.NzkwMA.NzkwMA

August 9, 1967 HOUSING RESOUR.Ci<:S CO:·:l ,ITTEE Comparison of Jul y S Analy.,is --:;y :!-:2C fro:n Zoni:'"lg ?fap c'ind Appendix to July 21 Me.'Tlo. from Planning Depart ment Zoning :Map was revised April 31, 1967. Appendix was compiled as of January 1966. As can be seen, discrepencies exist in both land lots and acreages between the Zoning Map Analysis and the Ap~endix. This may be accounted for by zoning changes and _new· developments which have taken place since the compilation shown in the Appendix. However, this reduces the dependency which can be placed now on the compilation of figures sho-~m in the Appendix. See Summary at end of the attached Comparative Tabulations for acrea;:;es already committed; turned dovm or rejected; and planned for otner us es . Vacant areas zoned A-L (understood to be generally f or a specifically planned development) and A-2 (not generally accepted locally as suitable for low-cost housing, except for the Elderly) have not been generally included in this comparison. The vacant land in both categories is relatively small however. CONCLUSION: In a:ny event, from the attached comparison, it is quite obvious that the land currently zonac A-1 is both inadequate in quantity and U.!equitably distributed throughout the City to meet requirements of the low-income housing progra111. Encl o Comparative Tabulations -.' / .. -;-~ -~ L ._ ...,__ ;--7;.: . ,:'> k..._.....-:.. . 9 / Ha.lcolm D. Joqes Supervisor of Ir.s?cC~ion Services �