.Nzg5OQ.Nzg5OQ

From Scripto
Jump to: navigation, search

-~ ,-


,


.,--.. ·-.::· rr.--, '-.,T ......__,,J__:_ ---- Toi. 522-44&3 Mo• Cc-Ge 4U DEP,\RD::::;-n o,: PLA;\:\l:\G COLLIE a D. GLA;)ll'>. f11trc,01 July 21., 1967 Hous i ng Resources Committee ?lanning and Development Committee TO: Planning Depa r tment SL'EJZCT: Prel imina ry Report - Amount o f Vacant Land by Zo ni,,g Jistrict In ~eply to the r equest by the secre t ary of the Housing Re s o~rccs Cor..:-.~i i: tee for figures s howing the total vncant ac re.:; 6 e i,, the Ci cy of Atl a nt a , the f ollo~ing da~a is supplied. These figures .:;=e base~ on c o~puter analysis of the Atl anta CIP Real Property Data Jan~, for use in the land use planning project, and reflec t conditions as of January 19~: Zoning AL Al A2 CL Acreage Vacant* Total Acreage* 25.2} 802 . 8 /0~2,2. 214 .2 4.6} Cl 350.7 C2 C3 C4 142.2 19.0 15.6 1,111.o}JojtJ.O /,2. 1.2 796 .4} RS 2, 69L,, l, 410.7 298.~ R9 1,368. 6 891.5 30 7. 2j , 2 8<:J ' 7 194. 7 1,9~3.0 · 632.5 3,172.0 5,133.2 261. 9} 6i..),8 4 ,2 87.2 1,687.7 27. 9 ) 1"3 2. ,/ o/.Va ca •• t: 97i'/, I l 3 'f,<J,0 65.7 17,841.6 3,8 66 . 8}977].CJ 5 , 907.1 17. 9 " /7, '7 2,308.2) 2,308.2 3 7. 3 12,972 . 81 18, 04S .1 F ~3~, 3 o. <o (;;. I 7 2 7. 3 9,248 . 8 3,340.9 1, 175. S ~/ J8'/ Lj,d ~i 79 • 69,631.5 lhe - ~ figures r eflect all parcels o~ land in the City as 16:36, 29 December 2017 (EST)~~j Howeve r, many v.:..c.in.~ ;:>,,~·c.:!:s ·J y t:·,c Joint i3oard of Tax Assessors. .- �~::Z~10i.1A~l)UH juiy 21, 196 7 Page 2 a r c s mall t rac t s of less than l ~c~e loccced in ot~c~1i~c ~cvc:c~2~ c. r c.1 s. Th.:!reforc, a seri es of 111.:ips .:it 400 scale t-1.1s ? -:c;:,.:-..-:e: C: ::, :·"::, ,; i,,g va cant l and a nd zoning for use in th e City's l.:inci JSC ?:anuin 0 ~re j ect . A cory o i t!1 c data pro c essing list inz o f parcei co~c nu~~c c3 c~ ~.:-..cant ~~=eel s, zoninJ and acreaze data was ~c live =cci to Steve Sc143.215.248.55 =tz of Ce ci l Alexander's office during the latter ?art of ~~ r il; cnci , A •wu ci u~ing the la tter part of A?ril, Mr . Schwartz w~s c ive n a c ces 5 ::o : ne 40G s c ale maps in the Planning Department showing tncse vac~nt ? a rccl s . ~hesc map s were copied and delivered t o Nr. Alexancier's offi ce ? r ior to )fay 1. On .;une 28 a:: a meeti g of the Plan nin/j and i)cvclo?;-;-,e;-,c Co::-.-:-,ittee , a r:iap of vacant and "under- developed" land was shoi-:n i.i. co;-..-i.ec ::ic, ;-, with the land use plan progress report . After this r;;cetir,:;, :-:~lco::..r.1 Jones requested that a copy of this map s howing zoning o f vaca .. t a =2a s oe provid e d to the Housing Resources Committee. rhis ma? was ?re ?areci by the Planning Department and deli vered t o Col. Jone s . On July 6 this ~ap and a preliminary analysis of arca3 zoncrl A-1 an rl v.:ic.:nt was presented to the Ho using Resources Com.T,itt ec . .:':-,e a .. .:.l ys~ s s;;ow cd a tot.Ji. of 482 acres "zoneC: for apartments " . '.i:'~.e c;:,;::> arcn : discrepancy between this figure and the 802 ac res shown in :~c 6.:i::.:-.. proc e ssing an.:.lysis can be ex?l.:iined by the fact that the Qa?s ilse d in both co ..~?utations , althoulih similar, were not re;:;i..ly cor:-,;,ar.::.b::.e . '.:he r..;:;p used ir-. the Housing Resources Committee analysis w.:.s a:: a sc.1lc o f 2,000 feet to the inch and the maps used in the data proce ssing analysis were at a scale of 400 feet to the inc h. Due to th~ SQall ma?s at a scale of 2,000 feet to the inch, accur ate mcas~re~cn t is difficult, and, a dditionally, on l y large parcels canoe shown. At 400 scale, more accurate representation and mcasureme~t .:.re ?OSs~ble.


~c::.::f.orc, u:;on :cece:ipt: by c;1c Planning Depart.nent of t:-1e co;-;-..--:-,itcc.:::



rcqucJt ior ad<litio.i.al data, further detailed maps at 400 scale "e=~ ?~C143.215.248.55cd showin3 only signific unt vaca nt tracts (4 acres anci lar6 e~). so=143.215.248.55 a more detailed listing of vacant land could he ~adc. A


-)

-cli,:, · r,z.ry ar.alysis has been made i)y the Planning Dc?art..icnt of eac~.


siGnificant tract, and the result of this analysis is presented in Appenciix A to :his mcm6randum. ~·... l··- r~? S us0d in ~he ~nalysis are available in the ?lanninJ Depar~~e~t for lcc~ilcci ex&~ination by interested parties. ~~. ~:cmcnt &3rces thac the hou3ing probl~~ iu is o.-,c of tc.e ,1,:.jo;:- problems f.:i.:ii,::; the City at t~ia tiQe,


he ?~~nnin3


�July 21 , 1967 P.:ig.:: 3 end : he ~ous ing R2~ou rccs Co~~ itt cc whi c ~ has bee~ =c~~c~:c~ ~2 ~c :~ cs s0on as ~ossib lc . At this ~cc~i~: an<l at o : hc r su~sc~~c~: ~c c ::. n~s> the City's 110 :...i sin:;; ;?Ol i c y $l:ou:c: ~2 e:..::~m~r~.2<l . ?o:::- -2 ::.::;:,?!.2} c si~aiiicant poli c y decision ~ust j j ~cd 2 on whct~c = c~c l ~w =c~= l~ous::.a; co :>c cons'.:ructcG. s!·toulci b 2 v£ t ::i. c zu:.... (l c :1 a? o.::-::::.:::;-~~ --:::2 Ci. ~::1 tcnsity--ou:lyi ng loccti on type or w~c: ~2r high rise-hi ; ~ tc~si:yccn~r~l area housing shou lri be co nsi dcrc ~. Ano t her ~robic~ i s :~2 policy o~ rc~ocation in u=ban renewcl c~d other tr ca :~en~ zc:ivitie s. Sho~ ld t~e disp l.:icc rl £.:iraili cs and i~Jivicluals he r2lo cat2l in th e g e neral .:ir2.:i of :he pro~ec : o r should atte~?tS he ~acie to r e loca :e


hc~ _in out lying arecs? ~~e s e are o nly a few ite~s on whic~ ?Olicy


de c isions are nece ssary i n order to insure that the low-cost housi ~g p roz~ara racets the goals set for it at each of the critical :i~c phases ov~r the next sev~~al years. ·- �