.NzkwNg.NzkwNg

r I Auzu_st 9, 1967 HOUSING RESOUflC?::S C ?·:ZITTE:c Comparison of July S Analys is oy !--2.C fro:n Zoni:'lg Hap and Appendix to July 21 Memo. from Plannine Depart men-::. Zoning Hap was revised April 31, 1967. Appendix was compiled as of January 1966. As can be s een, discrepencies exist in both land l ots and a creages between t he Zoning Map Analysis and the Ap~endix. This may be accounted f or by zoning chanees and new developments which have taken pla ce s i nce the compilation shown in the Appendix. However, this reduces the dependency which can be placed now on the compilation of figures sho~r.1 in the Appendix. See Summary at end of t he attached Comparative Tabul ations for a crea,:=;es already committed; turned dovm or rejected; and planned for other us es . Vacant areas zoned A-L (understood t o be generally for a specifi cally planned development) and A-2 (not generc.lly accepted locally as suitable for low-cost housing, except for the Elderly) have not been generally included in this comparison. The vacant land in both categories is relatively ~~all however. CONCLUSION: In any event, from the attached comparison, it is quite obvious that the l and currently zoned A-1 i s both inadequate i n quantity and U.4equitably distributed t hroughout t he Ci ty to meet requirements of the low-incorne housing program. / 1 Encl o Cornparat.ive Tabulations , . . ,) / ; ,/ - ~ ·..:: ~ L _ . __,. . .-7,.,.. ;.; ,e "--~ ...v Malcolm D. Jv!"(' S / Supervisor of fr..spe c~ion Services �