Ivan Allen City Hall Atlanta., Georgia Dear Hayor Allen: As it would be almost impossible to J.oce.te the offenders who are c reating a he alth hazard in the vacant lot a cro ss the street fro::n t he Shelterir:g ..'\r ns Day Nurse::.7 at 21h Baker Street., N. W., 1,ro are, tod~y, c:;ending our 01-m crews on t ::i this lo t and cleanin g i t up along with tte sidewalk are a that runs the e:1tir e l e:nc;th of the bl ock . The District In spector will then trace d o:-:11 the 01-mers of this property and advis e tl:.em tha.t it ~-, ill be their responsibility from now on to keep this vacant lot in sanitary condition. Very truly yours, StIG:~ld �I I I1_ She!teri11g Arms ASSOCIATION OF DAY NURSERIES 214 Baker Street, Atlanta, Georgia N.W. DOROTHY ARKWRIGHT DAY CARE CENTER 89 MEMORIAL DRIVE, S.E.-ZONE OSGOOD SANDERS DAY CARE CENTER 12 214 BAKER STREET, N.W.-ZONE 13 524-5747 525-5765 April 3, 1967 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1966-1967 M RS. HU GH NUNNALLY , JR. PRESIOENT MRS . H ARO LD MCK ENZIE, JR . PR ES ID ENT•E L E CT M RS. L . NEIL CON RAD , JR. 1ST VI CE-PR ES IDENT MRS . JA MES S. DUDLEY, JR . 2ND VICE - PRES IDENT MR. GEORG E E . SMITH TREASU RE R M RS. 0 . S . MANNING A SST . TREASU RER Mayor Ivan Allen City Hall Atlanta, Georgia M RS. G R I GGS SHAE FER DU ES TREASURER M RS. WM . C . WARREN , Ill Dear Mayor Allen: RECORD ING S E CRETARY Kay McKenzie and I wish to thank you for M RS . A. E. TH OMAS , JR. COR RES, SECRETARY M RS. JAM ES H . CRAWFORD HI STOR IAN M RS. F RANK E. SCOTT 0 . S. your interest in Sheltering Arms. N U R SERY CHMN . The lot across the street has been cleaned M RS . JO HN P. K ER N D . A . NU RSERY CHM N. off and th e trash haul ed away. This cert ai nly is MRS. JOHN B . ARMISTEAD MR. E. C . BARR MRS . FRAN CIS B E NNETT an improvement and a service to our organization. M R. H ARVEY B OOTH We look forward to hear ing from you regarding MRS. PAUL BURT MR. J OHN M . D EBORD E Ill MR. THos . T . FLAGLER, J R . our future plans. MR . E . 5. FORIO Sincerely yours, D R . C . DI XON F OWLER MR S . GLENVI LL E GIOOINCS )Lu.,,_,,.,,___ OR. ELL E N K I SER O R . WM . H . KIS E R }&_,__,,e,<Aj' MRS. CHA S, M . M c CULLOUGH (Mrs. ) Hugh Nunnally, Jr. President - 1966-67 M RS. JOHN O ' N E ILL , JR . M R. GEORCE M . POOL E , J R. M RS . R OBERT S H E LL E Y M R . WILL I A M SIMS M RS . H A RRY L . SPR I NG , J R. MN:eg MR . WM . C . WARR E N Iii M R. R OBERT W I G G INS M R. H . DIL LON WI NSH I P, JR. EXECUT I V E D I RECTOR MI SS M ARGAR E T L . C OLBERT . V~i ./ A Community Chest Agency 1888 of your United Appeal '7 �CITY OF AT~A1'JTA. CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 -1 DEPARTMENT OF PLAN1'1NG !

COLLIER B. GLADIN, Director !I May 11, 1967 MEMORANDU_ FROM: Planning Staff TO: Mayor Ivan Allen, - Jr. and Alderman Rodney M. Cook SUBJECT: Background material on Equal Opportunity in Housing Study .In securing the Federal Grant Funds for the undertaking of the Community Improvement Program one of the conditions was the preparation of an Equal Opportunity in Housing Study. The following fedE;ral guidelines established the scope and content of such~ study. 1. "Survey and analysis of the existing patterns of residence of Negroes and other minority groups in the community, including an appraisal of the extent to which the pattern is the result of discrimination. The survey and analysis shall include considerations of the quality of housing and of related community facilities and services available to minority groups, in relation to the quality of housing and related community facilities and services available in the conmrunity at large." · 2. "Development of an affirmative program to expand the housing opportunities available to minority groups in t h e community, including increases in the quantity and improvement in the quality of available housing, and to eliminate discriminatory barriers obstructing open access to housing. The affirmative program shall include consideration of how both federally assisted and other programs of housing improvement can be used to attain these objectives." Essentially the Equal Opportunity in Housing Report meets the federal guidelines and requirements for such a study as a part of the COIIDnunity Improvement Program. Our disagreement revolves around the following : �-2~ . 1. Conformity for such a Fleissig & the report to and interpretation of the requirements · of the contract study executed between the City of Atlanta and Candeub, Associates, dated May 6, 1965. The City questi9ns whether meets sections lb, Ild{l) and 11(2) of the contract. 2. Crediting the City for what has been done during the Allen Administration in the way of improving public services and facilities serving Negro areas, and 3. Reliance on the interview technique as a means of drawing conclusions on public services and facilities without checking and testing the validity of the information thus obtained prior to its incorporation in the report. Each of the above points are discussed below: 1. Conformity to and interpretation of contract. The Consultant appears to have met most of the requirements of the contract with the following notable exceptions: Section lb of the contract reads as follows: "The Consultant shall determine the adequacy of connnunity facilities and services in areas in which Negroes lives, (such as schools, parks, playgrounds, public housing, libraries, streets, utilities, sewers, and services from data supplied to the Consultant by the Local Staff). Adequacy shall be determined by applying nationally recognized standards of adequacy and service as modified by established local standards and shall include appraisals of intensity of use, variety and scope of services provided, and public attitude toward such facilities and services. For the latter purpose, interviews with informed sources in the Negro COlillllunity and in various appropriate professional associations will be used to secure their reactions to the adequacy of these facilities.n The phrase, "adequacy shall be determined by applying nationally recognized standards of adequacy and service as modified by established local standar ds ••• " was a problem for the reviewers. ., in the report that this was done? What proof exists This is not apparent in reading the text of the report, its appendices or methodology. Were comparable statistics of cities of Atlanta's size available in so far as the provision of public services and f acilities? compare with these cities? If so, how did Atlanta �-3Section IId(l) of the contract reads as follows: "The consultant shall: 1) Appraise factors which are conducive to the establisli.ment of an atmosphere of equal opportunity and those factors which create a negative atmosphere to the establishment of equal opportunity through selective interviews of representative neighborhood leadership, businessmen, realtors, and residents in selected neighborhoods of contrasting ethnic and economic composition." · Where in the text or the appendices of the report does a treatment of this exist? Such a treatment would entail, we would think, an . identification, appraisal, and findings of both positive and negative factors related to an atmosphere for establishing equal opportunity in housing. According to Section IId(2) of the contract, the consultant was to have made such findings. This is extremely important and should be the crux or basis of the program recommendations. The tenor of the program recommendations contained in Part II of the report, essentially requires and demands the existance of a "favorable environment". If this interpretation is correct, the consultant has apparently found some positive factors that exist which are conducive to the establishment of an atmosphere of equal opportunity. But , the reviewers could not find any discussion of such a "favorable . environment.. or positive factors in the report. Apparently, the sole bas i s for t he program r econnnendations appear s in t he Introduction to the r epor t. It r eads as follows : "Increas ing res i dent ial segr egation, dilapidation of non-white rental units and accompanyi ng soci al pr oblems are h i ghly i mportant t o , but not pecul i ar t o At lant a . St a ti s tical fi ndings coupled with intervi ew res ults i ndic ate that the City needs a strong program in equal opportunity in h,;:ms ing ••• " Section IIe(l) and (2) of the contra ct r e ad as follows: "The Consultant shall develop specific recommendations based both on experience in other cities and on the findings regarding _ community attitudes. These .recommendations will pertain to: �-4., . 1) general community attitudes and programs to deal with equal opportunity in housing and to reduce or eliminate friction and tension; 2) small area development and programs particularly applicable for areas for renewal to deal with softening of attitudes with respect to equal opportunity. The key words in these three clauses of the contract are the development of specific recommendations. In reading the reconnnendations contained in Section II there are few specific recommendations. A considerable number of the recommendations are extremely general, vague and to some extent useless. Examples of specif ic recommendations are: "The City support legislation at the federal and state levels to prohibit discrimination in the sale or rental of housing on the basis of race, creed or national origin. If action in this area is not forthcoming at the federal or state l evel, it is r ecommended that the city adopt local fair housing legislation." "The City adopt an anti-"block-busting" ordinance which would make it illegal to employ panic-inducing tactics to promote a rapid turnover in housing occupancy." "It is recommended tha t the Community Relations Commission be given the responsibility and adequate staff and budget to carry out the city's program for the achievement of equal opportunity in housing." Examples of general, vague and to some extent useless recommendations are: "It is recommended that the city utilize federal assistance availabl e to ci t i es through the Department of Housing and Urban Development t o cover part of the cost of a c oncentrated code enf or cement program in des ignated areas of the city . n "It is recommended that t he city re-evaluate its housing code and other codes t o make sur e t hat they pr ovi de adequa t e t ools for improving existing hous ing. " "It is recommended that the city move, under the Federal Demonstration Cities ;program to improve selected areas on a massive scale." "It is recommended that all city departments examine their activities and levels of service to determine if they serve adequately each residential area regardless of racial occupancy. Programs to correct deficiencies and inequalities should be prepared and implemented." �-s"It is recommended that housing for mixed occupancy be encouraged in outlying areas so that population shifts to the suburbs, if any, will be racially balanced. 11 nit is recommended that the city prepare and implement a formal program to more actively accomodate in-migrants." 2. Crediting the City for what has been done. The Report uses the statistical technique of comparing public services and facilities serving Negro areas to those serving the entire City. Although this technique provides an absolute comparison, it does create a false impression and a negative connotation that nothing is or has been done to improve the situation found to exist. This technique combines what has been done in the ancient past to what has been or is being done in the immediate present with no differentiation between the two. Such a statistical technique makes the current administration look exceedingly blameful, when in fact the current administration has made great strides in these areas. Public services and facilities have been improved and subsequent administrations &iould be encouraged to follow its example. Although, the contract does not specifically require the consultant to provide this credit to the City, it is deemed advisable and desirable in order t o dispell t he f a lse image created. To il lus t rat e stat isti cal technique mentioned above t he following discuss i on appear s i n t he appendices, (Section III , page 11), under Parks and Recreati on. , ., "Community parks in t he city contai ned a t ot al of 287 . 9 acr es . Of this total 34.1 per cent ( 98 .2 acres) are l ocated in ar eas in which Negroes live. Thi s indicates that 43.6 perc ent of the population of the City of Atlanta has only 34.1 percent of the parks space available in their neighborhoods. Another me thod of stating thi s deficiency i s that there i s one acr e of community park space available for every 1,753 peopl e in the city as a whole but only one acre for every 2,240 persons in neighborhoods in which Negroes live • . �-6.. - The parks classified as neighborhood parks contain 216.2 acres in the whole city of which 41.7 percent of 90.1 acres are located in areas in which Negroes live. This category of park space comes closest to providing space equivalent to population ratios. Green spaces in the Negro residential areas are the mose inadequate of all three park categories analyzed. Of the total 88.3 acres in this category, only 10.3 percent (9.1 acres) are located in Negro residential areas. To indicate this vast difference another way, the city-wide average is one acre per 5,717 people whereas in the Negro residential areas there is only one acre per 24,296 people." In the Summary of Interviews the following statements appear, (Section III, pages 14 and 15): "One interviewee _covered the entire range of responses relative to parks recieved in all interviews in this brief statement: 'Park services are woefully inadequate. Fifteen years ago there was only one (Negro) park for the whole city. The parks we have now are poorly maintained. The programs that are given are pretty good, but there's a need for more programmed recreation . The city promised to build about seven parks in the last bond issue; none were built' These remarks were all repeated in one or more other interviews. All indicated that Negroes thought conditions were better in all- white neighborhoods." This illustrates a damaging statement which was not verified or substantiated , particularly when the facts of the last five years or more are that : 1. Presently there are a total of 13 playlots in the City . Twe l ve of th ese are in Negro areas . 2. Twenty- one playlot s ar e planned; 20 of these are for Negr o area s . 3. Since Sep tember, 1964, twenty~two ma jor park pr oj ec t s have been initi ated. Ten of t he t went y-two are clear l y i n Negro neighb orhood s with t he remai ning twelve categoriz ed as general s ervice type f aci l ities , such as t he Grant Park Chi l dren's Zoo . 4. The City has purchas ed 14 new park sites in the las t 2 years; 7 of these ar e clearly in Negro neighborhoods. In relation to schools, the Report recommends, (page 12) that : �-7"The City take immediate steps to improve the educational programs and facilities serving Negro residential areas and to bring them up to the level of white areas." Yet the facts indicate that within the last 5 years or more that: 1. Eighteen schools have either been built, or have undergone modernization and/or enlargement of facilities. The latter would consist of new classrooms, gymnasiums, etc. These schools primarily serve Negro areas. 2. Seven schools are currently under construction which would primarily serve Negro areas. If the new school at Grant Park which will have a ratio of about 50% white and 50% Negro were included this would br ing the total to eight. The abov e are intended as examples only, but should serve to give the consultant some idea of the type of credit that the City is due. 3. Reliance on Interview Technique The use of interviews was made a part of the contract as a means of securing local comments and criticisms of facilities and services provided to Negro areas in the City. As a part of this effort, the consultant did invite CACUR to suggest the names of knowledgeable individuals whom they might consider for inclusion in such interviews. But, to our knowledge, the City has never seen and been provided the whole and official list of those interviewed, what was asked, what was s a id , or how the r esults may have been used by t he consul t ant in t hi s report. As the interview technique has been us ed in this r eport the f ollowing observations are made: 1. The names of the persons interviewed are not listed in the Appendix. 2. The Consultant apparently has taken verbatim the responses which were derived in the course of the interviews as repre- �-8senting absolute .factual information. Obviously, the results of the interviews contained in the report represent slanted and damaging statements which could have been heard in any section of the City - White or Negro. Yet, nowhere did the report attempt to verify the validity of the comments obtained through the interview technique. 3. The information generated by the interview technique has been used in some instances as a basis for program recommendations (as set forth in Part II of the text of the report). Since no attempt was made to verify these comments, responses from the interviews can be taken for no more than heresay information. Yet, it is this information which provides the basis for some of the program recommendations. It would have been more appropriate had the Consultant attempted to extend the scope of his interviews to include responses, replies, and/or reactions from the officials and agencies being criticized. Such an expanded technique would have given a much broader and fairer presentation of the two or more viewpoints, while at the same time such a technique would not have precluded the Consultant from making a judgement between which of the two or more viewpoints was more factual. ,/ �May 12, 1967 Mr . Collier B . Gladin Planning Dir cto1: City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Collier : This i to approve your reque t of May 11, 1967 for you and Alderman Cook to ttend th confer nee on "Design in Urban Transportation" to b held t the Statler Hilton Hotel in Washington on May 22, 1967 . If you will submit your expense accounts upon your return from W ehington. we h 11 b happy to reimburse you. Since:rely your , R. Earl Landers Admini trativ A sistant REL:lp �CITY OF .ATLANTA. CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DE PARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Dir ec tor May 11, 1967 Mr . Earl Landers Admini s trative Assistant Mayor's Offi ce City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Earl: I have re ceived a letter from Robert Weaver concerning the Department of Housing and Urb an Deve lopment 's sponsorship of a conference on the theme "Design in Urban Transportation". This is to be held in Wa shington at the Statler Hilton Hotel on May 22 , 1967. The conference is designed to inform government offi cials , architects, engineers and planners concerned with the development of urban transportation in order to explore the important role that transportation design plays, not only in shaping our cities, but in making them more attractive places in which to live and work. As you know, I have been very concerned about the lack of inv9lvement of Atlanta government officials in transit planning so far . In that Atlanta will be detailing its transit facilities between now and the spring of 1968 and voting a bond issue to develop this system possibly in the spring of 1969 , I feel that a tremendous amount of work is on top of us no t - now five or ten years away. For this reason, I feel that this conference could be very beneficial to the Chairman of the Planning and Development Conunittee, Alderman Cook, and myself. I have discussed this with Rodney and he feels as I do; he can also make this time available. I would like to request approval for the two of us to attend this conference, @ nc er ely, Co~ . Gladin Planning Director CBG/jp Attachment s �); l/ . CITY OF ATLANTA March 21, 1967 CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTM E NT OF PL ANNING MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr . FROM: Collier Gladin COL LI ER B. GLAD I N, Dir e c to r SUBJECT: Rezoning Petition #z-66-239-E Simpson Road, R-4 to A- 1 The above rezoning petition was originally heard on December 22, 1966, but had been filed in error by the applicant for C-1 Commercial instead of A-1 Apartments. Our staff had recommended denial fo r commercial but approval fo r a partments . Apartments had been recommended the previous year by the staff . On December 22, the Zoning Committee sent forwa rd to the Boa rd of Alde rmen a recommendation fo r approval as amended from C- 1 to A- 1. The Board, howeve r , on a dv ice from the City Attorney, felt that the petition should be reheard by the Zoning Committee fo r A- 1 Apa rtments . The pe t it ion was reheard by the Zoning Committee on March 9, 1967, bu t the pe t it ion was deferre d fo r further study a nd no a c t ion has been ta ken by the Commi ttee . Th e staff fe e ls that the z oni ng change is just ifi a b le fo r the follow in g reasons: 1 . Access to the tract is from Simpson Ro ad - a major stree t. 2 . The tract is adjo ined to the west by the new high sch oo l site fronting on Hightower Roa d; by Li ncoln Me moria l Ce me tery on the west; and is across the stree t from the cemete ry and a club to the north . A c ul de sac of singl e -fami ly homes backs o n the tract from the south and a 25 1 wooded buffer has been recommended fo r thei r protection . It is the feeling of the staff that these su rroundi ng institutional uses offer a great se nse of open space to the proposed developme nt while prote cting the qrea from future high density development . �Memorandum to Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. - 2 - March 21, 1967 3. This site had been recommended by the staff as a feasible location for housing to the Housing Resources Committee , 4. Adequate utilities are availabl e to the site . 5. The site is not included within the Collier Heights Planning Report . CG/Im Enclosure �I, ..... __ .,.

··--- • --·-· ,· _ _ _ _:__ - i __ __] I t .•• - - - i I I A , C. ~ - .. II l ~~ il . ' -~ ..... .., -· �. 1· . - JT 7 ·; :) I , ~. 3~ 1~- ~- ..,.._---1"-' ' "Ii I - --+-- , _ __ - .- -- 1 __J.. _..,.. )..r---+--~ r -----1--•_j'lJ ~r-·-+----l r I , <c ~ r---+--4 �l I CITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Dir e ctor y 9, 1967 Sr . Charles Davis , City of Atl nt troll r Atl nt , Georg r C.'harle l have iuenc · t n · inc rely. C'BD/jp c • • larl f.l Allen '1• ers er �CITY l. -A- L ATLANTA, GA. 3 0303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPA TMENT OF PLANN NG COLLIER B. GLAD I N, Director May 8 , 1967 Jv'LEHORANDUM TO: Mayor Iva n Allen, J r . FROM: Collier Gl adin SUBJECT: Mode l Citi es Propos al It has occurred t o me that the Federal Government may announce the awarding of a Model Ci ties Planning Grant to Atlanta during the ea rly part o f June, with most offi ci als o f the City o f Atlanta, and particularly the affected dep artmen t heads, knowing little, if any , of the deta ils of the c ity's Hodel Neighborhood prop o sal. Since the whole earted and enthusiastic cooperation of many of the ci ty's department heads wil l be required in co nducting this tremendous and most complex program, I feel that a meeti ng o f department heads should be called f o r the specific pu rp ose of explaining this program to them, prior to it s b eing officially announced by Washing ton . I feel that this meeting should be set f or Tuesday, May 22, or at least no later than Tuesday, May 29 , and that you should convey to t he departme nt heads the importance and magnitude of this program. The Planning Department is willing to dev elop a slide presentation t o help in explaining it to them . Two other matters co ncerning our Mod e l Ci ties Program also deserve attention. One is the possibility o f pro c eeding with the establishment of the Model Neighborhood ·Exe cutive Board which, as you will remen.ber, is the govern ing board for the Mode l -~ighb orhood Program and consists of the Mayor , two aldermen , Chairman o f the Fulton County Coll'mission, President of the Atlanta Board of Education, one rep res ent ative from State Government , appointed by the Governor, and one representat ive from the private sector, app oi nted by the other member s. I f e 1 ~h at it would be wise t o have this Board functioning and apprised o f th e Mo d~ l Neighborhood Program and its dutie s by the t i rne the announceme nt is made of the grant . In addition , I feel that it is imperative t ha t a Project Director be lined up by the time the grant is announced. �ME ·10RA:NDUM Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. Nay 8, 1967 Page 2 As you may re a li ze , a c ert a in amount of time will be r e quired f or devel op i ng t he 1ode l City staff , p rior to any actua l planning work getting underway. Having a Dire ctor a t the earliest possib l e noment will at least hold this wasted time to a minimum . CBG/jp Copy to - Earl Landers Dan Sweat �CITY OF .ATLANTA. CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COL LI ER B. GLADIN, Dir e ctor April 19 , 1967 Honorable Mayor and Board of Aldermen City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Gent lemen: We are t r ansmitting h er ewith ano t her r es earch repor t prepared in conne c tion with the Community I mpr ovemen t Pr ogr am . This repor t entitl e d, "Public School Resources Available to the Blighted Areas of Atlanta" was prepared by t he Conmrunity Council of the Atlanta Area, Inc. The report i s 128 pages in leng th , including bot h tex t and appe ndices, plus one er rata s heet. This report is being f orwarded t o you f or your informat ion pr ior to public release. It wil l be officiall y transmitted t o the Mayor and Board o f Aldermen at its r egul ar ly schedul e d meeting on May 1, 1967. At that time a single copy will be transmi tted t o the Clerk o f the Board of Al dermen and copies wi l l b e made avai l abl e t o the general public. At that time we wil l r equest that this r eport be referred to the Planning and Development Committee of the Board of Aldermen and to the Atlanta Board of Education for study and a c tion. In many respects the report is technical, bu t none the l ess , is very we l l documented in terms of the utilization of existing s chool fac i lities and services being offered, particularly to the disadvantaged people of Atlanta. Should time permit, we suggest that you read the entire report, however, a very good summary appears on the yellow pages numbered 1-6 in the first part of the report. Should you have any questions concerning the report or this release procedure, please let us know ~ Planning Director CBG :md �C I·rY OF .ATLANTA. C I TY HALL ATLA1TA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DE PARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLI E R B. GLADIN, Dir e ctor April 12, 1967 ble Zacltry Mullin Hr • 865 11n Stree, A lanta, Georgi Dear Mr . s. E. llins: Wear sorry you hav had o much difficulty getti cone ming City Plana for your n ighborhood. information Your n lghborhood h be n s 1 cted o be includ d n n applicat ion t o the r deral Gov r n for a del n 1ghborhood progr applica• t ion t bins submi ted for ney to develop plans for model neighborhood . e fact sh t included wi t h this 1 t er will brl fly explain th model n 1 hborhood progr , and the p enclos d will d scribe t he boundaries of th area included in th pro r • A_t ched to t he fact sheet i a card iden ifying • Johnny H. obin on of the Mayor's Offic . Ile ha be n given the as ig t of pr viding information to public concerning the d l ighborh od progr will b in touch wit h you v ry shortly. y W hope that thia 1 tter and Mr-. Robinson will anaw r t h have rals d . you for 1our 1 uiry . Sincer ly yours, Collier B. Cladt lanni Dir ctor CIG:ad cc: Iva Jo Mayr • COIIIDUM ty ve 1 nt C rdinat r �March 23, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO

Collier Cil den FROM

Ivan All n, Jr. As 1 intrepz t it, the Sheltering Arme i civic gency and i interested in stabli bing a new d y -c r center. I it within your plannini function to make an unofficial recommendation to good loc tion fort m to con ider? It may be that the Community Plannb1g Council would a better source of iiuormation for m to go to. Ple It p ra that th otf'icer of Sheltering Arma le to rda ying clo• to th do town re , but realize that thi i not nece aartl tb d ht thing to do. Pl ae !urniah me yollt' augg tiona d return thi fil • IAJi-:am Attachment a n �Sltelteri11{! Arms ASSOCIATION OF DAY NURSERIES Atlanta, Georgia 214 Baker Street, N.W. DOROTHY ARKWRIGHT DAY CARE CENTER 89 MEMORIAL DRI VE, S.E.- ZONE 12 525-5765 OSGOOD SANDERS DAY CARE CENTER 214 BAKER S TREET, N .W . -ZONE 13 524-5747 April 3, 1967 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 19 6 6-1967 M RS . H UG H NUNNALLY, JR. PRESI D E NT M RS. HA RO LD MCKENZIE, JR. PRESI D ENT-EL E CT M RS. L. N E IL CO NRAD, JR. 1S T V ICE - PRES I DENT M RS. J AMES S . DUDL E Y , JR. 2ND VI CE-PRESIDE NT M R. G EO RG E E . SMITH T REAS URER M RS. D . S. M A NNING ASST . TR E ASURE R Mayor Ivan Allen City Hall Atlanta, Georgia M RS. G RIGGS SHA E FER DUES T REAS U RE R MRS. W M. C , W ARRE N, Ill Dear Mayor All en: RECORDING SEC RET ARY Kay McKenzie and I wish to t hank you fo r MRS . A . E. TH OMAS, JR. CORRES . SECRET ARY M RS. J AM E S H . <:; R AWFORO HISTORIA N MRS. F RANK E . SCOTT your int e rest in She l teri ng Arms . 0. S. N URSERY CH M N . The lot ac r oss th e stree t has been cl eaned M RS . J OHN P . K ER N D. A . N U RSERY CHMN. off and t he trash haul ed away . This certainly is M RS, J O H N 8. A RM I S T EAD MR. E. C, BARR MRS. F RAN CI S BENNETT an improveme nt and a servi ce t o our organization. MR . HARVEY B OOTH We look f orward to hearing from you regarding MRS . PAUL B URT MR. JOHN M . DE B ORDE Ill M R. T H 0S , T . FLAG L ER , J R. our future plans. MR , E. S. F0R I 0 Sinc ere ly your s, D R . C . D I XO N FOW L ER M RS . G L ENV ILLE G ID D IN GS D R. EL L E N K I SER )Lu. ,t.,n'-- D R . W M. H . K I SER MRS . C H A S. M . MCCULLO U GH (Mrs. ) Hugh Nunnally, Jr. President - 1966-67 MRS . JOHN O' N E IL L, J R, MR. G EORGE M . POOLE, J R . MRS . ROB E RT S H E LL E Y M R . W I LLIAM S IM S M RS . H ARRY L . SPR ING, J R. ~'i MN:eg MR. WM . C , W A RR EN Ill M R . ROBERT WIGGINS MR . H. DILLON WINS H I P, JR . EXEC UT I VE D I RECT OR MI SS M ARG AR E T L . COLB E RT A Community Chest Agency of your United Appeal ��CITY O F ATLANTA DEPARTMENT OF SANITARY ENGINEERING Atlanta , Georgia 30303 March 24, 1967 S . W. G RAY DO N Sanita r y E ngi n eer R. D . SPEER Assistant W ILLE LA O S BORNE Offic e M anag e r Mayor I van Allen City Hal l Atlanta, Georgia Dear Mayor Allen: As i t would be almost impossibl e to l ocate t he of fenders who are creating a health hazard in the vacant l ot a cross the street from the Shelt ering Arrr~ Day Nursery at 214 Baker Street, N. w., we are, today, ~ending our orm crews on to this lot and cleaning it up along with the sidewalk area that runs the enti re length of the block. The District Inspector will then trace down the owners of this property and advise them that it will be their responsibili ty from now on to keep this vacant lot in sanitary condition. Very truly yours, s.~ Sanitary Engineer &JG:hld ATLA N T A Tl-I E DO G WO O D CI TY �April 6, 1967 Mr. ado-r Candeub, Pre ident C n.deub, Fl · lg and A ociate 32. Gre n Stre t N ·rk, New J ~tf~ 01102 ·o ppartunity to th01' In Hou ing report cti · th th Atl nta Comm,.~mt PQl~IU·ty 1 am. l ~, CC: Mr. Collier Gladin May. All • Jr. �DRAFT Mr, Isadore Candeub, President Candeub, Fleissig & Associates 32 Green Street Newark, New Jersey 07102 Dear Mr. Candeub: We have now had the opportunity to thoroughly review the Equal Opportunity In Housing report prepared by your firm in connection with the Atlanta Community Improvement Program. The planning staff, Alderman Rodney reviewed this report independently and then met Each of us had reached the same conclusions and reactions, which are appropriately reflected in comments. Basically, we consider this report to effective CIP report rendered to date, Cook, and I to discuss it. had the same the enclosed b~ ( the least It would be most helpful if we could set up a meeting at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. At that time we will provide you with specific comments. Sincerely yours, Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor �March 20, 1967 MEMORANDUM To: Mr • Helen Meiers From : R . Earl L nders We have been advi ed by the City Attorney' office that the City cannot le lly enter into a lease in excess of one year. REL :lp �Mar<:h 10, 1967 Mr. Jack C . Stein Stein Pdnting Company 2161 Monroe Drive, N. E . Atlanta, G orgia 30324 Dear Jack: Although I wa out of the office yesterday h-en your letter rrived r guding the rezoning petition Z - 66-260- B. my . ecr, tary for rded your letter to the Zonitl Committee to be considered at the meeting Thuz day afterno n . Sincerely your , Iv Allen, Jr. yor JA.Jr/br CC: Mr. Collier Gladin �CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN , Dir e ctor I I. C' • 1,af kh:

~1 2 • 1 7 �March 2, 1967 Mr. Charles E . Zink 717 Crew Street, S . W. Atlanta, Georgia Dear Mr . Zink: Thank you very much for your letter your intere t 1n the autification of our city. I ppreciate your ug e tio nd l am to- rding them. to the Planning De rtment for funh r conaider tio • Sine rely yo •, 1 an Allen, lr. Mayor lAJr/br CC: Planning Department �! CITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel . 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Direccor March 1, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. C. H. Hildebrand, Jr., Fire Chief Mr. W. S. Howland, Executive Director, CACUR Mr. M. B. Satterfield, Executive Director, Atlanta Housing Authority Mr. William R. Wofford, Building Official FROM: Collier Gladin, .Planning Director SUBJECT: Atlanta's Workable Program for Community Improvement ~ (\ ) - ) Certification of Atlanta's Workable Program for Community Improvement will expire on July 1, 1967. The Regional Office of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ·has requested that we submit our · request for recertification no later than June 1, 1967, in order to. provide for adequate review time bef~re expiration of our present certification. Attached is a copy. of the 1965 report prepared by your department or agency. Would you please update this report to reflect 1966 activities and expenditures, and the budget for 1967 activities. Please return your completed report no later than April 15, 1967. In view of the many federally-assisted programs in which Atlanta is involved, it is most important that we carefully document the progress and achieyeme"nts which have been realized in the past year in order to as sure the recertification of our Workable Program and continued eligibi lity for federal-aid programs. If you have any questions regarding the preparation of this report, call Mr. Kennedy at Extension 421 or 328. CG/ jp Copy to - Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. Rodney Cook, Chairman, Planning & Development Committee �February 28 , 1967 Mr. Jame R . D 1928 Beec ta, Georgia A De r r . D vi : y 1 cknowled recei of your letter re th development of your property in rf e t E rdi.ng • l am !o that he order _rding tbi to Mr. Colli r GJ.a.dtn y furnieh y reply. S el'ely yours, Alle , Jr. !Air/hr CC: Mr. Collier Gladin �CITY OF A.TLANTA CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Direccor F bruary 21, 1967 nzl . ·• 30305 . t , orgi Mr • Bua&l: Thank you fo"'r 7our cat 1 tter •upporting f cility ill Pi nt P •k . art art• facility ,.. tbe ft t au trative Aaai•t e

•·

rel1, •J• �r 3215 CA INS HILL PLACE, NW / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30305 ·l l I r I I I 38t h Season January 24,. l967 ,., ? j I t I ,\ ' · ·' , J f \ ·---. .. • I ::__,. J Nr. Eric Harkness Department of P lan ni ng Ci ty Ha 11 At la nta, Georgia 3030 3 INC. FOU NDER & AD VI SO R DOR OTHY ALEXANDER AR T ISTIC DIRECTOR ROBERT BARNETT CO -DIR EC TO R MERR ILEE SM ITH ASSOCIATE DIRECTORS VIRGIN IA RICH BARNETT CARL RATCLIFF PRESIDENT JULIAN BOEHM MOHR EXECUT IVE SECRETARY BLANCHE A. BEVINS D~ar hw, Harknss s We have fsarned wi th gr eat i nterest that s ome thought i s boing given to the construct ion of a permanent stage in P iedmont Park to be use d by the annual Ar ts Festi vaJ, and vari ous pe rforming gr oups i n Atl anta. TI1e Atlanta Ci vi c Ballet ardently supports s~ch an endeavor, for we are we ll aware of the l imited facilit i es available to all of the performing arts in our communitya A more expanded scheduls of dance programs would be possiblG with s uch a faci lityi particularly in the aroa of special performances for young people. For over 25 years the At lante Ci vic Ba l let has presented a special series of Saturday afternoon matinees for elementary schoolchildren, usi ng high school auditori ums; at an admission charge of on ly 60¢• We feel ·that, in t his area alone, much could be accompl ishe_d wi t h a facil ity which would ba avai la bl ~ to us at no cost, or for a vary nominal fe e. Arrangements for the use of high school auditor iums are not a lwa ys easy to mako, and the time availabl e in them is very lim ited. Eve n with the construction of a new city auditori um, and the theater a nd au ditori um in the Cultural Center, facilities wi II be extremoly limited, and r ental charges would be out of the Guestion for performances of the type mentioned a bove. ~The Atlanta Civic Bal Jet feels that it would be able to use to good advantage an add it ional perfor• ming faci fltyo We shall bo glad to consult with you further in this regard, should you desire to do so. Sincerely n· · vS: ~ \{Jber\ Barnett', · " Artistic Director CC: Mr. Jack Dellus, Mr. Charles Leftwich �Greater Atlanta Arts Council Member Organizations: Th e Ru th Mitche ll Dance Company; Th e Pocket Theatre, Inc.. ; Children's C ivic Theatre, Inc.; Atlant a Symphony Orchestra; Atlanta Pop Concerts; The Atlanta Music Club; Atlanta Civic Ball et ; Arts Festival of Atlanta, Inc.; The High Museum of Art ; Th e Atl anta Municipal Theatre, Inc.; Southern Ballet of Atl anta, Inc. The Choral Guild of Atl anta; Th e Ac ademy Theatre; Atlan ta Boy Choir; Atl anta Music Festival Association; Decatur-DeKalb Civic Ball et; Alliance of Professional Artists ; Actors and Writers Workshop, Inc.; Theatre Atlanta, Inc.; American Institute of Architects (North Georgia Chapter); Atlanta Singers; Atlanta Community Orchestra; Pro-Mozart Society __::J Sponsored by Atlan ta Junior Chamber of Commerce/ Atlanta Chamber of Commerce/ Atlanta Women's Chamber of Commerce November JO, 1966 Mr . Er ic Harkness Department of City Planning Mr. Jack Delius Manager, Department of Parks and Recreation City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Eric and Jack : I write on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Greater Atlanta Arts Council to urge the development of plans for the design and construction of an outdoor performing facility in Piedmont Park. The Council believe s that such a facility is sorely needed to meet a multiplicity of community ne eds , s ome of which are as follows: (1) Primary and secondary school musical (band, orchestra l and choral) concerts (2) Children's theatre and dance presentations (3) Atlanta Art s Festival performing arts events (4) Pol i t ical r allies (5) Other community acti vi ties of interest which have access t o no other stage f acility (6) College productions by Atlanta area colleges. Events which could be presented here would be very attractive to vast number s of Atlanta citiz ens because of t he informal outdoor s etting . This has been demonstrated by the event s presented for t he l ast dozen years by Ar ts Fest i val productions. The Council h opes t hat you may look fa vora bly ·on this request and we would be most happy to assist in the promotion and development of this project if you feel that it would be useful. Cordia lly yours, Perrin JSP/mjd Address: Art Department, Geo rg ia State Colleg e I 33 G il mer St reet, Sout heast/ Atlanta, Georgia 30303 �I. i'. I I i nri Cl cne C[)av1ce Compav1y February 16, 1967 r.:-r . Erj_c Iia rlmess Ci ty Planninc Department 7 oo c j _t y na 11 At l an t a , Georaia Deo. r j:',~r . Harkness : We u nd erstand that The Arts Council has presented ~he i dea of a permanent perf ormin5 arts fac ility in Pied~ont Park . As d irector of The Ruth Mitche ll Company , I a m very p l eased to hea r of th is p o ssibility . Our g roup would c er tain l y suppo rt this project wholehearted l y , as At l anta is too larg e a city to b e limited to j ust one perf orming. a rts center . All of our Dance Company membe rs, as we ll as our Associati on ,· wish to urge you to fo ll ow this p roposed plan. Sincere l y , / '} • _.-' [5'\.', .,...(/.__, i uN1wVlf / c./:_· / . . J, ., ,7/?

~~

R ~ itchell Kimbrell ' Direc t or BJ1K : eh T H E 3509 A T L A N T A CONCERT DANCE N O R T H S I D E PARKWAY, NW 111 GROUP111PHO NE ATLANTA, 237-8829 GEORGIA 30327 �3765 WIEUCA ROAD, N, E. • ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30305 February 8th, 1967 HONORARY CHAIR M AN Mr. Eric Ilarkness City Plannin g Department City Ilall Atlanta, Ga. MRS. WILFRI ED PL ATZE R ll'ife of tbe Austrian Ambassador Dr. \V ilfried Platzer, V ienna OFF I CERS : MRS . ROBERT M. BUNZL Preside 11t MRS. ERNEST FELBER Vice -Pres ident i11 charge of Pu b licity MRS. MICHAE L HACK Secr_e ta ry MRS. ROBERT T. WO ODBURY Tr easu re r DR . CHAPPELL WHITE Liaison O//zce r MRS. N O RMAN SWANN Ass i s tant lo the Secre tary Dear Mr. Harkness, We of the Pro-Mozart Society of Atlanta endorse whole heartedly the desire of the Arts Festiv~l Council to upgrade the quality of the performances and programs of the Arts Festival. For that reason we ur ge you to take this matter under advisement in considering plans for a Park Redevelopment. If the City of Atlanta could locate a permanent facility for the per f ormin g a'rts in Piedmont Park a better quality of programs could be a ssured. Thanking you, I remain with kindest re gards, 9v,1\; . _,;A•.,\\," ~ vV\J\.'?\.-t ,,;\\,,,.J-. ADV I SORY BOARD: MRS. A. THOMAS BRA DBUR Y MRS . G. L. BR I DGER MR. WALTER BUNZL MRS. J . LEE EDWARDS MR. AND MRS. HERBERT E L SAS MR. AND MRS. R ICH ARD GLASS CO-CHAIRMEN FOR PUB LIC I TY MRS. PAUL GR I GSBY CO N SUL MICHAEL HACK MISS ROXIE HAGOPIAN PROGRAM CHAIRMAN MRS. LEO L ANMAN MR. MICHAEL MCDOWELL MRS. LAWRENCE MCEVOY MRS . INGE MANSKl·LUNDEEN MRS, LOIS H. MOSS MR, JONATHAN PHELPS DR. CHAPPELL WHITE MR. LESLIE WHIT E Mr s. Robert M. Bunzl President �CITY OF A.TLANTA February 3, 1967 CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DE PART MENT OF PL ANNING CO LLI E R B . GLA DI N , Di rec tor MEMORANDUM TO: R. Earl Landers FROM: Eric Harkness SUBJECT: Urban Beautification Program George Berry and I have checked out the various items under Urban Beautification for which the City was responsible under the program . We know where we stand except for the Parks Department projects and here we are waiting on the determination of their 1967 program . Jack Delius is meeting wi th Charles Leftwich next week to make this determination. We will make ou r revisions in the Urban Beautification Program as soon as this information is avai Iable. EH/ Im �:;fa CITY OF ATLANTA CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 T~I. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ~O LLIER B. GLADIN. Di re cror Febru ry 6, 1967 • Clyde H. C wthorne ngine ring Section Atlanta - Fulton County Joint Bo rd of T x As essor Fulton County d inistr tion Bui l ding 165 Central Avenue , S. W. Atlant , Georgi 30303 De r Mr . Cewthorn : We re delight ed that information contained in the Atlant nity Improvem nt Progra Data Procee ing File might be of us to you . We h ve sp nt ore th n two year in the develop nt of th file syst and in gsthering the data which h be n placed in 1t . Your offic h s b n of gr ta sistance during t his period and we would like to ,q,re our ppreciation fo r your outl y of ti effort nd working p ce . Co W h ve , at thie ti copy of our lat et "error dit1 ' which contain an id nttfication of t of the u1 rov nta only" reel~ in th City of Atlanta . By u ing print-out you sho ld abl to loc t th pre l nd k ny djua nt• n c •ry. In resard tot 11at1ng of ich you v indlc.at d lllight b ould like to c rUy 1 ) , �r . Cly B. in, ry 6. 19 7 tho k yo fo-c your forwari to a contt u• of tbia d ta ba • looktn tion o1 Youn truly_.

J

••• �C ITY OF ATLANTA OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER CITY HALL Atlanta , Georgia Joo.uar, CHARLES L. DAVIS COMPTRO LL ER EDGAR A. VAUG H N, JR. DEPUTY COMPTROLLER , 1 7 30303 �~ - "' -- - - .- \ ~ --"· c-·TY ::-_ALL ATLAiS"TA. GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4, 63 Arca Cede 404 .- p , T~l ~- 'TO .- L:,'\':\ :\G COLLIER R. GLADf:--J . Di r ~etor January 26, i9 67 F3ct She e t Nash- Washing t on Ur han ~en w i Area I. De sc -;:- i t ion Bounda ri s : No rthside Drive, Ashby St r e e t , {unt e r Street, Bankhead Avenue . TotGl ac r eage : Clea ance : Total fa~.1i lies : Dis plac ed : 630 210 (33%) 5,710 2,324 (41%) Tota l nu~bc r of buildings : 2, 81 2 Tumbe r o f building s with structu ral or enviro nme ntal de fici e ncies: 1, 8 71 (6 6%) Number o f building s to be cle red : 1 , 650 Remai nde r t o be re habili ta t ed II. I II. Goals 1. Clea r slums 2. Is~rove environment - remove or separate with buffers industrial and co~mercial. from residential . 3. Redevelop and r e habili tate, especially housing . 4. Vj_n i mum displacement of residents fro:n area . 5. Pro v ide adeq uate communi ty services and facilities to support ,,:cca.. l'ro20s d Reuses and Improvements 0 A. Prcdomin~1tly multi - family residenti a l. B. L i:-:,roved street s ystem. �Fa ct Sh eet - No sh - Was hin g ton Urban Renewal Arca - Page 2 C. I V. V. Ic.1. roved c o!T'snunity fa ci lities . 1. C n tra l : i gi1 Corrmm i ty C:·:-:ter providin; mu ltiple s e rvic es . 2. Exp 2:1 s i on o f e xisting school g· ounds . 3. rew p r irn3 r y sc ho ol . 4. ~Jo l a r ge a nd six s mall pa~ks totaling 20 a cres . D. . dec:ua ·e comr:1e r ci a l fa c il i t i es . E. s~ pa r at i on of s ewe rs . i'lcthods and Pro ced ure s · Ao , 2proac he s wi l l b e s ought to nini rnize displac eme nt and re l o ca tio n p r oblems . B. Some Jubl ic housi ng will be Jrovided . C. Av. ~iety of hous ing will be provided. D. E:i-.-plore possibil i ·i e s o f conti:rno s p_occssin 6 t o a c qui r e , cl ea r a:1d ~rovic.e si t es fo _ residen ti a l re develo~m nt on a block by bl o cl· basis . This wi l l enable peopl e i s p l a ced fro m o ne block to make one relo c at i on move to near!Jy pe r man en t housing . E. Nc i gl.borhood faci l ity co ncept will provide improved and expanded social services t o al l ev i a t e some of these problems i n th e area i n conjunc ti o n wit1 r emo va l of phys i c a l problems. Financin 7 A. Ci t y's overal l Urban Renewal P~ojcct financing . 1. Committed a nd unf unded - existing projects . .::i . Scho ols ~- Cit y 1 $4,100,000 TOTAL 2. Committed and unfunded - pro~oscd projects, Bedford - Pi ne :is a coa'Tlittcd but unsubmitted project for ,-fh ich no funds are availab l e. Exact financing is unknown at th i s time. B. Nash-Washingt o n - Estimat & financing tr. P. C. Federal Share Local Share (Fu .. ded) (Unfunded) Surplus Credits $29,9 00,000 19,900,000 10,COO,OCO (4 ,900,0CO) (7,000, 000 1,900, 000 �~act Sheet - Nash - \·l.:i shing ton C. VII . rban Re 1cHa Bre.:ikclown of City's approxi1,,~ tc Arcn - P.-:ig c 3 nfuncled no1 - c a sh c r edits. j ,. Parks 3. Streets 850,000 C. Sidewal ·s 670,000 D. Sew r Separ ation E. Wa t e r $970,000 TOTAL VI. T L,, SCO, OUO - 8 , 0:)0 ---' S7,07 0 ,000 ():)tion on , e,,:c rs A. L- City separate s sewers d c~rric s out p lanned imp ro vements, a surp lus of c redits will result of nb~ t $2,000,000 . B. I f City doesn' t separate sewers, .:i defi cit of $1,000,000 will r es ult re quiring a ca sh payment o f t his amou nt . Possib l e so urces of money A. Prob nb le $2 . 4 millio n credit for a ud it orium under 66 Hous ing Act is not pr es ently allocated . B. Add itional money for citi es fror.1 State of Ge orgia - amo• n t unknown . C. If 1% pnyroll tax passes co nsid erable money could become ava ilable in near future . �January 18, 1967 Mr . Com.er J . Bo den Bog rd Corporation Zll2 Clevel ·nd Av: nu Fort Myers , Florid D a:r Mr . Bowden: Thi ill aclmo containing yoUT your letter of J auary 16th tion about n le ted ide - lk. I m for arding thi information to th · City Planniag D partment I apprec· t your iatere t. Sincerely y Ivan All n. J,:. M yor IAJr/br CC:j Planning Department • �January 16, 1967 Honorable Dick Lane House of Representative 2704 Humphries Street East Point, Georgia 30044 Dear Dick : This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of JanuaJ"y 12th addressed to Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. , enclosing a Legislativ bill concerning the annexation of certain land lot~ to the City of E ast Point. We are r ferring tbia bill to our City Planning Department and to our Planning and Development Committee of the Board 0£ Aldermen for th ir comments. Sine rely yours, R. E arl L nde:rs Administrative A REL :lp CC : P lanning Department i tant �J'anua.ry S, 1967 Mr. O . W. Sim.mons , Secretary West En.dB in Men' A sociati 670 StewaJl't Avenue, S . W. Atlanta, Georgia 30310 Dear Mr. Simmon : Thia will ackno ledge r .e ceipt of your letter reg rduig the a p1ic Hon filed to c ge zoning for a rtm ate on Mt. Gil ad R d. Yo r a oluti ia being forwarded to the Zoning Committe in C>Tder tbat it may r cei propel' con ideration. Sit,,cerely your• , lvan Alie M yor IA.Jr/br CC: Planning Department t Jr. �